Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
July 25, 2017, 10:32:48 PM |
|
Yup he is busy working on the Bitcoin Killer. AKA: Larimer's scam called Steem.. one of many he is behind. What a fucking douche LOL
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
|
|
Traxo
|
|
July 28, 2017, 08:20:53 PM Last edit: July 28, 2017, 08:50:02 PM by Traxo |
|
|
|
|
|
sinner
|
|
July 29, 2017, 07:37:21 AM |
|
has Shelby released any code for this project? is he planning to do an ICO at some point?
|
|
|
|
Geraldo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 272
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
|
July 29, 2017, 08:28:03 PM Last edit: July 29, 2017, 09:08:59 PM by Geraldo |
|
has Shelby released any code for this project? is he planning to do an ICO at some point?
No ICO. He hasn't released any code yet, only discussions on github. He was planning to create a new programming language called "Lucid" or something so he can program his coin on that. Also, he had/has some health problems which lower productivity and focus so he cannot progress as much as he would like to. Dont expect it to come any time soon.
|
|
|
|
YarkoL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 996
Merit: 1013
|
|
July 31, 2017, 08:51:49 PM |
|
|
“God does not play dice"
|
|
|
kennyP
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:58:43 AM |
|
This article is well worth reading!! The next few months are when fortunes will be lost, and made ... wise decisions need good information!
|
|
|
|
|
sud
|
|
August 01, 2017, 09:36:16 AM |
|
Damn, his possible scenarios are pretty scary. Hope it wont happen.
|
|
|
|
Traxo
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:33:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 02, 2017, 12:18:12 AM |
|
Of course, one can convert a segwit coin back to a bitcoin by spending it to yourself in a non-segwit transaction.
Not necessarily true. If anyone can spend the SegWit transaction, then miners can in theory orphan your second spend if there are long enough range chain reorganizations. Given the SegWit booty that will start accumulating when SegWit goes live (~Aug 23), then long range change reorganizations are economically plausible. Drat! You're right! Even worse! (Shelby - if you're reading this - I have no plans of creating a steemit account, which is the reason I reply here)
|
Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.
I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
|
|
|
iTradeChips
|
|
August 02, 2017, 04:25:37 AM |
|
interesting read as usual from anonymint. i need to spend some time reading through the links on the article to get a good grasp of what he is talking about. good to hear he is active again and his health is improving. keep it coming
|
|
|
|
█▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄ | | . Stake.com | | ▀▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄█ | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | █▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄▄ | | . PLAY NOW | | ▀▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄▄█ |
|
|
|
PedroLinh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
August 07, 2017, 01:22:51 PM |
|
I analyze many other systems such as PoW, (D)PoS, dPoW, Byteball, Iota, Casper, Tendermint, Intel's Proof of Elapsed Time, Trusted Execution Environments, etc, etc.. I lay it all out starting from fundamental explanations of the FLP impossibility result and a taxonomy of work arounds of which there are two main categories: probabilistic, asymptotic and Byzantine agreement. Then I put all the systems into that taxonomy and relate my design to it.
|
|
|
|
IadixDev
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 151
They're tactical
|
|
August 07, 2017, 04:38:23 PM |
|
Trusted execution environment is interesting problematic
|
|
|
|
sud
|
|
August 07, 2017, 06:56:54 PM |
|
I analyze many other systems such as PoW, (D)PoS, dPoW, Byteball, Iota, Casper, Tendermint, Intel's Proof of Elapsed Time, Trusted Execution Environments, etc, etc.. I lay it all out starting from fundamental explanations of the FLP impossibility result and a taxonomy of work arounds of which there are two main categories: probabilistic, asymptotic and Byzantine agreement. Then I put all the systems into that taxonomy and relate my design to it.
Can you elaborate more about that design?
|
|
|
|
kennyP
|
|
August 12, 2017, 11:05:38 AM |
|
Good to see zooko following anonymint's work. Thanks for writing this. I think it is an important point that the safety of "mixing" schemes (including ringsigs) depends on the nature of the "decoy" inputs. I'd like to see a more rigorous analysis of what exactly the requirements are for safety of schemes like the one Monero currently uses, under adversarial conditions. If someone wanted to gain more ability to break the privacy of future Monero transactions, the way to do it would be to generate lots of dummy transactions between now and then so that the future Monero transactions would accidentally choose your transactions as decoys, thinking that they were getting privacy that way, but actually since those are your transactions, it doesn't provide any privacy from you. Right? https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@anonymint/is-monero-s-or-all-anonymity-broken#@zooko/re-anonymint-is-monero-s-or-all-anonymity-broken-20170811t161441441z
|
|
|
|
thejaytiesto (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1014
|
|
August 12, 2017, 04:30:44 PM |
|
Last thing I heard is, he is recovering from the meds and he is feeling better and able to work on Bitnet now, let's see what he has to offer. Big things take time so we'll have to wait. This article is well worth reading!! The next few months are when fortunes will be lost, and made ... wise decisions need good information! If there is really a crash due the problems described there, then where would you put your bitcoins at? because in theory there wouldn't be any crypto that would be safe since the confidence would be lost in crypto altogether. Im hoping nothing goes wrong now that BTC is about to hit $4000+ I wouldn't like to go fiat, it just sucks. The whole process is a mess. What I don't get is, if segwit is such a flaw, how come all these programmers are saying it's perfectly fine, risking their reputation for life? I mean everyone in Core is wrong? Andreas A is wrong?, why are they gambling with their reputation? because I don't believe no one of these guys has realized the supposed flaws that have been commented about segwit for a while.
|
|
|
|
redhorse
|
|
August 12, 2017, 04:50:50 PM |
|
What I don't get is, if segwit is such a flaw, how come all these programmers are saying it's perfectly fine, risking their reputation for life? I mean everyone in Core is wrong? Andreas A is wrong?, why are they gambling with their reputation? because I don't believe no one of these guys has realized the supposed flaws that have been commented about segwit for a while.
I am asking myself exactly the same question. I'Ve googled for Segwit and stealing transaction and didn' find a lot of matches. Why is there not more discussion about it?
|
|
|
|
|