|
mai77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2013, 06:22:38 PM |
|
well first of all you must ask: is it legal to tax and how can you prove it?
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 07, 2013, 06:55:42 PM |
|
well first of all you must ask: is it legal to tax and how can you prove it?
Good point. I didn't mean legal in that sense. I meant legal according to the US government. They have the guns, the thugs, the lack of principles, and the short-sightedness to hurt people for doing what they deem "illegal". Most people think that includes refusing to pay taxes, but if they'd study the law closely enough, they'll see that (for most people) it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
mai77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2013, 06:58:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
unk
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2013, 09:53:04 PM |
|
there is no end to the scams and misinformation that 'tax protesters' or 'tax deniers' put out. it is all wrong. it doesn't even have a grain of truth. it's borderline illiterate nonsense adopted by crazies. people should read this excrement as they'd read a paper about how the illuminati are using north korea to promote a central world government that will control us all with radio waves.
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 08, 2013, 01:41:48 AM |
|
there is no end to the scams and misinformation that 'tax protesters' or 'tax deniers' put out. it is all wrong. it doesn't even have a grain of truth. it's borderline illiterate nonsense adopted by crazies. people should read this excrement as they'd read a paper about how the illuminati are using north korea to promote a central world government that will control us all with radio waves.
When you write "this excrement", are you talking about writing that uses hyperbole and accusations against other writers, employs ad hominem attacks, and describes the writing itself as "nonsense"? Does "this excrement" of which you write also contain advice on how people should read the writing it attacks? In other words, are you providing an example of what you're attacking? The only part I can't figure is how you call yourself a 'tax protester'. Do you protest against taxes, or do you feel that they are a good idea?
|
|
|
|
black flag capitalist
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
April 14, 2013, 12:12:26 PM |
|
It doesn't matter if paying income tax is legal or not. They have all the power, guns and most of the public opinion on there side. They don't care what the law is they will get there money if you go to court. Either decide to pay your taxes because you don't want to live in fear or move your money around cleverly. If you do go to court you will be on there shit list, lose your money and probably be thrown in prison. Look at larkin rose. Trust me it doesn't always work like these people say it does.
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 14, 2013, 09:06:58 PM |
|
I suppose you're right about this: It doesn't matter if paying income tax is legal or not. They have all the power, guns and most of the public opinion on there side. They don't care what the law is they will get there money if you go to court. Either decide to pay your taxes because you don't want to live in fear or move your money around cleverly. If you do go to court you will be on there shit list, lose your money and probably be thrown in prison. Look at larkin rose. Trust me it doesn't always work like these people say it does.
But I think it's only gone to court once. Here's the story from the victims keyboard, along with a few other cases which have been mistakenly assumed to follow the tax code. Here are examples in which the government didn't bother going to court (I assume because they expected to lose), and here are the examples in which it was handled properly from the get-go.
|
|
|
|
zakoliverz
|
|
April 15, 2013, 08:30:22 AM |
|
so how does one pay zero taxes.
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 15, 2013, 06:42:03 PM Last edit: May 06, 2013, 04:27:17 AM by dscotese |
|
so how does one pay zero taxes. Did you see the link? Unfortunately, this only applies to those whose tax burdens are created by the United States Internal Revenue Code. If you're subject to some other taxing authority, you're probably screwed.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
April 17, 2013, 03:52:13 PM |
|
I looked at your link. I wasted my time. Now I'm off to have fun.
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 17, 2013, 04:07:32 PM |
|
I looked at your link. I wasted my time. Now I'm off to have fun. Since you wasted your time, you might be willing to waste a bit more on this thread, where you might be able to help others (myself included!) see my folly. I, especially and obviously, could benefit from some education. Would you mind helping? I could offer bitcoin...
|
|
|
|
RodeoX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
|
|
April 22, 2013, 06:18:48 PM |
|
So if we stop paying taxes who is going to repair the roads, put out fires, check the safety of food?.... well, you get it. Or is that the sort of tyranny we want to avoid?
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 22, 2013, 08:24:10 PM |
|
So if we stop paying taxes who is going to repair the roads, put out fires, check the safety of food?.... well, you get it. Or is that the sort of tyranny we want to avoid?
Brace yourself - the "invisible hand" is about to be deployed saying that mysteriously all those things will get done by private markets. And nothing you can say will ever convince them that the magic of private markets is won't appear as soon as we fire the road repair teams, the firemen and the food standards inspectors.
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 22, 2013, 10:19:01 PM |
|
So if we stop paying taxes who is going to repair the roads, put out fires, check the safety of food?.... well, you get it. Or is that the sort of tyranny we want to avoid?
