[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone

[U2]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=492957






https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=741077



User links;

-winspiral is promoting U2cloudmining site  = U2 bitcointalk name
-as you can see on the picture both user time = December 08, 2016, 03:54:42 PM
-winspiral last active: Today at 03:34:14 PM    ,, u2 last active: Today at 03:53:48 PM   time differs  20mins which too close


Anyways just consider this as void if not satisfied by the proof given

You're kidding me right? My name is close to someone elses so I'm an alt? It's not my fault my favorite band is his scam company's name. I'm not his alt but obviously everyone knows that. There's nothing that's linking us whatsoever. I didn't bother checking because I've never even heard of this other guy.

[1714910005]

1714910005

[chixka000]

Well as i have stated above just consider it as a null void if you are not satisfied by the basis, It is my way of conducting an investigation tho (if denied by most of the agents then no problem at all)

[Timelord2067]

Update to my last find. I was going through each account's trust and Timelord2067 already tagged sorlunjo.

They're all alts of the (in?)famous Engg.Chaks. That obviously warrants a negative in my books.

Just how many does this guy have?

The plot thickens...


New accounts connected: Jog4444, sorlunjo, christinalorine, chr_sty, marlboroza, sporadic06. These are all alts of Engg.Chaks.

See this link for Timelord2067's connection to Engg.Chaks and more:

Other accounts connected:

dio, hothtszho, Engg.Akrepi, hosumfu, louise123e,  yingbb0301, sun64986161, kenshi222, williamho, diodio1, retes1234, kovaa, summer11, bank2, banklunjo, retes4321, diodio5, godzerosonic, retes43210, retes12345, Engg.Chaks, y02723942001, sun64986, yinghacked, summer111,  summer116, Deacidifyingbbas, sorlunjo,  kenshi2121, kenshin77, kenshin_8513,  d161616, Engg.Chalks.Returns,  chakchaks

Working on links to profiles arm Done. This was a bit nuts to stumble upon as you can imagine.

If I find connections that link two accounts (ie Alts) then I will mark them neutral, if they are scammers, I will give them Red Paint ^TM - but, I shouldn't have to be the only one who marks them.  If someone else finds a connection, they should also mark the Alts.  I'm not saying all of them, but certainly the ones they have connected.

Chris!  How are your finds connected?  You haven't said.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Just saying here, winspiral (IIRC) can barely form coherent sentences in english whereas U2 clearly can.  Don't think they're even in the same country, much less alts of each other.

[U2]

Just so we're clear, this is how you should prove people have alts. Real hard-hitting facts.


Accounts connected: chixka000, darklus123



Proof:

Good day sir luptin i want to be part of this campaign thank you
User: darklus123
Postion to Apply: newbie
Posts Start: 31
Address: 35HE5Le6cv68xet3ziqDr6ocSNPJaozYGy

https://web.archive.org/web/20161208173036/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545750.msg15615736

I would Like to join/Enroll 777coin signature campaign..

Name: chixka
Post:31
Activity: 31
Rank: jr.member
BTC: 35HE5Le6cv68xet3ziqDr6ocSNPJaozYGy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840124.msg15068343#msg15068343

https://web.archive.org/web/20161208173323/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840124.msg15068343

would like to join your campaign sir

Username: darklus123
Rank Member: newbie
Post Count: 1
Bitcoin Address: 3Gquxh8SSdDQMSGVvUJnXrRo7iU9oGfrrW

thank you Smiley

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1237129.msg15407096#msg15407096


https://web.archive.org/web/20161208171809/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1237129.msg15407096

good day admin thank you for the last payment you send. i would also like to inform you sir that my current rank right now is member can you please update my status sir? and if you allow that i will change my bitcoin address to this: 3Gquxh8SSdDQMSGVvUJnXrRo7iU9oGfrrW ,  thank you and more power to your projects
regards,

https://web.archive.org/web/20161208172606/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=907271.msg15333622


Addresses:

Code:

 3Gquxh8SSdDQMSGVvUJnXrRo7iU9oGfrrW
35HE5Le6cv68xet3ziqDr6ocSNPJaozYGy
 

Miscellaneous: Hahahaha. Thanks for letting me know you exist. Any other alts you'd like me to add?

