Satoshigames.io New signature campaign ! Earn UP to 0.05 BTC !

[Raimonn]

Name: Raimonn
Post count: 1690
Rank: Hero Member
Bitcoin address: 1ANaDK7p4AmDYRs68hDziZKCiENgGj2Wxi
Profile UID: 454323

[letyouearn]

I would like to join your campaign.

Name : letyouearn
Posts : 2203
Rank : Hero Member
BTC Address : 1A7RdYVo6rVmPXLHeeHqnTym7otCNmCDPb
UID : 358450

I was removed from the old campaign because of inactivity.  Please approve me here and I will be active with this campaign . You asked me to wait for a week , so I was waiting for your response.

Let me know if I am accepted.

[Lucas*]

Hi Gianluca95
I would like to continue my participation in Satoshigames in this new campaign

Name: Lucas*
Post count: 513
Rank: Senior member
Bitcoin address: 1MeCBfsm2HqCejoMHjJGbZC48Y9wmLvG3P
Profile UID: 557996

Thanks

[Docnaster]

Will you be opening any more slots for this campaign?

[Jemzx00]

Would like to join again on this new campaign. Hope I get accepted once again on this campaign. Thanks And Goodluck Gianluca.
Name: Jemzx00
Post count: 460
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin address: 32ef6ekUHR71th8z7A1fb6BazwmT3DLqHi
Profile UID: 763568

[socal]

Rules are well read and understood, kindly consider my applications
Name:  socal
Post count:  913
Rank:  sr member
Bitcoin address:  1BfefJR6bdgC8boKsUk9BuFTx1DyhYNUSf
Profile UID:  265035
Thank you.

[MadeinCoin]

Name: MadeinCoin
Post count: 2198
Rank: Hero Member
Bitcoin address: 1LPuZehWZFr5fajuJqCJKVq1Np6P8YD8NW
Profile UID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=441443

[Joel_Jantsen]

Name: Joel
Post count: 2476
Rank: Sr Member
Bitcoin address: 16k7uVZvhWYD9JJJoFzqG8NrvL3y8RDxYP
Profile UID: 560412

Hi Gianluca,suggesting you to go through the list of spammers here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.0 and help weeding them out.Cheers.

[jeffthebaker]

Name: jeffthebaker
Post count: 1047
Rank: Hero Member
Bitcoin address: 17o4Dyfc7GMbwMgaeXhQQ74nqDcdmP7RVM
Profile UID: 166937

Thanks!

[ikydesu]

I want to join.

Name: ikydesu
Post count: 2363 include this
Rank: Hero. member
Bitcoin address: 19PUFC3aCddpRUTcFZcgzYrihoujtjWytQ
Profile UID: 364027

I will put the signature if i'm eligible.

[cryptworld]

Username/UID:  cryptworld
Bitcointalk Rank:   Hero
Current number of posts: 845 (including this one)
Bitcoin Address to send the payment:  17WRRpcxMYGBQo2FB5EHMBTWDxXxDA3Rw8
Profile UID:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310188
Would like to join  Please contact me if i'm accepted

[Gianluca95]

That's a big pleasure for me to see many candidature in this campaign 

Tomorrow I'll review each one of you !

[Lauda]

Tomorrow I'll review each one of you !

Hi Gianluca,suggesting you to go through the list of spammers here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.0 and help weeding them out.Cheers.

OP I highly advise you to use our list of spammers. I've noticed a decent amount of users migrating into your campaigns in the last round of bans and the one that I'm doing today. Here's one example:

Banned today (list is yet to be posted).

[sana54210]

Hi Gianluca,suggesting you to go through the list of spammers here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.0 and help weeding them out.Cheers.

OP I highly advise you to use our list of spammers.

@Gianluca,
Instead of going with these suggestions, why not you give a probation for select who have decent track. After that, deny with zero payment if they not perform up to the mark. If you come across any severe spammers, report them to get permanent ban.

These people (@Lauda, @Joel_Jantsen) are treating spammers in scammers way. That is not right imho.

[Jemzx00]

Banned today (list is yet to be posted).

Uhmm. Lauda why'd you post something like that here. Why not post this on your own campaign thread. And because of this I think that you are saying that I'm a spammer which I'm not, and maybe because of this my chance of being accepted here would low now. This isn't right for me.

[Lauda]

Instead of going with these suggestions, why not you give a probation for select who have decent track.

People on that list are far from having a *decent track*. OP was part of the initial idea behind SMAS if I remember correctly.

These people (@Lauda, @Joel_Jantsen) are treating spammers in scammers way. That is not right imho.

No.

Uhmm. Lauda why'd you post something like that here. Why not post this on your own campaign thread.

You were a example that I had encountered today during the checkup (that's how I stumbled upon this thread). The thread will be updated in due time.

Lol! And how is that because all I know that I've done is posting on Service. And I didn't spam anything.

Update: That discussion is off-topic, stop derailing this thread.

[Jemzx00]

Uhmm. Lauda why'd you post something like that here. Why not post this on your own campaign thread.

You were a example that I had encountered today during the checkup (that's how I stumbled upon this thread). The thread will be updated in due time.

Lol! And how is that because all I know that I've done is posting on Service. And I didn't spam anything.

[sana54210]

People on that list are far from having a *decent track*.

1. What is stopping you to perma ban those who are far from decent track.

If you are talking about second chance to improve (as per the warning in bitmixer thread) why not they wear a signature and prove themselves. Does this forum has any such rule : you got warning, you should not participate campaigns.

These two (no ban and second chance with signature) can not be the constraints at a time. Still, you are taking your list everywhere, does it mean you want them to prove themselves only without signature? I beg to ask why not with a probation/zero pay/ban?

2. Is it too hard to identify a member who has post quality far from decent tracks ?
Do you think a campaign manager who is already running many campaigns will fail to catch that far quality ?

If your whole list falls under far category, you do not need to head up here. But you did, does it mean you are not sure about your list ?

stop derailing this thread.

@Gianluca,
I am extremely sorry about that.

[bapparabi]

i want to join the camping can you tell me if i am allowed to join or not

[socal]

Instead of going with these suggestions, why not you give a probation for select who have decent track.

People on that list are far from having a *decent track*. OP was part of the initial idea behind SMAS if I remember correctly.

These people (@Lauda, @Joel_Jantsen) are treating spammers in scammers way. That is not right imho.

No.

Uhmm. Lauda why'd you post something like that here. Why not post this on your own campaign thread.

You were a example that I had encountered today during the checkup (that's how I stumbled upon this thread). The thread will be updated in due time.

Lol! And how is that because all I know that I've done is posting on Service. And I didn't spam anything.

Update: That discussion is off-topic, stop derailing this thread.

all i can see here is an extreme greed, the op have his own rules and regulations and he should be allowed to use his own mind.
Live and lets live, the small token earned from this signature is what makes it standout from the rest in the world and we should not let GREED destroys this forum.
@ op, please update this list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ckks2iYEPe7Z2JelK-n8xZ1yqc7KSMwOtD5HVCKUwDE/edit#gid=0
@ lauda, i only posted 6 posts in bitmixer and you banned then add my name to spammer, not fair but it is just a token and not the real purpose of being on this forum.