Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 05:30:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: i got negative trust without any reason :(  (Read 1868 times)
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 12:13:59 PM
 #1

i got the negative trust  without any reason .
actually i posted a new topic " how to get Positive trust "
but in the thread i posted that " honestly how to get post trust "
but mr.  " lauda " gives me negative trust with commentment


  " This user is likely behind severe
account farming, in addition to
wanting to obtain positive trust for
likely illegitimate reasons. Bonus:
Signature spam. This is something that
I can not condone."

here what should i do . because i have only one account and i am in worried how to prove i am honest and where to makr request .
jacee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 12:27:45 PM
 #2

How about clicking the referrence to see why you get that negative?
There were 7 accounts named like yours with numbers and I am assuming that it's not only those.
i hope will get positive trust from this forum one day , because i am honest and making help honestly .

I struggle to keep up, not sure who to give my trust too,

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729529  jitenderpar15
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729533  jitenderpar16
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729535  jitenderpar17
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729551  jitenderpar18
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729558  jitenderpar19
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729564  jitenderpar22
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=729569  jitenderpar23

how many jintenderpar's are there?   Cheesy
noictib
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 515


One of the world's leading Bitcoin-powered casinos


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 12:46:48 PM
 #3

i also seen the same thing of same user name as given by jacee but thier last active is a big Matter whether " jitenderpar3 " using these or not or just make for farming .
i think your megeti trust Should be remove or not depend upon your last active seen by the forum moderator Smiley
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 12:53:26 PM
 #4

i also seen the same thing of same user name as given by jacee but thier last active is a big Matter whether " jitenderpar3 " using these or not or just make for farming .
i think your megeti trust Should be remove or not depend upon your last active seen by the forum moderator Smiley
i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .
K~Ehleyr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


Ooh, shiny things!!


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 01:08:56 PM
 #5

i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .

So you're saying you didn't create all those other accounts with the same name?  Then you bought your account and you surely won't mind telling us who you bought it from  Wink
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 01:29:13 PM
 #6

i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .

So you're saying you didn't create all those other accounts with the same name?  Then you bought your account and you surely won't mind telling us who you bought it from  Wink
no , accounts were created by me but not recover by me due to my foolness . and see no. of post activity whuch are all zero and i think it iw going for a year .
K~Ehleyr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


Ooh, shiny things!!


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 01:35:04 PM
 #7

i think you need to see the post , activity and last active date , which is public for everyone .
every account has 0 activity , zero post , mid of January and comes no active .

then how anyone can say i am making many account ,. means of account farming .

So you're saying you didn't create all those other accounts with the same name?  Then you bought your account and you surely won't mind telling us who you bought it from  Wink
no , accounts were created by me but not recover by me due to my foolness . and see no. of post activity whuch are all zero and i think it iw going for a year .

All those accounts were created on the same day and within an hour of each other.  7 accounts within 1 hour.  And you tell us you're not a farmer???

Seems legit  Roll Eyes

I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 01:54:38 PM
 #8

PM from user admitting this:
-snip-
all.the other accounts created by me but no activity , no post , no rank .
They had posts until they were all nuked (some were banned prior to this), so this is a partial lie (besides the fact that you created all of them).  Roll Eyes

I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 02:34:23 PM
 #9

PM from user admitting this:
-snip-
all.the other accounts created by me but no activity , no post , no rank .
They had posts until they were all nuked (some were banned prior to this), so this is a partial lie (besides the fact that you created all of them).  Roll Eyes

I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.
since i am fully honest here but here i think i need to give some proof but what i need to show Sad

any help or suggestion Sad
Lutpin
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874


Goodbye, Z.


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 02:39:13 PM
 #10

since i am fully honest here
So you admit having nuked/banned alt accounts, which would make your actions here ban evasion and hence a reason to get your account banned aswell.
To be honest, that feedback from Lauda should be the least of your worries right now.



it should also be banned but not banned by the forum
We can agree to that.

▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀████▄
████▀██████▀█▀██████▀████
██████████████████████████
▐█████▄███████████████▄█████▌
▐███████▄▄█████████▄▄███████▌
▐██████▀█████████████▀██████▌
▐███████████████████████████▌
▀██████████████████████▀
▀████▄████▄▀▀▄████▄████▀
▀███████▀███▀███████▀
▀▀█████████████▀▀
  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
   ███████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
██████████
███████



             ▄████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄
            ██                          ▄▄▄▄▄▄                           ██
           ██  ██████                ▄██████████▄     ████████████████████▀
          ██  ████████             ▄████▀   ▀████▄    ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
         ██  ████  ████           ████▀       ▀██▀    ████
        ██  ████    ████        ▄███▀                 ████

       ██  ████      ████       ███▀                  ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
      ██  ████        ████      ███                   ██████████████
     ██  ████          ████     ███▄                  ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

    ██  ████████████████████    ▀████                 ████
   ██  ██████████████████████    ▀████▄        ▄██▄   ████

  ██  ████                ████     ▀████▄   ▄████▀    ████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██  ████                  ████      ▀██████████▀     ████████████████████▄
  ██                                    ▀▀▀▀▀▀                           ██
   ▀█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 02:42:33 PM
 #11

PM from user admitting this:
-snip-
all.the other accounts created by me but no activity , no post , no rank .
They had posts until they were all nuked (some were banned prior to this), so this is a partial lie (besides the fact that you created all of them).  Roll Eyes

I suggest you get used to the pretty red paint you're wearing, because it isn't going anywhere.
Indeed.

