Open Source ZEC (ZCash) GPU Miner AMD & NVidia (up to 45 sol/s on RX480)

[sigwo]

Silentarmy rocks. Left this 4% pool behind. It was a great stop gap. Getting many more sol/s with v3.

[1714103518]

1714103518

[1714103518]

1714103518

[1714103518]

1714103518

[1714103518]

1714103518

[eXtremal]

Silentarmy rocks. Left this 4% pool behind. It was a great stop gap. Getting many more sol/s with v3.

It was 2.5% (calculator on site not working), since 5Nov 2016 fee will be 1% same as other pools.

[MinermanNC]

Silentarmy rocks. Left this 4% pool behind. It was a great stop gap. Getting many more sol/s with v3.

It was 2.5% (calculator on site not working), since 5Nov 2016 fee will be 1% same as other pools.

good news on the stratum support and fee's 

[dagarair]

I don't blame you for it being higher at the beginning, you were one if not the first on it so I gladly pay the higher %.

[hope2907]

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Thach>cd C:\Users\Thach\Desktop\zcashclient-0.2.4


4\zcashgpuclient_silentarmy.exe
madPrimeMiner-v1.1


found platform[0] name = 'AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing'
<info> found 8 devices
Using device 0 as GPU 0
Using device 1 as GPU 1
Using device 2 as GPU 2
Using device 3 as GPU 3
Using device 4 as GPU 4
Using device 5 as GPU 5
Using device 6 as GPU 6
Using device 7 as GPU 7
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 0 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 1 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 2 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 3 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 4 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 5 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 6 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 7 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 8 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
ZCash GPU miner thread 9 started
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
<info> OpenCL: alloc 8 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 603979776 bytes
<info> OpenCL: alloc 4098008 bytes
Hash tables will use 1208.0 MB
threads: 8192, work size: 256
Connecting to frontend: coinsforall.io:6668 ...
Assertion failed: rc == 0 || zmq_errno () == ETERM, file zsockopt.c, line 976

This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way.
Please contact the application's support team for more information.

Hi eXtremal I face following error with many of my rigs (7990 and 380), (some run normally), do you know what is this and how to fix it?
Regards

[isamamin]

Silentarmy rocks. Left this 4% pool behind. It was a great stop gap. Getting many more sol/s with v3.

It was 2.5% (calculator on site not working), since 5Nov 2016 fee will be 1% same as other pools.

good news on the stratum support and fee's 

eXtremal keep your good work, happy for this news

[Termie]

This silentarmy miner has much potential, but it can be obstinate as a mule!
Wonder why silentarmy devs talk about ~46 Sol with R9 Nano, while my cards stuck at ~34 Sol at its best (Windows 7/64, CoinsForAll miner 0.2.4)
Now after three days of testing and trying out my Nanos finally runs like they should - up to 47 Sol per card.



I'm curious about upcoming miner versions.

[lawrencelyl]

This silentarmy miner has much potential, but it can be obstinate as a mule!
Wonder why silentarmy devs talk about ~46 Sol with R9 Nano, while my cards stuck at ~34 Sol at its best (Windows 7/64, CoinsForAll miner 0.2.4)
Now after three days of testing and trying out my Nanos finally runs like they should - up to 47 Sol per card.



I'm curious about upcoming miner versions.

Do you mind to share your recipe to make your Nano running up to 47S/s?

[justin.ramos]

linux guys,

what OS/drivers are you using to mine? Actually, I've mined sgminer/claymore earlier, so, I'm still standing on f21 with fglrx 15.12. And now, using this miner I've got:

Code:

[GPU 0] T=-1C A=-1% sols=16.957
[GPU 1] T=-1C A=-1% sols=16.936
[GPU 2] T=-1C A=-1% sols=16.010
(ST/INV/DUP): 4317x 0ch(8/0/0)

per 3 x R9 NANO cards miner (small one closed chassis that I've got few). But reading the forum I'm coming to think that the mining speed seems is lower than usually taken with amdgpu-pro drivers.

I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 with amdgpu-pro 16.30.3.

[justin.ramos]

Anyone know how to install ADL on Ubuntu 16.04 such that the library is found?

Code:

Unable to load ati adl library

[Sam123]

SilentArmy V3 became a full mining app, it's not just a solver anymore.
For the moment linux only.

https://github.com/mbevand/silentarmy

Interesting, I might go ahead and give this a try. After all, the weekend is coming up
Thanks for the tip Doktor83

I have another tip for you :
https://github.com/nicehash/nheqminer/releases

I will try to install it this weekend

[smaxz]

Anyone know how to install ADL on Ubuntu 16.04 such that the library is found?

Code:

Unable to load ati adl library

when this type of thing comes up, always search terms like "adl repo ubuntu 16.04" or whatever your distro is specifically.

each distro and sometimes versions even have unique names for the same dependancies.

i am testing the new silentarmy miner (successfully so far, possible loss of hash vs console reported and front end pool results) and did not have any ADL specific issues during install.

are you building the git repo? amdgpu-pro drivers right?

[doktor83]

This silentarmy miner has much potential, but it can be obstinate as a mule!
Wonder why silentarmy devs talk about ~46 Sol with R9 Nano, while my cards stuck at ~34 Sol at its best (Windows 7/64, CoinsForAll miner 0.2.4)
Now after three days of testing and trying out my Nanos finally runs like they should - up to 47 Sol per card.



I'm curious about upcoming miner versions.

Do you mind to share your recipe to make your Nano running up to 47S/s?

recipe is use claymore zcash miner LOL

[aristokrat]

doktor83, can you share your config?

[doktor83]

doktor83, can you share your config?

config for what?

[doktor83]

server = "coinsforall.io";
port = "6668";
address = "tralala";
platform = "amd";
onCrash = "2";
instances = "1";
devices =        ["1", "1", "1", "1"];
worksizes = ["64", "64", "64", "64"];
threads = ["4096", "4096", "4096", "4096"];
corefreq =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
memfreq =        ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
powertune =      ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];
fanspeed =       ["-1", "-1", "-1", "-1"];

[aristokrat]

doktor83, can you share your config?

config for what?

Claymore's config for coinsforall.io pool

[kpierce77]

Well, looks like this miner has some competition. Claymore just came out with one. Can it be used on this pool?

[dlx]

Question for the Ubuntu team:

Can i install the server edition (no X, etc.) and then add all the drivers - SDK ?

Or do i need the full installation ?

Thanks

[eXtremal]

Well, looks like this miner has some competition. Claymore just came out with one. Can it be used on this pool?

Soon, I'll make announcement.