CrazyCraig
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
|
|
March 06, 2017, 04:50:21 AM |
|
.. for the time being we capped fees as it was generating large unnecessary fees.
I don't really understand this. The fees are based on (kilo)bytes and bitcoind should be able to calculate this properly. Therefor it would be large necessary fees Right now it seems players make withdrawals that will never be confirmed. That is only annoying for your real players and also for you, as you will have to manually verify/credit them again after 72h. If the micro deposits didn't get credited and the inputs are feasible to spend (which it indeed is), you would not lose money even if you have large fees? Again, might be better to make 1 big transaction. Or like RHavar said, lock those outputs and make 1 big transaction when mempool is low. Either way, temporarily stopping withdrawals and fixing the problem (by locking inputs either by that code commit or manually) seems better than sending withdrawals with way too low fee IMO The inputs are not feasible to spend. We have had several transactions that we have paid very large transaction fees on. We have had a few that were .1 for .005 transactions.
|
|
|
|
JackpotRacer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
|
|
March 06, 2017, 02:18:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Pseudo-Random
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 27
A dream that you had, about being a person.
|
|
March 06, 2017, 06:42:27 PM |
|
The inputs are not feasible to spend. We have had several transactions that we have paid very large transaction fees on. We have had a few that were .1 for .005 transactions.
That's such a waste of money to miners, the bitcoin protocol allows so easily. Ridiculous. No way ready for anything remotely close to business mainstream adoption. I'd be beyond enraged even as an entrepreneur if I spent $130 fees for $6 items - that's completely past 'cost of doing business'.
|
|
|
|
staxxd
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
'Bout It.
|
|
March 08, 2017, 03:43:50 PM |
|
Good luck guys. Hey!! Getting pretty close to ONE BILLION! Hard to keep up but at around 992,636,382 & counting fast. Just wanted to say thanks for the wonderful promotion once again and wish everyone good luck. *Since I finished typing this we are up to bet ID 992640610 Also - Wonderful update on Slot & Go Poker for Bit-Exo, J_Roc - Lots of fun. A very creative & well-made game my friend.
|
|
|
|
BITDV
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1001
Undeads.com - P2E Runner Game
|
|
March 08, 2017, 10:03:47 PM |
|
With the 1 BILLION'th Game on MoneyPot BTCDragon Casino has added its own additional Promo https://btcdragon.com
|
|
|
|
superbit
|
|
March 09, 2017, 02:15:17 AM |
|
How long for a withdrawal to be processed?
|
|
|
|
CrazyCraig
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
|
|
March 09, 2017, 02:28:40 AM |
|
How long for a withdrawal to be processed?
Your request exceeded the hot wallet. We once the top off confirms we will send your transacation.
|
|
|
|
Pseudo-Random
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 27
A dream that you had, about being a person.
|
|
March 09, 2017, 08:51:00 PM |
|
Ah I'm gonna look a bit like a fool here since I don't know after all this time the details of how tx failure is handled on the network ; But I thought transactions were dropped from mempool / returned to sender after 3 days - it's been 90 hours now and still trying to confirm this mistake..? My question is regarding this "Relay time : Wednesday, March 8th 2017, 21:29:39 -05:00" - Noticed that appearing there last night, is 'relay' meaning it's after 3 days that a miner / node first saw this tx as potentially mineable, or is it the time at which it was 'relayed' back to sender (and would now be sitting in some MP wallet other than my account balance, as the sending user) ..? Just curious what that entry really means
|
|
|
|
CrazyCraig
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
|
|
March 09, 2017, 09:01:25 PM |
|
Ah I'm gonna look a bit like a fool here since I don't know after all this time the details of how tx failure is handled on the network ; But I thought transactions were dropped from mempool / returned to sender after 3 days - it's been 90 hours now and still trying to confirm this mistake..? My question is regarding this "Relay time : Wednesday, March 8th 2017, 21:29:39 -05:00" - Noticed that appearing there last night, is 'relay' meaning it's after 3 days that a miner / node first saw this tx as potentially mineable, or is it the time at which it was 'relayed' back to sender (and would now be sitting in some MP wallet other than my account balance, as the sending user) ..? Just curious what that entry really means Eventually, miners will drop it from their unconfirmed backlog and the transaction will remain spent in our wallet. If we wish to use these funds, we would need to create a double spend. The fund will not be re-credited to the address owner on MP's system if that is what you are asking?