The rating is well deserved, and the fact that you don't know the right section for this type of threads tells us enough.
now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 02:51:53 PM
 #12

since i am fully honest here
So you admit having nuked/banned alt accounts, which would make your actions here ban evasion and hence a reason to get your account banned aswell.
To be honest, that feedback from Lauda should be the least of your worries right now.



it should also be banned but not banned by the forum
We can agree to that.
it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
DarkStar_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 02:52:35 PM
 #13

now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
Back to lying, I see. (archive of the thread, to this point)

Lauda stated that the accounts were nuked. Only newbies can be nuked. Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.


it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
So if I was supposed to be arrested, but they failed to arrest me for whatever reason, I am no longer guilty of my crimes?

taking a break - expect delayed responses
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
November 06, 2016, 02:57:08 PM
 #14

now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active .
Good question actually, since you admitted to creating these (albeit just now) and at least 1 was banned before, ergo this is ban evasion. Almost all of those accounts had spammy half one liners.

it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
No, I should not remove this rating. It is well deserved and now you got caught in an outright lie.

Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.
Patrollers can nuke newbies, but only administrators and some* global moderators can ban users of higher ranks. I nuked some, and then Cyrus should have started investigating the others (no update on this yet). Take a look at this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=658444 JITENDERPAR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=661926 JITENDERPAR2

First one has two negative ratings.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 03:02:01 PM
 #15

now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active . it should also be banned but not banned by the forum because it was only the account which was only handle by me  and non of them was getted by me .
Back to lying, I see. (archive of the thread, to this point)

Lauda stated that the accounts were nuked. Only newbies can be nuked. Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.


it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
So if I was supposed to be arrested, but they failed to arrest me for whatever reason, I am no longer guilty of my crimes?
you are right but for what , i am fully honest Sad
JITENDERPAR3 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 06, 2016, 03:10:19 PM
 #16

now i got a proof , if all the accounts were banned then how this ac " jitenderpar3" is active .
Good question actually, since you admitted to creating these (albeit just now) and at least 1 was banned before, ergo this is ban evasion. Almost all of those accounts had spammy half one liners.

it means negative trust Should be remove by  mr. lauda
No, I should not remove this rating. It is well deserved and now you got caught in an outright lie.

Normal moderators can't ban people (right?), and I'm sure whoever nuked those accounts probably didn't want to bother someone just to get you banned. Only digging your self into a deeper hole.
Patrollers can nuke newbies, but only administrators and some* global moderators can ban users of higher ranks. I nuked some, and then Cyrus should have started investigating the others (no update on this yet). Take a look at this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=658444 JITENDERPAR
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=661926 JITENDERPAR2

First one has two negative ratings.
jitenderpar2 was created by me but on that time i gaves this account to my friend and i was no longer user of tgis account .
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2242


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
November 17, 2016, 06:56:10 AM
 #17

Have found this many so far:

Code:
Offline 	jitenderbhai 							Brand new 	2011-06-01 	0 	
Offline jitender jitender9034461198@gmail.com Brand new 2014-02-24 0
Offline JITENDERKADYAN Brand new 2015-10-24 0
Offline Jitenderglobal Brand new 2015-10-30 0
Offline JITENDERPAR Member 2015-11-20 123
Offline JITENDERPAR2 Member 2015-11-23 64
Offline JITENDERPAR3 jitender9034461198@gmail.com Full Member 2015-11-23 490

Offline jitender4 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar5 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar4 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar6 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar7 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar8 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar9 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar10 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar11 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar12 Brand new 2016-01-15 0
Offline jitenderpar20 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitender920 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar15 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar16 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar17 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar18 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar19 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar22 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar23 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline jitenderpar24 Brand new 2016-01-16 0
Offline JITENDER PAL SINGH Brand new 2016-10-23 0

Offline kreetika MMM Global Brand new 2015-11-24 0
Offline kreetika2 MMM Global Brand new 2015-11-30 0

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes

Avirunes
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472


View Profile WWW
November 23, 2016, 09:35:18 AM
 #18

-snip-

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes

Done mate  Cheesy

You can find his alts connected here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16962940#msg16962940

Account Farmer , huff!!  Embarrassed
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3850
Merit: 2242


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
November 23, 2016, 09:51:45 AM
 #19

-snip-

Am still investigating...  Second from the top jitender matches the email of JITENDERPAR3

For the moment, I am throwing the two kreetika into the doubtful due to the MMM Global - unless JITENDERPAR3 wants to say they are his?   Roll Eyes

Done mate  Cheesy

You can find his alts connected here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206112.msg16962940#msg16962940

Account Farmer , huff!!  Embarrassed

Good catch there with the connections and the banning from the signature campaign back in January.

Avirunes
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472


View Profile WWW
November 28, 2016, 08:08:14 AM
 #20

In this forum you can not expect anything else. There are so many trust abusers here who will abuse you and will call you the same .

Look clearly before making any statement.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!