|
Otaci
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2013, 11:27:47 AM |
|
Courtesy recap of potential winners:
bitsalame | BTC60 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | GreatBug | BTC50 | LainZ | BTC50 | BlackLilac | BTC46 | BlackLilac | BTC46 | BlackLilac | BTC46 | camolist | BTC45 |
Time left: Timer removed. End time: 2013-04-19+16:00:00 2@36.5
They're already well beyond 36.5
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 17, 2013, 11:32:46 AM |
|
... It's easier to rise difficulty 16% when the value is 4M than when the value is 8M. And you are claiming difficulty will rise 16% when it's sitting at 34M.
1.16 ^ 10 = 4.4 9,000,000 diff = 64TH/s So you seem to think that the network being 280TH/s in 10 months is far from likely?
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 17, 2013, 11:34:54 AM |
|
Arrrgggghhhhh made a mistake 10 is only 4 months (10 x 12 days) Hmm - well yeah that is certainly pushing the limits of what it could be in 4 months - but still not ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
JimiQ84
|
|
April 17, 2013, 11:38:52 AM |
|
Arrrgggghhhhh made a mistake 10 is only 4 months (10 x 12 days) Hmm - well yeah that is certainly pushing the limits of what it could be in 4 months - but still not ridiculous. It's possible, probable even. But not certain. I'm just saying that the last rise of 16% means deploying 40TH/s in 12 days (faster actually, 'cos new difficulty is calculated from mean value of those 12 days). That seems ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
dogie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
|
|
April 17, 2013, 11:51:42 AM |
|
2@51
|
|
|
|
Oshero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:10:26 PM |
|
1@48
|
|
|
|
dykast
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:29:47 PM |
|
Just wanted to interject into this thread as I think it is important to note. Buying 10gh/s worth of GPUs would cost way more then this. And on top of that would require 10x + the power.
|
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:37:07 PM |
|
Courtesy recap of potential winners:
bitsalame | BTC60 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | dogie | BTC51 | dogie | BTC51 | GreatBug | BTC50 | LainZ | BTC50 | afro25 | BTC50 | Pinwheel | BTC50 |
Time left: Timer removed. End time: 2013-04-19+16:00:00
|
|
|
|
Oshero
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:37:52 PM |
|
1@52
|
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:41:02 PM |
|
This is a chance to get in the ASIC race cheaply - bid guys! Courtesy recap of potential winners:
bitsalame | BTC60 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | JHenderson | BTC53 | Oshero | BTC52 | dogie | BTC51 | dogie | BTC51 | GreatBug | BTC50 | LainZ | BTC50 | afro25 | BTC50 |
Time left: Timer removed. End time: 2013-04-19+16:00:00
|
|
|
|
dan99
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:43:40 PM |
|
2@5
|
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:44:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
April 17, 2013, 12:46:03 PM |
|
Someone who only read the first few posts probably.
|
|
|
|
davos
|
|
April 17, 2013, 01:00:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
physalis
|
|
April 17, 2013, 01:01:51 PM |
|
Someone who only read the first few posts probably.
Or someone who hopes that all the higher bidders won't pay
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
April 17, 2013, 01:04:02 PM |
|
There's pretty much no chance that a few dozen bidders won't pay.
|
|
|
|
Jimmy2011
|
|
April 17, 2013, 01:19:32 PM |
|
2@66.5 Or 2@26.5
Is it ok if I bid anyone above? That is: Case 1: I bid 2@66.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@66.5; Case 2: I put 2@26.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@26.5.
Am I right?
|
|
|
|
SebastianJu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
|
|
April 17, 2013, 01:25:39 PM |
|
2@66.5 Or 2@26.5
Is it ok if I bid anyone above? That is: Case 1: I bid 2@66.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@66.5; Case 2: I put 2@26.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@26.5.
Am I right?
Anyone above? The first bid would place you on top of the bidderlist. 2 units, each for 66.5, the second one would practically delete your bids because the price is lower then all bids.
|
Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
April 17, 2013, 02:04:44 PM |
|
2@66.5 Or 2@26.5
Is it ok if I bid anyone above? That is: Case 1: I bid 2@66.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@66.5; Case 2: I put 2@26.5, then my previous 2@36.5 are canceled, and now my bid is 2@26.5.
Am I right?
Anyone above? The first bid would place you on top of the bidderlist. 2 units, each for 66.5, the second one would practically delete your bids because the price is lower then all bids. Only the first is accepted here - else anyone can cancel their bids effectively by bidding ' 2@0.000001'.
|
|
|
|
|