Is the point of view for newbies brutal while for trusted members guys are blind

[LegalDiscussions]

When a user Lauda ( cool meaning in language Hindi actually ) clearly done something that was much more brutal and illegal than what QS did then why Lauda just got 1 -ve while QS has tons of that ?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

Any particular reason why such hate with some members or are lauda and 90% of green trust members alt of each other ?

Please define !

[1714830305]

1714830305

[1714830305]

1714830305

[suchmoon]

I guess I might as well post it here (and apologies to other recipients of my PM - didn't intend to click "reply all").

Why don't you "behave like a man" yourself and use your real account. Newbie with a hard-on for Lauda, QS, yahoo, or any other forum "celebrity" doesn't inspire any trust so please kindly fuck off and don't PM me. Thank you.

!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1771983.0

share your views and come on ! behave like a man rather worrying like a girl guys

[Vod]

I agree with suchmoon - I don't appreciate it when cowards PM me.  Stop it.

[moonpie45]

The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off" 

[suchmoon]

The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off" 

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.

[moonpie45]

The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.

Not quite sure what you are talking about.....but it sounds like it is someone's time of the month  

There are plenty of warnings about Lauda going around already, I just find it strange that those who make a hobby out of aggressively negging the not-so-innocent have not yet done so with Lauda. Some even negged the person in my above example who did the exact same thing as Lauda did

[suchmoon]

The last guy that was caught extorting someone got negative ratings as far as the eye can see. Another of his accounts got even more negative trust.

It seems the consensus (so far) that the reason Lauda does not have more negative trust is "fuck off"  

Oh FFS, post with your main fucking account, enough of your alt charades. Why haven't you bothered to post neg trust for Lauda from this puppet account, you filthy hypocrite? If you're trying to coerce others into your trust games at least make it look like you care.

tl;dr: yes, please fuck off. Thank you.

Not quite sure what you are talking about.....but it sounds like it is someone's time of the month  

There are plenty of warnings about Lauda going around already, I just find it strange that those who make a hobby out of aggressively negging the not-so-innocent have not yet done so with Lauda. Some even negged the person in my above example who did the exact same thing as Lauda did

Wow, a PMS joke... I bow to your wit.

Let me spell it out so you could be sure: you, referred to as "filthy hypocrite" above, as well as the OP of this thread - let's refer to him/her as "filthy spammer" - have not posted neg feedback for Lauda yet you're both advocating for OTHERS to do that. Post your negs, case closed, fuck off (I feel I may be repeating myself here). If you feel that's not enough - create some more sockpuppet accounts, post more negs, you can even network them into trust lists and get Lauda to -9999.

[Vod]

@suchmoon so basically if newbies are asking valid questions against " celebrities " of this forum ( you only used these words lol ) then they deserve to be get banned or shut up right ?

You mean to say that only trusted people should raise questions while if a newbie sees something wrong, he should shut his mouth for 5 years unless he becomes legendary, right ?

Newbies can ask valid questions - they are, after all, newbies.

We have an issue with you (Quickseller) making fake throw away accounts to complain. 

If you have an issue, have the balls to post it with your main account, and don't hide.

[suchmoon]

@suchmoon so basically if newbies are asking valid questions against " celebrities " of this forum ( you only used these words lol ) then they deserve to be get banned or shut up right ?

You mean to say that only trusted people should raise questions while if a newbie sees something wrong, he should shut his mouth for 5 years unless he becomes legendary, right ?

I don't "mean to say" anything I didn't say. You sent me an unsolicited PM with some whiny shit grievances that have nothing to do with me and I really, like REALLY don't appreciate that, therefore I keep repeating that you and your whole puppet theater should fuck off. Did that message get through your thick skull yet?

BTW I can't ban you nor do I think your piddly spam is actually worth moderator's time so you can skip this "play a victim" scene here. You're just a whiny sockpuppet, that's all there is to it. I do believe I have the right to make this valid observation here, what with me being "legendary" and all

[Dyatrev]

so put aside your "qs fuck off stop creating alts" what are you guys thinking about blackmailing shit lauda?

[suchmoon]

so put aside your "qs fuck off stop creating alts" what are you guys thinking about blackmailing shit lauda?

There is already a thread where anyone interested in the subject can post their "thinking": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757

But THIS sockpuppet thread is just that... puppet theater. Let's just get it to page 2, get QS to come in and play lone ranger, and be done with it.

[Cast12]

Good luck connecting a Jr. member account to QS .

