Archive: Project correction after feedback

[Sam San]

how to work my neurons to invest minimum and get maximum. what is my minimum cost?

[mike77777]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

[drays]

Anyway, so here are some questions related to more concrete things:
Q1. Do you have some minimum requirement? I mean if you raise just 50 BTC, will you continue, or will you refund? What is the minimum acceptable goal for this crowdfunding?

There no minimum - we working on this project anyway and have alternative ways to fund it. So ICO intent is to make progress faster and scope of project more global.

Q2. You sell your tokens at 0.001 BTC. If you sell X amount of tokens, with X < 80M, how many tokens will be issued? X tokens or 80M tokens?

0.001 BTC is maximum possible price per token - all 80M tokens will be distributed to ICO investors proportionally to investment. So if we collect 8 000 BTC real final price will be 0.0001 BTC per RUN and etc.

Q3. How many tokens will you leave for yourselfdevelopment&marketing. Will it be still 20M, or X/4 (one fourth of the supply)?

20% of tokens reserved to development&marketing.

Thanks for your answers. This clears up a lot. If you read comments in this thread, you can see practically everybody interpreted your investment scheme in a wrong way. You absolutely need to review the OP (opening post) to clear up confusion. I particularly mean - remove any mention of the 0.001 btc price, and clearly tell the supply is fixed, and the per token price is determined by actual investments volume, with all tokens being propoptionally divided among all investors.

Consider this as a friendly advise. I didn't yet make any opinion regarding your project, but I want it to be judged fairly at least. Your current ICO description is doing harm to your project.

[DISPERADO]

Anyway, so here are some questions related to more concrete things:
Q1. Do you have some minimum requirement? I mean if you raise just 50 BTC, will you continue, or will you refund? What is the minimum acceptable goal for this crowdfunding?

There no minimum - we working on this project anyway and have alternative ways to fund it. So ICO intent is to make progress faster and scope of project more global.

Q2. You sell your tokens at 0.001 BTC. If you sell X amount of tokens, with X < 80M, how many tokens will be issued? X tokens or 80M tokens?

0.001 BTC is maximum possible price per token - all 80M tokens will be distributed to ICO investors proportionally to investment. So if we collect 8 000 BTC real final price will be 0.0001 BTC per RUN and etc.

Q3. How many tokens will you leave for yourselfdevelopment&marketing. Will it be still 20M, or X/4 (one fourth of the supply)?

20% of tokens reserved to development&marketing.

There no minimum goal for crowdfunding but maximum is too high.
No refund will be anyway, right? You can wait forever to launch.
What alternative sources of funding do you have? I would like to hear their opinion.
20% of the tokens is not very bold? Or is it for dump on the stock exchange?

[CyanFox]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

[BitcoinRonnie]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

Probably will be review from bitcointalk users who are engaged in that are finding dishonest projects, and show all hidden facts.

[CyanFox]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

Probably will be review from bitcointalk users who are engaged in that are finding dishonest projects, and show all hidden facts.

We need to find them by ourselves, community members may be fooled by some elaborate scams, you see ASC ico scam, the scammers fooled famous escrows: lauda, yahoo.

[DISPERADO]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

Probably will be review from bitcointalk users who are engaged in that are finding dishonest projects, and show all hidden facts.

We need to find them by ourselves, community members may be fooled by some elaborate scams, you see ASC ico scam, the scammers fooled famous escrows: lauda, yahoo.

Such scam projects put on stream. Who really leads, is not clear. It is time to introduce more transparent rules for PR on forums like Bitcointalk. And introduce more quality escrow service.

[electronicash]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

Probably will be review from bitcointalk users who are engaged in that are finding dishonest projects, and show all hidden facts.

We need to find them by ourselves, community members may be fooled by some elaborate scams, you see ASC ico scam, the scammers fooled famous escrows: lauda, yahoo.

Such scam projects put on stream. Who really leads, is not clear. It is time to introduce more transparent rules for PR on forums like Bitcointalk. And introduce more quality escrow service.

the better thing for them to do though is to develop what they have to before having the ICO, this at least we know and see where its heading. if its all just whitepapers and some pitch posts here in the forum, it will still turn out scam in the end. they could just say everyone in the team died. specially that old man and there goes your BTC going to their funerals.

[dishku]

NeuroChat      1,000BTC
NeuroSecurity 10,000BTC
NeuroPassport 20,000BTC
NeuroBankinｇ  40,000BTC
NeuroLife　　　80,000BTC

High goal！
There is nothing between 1000 ～ 10000?

This is so high amount for minimum goal just for chat I hope dev team will consider to make new plan according to the ground reality. I don't think with these kind of plans people will trust on them.

[miayama]

This project was initially gives the impression of some uncertainty, why all this is necessary. From what the asset price should grow?

[kurbeks]

watching

[winterrose]

Never Invest there where there are Russian developers.

All Russian projects SCAM.

