Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[deadsilent]

Theres a new campaign which im accepted.

BYTEBALL

What is pay for each rank?


Member: 0.010 BTC/week
Full member: 0.015 BTC/week
Sr member: 0.022 BTC/week
Hero/Legendary: 0.030 BTC/week


Avatar Change: +25% to the base rate above

Check this out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666370.0

[1713500776]

1713500776

[1713500776]

1713500776

[1713500776]

1713500776

[satmas]

Theres a new campaign which im accepted.

BYTEBALL

What is pay for each rank?


Member: 0.010 BTC/week
Full member: 0.015 BTC/week
Sr member: 0.022 BTC/week
Hero/Legendary: 0.030 BTC/week


Avatar Change: +25% to the base rate above

Check this out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666370.0

In case you didn't read the OP of the thread, Byteball was already added to the table in the OP.

[Lutpin]

All spots in BitBlender are filled again, so it can be moved back to CFNP for now.
Although I've been jumping between having open spots and having all spots filled quite a lot, might be a campaign fitting for the FLUX section.

[jacee]

Satoshigames.io  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666258.new#new
Started their campaign again.

Payment rate:
Sr.Member: 0.04 BTC/Week
Hero Member: 0.05 BTC/Week

[GregH37]

Better Add * Mark with ImpulseCoin signature campaign. they have stopped signature campaign in middle of the week and didn't payed users yet..
the Impulsecoin dumped so badly in exchange and I don't think they'll be able to pay users.

[Betcoin.AG]

Hi Guys, first we want to thank everyone for their interest and involvement in the Betcoin.ag Signature Campaign.  The response has been overwhelming and we are very excited about the future of the campaign.  OP's statement about our campaign is however completely false "* means that the campaign is currently having some trouble. Joining is not recommend."

We know all of you know this already, but we were asked to respond to it.  The interest in our campaign is at an all time high and we have a growing wait list!  We just completed our first year of our campaign and the campaign couldn't be running better for everyone involved.  Again, we thank you all very much and look forward to a long future. 

[minifrij]

We know all of you know this already, but we were asked to respond to it.  The interest in our campaign is at an all time high and we have a growing wait list!  We just completed our first year of our campaign and the campaign couldn't be running better for everyone involved.  Again, we thank you all very much and look forward to a long future. 

The problem isn't with the signature campaign its self, it's with the untrustworthy nature and shadiness of the service people would be advertising. Anyone sporting the signature at this time is advertising a service that is not trustworthy (as is shown by your trust score, especially so by receiving another negative just today) and is by extension can be seen as untrustworthy themselves. AFAIK that is why your signature campaign is not recommended, not how the campaign its self is run.

[Fatanut]

Better Add * Mark with ImpulseCoin signature campaign. they have stopped signature campaign in middle of the week and didn't payed users yet..
the Impulsecoin dumped so badly in exchange and I don't think they'll be able to pay users.

I am aware of that but didn't know if I should remove them or just wait for the next update. I totally forgot about the * option. Thanks!

Perhaps I should add the * mark to girlbtc campaign as well since the owner has been banned in the forum for 7 days.

[shapeshiftscam]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1574664

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1656122
 
no place for these campaigns, plz move it.

[isen]

BITCOIN.COM GAMES/NEWS signature campaign has just launched https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671041.0
Managed by OgNasty, only five slots are available and Sr. Members or above are allowed to join, as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

[Lutpin]

as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

This is a little bit concerning.
Without having a pay per post rate or a fixed weekly payment for a minimum of X posts,
the payment basically depends only on the decision(/mood) of the manager, without having any way to verify how they got to the paid amount.

Who said that OgNasty can't provide new rules of signature campaigns?
It looks like is coming new age of campaigns on Bitcointalk.

Call me conservative, but I prefer clear rates and clear rules.

Competition is always healthy!

Ever cared to take a look at OP? One more or less campaign, does it make a difference?
There already is competition

[keyscore44]

as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

This is a little bit concerning.
Without having a pay per post rate or a fixed weekly payment for a minimum of X posts,
the payment basically depends only on the decision(/mood) of the manager, without having any way to verify how they got to the paid amount.

Who said that OgNasty can't provide new rules of signature campaigns?
It looks like is coming new age of campaigns on Bitcointalk..
Actually i like that!

Edit/
Competition is always healthy!

[isen]

One more new signature campaign has launched today by PotLuckGame.com  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671785.0
Managed by 0day, five slots are available and only Sr.members and above are eligible to join
The rates are 0.0006 BTC per post, minimum 20/maximum 40 posts per week and there is a 0.001 BTC per week avatar bonus.

edit: typo corrected

[Superzpay]

One more new signature campaign has launched today by PotLuckGame.com  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671785.0
Managed by 0day, five slots are available and only Sr.members and above are eligible to join
The rates are 0.0006 BTC per post, minimum 20/maximum 40 posts per week and there is a 0.0001 BTC per week avatar bonus.

You have done a mistake for the avatar bonus as on the thread of signature campaign it is written that avatar bonus is 0.001 BTC per week but you have mentioned that it is 0.0001 which is wrong.

[axrhuls]

BITCOIN.COM GAMES/NEWS signature campaign has just launched https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671041.0
Managed by OgNasty, only five slots are available and Sr. Members or above are allowed to join, as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

Don't see it in the list, any reason?

[stiffbud]

BITCOIN.COM GAMES/NEWS signature campaign has just launched https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671041.0
Managed by OgNasty, only five slots are available and Sr. Members or above are allowed to join, as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

Don't see it in the list, any reason?

Maybe because it does not have a fix rate?
 

as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

This is a little bit concerning.
Without having a pay per post rate or a fixed weekly payment for a minimum of X posts,
the payment basically depends only on the decision(/mood) of the manager, without having any way to verify how they got to the paid amount.

Who said that OgNasty can't provide new rules of signature campaigns?
It looks like is coming new age of campaigns on Bitcointalk.

Call me conservative, but I prefer clear rates and clear rules.

Competition is always healthy!

Ever cared to take a look at OP? One more or less campaign, does it make a difference?
There already is competition

[u9y42]

BITCOIN.COM GAMES/NEWS signature campaign has just launched https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1671041.0
Managed by OgNasty, only five slots are available and Sr. Members or above are allowed to join, as for the rates participants can earn up to 0.025 BTC every week but no info is given about the minimum/maximum posts per week.

Don't see it in the list, any reason?

Maybe because it does not have a fix rate?

[...]

Actually, that was a good question - why isn't that campaign in the list? It's not as if campaigns with variable rates / conditions haven't been added before (the PlayTodos campaign, campaigns with bonuses given at the discretion of the managers, and so on).

Wouldn't it be enough to add it along with a couple of asterisks to denote the special conditions, as is done with other campaigns?

[snipie]

-snip-
Actually, that was a good question - why isn't that campaign in the list? It's not as if campaigns with variable rates / conditions haven't been added before (the PlayTodos campaign, campaigns with bonuses given at the discretion of the managers, and so on).

Wouldn't it be enough to add it along with a couple of asterisks to denote the special conditions, as is done with other campaigns?

Yes campaigns that offers a variable rates or have two payments system or conditions was generally accepted and an astericks was written instead of the price. For this campaign maybe it isn't mentioned here because of the content that it is currently advertising or maybe fatanut/mitchett didn't pay attention for it

[dsattler]

Please add the Byteball campaign:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666370.0

[kotwica666]

Please add the Byteball campaign:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666370.0

This campaign over one week is on the list. Next time look better..