Just saying here, winspiral (IIRC) can barely form coherent sentences in english whereas U2 clearly can.  Don't think they're even in the same country, much less alts of each other.

Exactly. Oh also, I see he's from France. I went there once so we have that in common too! Also if his picture is accurate I also have some grey hairs too. I think we're onto something here..

[Timelord2067]

Well as i have stated above just consider it as a null void if you are not satisfied by the basis, It is my way of conducting an investigation tho (if denied by most of the agents then no problem at all)

chixka000 - You are an Alt of Alaki because you both have the letters "A" "I" and "K" in your user name.  It's obvious, I don't even need to offer proof.

Name:    Alaki
Posts:    748
Activity:    266
Position:    Sr. Member
Date Registered:    15 July 2015, 00:56:58
Last Active:    22 June 2016, 12:36:58

Location:    Earth (Behind You)

As you can see, Alaki registered on a Wednesday, and....

Name:    chixka000
Posts:    1556
Activity:    238
Position:    Full Member
Date Registered:    11 April 2016, 01:12:51

Location:    A smart one does not under estimates other persons capability.              <<<------  eArth - get it?

You registered on a Monday...

The hit song "I don't like Mondays" was a hit by the Boom Town Rats and as you can see Alaki was last active on the 22nd of June which was a Wednesday...

And then there is "E-A-R-T-H" HIDDEN IN PLAINT VIEW IN YOUR LOCATION.  !!! !!! !!!


Of course if I *really* wanted to make comparison's I'd use things like Wallet Addresses / TX / not just stuff above.

Which means I haven't really proved you're an alt of Alaki, I was just yanking ya chain...

[Timelord2067]

...then again, this is in chixka000 trust:

ALT Finder 0: -0 / +0   2016-08-20   0.00000000      ALT OF darklus123

http://archive.is/Nisad
http://archive.is/OtAYx#60%

*Giving +ve trust to alt account
Original Comments:
From chixka000 to darklus123
Thank you for helping me sir especially for guiding me in signature campaign

[U2]

...then again, this is in chixka000 trust:

ALT Finder 0: -0 / +0   2016-08-20   0.00000000      ALT OF darklus123

http://archive.is/Nisad
http://archive.is/OtAYx#60%

*Giving +ve trust to alt account
Original Comments:
From chixka000 to darklus123
Thank you for helping me sir especially for guiding me in signature campaign

Ugh I screwed up the code in my post and can't figure out how to fix it. Can you read that ok? It's kind of a clusterfuck but it's all there.

[Lauda]

@chixka000 Your report is useless because it doesn't follow the format nor has it any actual evidence.
@U2 Your report is useless because that is already listed in the table. Please take a look in it before 'investigating':


Take out your problems elsewhere.

[Chris!]

Chris!  How are your finds connected?  You haven't said.

I found the 6 accounts here and after going through their trust I found that you had already tagged sorlunjo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=773484) because he was connected to Engg.Chaks. Honestly I didn't double check your work, I just assumed it was correct and if this one account is connected it means they're all connected. Correct me if I'm wrong though.

@chixka000 Your report is useless because it doesn't follow the format nor has it any actual evidence.
@U2 Your report is useless because that is already listed in the table. Please take a look in it before 'investigating':


Take out your problems elsewhere.

Hey Lauda, why didn't you make this thread self-moderated? We could have avoided all of the drama  .

Hahahahahahahahaha I'm sorry I just had to say that hahahahaha. I crack myself up .

