Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 12:56:50 PM |
|
I was doing stats for 3 days !!!!! I came out, that gets paid 94-95% of wages. About BTTS that must be shared between participants in a pool of 7 / 24, which comes from part-time participation in a round do not even want to raise the topic .... I think you should stop cheating and really show% commission, which you take each and decide he should take part in your pool or not. I look forward to one day return to 5% for 3 days. The trust is lost. This occurs in 3 days.
If I was taking 6% of everyones rewards, that would be 3 BTC per block.. you don't think people would notice ? When we moved over to PPLNS system I went through the calculations in detail with our pools biggest contributor, and we confirmed that the values were correct for his % of the pool ownership. They certainly were not 6% off. Again, you are basing your calculations on totally incorrect values. You are using snapshot values, and estimates - so it's not surprising your calculations are around 5% off ? As I've said - the most accurate value is the "Your Reward:" section in the left.
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 01:12:23 PM |
|
The last Block for example was calculated over the last 764101 Shares.
So your reward for a 50BTC block would be :
(YourShares / 764101) * 50 BTC
So if you had 33811 shares then..
(33811 / 764101) * 50 = 2.21246929 BTC
|
|
|
|
lll
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 02:32:10 PM |
|
I do not need someone else and not give my
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 02:51:15 PM |
|
I do not know what your username is ?
|
|
|
|
lll
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 03:09:12 PM |
|
I mean, in our country saying - I do not need another person BTC and I will not give my BTC ( do not steal and not give my )
I am not guilty - a translator
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:04:34 PM |
|
After talking with some people in IRC, I realised that we were showing the GH settings in gibibyte (GiB) instead of gigabyte (GB). I've updated it now across the site. This might account for the 4% in your calculations, but I'm a bit lost on what you are saying/asking so I don't really know
|
|
|
|
Luigi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 1
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:14:14 PM |
|
Would it be possible for you to supply statistics as rss-feed?
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:15:07 PM |
|
Globally or per user ?
|
|
|
|
Luigi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 1
|
|
July 14, 2011, 08:59:23 PM |
|
globally - just to see that a nu block's found
|
|
|
|
OCedHrt
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
July 14, 2011, 09:09:57 PM |
|
I was getting insane rates of stale shares on my 6730 (20 accepted, 80+ stales). I thought it was my system but switched to BTCGuild and it's much improved (127/11). Not sure what it is I didn't have this problem until yesterday.
|
|
|
|
jebathga
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 10:44:48 PM |
|
Total this block: 11825 Eligible for Reward: 6359
Could you clearify this?
Maybe it's just cosmetic. It looks from my point of view that I have 11825 shares but only 6359 are counted toward the next block found?
I know the need to stop pool hoppers exists. But it really bites guys like me who mine all night 8-10 hours just to end up loosing all my shares durring the day when I don't mine (using pc durring the day). Would it save my shares if I logged in with only one of my cpu cores mining? or maybe just one of my 5970 cores mining durring the day?
|
|
|
|
jebathga
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
July 14, 2011, 11:31:43 PM |
|
Total this block: 11825 Eligible for Reward: 6359
Could you clearify this?
Maybe it's just cosmetic. It looks from my point of view that I have 11825 shares but only 6359 are counted toward the next block found?
I know the need to stop pool hoppers exists. But it really bites guys like me who mine all night 8-10 hours just to end up loosing all my shares durring the day when I don't mine (using pc durring the day). Would it save my shares if I logged in with only one of my cpu cores mining? or maybe just one of my 5970 cores mining durring the day?
Now it seems my shares are falling? Total this block: 12568 Eligible for Reward: 5945 What the ?
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2011, 11:33:16 PM |
|
Total this block: 11825 Eligible for Reward: 6359
Could you clearify this?
Maybe it's just cosmetic. It looks from my point of view that I have 11825 shares but only 6359 are counted toward the next block found?
I know the need to stop pool hoppers exists. But it really bites guys like me who mine all night 8-10 hours just to end up loosing all my shares durring the day when I don't mine (using pc durring the day). Would it save my shares if I logged in with only one of my cpu cores mining? or maybe just one of my 5970 cores mining durring the day?
Everyone is losing shares, not just you. So your % of the reward is still the same... Your eligible shares are how many shares you have in the last 1/2 difficulty so your "Estimated Reward" shouldn't be changing all that much.. Read more about the method here : http://eligius.st/wiki/index.php/Pay_Per_Last_N_SharesOr come chat with us on IRC if you don't understand.
|
|
|
|
Wuked (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2011, 08:02:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
HeroMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 17, 2011, 09:05:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
861362
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2011, 11:55:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Peripeteia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
July 19, 2011, 11:08:30 AM |
|
Another 1 day + block so soon after the last one (Block 44) is really frustrating I'm just bitching about it in the hopes that complaining about it will make it go away
|
|
|
|
spiccioli
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
July 19, 2011, 07:38:43 PM |
|
Hi, after last change in difficulty the one I see here http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/ does not match with the one shown in the left frame of the site. # Current rate: 130 GH/s # Time: 0 days 06:50:50 # Total Shares: 801212 # Difficulty: 1690895 # Server Load: Low
which is the correct one? spiccioli.
|
|
|
|
randomguy7
|
|
July 19, 2011, 10:36:14 PM |
|
My stale rate currently is very high. Were there some changes recently? It was very low when I joined (few weeks ago).
|
|
|
|
Bert
|
|
July 20, 2011, 12:29:15 PM Last edit: July 20, 2011, 03:31:38 PM by Bert |
|
which is the correct one?
Short answer: left frame of the site Longer answer: The new Bits/difficulty introduced in block number 137088 is 1a09ec04, which once converted into human readable format is 1690895.803052. This is an increase of 8.18% over the previous difficulty of 1563027.996116 (set in block number 135072, which took 12.9 days to solve all 2016 blocks).
|
Tip jar: 1BW6kXgUjGrFTqEpyP8LpVEPQDLTkbATZ6
|
|
|
|