[ANN]PiCoin [POS+POW] [SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN]

[legday]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

[1714486427]

1714486427

[1714486427]

1714486427

[1714486427]

1714486427

[honghaisea]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

why you think it can be revive without DEV, the DEV has given up this coin for a long time

[Javi_Anibarro]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

I think the question really is, would there be a possibility that there might be instances of someone selling a big amount of picoin on any available exchanges and taking a big profit out of it? If there was a pattern on that then that would answer the question as to what might possibly have gone wrong with picoin.

The only exchange PI was avail as far as I know was at Novaexchange and as per Coin Market Cap data is there from May 9, 2017 where the top value is 16k in a single day. No pattern whatsoever. Howelse can one find the earlier data..? however there are many advocates of PI who think it was fair airdrop and PI is not a SCAM... including me.

The last node disappeared.

It's BACK.

why you said it is back? any link for it? i even lost my PI coin bought from novaexchange , forgot it ,just think i did never have any PI coin .

novaexchange  On April 12, it reopened. PI no nodes are available.

addnode=112.211.214.64:22666
addnode=14.1.201.105:22666
addnode=46.188.4.74:22666
addnode=73.173.157.53:22666
addnode=79.169.1.145:22666
addnode=85.92.34.118:22666

Not connected one after another.

Who has the node? ? ?

I believe this project has been abandoned long time ago.
It makes no difference whether there is node or not.

It makes difference because he/she can send his/her coin to the market when they are re-opened it in the future.
if he/she do not have a node,
he/she can not sync his/her wallet to the network and completely unuseable.
and yeah,
this project has been abandoned by the developer long time ago.
(the reason why novaexchange will reopen it again in the future,might be because someone want to take it over ? who knows)

[legday]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

why you think it can be revive without DEV, the DEV has given up this coin for a long time

It all depends how valuable being listed on NOVA will be. There can always be found dev to work on a coin, as long as there is value in it. right now, it has 0

[skybot13x]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

[legday]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

[newegggo]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

[honghaisea]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

why you think it can be revive without DEV, the DEV has given up this coin for a long time

It all depends how valuable being listed on NOVA will be. There can always be found dev to work on a coin, as long as there is value in it. right now, it has 0

From the perspective of the previous developer's behavior, the coin can basically be determined to have died. If the developer wants to continue the project, then even if there is no novaexchange there will be other platforms, but the development did not do anything, directly abandoned

[phuocduong]

yeah, you need website and whitepaper for project ...

[moonriver]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

why you think it can be revive without DEV, the DEV has given up this coin for a long time

It all depends how valuable being listed on NOVA will be. There can always be found dev to work on a coin, as long as there is value in it. right now, it has 0

From the perspective of the previous developer's behavior, the coin can basically be determined to have died. If the developer wants to continue the project, then even if there is no novaexchange there will be other platforms, but the development did not do anything, directly abandoned

I believe you are right.
We all know that the dev abandoned Pi long time ago.
It makes no sense to trade Pi now. The only explanation is speculation.

[honghaisea]

When novaexchange opens and if coin is still listed there, perhaps it would be worth to revive this coin.

why you think it can be revive without DEV, the DEV has given up this coin for a long time

It all depends how valuable being listed on NOVA will be. There can always be found dev to work on a coin, as long as there is value in it. right now, it has 0

From the perspective of the previous developer's behavior, the coin can basically be determined to have died. If the developer wants to continue the project, then even if there is no novaexchange there will be other platforms, but the development did not do anything, directly abandoned

I believe you are right.
We all know that the dev abandoned Pi long time ago.
It makes no sense to trade Pi now. The only explanation is speculation.

Although this coin is still list on novaexchange, but do not take the risk to buy, because you will lost money after you bought it, I once bought a few coins that became 0 on novaexchange .

[hoop]

For sure Pi coin was a promising project, but the Pi developer abandoned the project so there is no point to make any further discussion on this thread.

[skybot13x]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

[honghaisea]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

remember that DEV can create one token so he can create the second and the third and so on , it cost little money , he no need to continue just this one

[BtcMan2009]

Quite recently saw this subject and remembered that I have a purse with coins from distribution from last year. I so understood still long ago that the developer threw the project. And what there is a probability of addition of a coin on the exchange? If this is so, then it is an improbable miracle.

[skybot13x]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

remember that DEV can create one token so he can create the second and the third and so on , it cost little money , he no need to continue just this one

It sucks that they abuse their ability to create tokens. They should rather focus fully on one project and try to innovate and make the best out of it instead of scamming people over and over and over again.

[honghaisea]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

remember that DEV can create one token so he can create the second and the third and so on , it cost little money , he no need to continue just this one

It sucks that they abuse their ability to create tokens. They should rather focus fully on one project and try to innovate and make the best out of it instead of scamming people over and over and over again.

You're right, but they don't have the ability to develop new features, so you can only continue to create tokens to scam money

[legday]

We just keep beating that dead horse huh? Coin is not even listed on coinmarketap anymore. It's over!

[skybot13x]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

remember that DEV can create one token so he can create the second and the third and so on , it cost little money , he no need to continue just this one

It sucks that they abuse their ability to create tokens. They should rather focus fully on one project and try to innovate and make the best out of it instead of scamming people over and over and over again.

You're right, but they don't have the ability to develop new features, so you can only continue to create tokens to scam money

Yeah and that is why people should stay away from very basic functionality tokens and coins, but it seems they don't and they out their money into amateurish projects no matter what. It's all about greed and irrational reasoning and hope.

[honghaisea]

There are a lot of people talking about it as a fraud. Is that true? There's no one to explain, and what's the signature, I hate a cheater. It's really shameless, and I get out of here.

Yes, perhaps it is correct
However, I think Picoin is not a fraud because it does not do ICO.

I will continue to observe as long as this topic continues. There is a person who still supports it.

I am sorry for you but an ICO is by far not the only way to defraud someone. You can also dump a large premine or an instamine and there are also other things that can be done to let others hanging.

If I'm not mistaken distribution was fair and square. I was here since the beginning. Doesn't look like original dev made any money. just abandoned the project

I believe that is the case.
The total volume of PI trading was very low.
There is no way dev got substantial fund from this project.

Are you really sure about that? Was there no instamine or aan airdrop that lacked transparency? Weird then that he left but maybe he found a more profitable project to work on.

remember that DEV can create one token so he can create the second and the third and so on , it cost little money , he no need to continue just this one

It sucks that they abuse their ability to create tokens. They should rather focus fully on one project and try to innovate and make the best out of it instead of scamming people over and over and over again.

You're right, but they don't have the ability to develop new features, so you can only continue to create tokens to scam money

Yeah and that is why people should stay away from very basic functionality tokens and coins, but it seems they don't and they out their money into amateurish projects no matter what. It's all about greed and irrational reasoning and hope.

Because even tokens are very risky, but they have great benefits, so there is no way to suppress human greed