Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[actmyname]

New one today: Wajur Mobile Casino

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1640298.0


Member: 0.00012 BTC per post (4 slots open)
Full member: 0.0004 BTC per post (5 slots open)
Sr member & above: 0.0006 BTC per post (5 slots open)

Minimum posts per week: 20
Maximum posts per week 30

Escrow: Lutpin
Campaign Manager: 0day

100+ character posts minimum

Important rule:

[TEN(10) posts per week must be from the gambling section among which ONE (1) must be from the official thread of Wajur (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1614408.0) to get paid]

[1714194518]

1714194518

[1714194518]

1714194518

[1714194518]

1714194518

[1714194518]

1714194518

[1714194518]

1714194518

[1714194518]

1714194518

[Fatanut]

-snip-

-snip-

Both added. Thanks for helping me!

[snipie]

Openledger could be moved to CFNP after avirunes post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1633622.msg16502902#msg16502902

[actmyname]

Another new one: King Dice Signature Campaign

Minimum: 90 posts/month (100+ characters)

4 Legendary/Hero
5 Senior
3 Full member
3 Member

Rates (fixed/monthly):

Legendary/Hero => BTC 0.1
Senior => BTC 0.075
Full member => BTC 0.05
Member => BTC 0.025

Escrow: Y/N seemingly (izanagi narukami)


Also updated: SatoshiLottery

Senior Members: 0.0009 BTC/post
Hero/Legendary Members: 0.0011 BTC/post

Minimum posts: 10/week
Maximum posts: 30/week

[Mitchell]

Updated!

[FLoving]

A new signature campaign has just been started: SatoshiLottery Signature Campaign
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1640023.0

manager: Edwardard
max 5 participants
Senior Members: 0.0005 BTC/post.
Hero/Legendary Members: 0.0007 BTC/post.
Minimum posts: 10/week
Maximum posts: 25/week

They have now increased their payment and post count.
SatoshiLottery Signature Campaign
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1640023.0

manager: Edwardard
max 5 participants
Senior Members: 0.0009 BTC/post.
Hero/Legendary Members: 0.0011 BTC/post.
Minimum posts: 10/week
Maximum posts: 30/week

[bitcoinisbest]

OP - You have created a wonderful thread which keeps in updating about the different signature campaign and their reviews and payment. Keep up the good work and keep updating.

[panjul07]

New signature campaign: KING DICE SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1641020.0

manager: izanagi

Minimum 90 post per month
4 Legendary/Hero => BTC 0.1
5 Senior => BTC 0.075
3 Full member => BTC 0.05
3 Member => BTC 0.025

Is it hard to read at least some previous posts before posting? Someone has informed about this campaign already, no need to post the same information because it is useless. Unless there is a mistake on the previous post.

[Fatanut]

-snip-

Moved.

-snip-

Added and updated.

Thanks to the both of you for helping me save time and energy.

[DarkStar_]

Let's Think About The Future's escrow status should be changed to Y/N, from Y. While Avirunes is managing the campaign, and Lutpin is escrowing, Lutpin is still making the payments, which means it qualifies for Y/N.

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also pays the participants. This is a conflict of interest, but shouldn't be a big problem if the person doing escrow is trusted.

[pawel7777]

Let's Think About The Future's escrow status should be changed to Y/N, from Y. While Avirunes is managing the campaign, and Lutpin is escrowing, Lutpin is still making the payments, which means it qualifies for Y/N.

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also pays the participants. This is a conflict of interest, but shouldn't be a big problem if the person doing escrow is trusted.

If Lutpin is not managing and if he can be considered an independent 3rd party, then I can't see any conflict of interest.

[Lutpin]

Let's Think About The Future's escrow status should be changed to Y/N, from Y. While Avirunes is managing the campaign, and Lutpin is escrowing, Lutpin is still making the payments, which means it qualifies for Y/N.

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also pays the participants. This is a conflict of interest, but shouldn't be a big problem if the person doing escrow is trusted.