[shorena]

-snip-
are all part of wallet: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0a9a3404a624c345/addresses

I see you - and others - consider this as proof. Just a heads up, unless there are transaction IDs that show the actual linking of the address, I do not trust the page enough to leave negative ratings. I left ratings for all other connections to Candy.

[Chris!]

-snip-
are all part of wallet: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0a9a3404a624c345/addresses

I see you - and others - consider this as proof. Just a heads up, unless there are transaction IDs that show the actual linking of the address, I do not trust the page enough to leave negative ratings. I left ratings for all other connections to Candy.

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

[shorena]

-snip-
are all part of wallet: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0a9a3404a624c345/addresses

I see you - and others - consider this as proof. Just a heads up, unless there are transaction IDs that show the actual linking of the address, I do not trust the page enough to leave negative ratings. I left ratings for all other connections to Candy.

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

I dont know I dont use it, but to verify the connection I would have to click through up to 2778 transactions (in this example). It might sound lazy, but Im not gonna do that before I leave a negative rating and Im also not going to leave one just because someone said so (as in without checking the data myself).

[christinalorine]

my old account was chr_sty and i lost it on a loan lol tbh but this account is mine and i assure you it is mine alone
Yall are retarded

[Lauda]

I thought that it just showed all addresses in an HD wallet. Does it make mistakes sometimes?

No. Otherwise my personal vanity address wouldn't be in there, since it is from an SD wallet. There isn't much information regarding the exact mechanisms used by the website in question. However, in the majority of cases it tends to have correct results. This excludes extreme wallet cases such as the one that was posted by you on the previous page, where there were hundreds/thousands of addresses. These are the most likely candidates for false positives.

[Gunthar]

my old account was chr_sty and i lost it on a loan lol tbh but this account is mine and i assure you it is mine alone
Yall are retarded

You didnt "lost" it on a loan, you defaulted a loan. Retard!!!
~Gun

[Zodiac1233]

Facts: christinalorine and chr_sty are alts as the last one defaulted a loan on my lending thread and wrote me in PM with the first account. Actually chr_sty is locked as collateral by me. Jog4444 defaulted a loan on my lending service too a week ago. I woudnt call this "false positive".
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1448684.msg14650558#msg14650558

EDIT: afaik marlboroza is eng.chakk (or whatever is spelled) i am going to find the reference topic i read this morning. Will update here.

EDIT2: oh well, didnt verify this tho https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1545652.msg17121438#msg17121438

I'm not vouching for their trust, just stating Jog4444 and christinalorine/chr_sty (christinalorine and chr_sty are the same person though), and all the other users you've linked thru our wallet (aside from kovaa) are not eng.chakk. I have lots of internal data at my site that makes it seem highly improbable they are the same person.

As far as I can tell, you are relying on walletexplorer. While that site is a useful tool (I've even used it myself), it does not prove a link. It only finds coins which it believes are from the same wallet. It is generally highly accurate with that, however, while having coins from the same wallet can mean they are the same person, it can also be something as minor as the linked users happening to use the same service which links all users together with a centralized wallet. This happens to be the case with jog, christy, and kovaa. I control the wallet you have linked (005096a6a2b90487). I have posted a signed message from one of the linked addresses below.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Zodiac1233 on bitcointalk controls this address - Dec 8, 2016
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1MXbQHmLZ5DcEAaDVUFB7dyPbXBfJrAKDj
Hz+Mp56oeJ5oF4wOikHiDkIU8zw4xRpjBgKD5JJY0p/mVkBZ7vFlArI3v/LkFICHQR9a5St7qO9afaI4Du1RZRM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Just because someone spends some coins that have a similar source, it does not mean they are the same person. Again to clarify, I am not vouching for trust, just stating kovaa, christy, and jog are different people.

Edit: I should add, Kovaa is a known scammer to us, along with his large list of alts, definitely stay away from him.

