Bitcoin Forum
February 13, 2026, 07:27:38 PM *
News: Community awards 2025
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 35452 35453 35454 35455 35456 35457 35458 35459 35460 35461 35462 35463 35464 35465 35466 35467 35468 35469 35470 35471 35472 35473 35474 35475 35476 35477 35478 35479 35480 35481 35482 35483 35484 35485 35486 35487 35488 35489 35490 35491 35492 35493 35494 35495 35496 35497 35498 35499 35500 35501 [35502] 35503 35504 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26929886 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4760
Merit: 11434


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2026, 07:17:46 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1)

Can't Biodom just admit that OG was right so we can go up again....

I really hope we don't have to wait another 2.5 years to get to a new ATH again... fuck these cycles I have enough

wait! is it now 2.5 years?

that's just a good news. I have already prepared my mind for 2030.

It's about 2.5y to reach the last ATH again.. after that, price discovery for the new cycle high...  however.. fuck these cycles

A wise Chinese proverb went something like this…

It is better to fuck cycle than be fucked by one.

Embrace the buying opportunity that those who do not believe in the 4-year cycle will present to you over the next year, even if you missed the selling opportunity that they presented to you last year.

^ it ain't going to happen as you describe it. This would be idiotically consistent and markets are not.

I don’t know. I thought it was idiotic to not sell this cycle high and yet most people didn’t. Everything has happened exactly as I’ve been predicting it in financial markets for about 28 years now. The only thing that surprises me is that people still doubt when I tell them what is going to happen. Just like when I say you will bend the knee and admit I was right when we dip around $50K this summer. Only then will the market truly recover.

you need prices to drop more to be correct completely.


but you are on the road to being fully correct.

as much as I would hope we rally like mad in the next 60 to 90 days we likely won’t.

at least in my case I got the silver rally correct.

OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5376
Merit: 6046


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2026, 07:30:24 PM
Merited by Gachapin (1)

Can't Biodom just admit that OG was right so we can go up again....

I really hope we don't have to wait another 2.5 years to get to a new ATH again... fuck these cycles I have enough

wait! is it now 2.5 years?

that's just a good news. I have already prepared my mind for 2030.

It's about 2.5y to reach the last ATH again.. after that, price discovery for the new cycle high...  however.. fuck these cycles

A wise Chinese proverb went something like this…

It is better to fuck cycle than be fucked by one.

Embrace the buying opportunity that those who do not believe in the 4-year cycle will present to you over the next year, even if you missed the selling opportunity that they presented to you last year.

^ it ain't going to happen as you describe it. This would be idiotically consistent and markets are not.

I don’t know. I thought it was idiotic to not sell this cycle high and yet most people didn’t. Everything has happened exactly as I’ve been predicting it in financial markets for about 28 years now. The only thing that surprises me is that people still doubt when I tell them what is going to happen. Just like when I say you will bend the knee and admit I was right when we dip around $50K this summer. Only then will the market truly recover.

OK ... here's the thing.

You are just posting what amount to "I have been right for 28 years and you are all idiots for not doing what I say".

Do you not see how fucking annoying that is?  Would *YOU* listen to someone who was saying that to you?  The technique of selling tops and buying bottoms is an EXTREMELY risky game.  PARTICULARLY with something as volatile as BTC.

The US could make some crazy announcement and cause a Samson "Omega Candle" to happen and leave you in the dirt.

Also many of us here have trading strategies that have worked well, and arguable protected our stash.

And there are those like me who have no excuse but did not seriously accumulate Bitcoin early and then you are just hurting my feelings over and over.

Look... I am super glad if your plan continues to work, and am even rooting for you.  Though that second part is getting harder by the post lol.

If someone was right consistently and I was calling them names for being right, I would consider myself an idiot too.

I don't even go full retard with my buys and sells.  Nobody has to follow what I say.  I prefer the opposite.  I learn nothing from people who want to agree with me.  I poke the people with opposing arguments so that I can get an opposing viewpoint.  That has always been the best way to determine who is knowledgeable and who is full of shit.  

