I have a list of users to DT tag if anyone have time...

[Gunthar]

I tagged some users that defaulted a loan on my lending service (with references). It would be appreciated if any DT would confirm the tags (even neutral). This is to assure those accounts dont get sold/recovered and to confirm my lending policy to not sell collateral accounts to not feed account farming/market on the forum.
Thank you.
~Gun

EDIT (last update 3 feb 2017):

Borrower	Defaulted amount	Reference	DT tag	Lender tag	Alts reference
jrpatking	0.0275BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	jrpatking_alt
chr_sty	0.037BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	christinalorine
Slowturtleinc	0.0144BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	Milkduds (profile)
Dormund	0.01BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	JYPE
jermwerty	0.108BTC	Link/Link2	Yes	Yes	jermwerty2
Vasco**	0.8BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	unknown
maduchen	0.0088BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	madu_alt
Kevinrasf	0.033BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	kevinrasffoo/issie81
Jog4444	0.028BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	unkown
ghost15	0.045BTC	Link	Yes	Yes	HEPHAISTOS (Reference)

** Due to the "Donator" status of this user, Theymos has been informed and he is aware i control this account now.

[1715360127]

1715360127

[1715360127]

1715360127

[1715360127]

1715360127

[Quickseller]

Open scam accusations

[brituspol]

I think Reputation suits this kind of thread. So I guess you should move it there

Also can you just put links in OP. It would be much easier to leave neg rating

As said here, make a thread* publishing the list along with all the proof. That and/or PM some of the active DT members, for example Vod, shorena, Lutpin , mexxer-2 and EquaMobi.

*Scam accusations would suit it better

[Gunthar]

ok moving in rep. Will update with the complete list in OP
Thanks!

[Lauda]

ok moving in rep. Will update with the complete list in OP
Thanks!

Watching. Thank you for the transparency.

Why did you take accounts as collateral in the first place ?

This practice needs to stop since nothing good can come out of it. In most cases, a defaulted account gets sold to either a spammer or someone with a intent to scam.

[Joel_Jantsen]

This is to assure those accounts dont get sold/recovered and to confirm my lending policy to not sell collateral accounts to not feed account farming/market on the forum.
Thank you.
~Gun

Why did you take accounts as collateral in the first place ? Nevermind.Just a random comment passing by.

[Gunthar]

This is to assure those accounts dont get sold/recovered and to confirm my lending policy to not sell collateral accounts to not feed account farming/market on the forum.
Thank you.
~Gun

Why did you take accounts as collateral in the first place ? Nevermind.Just a random comment passing by.

Oh dont worry, you gotta love the way i'm handling those collaterals: it's time to cleanup a bit this forum and force the lender to stop supporting account farming.
~Gun

[Gunthar]

updated OP with complete list and references.
Thanks!
~Gun

[mexxer-2]

Well I can't see why you would want to tag accounts which now (if you have the necessary proof) rightfully belong to you. At any rate, would you prefer a neg tag or a neutral?

[Gunthar]

Well I can't see why you would want to tag accounts which now (if you have the necessary proof) rightfully belong to you. At any rate, would you prefer a neg tag or a neutral?

• They can come up whenever they want to theymos with a signed message and claim back their account aand continue to scam?
• They can be tied to their alts and continue to scam? (the more informations we have the easier we can find their alts)
• With DT tag they become useless so none will attempt to sell those accounts (hackers, original owners, DA LENDER(S)) aka let's help stopping account farming

i can continue the list but i'd need some more coffee this morning...
Thanks!

[Fortify]

It's good of you to share the list and stop them from spreading any further, but have you also stopped taking any new accounts as collateral for loans? I doubt this will change much, as someone else is always willing to accept these "dirty" trades and perpetuate this underground economy. BTCTalk needs to take a stand against it

[Gunthar]

It's good of you to share the list and stop them from spreading any further, but have you also stopped taking any new accounts as collateral for loans? I doubt this will change much, as someone else is always willing to accept these "dirty" trades and perpetuate this underground economy. BTCTalk needs to take a stand against it

Yes i have as you can read in my lending policy of May 2016 (reference) and i have invited other lenders to do the same. Some of them promised to do so and then regret so, my business got broken and they continued to grow. For now, my lending policy updates to "i am not selling collaterals account that defaulted loans" but believe it: i will do a mess with them and all their alts.
Of course my responsability is to not accept accounts that would ruin their reputation for a bunch of dollar cents. The most trusted are already taking loans without collatera: see yahoo, avirunes, ranochigo and others...
It's not easy tho uh...
~Gun

[devthedev]

I have flagged all of the listed users and alts with negative trust. Please contact me if any of them repay their loans.