Brace yourself - the "invisible hand" is about to be deployed saying that mysteriously all those things will get done by private markets. And nothing you can say will ever convince them that the magic of private markets is won't appear as soon as we fire the road repair teams, the firemen and the food standards inspectors. Actually, it's simpler than all that. If you want it, you buy it, or you find a lot of people who also want it and you pool your money with them. Who grows the food you eat? Who makes the clothes and the cars and the computers? Who built your house/apartment building? Those hands are not invisible. But they are private and don't generally force you to pay for things you don't want. And when they try to force you to pay for things you don't want, you cry foul. Don't you? There's an even simpler way to view it. You have resources that you earned. If you don't take responsibility for deploying them to the betterment of your life (whether by extinguishing fires, building roads, performing safety checks on your food, or building/buying/renting a place to stay), then who will? If you insist that someone else must do these things for you and take your money to do them, then go find a seller of such services, but stop insisting that everyone else use the same seller you chose. These are the reasons that the US constitution has an apportionment requirement for direct taxes. That people don't understand that, and don't puzzle over the tax laws to figure out why it looks like such a restriction no longer applies, is a tragedy. If they did that research, they would learn that the appearance is deceiving. The income tax is an excise on activities that are easily avoided, but people don't know that, so they end up paying anyway. These payments end up covering the cost of the destructive wars our government blindly wages in order to profit the fascist corporations run by their friends - wars on plants (drug war), on countries that want to sell oil for something other than US dollars (Iran/Iraq/Lybia/...), on its own citizens in a gambit to justify increased tyranny (9/11), on the minds of young people (public education), and the list goes on and on.
|
|
|
|
AprilShowers
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2013, 10:24:06 PM |
|
So....I want to get to work on the highway.....
So now I have to find a group of people who also want to use said hwy, and pool money to make that happen.....
Are you serious?
I hope you get locked up for fraud.
Good day
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 22, 2013, 10:38:12 PM |
|
So....I want to get to work on the highway.....
So now I have to find a group of people who also want to use said hwy, and pool money to make that happen.....
Are you serious?
I hope you get locked up for fraud.
Good day
That is how Disneyland was built. Microsoft too. Also most of the Internet. You might also want to look up James J Hill, who nearly finished building a transcontinental railroad across the USA that way.
|
|
|
|
AprilShowers
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2013, 10:40:03 PM |
|
OK, well lets get that going then.
Go get a group of people to pay to repave I70 please
|
|
|
|
dscotese (OP)
|
|
April 23, 2013, 12:35:54 AM |
|
How much do you want to spend? If you want to write some copy for a press release, I know a PR guy. He could also write up a business plan, but that'll cost you. You'll have to get public opinion on your side first, as I expect the government will try to persecute (and prosecute) you for stepping on their toes. They think that "We the People" don't own "public lands" (including the 170), as far as I know.
|
|
|
|
Hawker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 23, 2013, 03:05:08 PM |
|
So if we stop paying taxes who is going to repair the roads, put out fires, check the safety of food?.... well, you get it. Or is that the sort of tyranny we want to avoid?
Brace yourself - the "invisible hand" is about to be deployed saying that mysteriously all those things will get done by private markets. And nothing you can say will ever convince them that the magic of private markets is won't appear as soon as we fire the road repair teams, the firemen and the food standards inspectors. Actually, it's simpler than all that. If you want it, you buy it, or you find a lot of people who also want it and you pool your money with them. Who grows the food you eat? Who makes the clothes and the cars and the computers? Who built your house/apartment building? Those hands are not invisible. But they are private and don't generally force you to pay for things you don't want. And when they try to force you to pay for things you don't want, you cry foul. Don't you? There's an even simpler way to view it. You have resources that you earned. If you don't take responsibility for deploying them to the betterment of your life (whether by extinguishing fires, building roads, performing safety checks on your food, or building/buying/renting a place to stay), then who will? If you insist that someone else must do these things for you and take your money to do them, then go find a seller of such services, but stop insisting that everyone else use the same seller you chose. These are the reasons that the US constitution has an apportionment requirement for direct taxes. That people don't understand that, and don't puzzle over the tax laws to figure out why it looks like such a restriction no longer applies, is a tragedy. If they did that research, they would learn that the appearance is deceiving. The income tax is an excise on activities that are easily avoided, but people don't know that, so they end up paying anyway. These payments end up covering the cost of the destructive wars our government blindly wages in order to profit the fascist corporations run by their friends - wars on plants (drug war), on countries that want to sell oil for something other than US dollars (Iran/Iraq/Lybia/...), on its own citizens in a gambit to justify increased tyranny (9/11), on the minds of young people (public education), and the list goes on and on. As predicted. The good news is that if you are right and able to convince a majority of your fellow countrymen you are right, then you can remove the state. The bad news is that most people like having a state. For example, building a road though a city requires eminent domain. If the road is private, at some point its tolls start to be considered a tax and people will insist on representation to go with that taxation. Food regulation was introduced to combat the poisonings that characterised food production in the 19th century - who wants to go back to that? When Adam Smith wrote about the invisible hand, people were piss poor. Unless we want to return to that poverty, we need a state and that means you pay income tax.
|
|
|
|
|