[CLOSED] YOLOdice.com Signature Campaign

[InvoKing]

Firstly, you seem to know a lot about this forum being a newbie

Oh please Haunebu, you are old enough in bitcointalk to know such attitude of a desperate full member or plus account holder who cannot find a suitable sig camp for himself so he creates a newbie account and try to give "advice" to get ride of his rivals or to pick a place of another one. Such disgusting behaviour  
Ps, i am not planning to join any camp for now since I am not very active but seeing stupidity and egoism here attract me a lot to keep visiting bitcointalk.
Something come to my mind with this evil tricky suggestion, are members of the same sig "recycling" merit between them, their alts or between parallel accounts linked to them? Maybe i should pay more attention if this is already done elsewhere?

[Plaguedeath]

Something come to my mind with this evil tricky suggestion, are members of the same sig "recycling" merit between them, their alts or between parallel accounts linked to them? Maybe i should pay more attention if this is already done elsewhere?

Have you visit this thread sir? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238497.0 large farm high account and claiming have 100+ account in this forum 

[InvoKing]

Something come to my mind with this evil tricky suggestion, are members of the same sig "recycling" merit between them, their alts or between parallel accounts linked to them? Maybe i should pay more attention if this is already done elsewhere?

Have you visit this thread sir? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5238497.0 large farm high account and claiming have 100+ account in this forum  

No i wasn't aware of it, thanks Plaguedeath. +1, nice name by the way  
Will stop popping the topic and commenting here for the moment since it isn't the appropriate place to highlight people with bad faith intention especially after seeing the topic mentioned above  

Edit: i left a neutral feedback, cannot endorse people shaming on public and people who support this should be ashamed. I ask for removal or hiding those member names since they didn't broke any rules, example: member = mem***...

[eaLiTy]

Edit: i left a neutral feedback, cannot endorse people shaming on public and people who support this should be ashamed. I ask for removal or hiding those member names since they didn't broke any rules, example: member = mem***...

It was inappropriate in my opinion for a feedback as he did not reveal any private information, the spreadsheet is public information.
ethan_nx and mOgliE were getting the results from the participants and hence they were continuing with the long running campaign and it was unwarranted to put pressure on the campaign manager questioning their selection but that does not mean that he cannot ask a question .

[hatshepsut93]

Hello ethan_nx and m0gliE.

I didn't receive my last week payment of the signature campaign. I sent a couple of PM to both and received no answer...
I wore the signature for 1 and half year and removed it about 10hours before the end of the week cycle, which can be proved by this post .

I think it is very unreasonable and disproportionate not to pay me in this last week, after so much time representing your brand.

I did a very good job and we had a very good relationship in this period. It is not time to have a disagreement now, especially for such a small amount (aprox 0.00675 btc), in my opinion.

I kindly ask ethan_nx and m0gliE to verify my payment situation again.

Thank you.

m0gliE most likely missed your original post, and he also might miss this one, especially if people will continue having their offtopic conversations here, or someone will start making applications just because the thread was bumped.

You should have and still should write a pm directly to m0gliE and explain the situation. If he missed your post he couldn't have known that you removed your sign in the last moment, so he assumed that it happened earlier in the cycle, so he acted as per the rules and removed your from campaign without payment.

[Text]

This is why I see why you may not have received the last week's payment stated in their rules.

The following will result in removing your account from the campaign without payment:
  - changing the signature for a non-campaign signature during a cycle,

But, you still have to wait for their statement on this matter. They can also read it when they visit here again in the thread.

[posi]

This is why I see why you may not have received the last week's payment stated in their rules.

The following will result in removing your account from the campaign without payment:
  - changing the signature for a non-campaign signature during a cycle,

But, you still have to wait for their statement on this matter. They can also read it when they visit here again in the thread.

You make a good point but if you're use to this thread youll understand that ethan_nx dont have the time to handle questions which is the reason why he hired m0gliE and m0gliE either is kinda busy taking care of his close relative which is why he's late sometime in post counting.
For what is what,  Bitmover shouldn't rely on getting pay for his last week on this campaign since he couldn't wait for the manager reply, he's on this campaign for more than a year and a week free advert shouldn't hurt.

[mOgliE]

Hello ethan_nx and mOgliE.

I didn't receive my last week payment of the signature campaign. I sent a couple of PM to both and received no answer...
I wore the signature for 1 and half year and removed it about 10hours before the end of the week cycle, which can be proved by this post .

I think it is very unreasonable and disproportionate not to pay me in this last week, after so much time representing your brand.

I did a good job representing yolodice and we had a very good relationship in this period. There is no need for a disagreement now, especially for such a small amount (aprox 0.00675 btc), in my opinion.

I kindly ask ethan_nx and mOgliE to verify my situation again and answer to my PM.

Thank you.

It would have been a good idea to link this proof in the PM you've sent me you know, would have avoided me to try to find something proving your words.

I could return you the opposite statement: You've been paid for a year and a half without problem so it is pretty unreasonable and disproportionate to make a fuss for such a small amount.

You've technically broken the rule as you've changed your signature in a week cycle. Still your case was in discussion as you were a good member. Ethan asked me to include you in this week payment which is quite nice of him I think, but it's not unreasonable and disproportionate for us to take a week to discuss about you and to include you in the weekly payment and not make a special payment just for you no?