[Gunthar]

I have flagged all of the listed users and alts with negative trust. Please contact me if any of them repay their loans.

Thank you.
~Gun

[zazarb]

sorry, Gunthar but this alleged fight more like a Don Quixote fighting windmills...
if the policy do not want to sell account's can understand, and evaluate the positive.
That a desire marked  "self" in in red, in my opinion is illogical, (of course only with exceptions that you took accounts without proof that account belongs to original user). Theymos certainly does not return account to real owner if you have agreement with signed message that  original owner gave this account as collateral. If all accounts under your control, and you yourself positioned itself as honest, so community should not be afraid new attempt to scam.
Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...
P.S.
I'm sorry that my guess for donator comes true..

[Gunthar]

Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...

mmm? It looks shady to you that i dont sell those idiot's account and i decide to use their post with my signature? Tell me more....

[zazarb]

Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...

mmm? It looks shady to you that i dont sell those idiot's account and i decide to use their post with my signature? Tell me more....

I'm sorry that my language is incomprehensible,  but you or miss the first part of post, or understood everything vice versa.
Or maybe you think that advertising  under tagged as scamer account looks alluring?

[Gunthar]

Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...

mmm? It looks shady to you that i dont sell those idiot's account and i decide to use their post with my signature? Tell me more....

I'm sorry that my language is incomprehensible,  but you or miss the first part of post, or understood everything vice versa.

Lol is ok i love you too zaza  
Dont worry about the collaterals i lost, it is part of the risk of being a lender. I just dont approve the account farming that lately we have all seen. A lot of people say lenders shoudnt take accounts as collateral at all but you know...how hard it would become. So i'm following a different path. And no i dont feel like Don Chisciotte...if you look around there are a lot of people that dont like the account farming supported by lenders...
~Gun

PS: what is your native language tho?

[zazarb]

Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...

mmm? It looks shady to you that i dont sell those idiot's account and i decide to use their post with my signature? Tell me more....

I'm sorry that my language is incomprehensible,  but you or miss the first part of post, or understood everything vice versa.

Lol is ok i love you too zaza  
Dont worry about the collaterals i lost, it is part of the risk of being a lender. I just dont approve the account farming that lately we have all seen. A lot of people say lenders shoudnt take accounts as collateral at all but you know...how hard it would become. So i'm following a different path. And no i dont feel like Don Chisciotte...if you look around there are a lot of people that dont like the account farming supported by lenders...
~Gun

PS: what is your native language tho?

my post essence, that everything was fine until you  advertised own service with accounts not marked in red.
Now people even are afraid to click link with your advertise, ,that did not get any virus or whatever,
summing it works as  anti advertising.

[Gunthar]

Now even your service advertise  in signature of these accounts  it looks like shady...

mmm? It looks shady to you that i dont sell those idiot's account and i decide to use their post with my signature? Tell me more....

I'm sorry that my language is incomprehensible,  but you or miss the first part of post, or understood everything vice versa.

Lol is ok i love you too zaza  
Dont worry about the collaterals i lost, it is part of the risk of being a lender. I just dont approve the account farming that lately we have all seen. A lot of people say lenders shoudnt take accounts as collateral at all but you know...how hard it would become. So i'm following a different path. And no i dont feel like Don Chisciotte...if you look around there are a lot of people that dont like the account farming supported by lenders...
~Gun

PS: what is your native language tho?

my post essence, that everything was fine until you  advertised own service with accounts not marked in red.
Now people even are afraid to click link with your advertise, ,that did not get any virus or whatever,
summing it works as  anti advertising.

Oh i see your point now