Bitcoin Forum
November 20, 2017, 04:29:15 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: why don't miner show intrest in mining iint segwit enabled pool  (Read 211 times)
bapparabi
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 826


View Profile
January 24, 2017, 09:18:59 AM
 #1

hi recently i have started segwit LTC mining pool ..but miner are not showing any interested in mining ti is there any specific reason for this ..

Because there huge debate on implementing segwit in in cripto currency so final LTC has done it but bitcoin still wating for that ...

also after f2pool announce 51% hashrate many miner also switch to other pool ..but now sure which pool is there ..

Alos we have bounty of 2 LTC for block finder but no miner we can find
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511152155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511152155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511152155
Reply with quote  #2

1511152155
Report to moderator
1511152155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511152155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511152155
Reply with quote  #2

1511152155
Report to moderator
JeffBrad12
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile
January 24, 2017, 12:44:20 PM
 #2

You may read the bitcoin SegWit debate and it seems the result of SegWit implementing on ltc and btc will be same.
But how can you think if the Segregate Witness has needed by LTC?
4 times block speed of btc

http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

OMG!!!!

██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██
'BTC MULTI-WALLET SOON'
▬▬▬▬ Download WHITEPAPER ▬▬▬▬

                    ▄██▄
                  ▄██████▄
                ▄██████████
              ▄██████████▀   ▄▄
            ▄██████████▀   ▄████▄
          ▄██████████▀    ████████▄
         ██████████▀      ▀████████
         ▀███████▀   ▄███▄  ▀████▀   ▄█▄
    ▄███▄  ▀███▀   ▄███████▄  ▀▀   ▄█████▄
  ▄███████▄      ▄██████████     ▄█████████
  █████████    ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
   ▀█████▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
     ▀▀▀   ▄██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ██████████▀    ▄██████████▀
          ▀███████▀      █████████▀
            ▀███▀   ▄██▄  ▀█████▀
                  ▄██████▄  ▀▀▀
                  █████████
                   ▀█████▀
                     ▀▀▀
e i d o o
██

███▀▀
▐▐▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▐▌
███▄▄
▀▀███
▐▌▌
▐▌
▐▌
▐▌▌
▄▄███
ETFbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134


Betcoin.ag - Casino, Sports, Poker


View Profile
January 24, 2017, 02:40:37 PM
 #3

SegWit have bad reputation because many FUDs, lack of knowledge or misunderstanding, so SegWit implementation at BTC and LTC are very slow.
Maybe if LTC block always full, then LTC miners/community might need SegWit Roll Eyes

jacaf01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546


★ BitClave ICO. Join NOW ★


View Profile WWW
January 24, 2017, 06:15:20 PM
 #4

From what I can deduce from the information at my disposal, it seems miners feel that the developers would reduced their influence if the SegWit code is pass. It is a matter of devil we know is better than unknown angel


                  ,'+██':                 
              ,█████████████;             
            .██████████████████           
            .████████████████████         
         █  .███;         ,███████.       
        ██  .█+              '█████'       
      `███  .█+    ,;'':       █████+     
      ████  .█+ ███████████,    ,████+     
     █████  .████████████████,    ████,   
    ██████  .██████████████████   `████   
   ;██████  .█████`      '██████  .█████   
   ████ ██  .███           :████████████. 
  +███  ██  .█.     `..      ████████████ 
  ████  ██  .    .███████'    ███████████`
 ,███   ██      ███████████    ███████████
 ████   ██     █████████████`  `██████████
 ███;  ███    ███████████████   ██████████`
 ███   ███   .████████████████  `█████████'
,███   ███   █████████████████   ██████████
'███  ,███   █████████████████:  ██████████
+███  ;███  `██████████████████  ██████████
████  '███  .██████████████████  +█████████
████  '███  .██████████████████  +█████████
'███  :███   █████████████████'  ██████████
:███   ███   █████████████████   ██████████
 ███   ███'  '████████████████   ██████████
 ███,  ████   ███████████████`  ██████████,
 ████  ,███:  `█████████████+   ██████████
 ;███   ████   `███████████+   ███████████
  ███'  .████    █████████`   +██████████;
  ████   █████     :███'     +███████████ 
   ████   █████`            ████████████+ 
   ████,   ██████`        +█████. +█████   
    ████    █████████++████████`   ████.   
    .████    ;████████████████    █████   
     '████`    +████████████     █████     
      +████+     `'█████+.     .█████     
       +█████.                ██████       
        ,██████;           .███████       
          █████████':,:;█████████.         
           ,███████████████████+           
             .███████████████;             
                `'████████,               
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!