Round, Nodio, Lithium and others. This same shit.


Stacy fox
Unemployed and former seller of cosmetics.
https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@steemingnow/starting-a-business-when-you-are-a-21-year-old-girl-difficulties-and-challenges

Dmitry Ermolaev
The known and recognized in Russia SCAM, and the loser.
http://datachains.world/ There is his financial pyramid.

JuliA Yaroslavtseva
The TV host and with not too developed intelligence.
https://vk.com/id4290890

If you think that these people will be able to deliver you a product which will be popular. That you idiot.

All they want, it to get your BTC.

I fully agree with your words

[Stacy_Fox]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

What is the thing that makes you feel puzzled when it comes up to the team? If you like I can organize a hangout with everyone from the team introducing themselves online. That's not really a problem and if you call the team "fake and scam" — there's a tool to make it as transparent as possible.

[Stacy_Fox]

This project was initially gives the impression of some uncertainty, why all this is necessary. From what the asset price should grow?

RUNEURO has already developed the prototypes of neurotypesetting for example. What we need to do now is to enhance the speed of the typesetting and make the neurointerface itself more handy. As we already have quite long experience for future research, new achievements will be announced and demonstrated regularly which will result in the growing asset price.
The first step, neurochat, will be launched in the second quarter of 2017 whereas neurosecurity module is to be developed by the end of the year.

[electronicash]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

What is the thing that makes you feel puzzled when it comes up to the team? If you like I can organize a hangout with everyone from the team introducing themselves online. That's not really a problem and if you call the team "fake and scam" — there's a tool to make it as transparent as possible.

can we set up a date this feb 14?  winky winky  
after that i can really vouch and ask everyone to send all their coins to the team. is this possible? because i really think having a meeting with some from the forum could be a solution.

an AMA maybe and also make your profiles public.

[bitcampaign]

I have not seen the full data from the profile team that worked on this project, I think a lot of things it takes to see a project that is really big

[bittraffic]

This project was initially gives the impression of some uncertainty, why all this is necessary. From what the asset price should grow?

RUNEURO has already developed the prototypes of neurotypesetting for example. What we need to do now is to enhance the speed of the typesetting and make the neurointerface itself more handy. As we already have quite long experience for future research, new achievements will be announced and demonstrated regularly which will result in the growing asset price.
The first step, neurochat, will be launched in the second quarter of 2017 whereas neurosecurity module is to be developed by the end of the year.

It sound like I can't understand in simple English. NeuroChat, means we can chat using a gadget connected to our heads? Seem pretty challenging. I can't imagine how huge the company will be if all these technology are going to be produced.

[Stacy_Fox]

So you're saying they want to RUN with people's EURO 

Actually I can't trust this project because the team devs identities are not real, it is faked and not transparent to the community, there must be something to hide, not worth to invest. Maybe next ASC scam.

What is the thing that makes you feel puzzled when it comes up to the team? If you like I can organize a hangout with everyone from the team introducing themselves online. That's not really a problem and if you call the team "fake and scam" — there's a tool to make it as transparent as possible.

can we set up a date this feb 14?  winky winky  
after that i can really vouch and ask everyone to send all their coins to the team. is this possible? because i really think having a meeting with some from the forum could be a solution.

an AMA maybe and also make your profiles public.

No problem, I think. I've sent your message to the team so I think that most of us will be present during the hangout.
As for the profiles:
https://www.facebook.com/anastasia.yakovleva.146 — this is my FB account knit to my "birth" name
https://www.facebook.com/rysev — Dennis Rysef, CTO
https://www.facebook.com/zamirakimov — Zamir Akimov, CEO
https://www.facebook.com/kibalnikov?fref=ts — Sergey Kibalnikov, MSU professor
https://m.facebook.com/Gent3lmen — Alex Kogan, Creative Manager

I will expand the list as I get more links from the team:)

[Stacy_Fox]

This project was initially gives the impression of some uncertainty, why all this is necessary. From what the asset price should grow?

RUNEURO has already developed the prototypes of neurotypesetting for example. What we need to do now is to enhance the speed of the typesetting and make the neurointerface itself more handy. As we already have quite long experience for future research, new achievements will be announced and demonstrated regularly which will result in the growing asset price.
The first step, neurochat, will be launched in the second quarter of 2017 whereas neurosecurity module is to be developed by the end of the year.

It sound like I can't understand in simple English. NeuroChat, means we can chat using a gadget connected to our heads? Seem pretty challenging. I can't imagine how huge the company will be if all these technology are going to be produced.

NeuroChat will be a messenger app that will provide every user with an opportunity to rate and upvote other people's proposals and initiatives. If we put it as easy as possible, that will be a steemit.com moved to messengers. On the first stage this will be a messenger app (Telegram etc.) and the user's will upvote with their smartphones; later on they'll rate content using the power of their thought only.
*I tried to put it as simple as possible*