The reason I continue to troll certain people here is that I was right and they were wrong, I told them I was going to be right and they were going to be wrong, and still they continue to criticize me as I'm right and they are wrong.  They were literally calling me names at the time for trying to save them from losing 50% of their savings and now they're bitter about it.  How can I not have some fun?

Am I annoying?  Maybe for the folks that didn't listen to me and chose to criticize me instead.  Those quotes aren't going away.  The folks that did listen and saved themselves from watching half their savings disappear might have a different opinion.  

Anyone is free to hit the ignore button if they don't feel I'm providing any value.  I won't lose any sleep over it.


at least in my case I got the silver rally correct.

I was glad to see you selling the silver rally.  I sold 5 ounces over the weekend for USD and another ounce this morning with a sale currently pending for 11 more in BTC.  Dumping it as fast as I can.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 7217


The OTHER Wordy Man


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 07:48:26 PM
Merited by AlcoHoDL (1)


Good comment, as always!  However, that fewlings part sounds a bit gay .... no offense bob!

I cannot help it.  I am a very sensitive fellow.
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 6546


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 07:52:22 PM


Good comment, as always!  However, that fewlings part sounds a bit gay .... no offense bob!

I cannot help it.  I am a very sensitive fellow.

Yes. The Tingle told me so.

I miss her.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 2413


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 08:01:14 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4284
Merit: 7217


The OTHER Wordy Man


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 08:13:26 PM


Good comment, as always!  However, that fewlings part sounds a bit gay .... no offense bob!

I cannot help it.  I am a very sensitive fellow.

Yes. The Tingle told me so.

I miss her.

The price drop bent her wand very badly... She will be back.
Ermaios
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 08:56:46 PM

I am sorry that I'm too dense to understand still, what you think I've lied about.




And I'm assuming that's a picture of your mother.

Now why do you have to compare a fine looking - beautiful - alpaca to my mother? Do you know her?


Is that relevant somehow?

Your massive cunt certainly is. So is Jimbo’s.




what matters is how often those respective cocks get a good pump and dump.



Your best post ever phil, you go girl go!




I do have a fairly detailed thesis on why Bitcoin ultimately trends to zero within a couple of years but it is not a one-paragraph argument.

OK, make it two. Tongue
Seriously, please elaborate. I’m thinking it’s either going to s-curve or die.*


This thread moves too fast for that kind of heresy.

Don’t worry, I have your back boob. I’ll deal with the lying punks whilst you post, OK?




*yawn* Another boring day.

Just go and fuck yourself. That should make it exciting.




Instead, decide if bitcoin is going to have a bull market for many years OR it would undergo a secular bear market.
These are the real choices.

Sure, we could have a secular bear market … or not
For the time being, 4 year cycles are still a thing imo, just because of: whales.
Of course the ETF elephant in the room might fuck things up completely - trying to get hold of their coinz. Should this happen, well … see the bold above.*




you need prices to drop more to be correct completely.

Yes he does. He also needs a bull market after that.




I am a very sensitive fellow.

You are as thick as they come capsie, nothing to do with “sensitive”.
How is your tinnitus doing btw? You know why you have it right? Not age.


I cannot help it.

Sure you can. Just fuck off for ever.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 2413


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 09:01:16 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 120


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 09:15:35 PM
Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1), Richy_T (1)

You are just posting what amount to "I have been right for 28 years and you are all idiots for not doing what I say".
Someone who has been always right about the financial markets for 28 years is posting for scraps as part of a signature campaign. It all adds up.  Cheesy Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4354
Merit: 13970


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 09:25:09 PM

Glad you came to lick your boob here for a moment, Vod... your guess is as good as ours. There are other people here that might have more solid opinions, but how about you? What do you think's doing it?
Thanks for the laugh; brand maintenance is important!
I do have a fairly detailed thesis on why Bitcoin ultimately trends to zero within a couple of years but it is not a one-paragraph argument.

