Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 03:08:12 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Volatility [Fill in the Blanks]  (Read 2300 times)
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 04, 2013, 08:54:38 PM
 #21

Of course, Bitcoin will inevitably fail when a newer technology takes its spot.  But it'll probably be another crypto-currency.
Right. Just like the Internet failed when we replaced with Internet2.

I don't think any of us are using the same technology when the Internet was first introduced.  If you're implying the Internet as a concept, of course there will never be an Internet2.  And if we're implying Crypto-currencies as a concept, likewise.  But specifically, considering what Bitcoin actually is right now (not even completely 1.0, mind you), we'll inevitably abandon it for something new and improved.

As masize said, it's incomparable.  A lot of what the Internet brought over from its first incarnation is still around, but a lot of it isn't; HTML is great, but HTML5 is probably better than HTML2.  I'm not saying HTML2 isn't around anymore, but why use HTML2 when everyone wants you to use HTML4 or HTML5?  Python's great, but most everyone prefers Python 2 at this point.  I also heard Windows has been steadily releasing newer OSes for a while; did Windows 98 disappear?  No.  Does anyone use it?  I suppose.  Software becomes obsolete as technology improves.  Why should Bitcoin be the exception?  It has certain hard-coded rules that cannot be upgraded without forking the whole thing.  Now everyone's gotta use one or the other: let's say, Bitcoin 1, and Bitcoin 2.  Bitcoin 2 has all the improvements over Bitcoin 1, so everyone moves their assets from Bitcoin 1 to Bitcoin 2.  Inevitably, people stop using Bitcoin 1.  Now: is Bitcoin 2 literally going to be Bitcoin, or is it going to be another form of crypto-currency all together?  Either way, the original technology is left behind, and a newer technology takes its spot.  Thus, Bitcoin, without anyone to trade with, as we've all moved onto another technology, fails; rather, fail is a harsh word, and I feel I should've picked a better one.  Bitcoin will lose enough popularity for its value to drop tremendously from where it would've been if no superior alternative was proposed (including an improved, forked version of Bitcoin.)  This could happen in ten years, it could happen in a hundred years, but at the rate technology improves, it is an inevitability.  What I do believe, however, will remain for a long time, is what Bitcoin is: a crypto-currency.  The concept of crypto-currency will doubtfully have a crypto-currency2; rather, it will simply be improved over time.

justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013



View Profile
April 04, 2013, 09:01:33 PM
 #22

Really? show me...
Not a complete list:

1
2
masize
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


Rockefeller Oil in his time, Today is BTC time


View Profile
April 04, 2013, 09:42:42 PM
 #23

Really? show me...
Not a complete list:

1
2

So what you are saying is that the rules can be changed anytime by the bitcoin.org ?

That doesn't seem so descentralized as very foundation of Bitcoin claims to be.

Client upgrades doesnt change Bitcoin core algorithm or block rules or whatever limits established.

If Bitcoin.org upgrade changes core rules, like coins per block, or coin limit. That can't be fair.

Or Bitcoin is centralized currency ruled by the founders and can be upgraded anytime, or is descentralized as everybody has the rules set up from the beginning as there's no authority to change them in the future.

There cannot be both at the same time.

Always BUYING BTC at Last mtGox.
Neteller, Webmoney, Paypal, MoneyBookers
http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=masize&sign=ANY&type=RECV
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013



View Profile
April 04, 2013, 09:45:57 PM
 #24

The bitcoin developers can propose changes, but they can't force anyone to install new versions containing their proposed changes. They are limited in what they can change by what the community of users will accept.
masize
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


Rockefeller Oil in his time, Today is BTC time


View Profile
April 05, 2013, 05:00:28 AM
 #25

The bitcoin developers can propose changes, but they can't force anyone to install new versions containing their proposed changes. They are limited in what they can change by what the community of users will accept.

Is it a democratic thing? Does having 1000 BTC make you a voter on the changes? I'm just curious, and honestly don't like very much the idea of "Community" changing the rules whenever they please, because they are the "Official Community". I'm investing a lot of money on Bitcoin the way it is.

Always BUYING BTC at Last mtGox.
Neteller, Webmoney, Paypal, MoneyBookers
http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=masize&sign=ANY&type=RECV
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 11:18:14 AM
 #26

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Economic_majority
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!