So yeah, you were a good member, it was nice working with you, but I don't like that you start being so aggressive because I haven't answered your PM in the last 3 days. I've managed and paid you every week for a year and a half, maybe at least give us a week before making public claims no?


Additionnaly, I've been authorized by Ethan to open the positions of Bitmover and Bitcoinclubgirl. There will be no enrollement period because I was aksed to chose someone "if there was someone worth engaging". Which means I'm going to keep the slots opened until someone can assume the position.

Have a nice day everyone.

[ChuckBuck]

You've technically broken the rule as you've changed your signature in a week cycle. Still your case was in discussion as you were a good member. Ethan asked me to include you in this week payment which is quite nice of him I think, but it's not unreasonable and disproportionate for us to take a week to discuss about you and to include you in the weekly payment and not make a special payment just for you no?

I appreciate this decision of ethan_nx and you  It shows your generosity. If you follow the right rules from the start, he should not receive the payment as he requested. I have no problem with him, but it's ridiculous that he left your campaign before completing the round but still requested payment. Moreover, I judge his actions as unprofessional, normally, before leaving a campaign, people should message the manager, then wait for a response from them. You're right, he's been working with you for over a year and he can't even wait for a week to get a response 

What about the open positions, you will move old members to the right rankings? So will open positions be Sr member?

[snipie]

What about the open positions, you will move old members to the right rankings? So will open positions be Sr member?

I think it would be better to move old members enrolled in lower rank to their appropriate rank, based on the date of their enrollment, older by older, whenever a spot is available. New one will join as full member and will get higher rank whenever available.
I will not argue with this proposition, personally I asked to join whatever the rank was and I accept mOgliE and ethan_nx decisions to adopt or not this proposition. Our campaign is one of the best and longest campaign in bitcointalk which is a honor. Good day everyone 

[LogitechMouse]

What about the open positions, you will move old members to the right rankings? So will open positions be Sr member?

I think it would be better to move old members enrolled in lower rank to their appropriate rank, based on the date of their enrollment, older by older, whenever a spot is available. New one will join as full member and will get higher rank whenever available.
I will not argue with this proposition, personally I asked to join whatever the rank was and I accept mOgliE and ethan_nx decisions to adopt or not this proposition. Our campaign is one of the best and longest campaign in bitcointalk which is a honor. Good day everyone 

I'm not against this proposition. The only problem is the only slot that is open for the Senior member rank is only one. I browsed the spreadsheet for a bit and all of the members that are in Full Member spot are either Senior Member up to Legendary. I don't think that there is enough spots for all to be put in their appropriate ranks.

Anyway like you said, lets wait for their opinion with regards to this but for me the chances of this to happen is low but who knows they will do something about it. We are in one of the longest campaign in the forum. Same with you, I'm happy to be one of it

[snipie]

What about the open positions, you will move old members to the right rankings? So will open positions be Sr member?

I think it would be better to move old members enrolled in lower rank to their appropriate rank, based on the date of their enrollment, older by older, whenever a spot is available. New one will join as full member and will get higher rank whenever available.
I will not argue with this proposition, personally I asked to join whatever the rank was and I accept mOgliE and ethan_nx decisions to adopt or not this proposition. Our campaign is one of the best and longest campaign in bitcointalk which is a honor. Good day everyone 

I'm not against this proposition. The only problem is the only slot that is open for the Senior member rank is only one. I browsed the spreadsheet for a bit and all of the members that are in Full Member spot are either Senior Member up to Legendary. I don't think that there is enough spots for all to be put in their appropriate ranks.

Anyway like you said, lets wait for their opinion with regards to this but for me the chances of this to happen is low but who knows they will do something about it. We are in one of the longest campaign in the forum. Same with you, I'm happy to be one of it

No no, just older by older.
For example legendary joined the campaign 05-2017 as full member and senior joined 04-2017 also as full member and there is an available spot for senior, then this senior member will be eligible for that spot since he is older in the campaign than the legendary. That's the proposition cited above. No one will be offended then tho

[dre1982]

BitcoinTalk username: dre1982
YOLOdice user id: 67202
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 909

[Rengga Jati]

BitcoinTalk username: Rengga Jati
YOLOdice user id: 299235
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 1032

*I will wear the avatar + signature if accepted.

Hello mOgliE.

I see bitmover has moved to another campaign, so I guess there is an open slot there. I read OP and it is stated "Open" as well.
But if it is a mistake by applying too early, I will delete my post. Thank you.  

[AniviaBtc]

BitcoinTalk username: AniviaBtc
YOLOdice user id: to be added when accepted
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 992

[posi]

You guys ought to wait for the campaign manager or the owner's open application announcement before applying.
Edit : Sending my application since mOgliE confirm the open slot.


BitcoinTalk username: Posi
YOLOdice user id: 299280
Forum rank: Senior
Current post count: 2688

[dre1982]

You guys ought to wait for the campaign manager or the owner's open application announcement before applying.

Well in the OP they told there are open applications so that's why we posted here and are indeed waiting now. 

[mOgliE]

Maybe my first message wasn't clear enough.

Two slots are open at the moment.

[TravelMug]

Applying for any slot:

BitcoinTalk username: TravelMug
YOLOdice user id: Will create once accepted.
Forum rank: Hero
Current post count: 2979 + 1

[plvbob0070]

BitcoinTalk username: plvbob0070
YOLOdice user id: 299253 (my new id)
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 820 + 1

Thank you!