Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Mitchell]

Updown.bt imposed a new 200/week post limit to his campaign. I think that is pretty reasonable. The old 3000/month (750/week) limit may have been encouraging some spamming.

Ah yes, need to change that in the OP. Thank you for reminding me
EDIT: Changed

[poeEDgar]

thanks for the information here! it looks like being a full member (and up) can be quite lucrative!

[u9y42]

thanks for the information here! it looks like being a full member (and up) can be quite lucrative!

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts... 

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

[Cloudbet]

Hi bitcoininformation,

We have just updated our qualifying criteria to require a minimum number of existing posts (the amount varies depending on membership level). Would appreciate it if you would please note this in your OP.

Cheers, and thanks again for managing this thread!
Cloudbet

[acs267]

thanks for the information here! it looks like being a full member (and up) can be quite lucrative!

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts... 

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

Selling accounts is allowed.

On Topic:

Thanks for the topic, OP. This really helps some of the newbs, that just got high enough into the criteria for a campaign.

[u9y42]

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts...  

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

Selling accounts is allowed. [...]

Yes, I know it is. However, it is only allowed because it would be too hard to enforce a ban on such activity; it's just easier to let people know that these things can happen. That's why I asked for someone (preferably on the default trust list) to give him negative feedback for it, and hopefully on his other accounts as well.

[poeEDgar]

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts...  

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

Selling accounts is allowed. [...]

Yes, I know it is. However, it is only allowed because it would be too hard to enforce a ban on such activity; it's just easier to let people know that these things can happen. That's why I asked for someone (preferably on the default trust list) to give him negative feedback for it, and hopefully on his other accounts as well.

that's really sweet of you. thanks. 

[crazyearner]

Wow so many sig campaigns wasn't aware of half of them until seeing  this thread with a lot more details in than last time. bitcoininformation your doing a good job here. Amazes me how you get the time to do all this. Then again it amazes me how I get all the time to post on here and do a lot of other work too. Might have a section made on my website for this soon and a full section for each one. More sorted and more user friendly as in services theirs a lot of different things however bitcointalk don't seem to sort the lists out or section things off correctly.

UpDown.BT (thread)
Payment period: Currently weekly, will be switched to monthly after 5th Juni.
Minimum posts: 10 posts per week, will be 50 posts per month after 5th Juni
Payments: If minimum post count is reached: M: 0.00075BTC per post, F: 0.00085BTC per post, S: 0.00135BTC per post, H: 0.0016BTC per post.
Miscellaneous: Constructive posts only. No other text allowed in signature space. Maximum amount of posts is 200 per week.

Where is this information from do you have contact with him as theirs been no updates or changes made to the original post.

And I think I will be leaving after that date then as I do way too much posting on here as it is. 200 post cut off is ok but would of been nice to continue at the max 3,000 posts as razing funds for a  few projects and to get other things paid for. Looks like the only one I will be left with on monthly payment for 3,000 posts is PrimeDice unless something else comes along and their now also considering weekly payments option and increasing their min pay per post. Campaigns should be weekly if you ask me if it takes more work then so be it. Get one or 2 people to do the work and pay them accordingly.

[Mayuyu48]

^^
I think so, why this thread in marketplace section
i think this thread more suitable in service section

Updown.bt imposed a new 200/week post limit to his campaign. I think that is pretty reasonable. The old 3000/month (750/week) limit may have been encouraging some spamming.

right, 200 posts per week is reasonable
too bad for heavy spammers posters who can make 100 posts a day 
and limited posts will ensure they can pay they campaign everyweek

thanks for the information here! it looks like being a full member (and up) can be quite lucrative!

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts... 

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

usually vod & tomatocage give negative trust to account seller in this forum
maybe they don't see him yet

[u9y42]

Yes, I know it is. However, it is only allowed because it would be too hard to enforce a ban on such activity; it's just easier to let people know that these things can happen. That's why I asked for someone (preferably on the default trust list) to give him negative feedback for it, and hopefully on his other accounts as well.

that's really sweet of you. thanks. 

Sure, anytime. And thanks for giving me negative trust as well; very thoughtful of you. 