|
|
|
|
RHavar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2557
Merit: 1886
|
|
March 09, 2017, 09:32:46 PM |
|
My question is regarding this "Relay time : Wednesday, March 8th 2017, 21:29:39 -05:00" - Noticed that appearing there last night, is 'relay' meaning it's after 3 days that a miner / node first saw this tx as potentially mineable, or is it the time at which it was 'relayed' back to sender (and would now be sitting in some MP wallet other than my account balance, as the sending user) ..?
Just curious what that entry really means
The "first seen" is self-descriptive, it's the time that blocktrail first saw the transaction. This was went it was first made. The "relay" time is the *last* time it saw it. Wallets like bitcoin core will continually rebroadcast transactions (every 24h?) so that the network doesn't forget about it (most nodes expire mempool transactions after 48-72h). In your case, this is the opposite of what you want (I guess they forgot to `abandontransaction` on it). The simplest solution would be to use CPFP to push the transaction through. Either you could do that (using the output they sent to) or moneypot could do it (using the change address) and it would confirm with ~30 minutes or so
|
Check out gamblingsitefinder.com for a decent list/rankings of crypto casinos. Note: I have no affiliation or interest in it, and don't even agree with all the rankings ... but it's the only uncorrupted review site I'm aware of.
|
|
|
CrazyCraig
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
|
|
March 09, 2017, 09:51:45 PM |
|
My question is regarding this "Relay time : Wednesday, March 8th 2017, 21:29:39 -05:00" - Noticed that appearing there last night, is 'relay' meaning it's after 3 days that a miner / node first saw this tx as potentially mineable, or is it the time at which it was 'relayed' back to sender (and would now be sitting in some MP wallet other than my account balance, as the sending user) ..?
Just curious what that entry really means
The "first seen" is self-descriptive, it's the time that blocktrail first saw the transaction. This was went it was first made. The "relay" time is the *last* time it saw it. Wallets like bitcoin core will continually rebroadcast transactions (every 24h?) so that the network doesn't forget about it (most nodes expire mempool transactions after 48-72h). In your case, this is the opposite of what you want (I guess they forgot to `abandontransaction` on it). The simplest solution would be to use CPFP to push the transaction through. Either you could do that (using the output they sent to) or moneypot could do it (using the change address) and it would confirm with ~30 minutes or so I personally have attempted to abandon the transaction. The RPC states that the transaction is not eligible for abandonment. The user above's account has been credited. I believe his question was more out of curiosity.
|
|
|
|
Pseudo-Random
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 27
A dream that you had, about being a person.
|
|
March 09, 2017, 10:23:01 PM |
|
My question is regarding this "Relay time : Wednesday, March 8th 2017, 21:29:39 -05:00" - Noticed that appearing there last night, is 'relay' meaning it's after 3 days that a miner / node first saw this tx as potentially mineable, or is it the time at which it was 'relayed' back to sender (and would now be sitting in some MP wallet other than my account balance, as the sending user) ..?
