Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 06:37:53 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Deepbit and BTCGUILD  (Read 2679 times)
klamathonsite
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2011, 11:06:27 PM
 #1

They both have issues today has anyone else noticed it?
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin-Qt, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
1481135873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481135873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481135873
Reply with quote  #2

1481135873
Report to moderator
kinghajj
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile
June 13, 2011, 11:33:23 PM
 #2

Yeah, I noticed that my GPU was idling a lot last night so I switched back to Eligius in the meantime. I left it for Deepbit earlier because of some server problems, but now it seems they've fixed it (at least for the current load). I wonder what pools are in the "Other" category on bitcoinwatch...?
PcChip
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294



View Profile
June 14, 2011, 12:07:57 AM
 #3

Yeah, I noticed issues with BTCGuild getting overloaded again, so I ran double miners on each gpu with the second pointing to deepbit (I don't like my gpu load to fluctuate between 0% and 99%, it sometimes hangs the pc with them being so overclocked)

apparently I chose the wrong pool as a backup  Roll Eyes

All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5850 - 400 MH/s  |  5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s  |  GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
gigitrix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


Bitcoins finest!!!


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 01:29:04 AM
 #4

bitcoins.lc has been ddosed as well.
1248
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22



View Profile
June 14, 2011, 03:56:01 AM
 #5

yeah.  apparently, it has pushed a bunch of miners to deepbit.  http://bitcoinwatch.com/  they're very nearly half the network now.  What can we do to convince enough people off of deepbit?

13JusT3z9WmaZqJQQx6j3fYWjuRVQgaEDm
The Singularity is coming... eventually.
innervisi0nn
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 03:59:43 AM
 #6

yeah.  apparently, it has pushed a bunch of miners to deepbit.  http://bitcoinwatch.com/  they're very nearly half the network now.  What can we do to convince enough people off of deepbit?

whats wrong with deepbit? its one of the only pools that allow PPS.
so sick of proportional mining

1248
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22



View Profile
June 14, 2011, 04:06:39 AM
 #7

Nothing wrong with it, thats ironically the problem.  We dont want too much power vested into one group, regardless of who they are, so we can keep bitcoin decentralized.  Hopefully this will even out as the other pools get more developed.

13JusT3z9WmaZqJQQx6j3fYWjuRVQgaEDm
The Singularity is coming... eventually.
innervisi0nn
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98


Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 04:25:36 AM
 #8

Nothing wrong with it, thats ironically the problem.  We dont want too much power vested into one group, regardless of who they are, so we can keep bitcoin decentralized.  Hopefully this will even out as the other pools get more developed.

True..that's why he needs to break up his pool into multiple mini ones...


Mini me, you complete me!

itsagas
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 05:27:38 AM
 #9

This DDos attack thing is getting stupid.  Is it the pools attacking the other pools?  outsiders?  people against bitcoin?
kinghajj
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 05:29:59 AM
 #10

This DDos attack thing is getting stupid.  Is it the pools attacking the other pools?  outsiders?  people against bitcoin?

Or maybe commercial miners (there are supposedly some) are trying to take down the pools so that they can have a larger proportion of the network computation power?
PcChip
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294



View Profile
June 14, 2011, 06:10:49 AM
 #11

This DDos attack thing is getting stupid.  Is it the pools attacking the other pools?  outsiders?  people against bitcoin?

Or maybe commercial miners (there are supposedly some) are trying to take down the pools so that they can have a larger proportion of the network computation power?

I'm assuming that DDoS'ing the pool's webserver has no effect on the hashing power of the pool & local bitcoin generation, they would have to flood the pool mining software with stales (which as far as I know does still happen, but that wouldn't take their webpage offline)

All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5850 - 400 MH/s  |  5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s  |  GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
jhansen858
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
June 14, 2011, 09:32:52 AM
 #12

Or maybe their servers are just cracking under the pressure of having    Pool rate: 3271 Gh/s...


Hi forum: 1DDpiEt36VTJsiJunyBc3XtG6CcSAnsQ4p
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!