I'm sure; especially for people like you selling accounts... 

By the way, why hasn't anyone given you negative trust yet? (not that you wouldn't jump to an alt account, but still)

usually vod & tomatocage give negative trust to account seller in this forum
maybe they don't see him yet

Yes, it seems they're getting slow. 

[hollowframe]

Yes, I know it is. However, it is only allowed because it would be too hard to enforce a ban on such activity; it's just easier to let people know that these things can happen. That's why I asked for someone (preferably on the default trust list) to give him negative feedback for it, and hopefully on his other accounts as well.

hmm. so what's the problem with doing this exactly?

i've never heard of this. how much is my account worth? somebody wanna make me an offer?!?! (half) joking...

[hilariousandco]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=93.0

Have a look in the Digital Goods subforum for an idea of the prices, but Members usually go for around 0.05-0.1, Full Members 0.1-0.2, Snr Members 0.4-0.6, and Heroes 0.8-1btc+

[Mitchell]

Could you guys stay on-topic? Talking about selling accounts is not on-topic so please do that somewhere else.

Hi bitcoininformation,

We have just updated our qualifying criteria to require a minimum number of existing posts (the amount varies depending on membership level). Would appreciate it if you would please note this in your OP.

Cheers, and thanks again for managing this thread!
Cloudbet

I will look into it right now

[Mitchell]

Wow so many sig campaigns wasn't aware of half of them until seeing  this thread with a lot more details in than last time. bitcoininformation your doing a good job here. Amazes me how you get the time to do all this. Then again it amazes me how I get all the time to post on here and do a lot of other work too. Might have a section made on my website for this soon and a full section for each one. More sorted and more user friendly as in services theirs a lot of different things however bitcointalk don't seem to sort the lists out or section things off correctly.

Thanks a lot. Doing my best

UpDown.BT (thread)
Payment period: Currently weekly, will be switched to monthly after 5th Juni.
Minimum posts: 10 posts per week, will be 50 posts per month after 5th Juni
Payments: If minimum post count is reached: M: 0.00075BTC per post, F: 0.00085BTC per post, S: 0.00135BTC per post, H: 0.0016BTC per post.
Miscellaneous: Constructive posts only. No other text allowed in signature space. Maximum amount of posts is 200 per week.

Where is this information from do you have contact with him as theirs been no updates or changes made to the original post.

He hasn't updated the OP, but he does post a lot of information in this topic. I keep an eye on that and update it when changes occur.

And I think I will be leaving after that date then as I do way too much posting on here as it is. 200 post cut off is ok but would of been nice to continue at the max 3,000 posts as razing funds for a  few projects and to get other things paid for. Looks like the only one I will be left with on monthly payment for 3,000 posts is PrimeDice unless something else comes along and their now also considering weekly payments option and increasing their min pay per post. Campaigns should be weekly if you ask me if it takes more work then so be it. Get one or 2 people to do the work and pay them accordingly.

Well, I have send a proposal to UpDown.BT in which I take over the campaign, payout members and keep everything correct and neatly organized. This would also mean weekly/bi-weekly payments. He hasn't responded to my message, yet.

[dbshck]

Hey OP there's a new Signature campaign by Genesis Mining. Check it out!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631729.new#new

[Mitchell]

Hey OP there's a new Signature campaign by Genesis Mining. Check it out!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631729.new#new

Thanks a lot! Will be add them right now

[Rigon]

TO bitcoin information is time you let others know that uptown are not responsible are or organized with there sig campaign they dont come online everyday plus I didn't get paid for two weeks and I am on the list of uptown sigs

[Mitchell]

TO bitcoin information is time you let others know that uptown are not responsible are or organized with there sig campaign they dont come online everyday plus I didn't get paid for two weeks and I am on the list of uptown sigs

I know that there have been some problems, but not enough, yet, to change their position. I will keep an eye on it, of course.

[hilariousandco]

I have a suggestion: how about linking to the threads on the names of the deals in the simple version table?

[Mitchell]

I have a suggestion: how about linking to the threads on the names of the deals in the simple version table?

Ah yes, that is a good suggestion. Will do that right now!
EDIT: Done