Adam Back thinks he is the inventor of Bitcoin

[RawDog]

Look at his stupid argument to promote himself as inventor of Bitcoin



Everyone knows Craig Wright is the actual inventor and owner of Bitcoin.

[asdalani]

So much people are pretending to be "Satoshi Nakamoto" it's kind of annoying already.


That is all I am going to say in this thread.

[bitcampaign]

so what is important if we really find satoshi Nakamoto, what it would endanger her or harm us here, I think he's a smart guy and certainly satoshi nakamoto will never admit he is the inventor of bitcoin

[unamis76]

I guess he sin't saying any lie, so... Doesn't demerit Satoshi or increase his merit in any way. Especially being a Twitter bio...

[Xester]

Adam Back just wanted to have a publicity so he will be known in the bitcoin industry. He isn't the inventor of bitcoin and it is very clear that he is lying and not serious about giving evidence to back-up his claims. Another thing Craig Wright is not satoshi nakamoto and he is just another fake trying to claim that he invented bitcoin.

[Dudeperfect]

As I said before, We are going to have at least 10+ candidates claiming to be Real satoshi but the real satoshi would never reveal his identity in such way. The only way to identify the real identity of satoshi is a verified signature from the wallet address which was used to claim early mining rewards. If he has lost the access to that wallet then it is difficult to prove his identity even for real satoshi.

[Vaskiy]

Everyone can claim that they are the creators of bitcoin. The reality gets hidden till Satoshi expose the truth. Till that let we too be the creator of bitcoin, because none has the proof to confirm.

[alani123]

Many people (that aren't Adam Back) have been praising him for hashcash and saying the same thing. I don't see anything bad with him saying this. Using work that isn't your own as a claim to fame isn't exactly honorable but he isn't lying either. No problem with him saying this.

[Shiroslullaby]

He is only saying he is inverntor of Hashcash so I dont see anything wrong with that part.
Now, if Hashcash and Bitcoin are exactly the same thing minus the inflation control is up for debate possibly.
I don't know the technical aspects of either well enough to make an argument there.

[Sundark]

Unlike some other individuals (Craig, I am talking about you) Adam Back is not claiming directly that he invented bitcoin.
Technically he is not wrong about hashcash, he invented the system more than 20 years ago.
Bitcoin is using hashcash as part of its mining algorithm. So what is the problem here?

[Dudeperfect]

As I said before, We are going to have at least 10+ candidates claiming to be Real satoshi but the real satoshi would never reveal his identity in such way. The only way to identify the real identity of satoshi is a verified signature from the wallet address which was used to claim early mining rewards. If he has lost the access to that wallet then it is difficult to prove his identity even for real satoshi.

He has multiple multiple wallets, should be easy even if some are lost.

In such case, I think we should ask for a signed message from any of his wallet address. If we ask for signed message from address even for account ownership then Satoshi’s identity is the whole new episode. I can’t understand why the candidates claiming to be Satoshi are not coming up with such concrete evidence if they think that they are real satoshi? A simple signed message would make everyone believe that XYZ is real satoshi.

[avikz]

Actually there are two laughable elements in your post..First is definitely Adam. Lately so many people is claiming himself as Satoshi Nakamoto which is hilarious and Adam is no exception. They are just trying to draw mass attention. But they are unaware that it could land him to jail.

Second element is that you claim Mr. Wright is the inventor of bitcoin. Till date we didn't see any solid proof that honors him with the title of the creator of bitcoin. It is just another claim but stronger than others. My suggestion is that, leave Mr. Nakamoto in peace and enjoy the power of bitcoin. Let Mr. Nakamoto live in peace for the rest of his life and lets not disturb him in any way.   

[Zadicar]

So much people are pretending to be "Satoshi Nakamoto" it's kind of annoying already.


That is all I am going to say in this thread.

I agree on what you have said previously i saw a thread claiming that hes the creator of bitcoin and now i read again these kind of such shit claims. I dont know whats the thing on their minds which they are striving to claim bitcoin as their creation.Satoshi will be the only one.

[audaciousbeing]

Anyone can think about anything or whoever at least that right is still available to all of us pending the time government might say its a sin to think. Even me I can think I am the inventor of Qtum since I am wearing its signature. The way the controversy about Satoshi is going these days, I am sure that even if Satoshi himself should come out he will do more than just announcement to say he is the real one because we have had more than enough Satoshis.

[Kakmakr]

Give him credit, he did come up with hashcash first and that might have inspired Satoshi to improve this technology to create Bitcoin. Adam might even have worked with Satoshi on the project. One thing I definitely know is, CW is not Satoshi, how can a sheep shagger be Satoshi. ^smile^

Just when I thought all of us were Satoshi. ^hmmmmmm^

[Newmine]

Actually there are two laughable elements in your post..First is definitely Adam. Lately so many people is claiming himself as Satoshi Nakamoto which is hilarious and Adam is no exception. They are just trying to draw mass attention. But they are unaware that it could land him to jail.

Second element is that you claim Mr. Wright is the inventor of bitcoin. Till date we didn't see any solid proof that honors him with the title of the creator of bitcoin. It is just another claim but stronger than others. My suggestion is that, leave Mr. Nakamoto in peace and enjoy the power of bitcoin. Let Mr. Nakamoto live in peace for the rest of his life and lets not disturb him in any way.   

Besides Craig Wright, who is claiming themselves to be Satoshi Nakamoto? I haven't seen these claims. I have seen others claiming they think someone else is, but not self claims.

[topesis]

Look at his stupid argument to promote himself as inventor of Bitcoin



Everyone knows Craig Wright is the actual inventor and owner of Bitcoin.

SO you think Adam Back is not but Craig Wright invested Bitcoin, funny isn't it. I'm very sure both are not Satoshi. If Craig Wright his he would have done what he was told to do, to proof his claim.

[Zadicar]

Look at his stupid argument to promote himself as inventor of Bitcoin



Everyone knows Craig Wright is the actual inventor and owner of Bitcoin.

SO you think Adam Back is not but Craig Wright invested Bitcoin, funny isn't it. I'm very sure both are not Satoshi. If Craig Wright his he would have done what he was told to do, to proof his claim.

None of those two guys who invented bitcoin i dont know whats on their minds and what they could get on claiming such false informations to public.Anyone could claim that they are satoshi nakamoto. Even the creator himself didnt tend to reveal himself on public because of privacy reasons and also on security of his life.

[Luviasst]

what a ashol

[Juggy777]

Why does this kind of thread keep on pooping every now and then? Not the man op claims or Craig is satoshi and it's better to get on with life rather than argue. No one has any solid proof it's just one words. They are just saying big and not matching proof. I think this forum really should ban this question until someone gets major proof. There a bigger issue that you should look at like the unconfirmed transactions. I don't think we will ever know who created Bitcoin and that's how it was meant to be.