Bitcoin Forum
May 30, 2024, 06:22:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 2013-04-12 Bitcoins are unconstitutional  (Read 2437 times)
vvic (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 104


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:04:46 AM
 #1

This is THE MOST AMAZING bashing ever  Grin
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000161076&play=1
Bitcoins go against everything we beleive in. Like central banking system. What if I don't believe in such system?
CNBC is doesn't really bash bitcoins like other channels, but heck, they sure find the most amazing guests to talk about them
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:21:51 AM
 #2

I've seen two articles on cnbc.com just in the last couple of weeks that bashed bitcoins completely:

1) The one from last week was it with headline "bitcoin hacked" - the "journalist" later retracted that headline to "major bitcoin exchange hacked" when I pointed out the truth to him. But even his amended headline was completely wrong. MtGox had many issues the last week, but it wasn't hacked.
2) Another one from later last week saying "Bitcoin Is Good 'for Narco Traffickers" - enough said.

Same "journalist" funnily enough. I use the term "journalist" is the lightest possible sense.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:27:18 AM
 #3

Typical blonde argument:

'It's gonna get hacked, I just know it, I just know it!!! '
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:28:57 AM
 #4

This is THE MOST AMAZING bashing ever  Grin


From the description:
"bitcoins dropped 270% to a low of just over $54"

How does something drop more than 100%?

Unichange.me

            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █
            █


cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:32:20 AM
 #5

I'm actually getting a little tired of nick colas not getting his arguments in order.
krncoolwater
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 08:35:20 AM
 #6

This is THE MOST AMAZING bashing ever  Grin
http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000161076&play=1
Bitcoins go against everything we beleive in. Like central banking system. What if I don't believe in such system?
CNBC is doesn't really bash bitcoins like other channels, but heck, they sure find the most amazing guests to talk about them


LOL, WTH??  Everyday the bought and paid for lame stream media is getting more and more irrelevant...




Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 12:19:34 PM
 #7

And they are paid to spit such bullshit  Roll Eyes

noedaRDH
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


Finding Satoshi


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 04:02:35 PM
 #8

Maria is Satan's wife.

1NwGKiLcAngD1KiCCivxT6EDJmyXMGqM9q

Ask not what Bitcoin can do for you - ask what you can do for Bitcoin.
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 04:12:08 PM
 #9

And they are paid to spit such bullshit  Roll Eyes
Of course they are. In politics & media, somebody is almost always paid to say something.

StarfishPrime
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 04:42:16 PM
 #10

The best part is where Nick Colas replies that getting paid in bitcoins would actually have been a pretty good deal so far.

                         
    ¦                     
  ¦    ¦¦¦               
¦¦  ¦¦¦¦                 
                             ¦¦  ¦¦¦¦
                          ¦ ¦¦ ¦¦¦¦                     
                         ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
                        ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
                        ¦¦¦¦¦¦
                  ¦¦¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦
                   ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦

                    ¦¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦
                    ¦¦    ¦¦¦¦
                    ¦¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦
                   ¦¦¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦
                ¦¦¦¦    ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
             ¦¦¦¦¦    ¦ ¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
          ¦¦¦¦¦       ¦  ¦   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
        ¦¦¦¦         ¦        ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
     ¦¦¦¦          ¦      ¦    ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
    ¦¦¦         ¦¦         ¦   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
   ¦¦        ¦¦         ¦¦  ¦   ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¦¦       ¦          ¦ ¦¦   ¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
 ¦¦¦     ¦¦          ¦   ¦    ¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦     ¦          ¦      ¦   ¦¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦    ¦        ¦¦         ¦¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦   ¦¦     ¦¦         ¦   ¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
¦¦¦   ¦     ¦¦         ¦¦¦   ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
 ¦¦   ¦¦    ¦        ¦    ¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
 ¦¦    ¦   ¦        ¦¦    ¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
  ¦¦    ¦  ¦¦       ¦     ¦  ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
   ¦¦    ¦  ¦      ¦      ¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
    ¦¦¦   ¦ ¦¦     ¦¦     ¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
     ¦¦¦   ¦ ¦¦     ¦¦    ¦ ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
       ¦¦¦¦  ¦ ¦¦    ¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
          ¦¦¦¦¦¦  ¦¦  ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
             ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
                        ¦¦

