|
klamathonsite (OP)
|
 |
June 13, 2011, 11:06:27 PM |
|
They both have issues today has anyone else noticed it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
kinghajj
Member
 Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
June 13, 2011, 11:33:23 PM |
|
Yeah, I noticed that my GPU was idling a lot last night so I switched back to Eligius in the meantime. I left it for Deepbit earlier because of some server problems, but now it seems they've fixed it (at least for the current load). I wonder what pools are in the "Other" category on bitcoinwatch...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
PcChip
|
|
June 14, 2011, 12:07:57 AM |
|
Yeah, I noticed issues with BTCGuild getting overloaded again, so I ran double miners on each gpu with the second pointing to deepbit (I don't like my gpu load to fluctuate between 0% and 99%, it sometimes hangs the pc with them being so overclocked) apparently I chose the wrong pool as a backup  |
Legacy signature from 2011:
All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK
5850 - 400 MH/s | 5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s | GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
|
|
|
|
gigitrix
|
|
June 14, 2011, 01:29:04 AM |
|
bitcoins.lc has been ddosed as well.
|
|
|
|
|
1248
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2011, 03:56:01 AM |
|
yeah. apparently, it has pushed a bunch of miners to deepbit. http://bitcoinwatch.com/ they're very nearly half the network now. What can we do to convince enough people off of deepbit? |
|
|
|
|
innervisi0nn
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!
|
|
June 14, 2011, 03:59:43 AM |
|
yeah. apparently, it has pushed a bunch of miners to deepbit. http://bitcoinwatch.com/ they're very nearly half the network now. What can we do to convince enough people off of deepbit? whats wrong with deepbit? its one of the only pools that allow PPS. so sick of proportional mining |
|
|
|
1248
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2011, 04:06:39 AM |
|
Nothing wrong with it, thats ironically the problem. We dont want too much power vested into one group, regardless of who they are, so we can keep bitcoin decentralized. Hopefully this will even out as the other pools get more developed.
|
|
|
|
|
innervisi0nn
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!
|
|
June 14, 2011, 04:25:36 AM |
|
Nothing wrong with it, thats ironically the problem. We dont want too much power vested into one group, regardless of who they are, so we can keep bitcoin decentralized. Hopefully this will even out as the other pools get more developed.
True..that's why he needs to break up his pool into multiple mini ones... Mini me, you complete me! |
|
|
|
itsagas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2011, 05:27:38 AM |
|
This DDos attack thing is getting stupid. Is it the pools attacking the other pools? outsiders? people against bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
|
kinghajj
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2011, 05:29:59 AM |
|
This DDos attack thing is getting stupid. Is it the pools attacking the other pools? outsiders? people against bitcoin?
Or maybe commercial miners (there are supposedly some) are trying to take down the pools so that they can have a larger proportion of the network computation power? |
|
|
|
|
|
PcChip
|
|
June 14, 2011, 06:10:49 AM |
|
This DDos attack thing is getting stupid. Is it the pools attacking the other pools? outsiders? people against bitcoin?
Or maybe commercial miners (there are supposedly some) are trying to take down the pools so that they can have a larger proportion of the network computation power? I'm assuming that DDoS'ing the pool's webserver has no effect on the hashing power of the pool & local bitcoin generation, they would have to flood the pool mining software with stales (which as far as I know does still happen, but that wouldn't take their webpage offline) |
Legacy signature from 2011:
All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK
5850 - 400 MH/s | 5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s | GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
|
|
|
|
jhansen858
|
|
June 14, 2011, 09:32:52 AM |
|
Or maybe their servers are just cracking under the pressure of having Pool rate: 3271 Gh/s...
|
Hi forum: 1DDpiEt36VTJsiJunyBc3XtG6CcSAnsQ4p
|
|
|
|