Might be that that definition is easy to be misunderstood or that we've been doing things differently all along,
but WhyFuture qualifies for the Y status, as it's essentially different from all other Y/N campaigns, since I am not the one managing the campaign/deciding about the payments.


BitBlender can be moved to CFNP, we only got one spot left, which I'm currently in discussion of filling.

[DarkStar_]

that the person holding the funds also pays the participants

Lutpin holds the funds, Lutpin pays the participants, so I think it should be Y/N. I'm pretty sure the Y is reserved for campaigns with an passive escrow.

[Lutpin]

that the person holding the funds also pays the participants

Lutpin holds the funds, Lutpin pays the participants, so I think it should be Y/N. I'm pretty sure the Y is reserved for campaigns with an passive escrow.

As said above, I consider this definition to be wrong or at least misleading for what we used to do when categorizing, and I don't think the situation changed either.
Also, as mentioned by pawel7777 above, I don't see any conflict of interest in this case. Could you explain that to me, maybe you change my view on it.
Another thing might be the case when the person doing the escrow acts as campaign manager aswell, and decides about the payments.
This is the case for all other Y/N campaigns.

[drwtsn32]

Hello guys, just a general question:

Do we have a thread here for some analysis? I mean which campaign would be best for which type of user.
Because I have been thinking of switching sig camp. I think YoBit is not best for me.

[Xenophoto]

Hello guys, just a general question:

Do we have a thread here for some analysis? I mean which campaign would be best for which type of user.
Because I have been thinking of switching sig camp. I think YoBit is not best for me.

I don't think a thread is needed at all. Just a calculator.

If you have a lot of time and can reach the maximum post count, then go ahead and calculate all of the maximum earnings that you can get from each signature campaign and pick the one that pays you the most.

If you can only keep up slightly higher than the minimum post count, then I advice that you should pick the one that pays you a fixed amount of money over a period of time.

But if you're really busy, then pick the one that pays the highest rate per post so even if you don't post that much, you'd still have enough earnings.

[Fatanut]

that the person holding the funds also pays the participants

Lutpin holds the funds, Lutpin pays the participants, so I think it should be Y/N. I'm pretty sure the Y is reserved for campaigns with an passive escrow.

I think you simply want to say instead of,

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also pays the participants.

It should be

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also manages the campaign.

I'd PM Mitchell about this. Let us see if he/she will approve to change the definition of Y/N.

BitBlender can be moved to CFNP, we only got one spot left, which I'm currently in discussion of filling.

Moved. Thanks!

[Mitchell]

If a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also manages the campaign.

Agreed. This is indeed what I meant, dunno how I fucked up the definition.

If a campaign has a "Y" it means that it's escrowed by someone who does not participate in the campaign in any form or way. A "Y" means the same as "Y" but it's escrowed by someone who is trusted within the community. "Y/N" means that it's escrowed by someone who also manages the campaign (which is a conflict of interest IMO). A "N" speaks for itself.

[Xenophoto]

Not sure how are you guys going to put this on the table. This new campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1644684) Alcurex Exchange, requires you to make your own signature code and then you have to wear it for a week. Your payment is fixed but it would depend on how good the signature that you have made, kind of a contest. They didn't mention any minimum rank, so maybe anyone could join.

I think this falls into the fixed/weekly category because it is not based on the post count but the design of your signature. Another thing, it will run on Oct. 12 - Oct. 9, and then Oct. 20 - Oct. 27.

[Lutpin]

I think this falls into the fixed/weekly category because it is not based on the post count but the design of your signature. Another thing, it will run on Oct. 12 - Oct. 9, and then Oct. 20 - Oct. 27.

I think it falls in none of the categories, as it's not a campaign, but rather a contest.

Up for grabs:  3 prizes of .02 BTC  - then grand prize of .05 BTC  (Winner)

They're only going to pay 3 participants, that isn't the kind of thing we should be listing in this thread.