We've run an internal investigation on our site some time ago related to "kovaa" who had attempted to scam several members and abuse our referral system with numerous alts. We had linked him to the following names: bank, lovekaze, williamho, louise, wongtszho, kovaa, hohohoho, scattt, drazeee, dioxin, diodio, angel, qp123asd, kaybb. While my word isn't really proof of the links, this list is hopefully of some use. I should point out, these are usernames on our site and not bitcointalk, but going from the list, it seems likely he reuses names a lot,.

[christinalorine]

right i could of very easily previously used my bitvest wallet as someone stated earlier matter of fact i believe i did at least once if not more and some of those are also bitvest players who could of done the same

[christinalorine]

and what is your point? so i used the wrong wording? i was very honest here? i said that my account was chr_sty and i lost or DEFAULTED it? either way admitted before you said any of that but my posts are being deleted not sure why? to make it look as if i'm being dishonest? cause i am not. and as you said i have no control of that account so not sure what i am even defending here? obviously i am not using two accounts?

[Chris!]

Accounts connected: Farma, OrangeII, Dr.Osh, hawkins, Mr.grin, CyberKuro


Proof:

Username: Farma
BTC : 1FmXh5Z2BRWR9uKTt8QMkiL6VES2At6m7S
Bankroll : 100 mbtc
Doge:  DCrCbAn1D3L5gHu4yieWDJpdhjGtFE6y3s
bankroll : 200K doge

Archive

UserName :OrangeII
Doge address : DShq7mMnuvNKm9CNv1t75xE48eMtFqXWa6
Barkroll :300k Dogecoin


UserName :OrangeII
BTC address : 1NRsbe8bKqyZJAsJs4p7on1pC6Ej16os7c
Barkroll :100mbtc

Archive


Addresses:

Code:

1FmXh5Z2BRWR9uKTt8QMkiL6VES2At6m7S
16dUusVocrdvtir9asorZdEBmWQ88s8CTM    
1NRsbe8bKqyZJAsJs4p7on1pC6Ej16os7c

Miscellaneous:
All addresses are from Wallet [192009c2d4]

This is really very nice, hopefully I get a bonus $ 5 and if that happens I guess this will be my lucky day. yeah, but it all just depends on luck, yeah but I expect the best, this is my wallet 1MjJBuojE1dJkTBeb4sagAKfuszsoq9LeF I'll wait giveaway, hoping to get a bonus, thanks  

Archive

I choose b) in the Telegram group before you reply in this thread as well.

My Bitcoin address is: 1MjJBuojE1dJkTBeb4sagAKfuszsoq9LeF

Here he is cheating a giveaway. Also posted on his alt.


Archive

a) Pocket

My Bitcoin address is:  1Dw4c2fwAKZnEHe7uRamrNQxMqcpo5AvDo

And

I choose a) Pocket

On this same page here (Archive)

I would like to join too

Username: Hawkins
Current Post Count: 985
Current Rank: Sr Member
Bitcoin Address: 1JFoyP7uU7caqiFhycxc8h4qSq7a949CN2

Thanks

Archive

a) Turn into a termite

My Bitcoin address is: 1Cf1CEiztqsXRoVkPckJeSTZUzdxnubnhW

Archive

Voted
1EJQF1Ua8sqpNowYJW69Ef6sLmc1WZ77Hk

Thanks

Archive

All addresses are from wallet [4bd7a02ff8]


Addresses:

Code:

1GU6MdjVHA8gpyNkHnsckKUQXaHghPPneo
1MjJBuojE1dJkTBeb4sagAKfuszsoq9LeF
1JFoyP7uU7caqiFhycxc8h4qSq7a949CN2
1Cf1CEiztqsXRoVkPckJeSTZUzdxnubnhW
1Dw4c2fwAKZnEHe7uRamrNQxMqcpo5AvDo
1EJQF1Ua8sqpNowYJW69Ef6sLmc1WZ77Hk

If any clarification is needed on my findings I'll add it tomorrow. It's so late! This took over an hour to go through everything on my phone. I've got to find a laptop I like hahaha.