[Dyatrev]

so put aside your "qs fuck off stop creating alts" what are you guys thinking about blackmailing shit lauda?

There is already a thread where anyone interested in the subject can post their "thinking": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757

But THIS sockpuppet thread is just that... puppet theater. Let's just get it to page 2, get QS to come in and play lone ranger, and be done with it.

oh so you are aware of that thread but choosing to stay silent about that? what are you thinking about those blackmailers?

[suchmoon]

so put aside your "qs fuck off stop creating alts" what are you guys thinking about blackmailing shit lauda?

There is already a thread where anyone interested in the subject can post their "thinking": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757

But THIS sockpuppet thread is just that... puppet theater. Let's just get it to page 2, get QS to come in and play lone ranger, and be done with it.

oh so you are aware of that thread but choosing to stay silent about that? what are you thinking about those blackmailers?

I'm aware because it's posted in the OP and LegalDiarrhea was very kind to spam it via PM.

If I can be bothered to dive into that drama I will let you know what I think IN THE APPROPRIATE THREAD.

[Dyatrev]

so put aside your "qs fuck off stop creating alts" what are you guys thinking about blackmailing shit lauda?

There is already a thread where anyone interested in the subject can post their "thinking": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757

But THIS sockpuppet thread is just that... puppet theater. Let's just get it to page 2, get QS to come in and play lone ranger, and be done with it.

oh so you are aware of that thread but choosing to stay silent about that? what are you thinking about those blackmailers?

I'm aware because it's posted in the OP and LegalDiarrhea was very kind to spam it via PM.

If I can be bothered to dive into that drama I will let you know what I think IN THE APPROPRIATE THREAD.

weird while you are so eager to dive every potential scam/ponzi drama and negging newbies you dont want to join blackmailer shits judgement

[suchmoon]

weird while you are so eager to dive every potential scam/ponzi drama and negging newbies you dont want to join blackmailer shits judgement

It isn't EVERYONE's responsibility to get involved into EVERY drama. That's not how it works, not here, not in real life. Nor have I been "eager" to do what you're trying to attribute to me. Lying diminishes the validity (if any) of the argument you're trying to make.

And you haven't posted trust feedback for Lauda either, seems like a pattern developing in this thread. Hypocrisy much?

[Dyatrev]

weird while you are so eager to dive every potential scam/ponzi drama and negging newbies you dont want to join blackmailer shits judgement

It isn't EVERYONE's responsibility to get involved into EVERY drama. That's not how it works, not here, not in real life. Nor have I been "eager" to do what you're trying to attribute to me. Lying diminishes the validity (if any) of the argument you're trying to make.

And you haven't posted trust feedback for Lauda either, seems like a pattern developing in this thread. Hypocrisy much?

i didnt posted my feedback yes you right because i know my feedback has no value compared to yours or other green trust members instead of that i wrote at many threads they are blackmailers and deserve punishment but if you think i have to do it so be it here it comes

[Lutpin]

i didnt posted my feedback yes you right because i know my feedback has no value

You have left 8 feedbacks, what's stopping you to leave another one? Stand behind your words.

It isn't EVERYONE's responsibility to get involved into EVERY drama. That's not how it works, not here, not in real life.

What if I write you a PM about it?

[suchmoon]

What if I write you a PM about it?

Then I'm gonna bitch about the invasion of my privacy for a couple of days

[gorgon666]

weird while you are so eager to dive every potential scam/ponzi drama and negging newbies you dont want to join blackmailer shits judgement

It isn't EVERYONE's responsibility to get involved into EVERY drama. That's not how it works, not here, not in real life. Nor have I been "eager" to do what you're trying to attribute to me. Lying diminishes the validity (if any) of the argument you're trying to make.

And you haven't posted trust feedback for Lauda either, seems like a pattern developing in this thread. Hypocrisy much?

i didnt posted my feedback yes you right because i know my feedback has no value compared to yours or other green trust members instead of that i wrote at many threads they are blackmailers and deserve punishment but if you think i have to do it so be it here it comes

Dyatrev I think suchmoon is lying to you. She likes to get involved in drama when she is in control and likes to take the side of those who are in power -- it helps her climb the proverbial latter (and is how she was able to marry a doctor )

As long as Lauda is in power everyone will turn a blind eye to everything she does, and no one will speak up out of fear of what will happen to them. Just look at what happened here, QS questioned someone in power with an ego and ended up getting 4 negative trusts - Ironically this is exactly what zepher, TMAN Lauda and others did to Zeroaxl when they were running a "deep investigation"