Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Ibian]

After CME and Nasdaq now Cboe will start trading Bitcoin futures December 10th.

Love it ore hate it...Wallstreet is coming 

Hold on. Does everyone here count as sophisticated and professional?

[BitcoinBunny]

Hold on. Does everyone here count as sophisticated and professional?

That's better than being branded as a tax dodging criminal. 

[Ludwig Von]

Hold on. Does everyone here count as sophisticated and professional?

That's better than being branded as a tax dodging criminal. 

You should receive an award !!! (to be handed to you by Mr Dimon himself)

[BitcoinBunny]

Hold on. Does everyone here count as sophisticated and professional?

That's better than being branded as a tax dodging criminal. 

You should receive an award !!! (to be handed to you by Mr Dimon himself)

Coming from him an award would mean.... absolutely nothing. 

[Ludwig Von]

Hold on. Does everyone here count as sophisticated and professional?

That's better than being branded as a tax dodging criminal. 

You should receive an award !!! (to be handed to you by Mr Dimon himself)

Coming from him an award would mean.... absolutely nothing. 

I suppose not the award, but Mr Dimon is totally worthless ? 

[LFC_Bitcoin]

After CME and Nasdaq now Cboe will start trading Bitcoin futures December 10th.

Love it ore hate it...Wallstreet is coming 

HODL & enjoy the show gentlemen!

[Meuh6879]

Oh yeah, hedge funds will like that ... 

(remember the number that they have going to bankrupty for a less than 10% stock variation over the years ?)

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-03/cameron-and-tyler-winklevoss-are-worlds-first-confirmed-bitcoin-billionaires

[Wekkel]

Momentum is slowly disappearing so a small correction could be forthcoming.

* Blasphemy!! * 

[Rosewater Foundation]

Oh yeah, hedge funds will like that ... 

(remember the number that they have going to bankrupty for a less than 10% stock variation over the years ?)

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-03/cameron-and-tyler-winklevoss-are-worlds-first-confirmed-bitcoin-billionaires

It's amazing the things you can get used to.

[Meuh6879]

Source : http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-02/jpmorgan-has-some-bad-news-bitcoin-bears

If JPM is right, the implications are staggering:  contrary to expectations that bitcoin's market cap is a rough reflection of its inflows, JPM's calculations reveal that a mere $6 billion in net inflows since 2009 has resulted in a market cap of $330 billion. This goes to what Mike Novogratz said last week when he said that cryptos are unique, because unlike all other asset classes, there is no corresponding increase in supply when prices surge.

This also means that as new capital flows into the crypto space as more retail and institutional investors scramble for "a piece of the pie", the potential market cap gains are unprecedented.

[Last of the V8s]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

[arklan]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?

[Last of the V8s]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2485318.0

[Ibian]

Source : http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-02/jpmorgan-has-some-bad-news-bitcoin-bears

If JPM is right, the implications are staggering:  contrary to expectations that bitcoin's market cap is a rough reflection of its inflows, JPM's calculations reveal that a mere $6 billion in net inflows since 2009 has resulted in a market cap of $330 billion. This goes to what Mike Novogratz said last week when he said that cryptos are unique, because unlike all other asset classes, there is no corresponding increase in supply when prices surge.

This also means that as new capital flows into the crypto space as more retail and institutional investors scramble for "a piece of the pie", the potential market cap gains are unprecedented.

But... but this is not news for us. Known mechanic for YEARS now. THAT'S WHY I WENT ALL IN FOUR YEARS AGO! These old, fucking, dusty fossils...

[Meuh6879]

Source : http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-01/what-gives-cryptocurrencies-their-value

Think of transactions as the money you carry in your wallet or checking account, and savings as the rest of what you have in the bank or buried in the yard. It’s worth mentioning here that that vast majority of money demand is indeed savings, making up 90% or more of all money demand.

The reason this matters is because if we know what transactions cryptocurrencies are good at, we can estimate how much money demand they’ll start pulling from fiat or gold, and therefore how much those cryptos will increase in price.

[Last of the V8s]

[Karartma1]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2485318.0

It looks like everybody disappeared from the WO after this news.
 

[jojo69]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2485318.0

It looks like everybody disappeared from the WO after this news.
 

yeah, it is a very sad day, the utility of this forum is diminished

[thisisntbic]

fkin thermos moved btctalk to cloudfare, admitting 'it's prolly an nsa honeypot'.
fkin meddling kids

Wanna run that past me again in English this time?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2485318.0

It looks like everybody disappeared from the WO after this news.
 

yeah, it is a very sad day, the utility of this forum is diminished

Not that I plan on leaving here anytime soon, any recommendations as to other forums/platforms worth following (not reddit)?

[JayJuanGee]

Try to ignore him Jay.

hahahahaha...


U b referring to my response to dee roach..... ...


A large majority of the time, I only skim his posts, for example, looking at one or two lines per paragraph - however, the conceded (Edit  - I meant to say conceited) nature in me cannot resist responding to my having had spotted a personal reference - perhaps a weakness of mine.. ?  Believe it or no?