.
TorCoin.....
¦
¦
¦
¦
  Fully Anonymous TOR-integrated Crypto
               ¦ Windows     ¦ Linux     ¦ GitHub     ¦ macOS
     ¦
     ¦
     ¦
     ¦
.
   ANN THREAD
     ¦
     ¦
     ¦
     ¦
[/center]
grondilu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1076


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 05:41:18 PM
 #11

The blonde girl says that she would not like to hold bitcoins because they are not insured.  There is nothing preventing an insurance company from offering an insurance for bitcoin holdings.  There is nothing preventing a bank from holding her bitcoins and be regulated in exactly the same way as it currently is when holding US dollars.  All of these are merely a matter of laws and insurance services.  It's just a decision that can be taken, or not.

So what I mean is that those concerns are not idiosynchratic to bitcoin.   Pretty much everything the current banking system does, bitcoin could do it as well, except letting a minority of people secretly mess around with the total amount of money in circulation.

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
April 13, 2013, 07:53:20 PM
 #12

The blonde girl says that she would not like to hold bitcoins because they are not insured.  There is nothing preventing an insurance company from offering an insurance for bitcoin holdings.  There is nothing preventing a bank from holding her bitcoins and be regulated in exactly the same way as it currently is when holding US dollars.  All of these are merely a matter of laws and insurance services.  It's just a decision that can be taken, or not.

So what I mean is that those concerns are not idiosynchratic to bitcoin.   Pretty much everything the current banking system does, bitcoin could do it as well, except letting a minority of people secretly mess around with the total amount of money in circulation.

as the financial CEO of an investment company i'm sure the insurance she's referring to isn't what you think.

what she's probably referring to is a "put", as in a Greenspan put where speculative losses are always covered. 
Zomdifros
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 13, 2013, 09:14:03 PM
 #13

I think Nick Colas did a great job on this interview, giving all the right answers at the right moment. Bitcoin owes a lot to him.

paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1004


Firstbits: 1pirata


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2013, 09:18:06 PM
 #14

I think Nick Colas did a great job on this interview, giving all the right answers at the right moment. Bitcoin owes a lot to him.

+1

BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2013, 09:20:35 PM
 #15

Where's the problem?

All the time you asked for the establishment to crack down on us, now that is finally happening you are getting fizzles?

cheap coins ahead!
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
April 13, 2013, 10:41:20 PM
 #16

I highly doubt that the airhead that raised the "unconstitutional" argument has ever read the Constitution. For one, the point is nonsensical in that context and secondly that she doesn't strike me as the type that would bother to do such basic due diligence as background reading.

Orgonix23
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
April 13, 2013, 10:50:43 PM
 #17

The mainstream media has been given its marching orders by its corporate overlords, and that is "Bitcoin is to be discredited by any means necessary."
The reason for this is obvious of course.
benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 14, 2013, 01:22:36 AM
 #18

I think Nick Colas did a great job on this interview, giving all the right answers at the right moment. Bitcoin owes a lot to him.

+2

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
noedaRDH
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


Finding Satoshi


View Profile
April 14, 2013, 02:56:04 AM
 #19

"BITCOINS RAPED BY CHILDREN!"
"BITCOIN IS RACIST!"
"BITCOINS ARE THE NEW WMD'S!"

1NwGKiLcAngD1KiCCivxT6EDJmyXMGqM9q

Ask not what Bitcoin can do for you - ask what you can do for Bitcoin.
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
April 14, 2013, 03:00:11 AM
 #20

"BITCOINS RAPED BY CHILDREN!"
"BITCOIN IS RACIST!"
"BITCOINS ARE THE NEW WMD'S!"

You forgot the part where only hookers and drugees use it, but I'll forgive you Wink

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!