Just curious what that entry really means
The "first seen" is self-descriptive, it's the time that blocktrail first saw the transaction. This was went it was first made. The "relay" time is the *last* time it saw it. Wallets like bitcoin core will continually rebroadcast transactions (every 24h?) so that the network doesn't forget about it (most nodes expire mempool transactions after 48-72h). In your case, this is the opposite of what you want (I guess they forgot to `abandontransaction` on it). The simplest solution would be to use CPFP to push the transaction through. Either you could do that (using the output they sent to) or moneypot could do it (using the change address) and it would confirm with ~30 minutes or so I personally have attempted to abandon the transaction. The RPC states that the transaction is not eligible for abandonment. The user above's account has been credited. I believe his question was more out of curiosity. Thanks for your explanations Ryan & Craig, as always Today I learnedSo I guess this explains what happened.. this whole time I had thought MP had decided to wait until this tx was fully abandoned before crediting me haha, it's rather that they thought they had done so, probably based on the messages exchanged earlier in the thread, but then other things must've got mixed up and someone forgot to actually do it. Maybe it's when DogeD sent me BTC from his wallet to one of my off-site wallets, and then I tipped him on MP to his account ; That was not a case of me being tipped/credited to my MP account, and the amount is different than 6666 anyway. I checked each MP account, no 6666 bits received (or 5666 - you can fairly charge me that full withdraw fee for failed tx) in my balances anywhere. The withdraw had been done Sunday on this account. Assuming it will be credited by ~tomorrow or so :s Again sorry to be a bother w/ such "small" amount - I wouldn't normally, except that I busted and there is an MP contest going on =P
Thanks
|
|
|
|
RHavar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2557
Merit: 1886
|
|
March 09, 2017, 10:46:44 PM |
|
I personally have attempted to abandon the transaction. The RPC states that the transaction is not eligible for abandonment.
FWIW all wallet transactions are eligible for abandonment, abandonment is not something that spreads on the network or anything -- it's purely a local thing to stop it continually broadcasting it. In your case, as you've credited his account you'll want to abandon it to make it less likely to confirm (and easier to conflict). The only reason I can think you'd have trouble abandoning it, is if you've got child transactions from it (which you need to abandon first) or if you haven't cleared your mempool
|
Check out gamblingsitefinder.com for a decent list/rankings of crypto casinos. Note: I have no affiliation or interest in it, and don't even agree with all the rankings ... but it's the only uncorrupted review site I'm aware of.
|
|
|
CrazyCraig
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 501
Merit: 340
Bye Felisha!
|
|
March 09, 2017, 11:25:11 PM |
|
I personally have attempted to abandon the transaction. The RPC states that the transaction is not eligible for abandonment.
FWIW all wallet transactions are eligible for abandonment, abandonment is not something that spreads on the network or anything -- it's purely a local thing to stop it continually broadcasting it. In your case, as you've credited his account you'll want to abandon it to make it less likely to confirm (and easier to conflict). The only reason I can think you'd have trouble abandoning it, is if you've got child transactions from it (which you need to abandon first) or if you haven't cleared your mempool I've cleared the mempool. The possibility of child transactions does exist. I will continue to investigate.
|
|
|
|
seuntjie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1717
Merit: 1125
|
|
March 10, 2017, 10:50:23 AM |
|
I know it's not a very high priority at the moment, but any ETA on when socketpot will be fixed? It's having a very negative effect on my DiceBot app even though the main betting isn't dependant on the socketpot.
|
|
|
|
JackpotRacer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
|
|
March 10, 2017, 10:52:33 AM |
|
I know it's not a very high priority at the moment, but any ETA on when socketpot will be fixed? It's having a very negative effect on my DiceBot app even though the main betting isn't dependant on the socketpot.
very interested to hear the answer for this question. thx for asking cause I thought I am the only one
|
|
|
|
LTC0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2017, 09:42:18 PM |
|
My withdrawal request went to pending then manually pushed through and it was sent with 34S/b transaction fee along with many dust inputs Be careful when withdrawing it will most likely get stuck until Moneypot fix this issue
|
|
|
|
|
Ddhacked
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2017, 02:18:39 AM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1822729.new#newMy sim card has been socially engineered. Please ignore all communication from dogedigital until this has been resolved.All user funds are safe. We use multi sig wallets with video verification before signing. Access to servers is not possible with simcard or email access.
|
|
|
|
|
|