This thread moves too fast for that kind of heresy. 🙂  
Trends to zero within a couple of years?  a couple...so around 2 before next halving?


So frequently I am surprised how long term forum members (especially guys who were here before me) can retain such ongoing questions in their head about the bullish case for bitcoin... or to be able to recognize that bitcoin has  ongoing number go up technology built into it.

Even guys who have been registered on the forum since 2018 or earlier (so at least 2 cycles), should have had enough time just watching how bitcoin plays out, to recognize and appreciate the number go up technology that seems to be built into dee cornz... yet even seemingly experienced members of the forum still want to talk about bitcoin extreme downside scenarios (the spiraling downity scenarios) as if such spiraling downity scenarios were meaningfully plausible or as if they were providing some kind of "enlighten" scenario when they are spouting off in terms of their supposed "enlightenment" in regards to such plausible downity scenario.

It seems that the real innovative bitcoin price scenarios are those that reflect on UPpity rather than DOWNity, even though surely I am not opposed to various downity scenarios as long as the downity scenarios "stay in their lane."  In other words, downity scenarios are not exactly as genius and insightful as their proponents make them out to be.  Remember member (supposed professor) Jorge Stofli who (in 2014 and 2015-ish) participated quite a bit in this thread and spouted out all kinds of seemingly genius (academically "rigorous") downity scenarios, and how did those supposedly "insightful" scenarios play out in the past 10-12-ish years?

Institutional investors now have a new way to trade crypto without depositing assets directly on an exchange or touching an exchange!
https://beincrypto.com/binance-franklin-templeton-tokenized-collateral-program/

Call me a dummy, since I am having some difficulties understanding how excited that we might get in regards to how trading various shitcoins and even trading paper bitcoin relates to bitcoin as an underlying asset that is being represented though the paper bitcoin trading and the potential allowance of such through new 3rd party intermediaries.

Surely with these kinds of topics that are "quasi-related" to bitcoin, it would be nice to see a wee bit of critical thinking about such posted links rather than members (such as paper bitcoin loving BTCETFInvestor) at least attempt to relate their post to actual bitcoin.

In other words, all of us are going to be engaging in sloppy thinking about bitcoin if we are failing/refusing to differentiate bitcoin from paper bitcoin, even if there are ongoing claims from the various 3rd party custodians that they are backing up their bitcoin claims with actual bitcoin.. which, probably, we should be presuming that an overwhelming majority of them are dickering around with the quantity of bitcoin that they have to back up the bitcoin that they claim to be holding.

more discounts for us.
hmm 15.9/19.9=0.799

so 55.1/69=0.799
do we need to get to 55.1?


"Need?"  That is a pretty BIG presumption, even though I will concede that my earlier borderline questions about our having had confirmed a bear market have been mostly resolved, since I find it quite difficult to continue to presume a bull market when the bounce backs have not been sufficiently sustained and/or enough to trigger some level of meaningful/significant UPpity movements.

In any event, presumptions of "needing" to touch certain bottom points come off as wishful, even if they might have odds that arguably are in the ballpark of greater than 50/50.

In other words, I am not very receptive of "need" proclamations in regards to our touching certain bottoms merely based on "technical" analysis - especially since historically, there have been a lot of folks who had failed/refused to adequately prepare for UP, based on their assiging overly high values on the "need" to touch certain bottom points before we can go up.. - the famous (and often-times wrecked) "down before up" proclamations.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5376
Merit: 6046


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2026, 09:27:51 PM

You are just posting what amount to "I have been right for 28 years and you are all idiots for not doing what I say".
Someone who has been always right about the financial markets for 28 years is posting for scraps as part of a signature campaign. It all adds up.  Cheesy Cheesy

If you’re good at something, never do it for free.

The amount of BTC I’ve been given to wear a signature over the years would make you sick. It’s very likely more than your lifetime earnings by a significant amount. You think I’d waste time acknowledging people like you exist if I wasn’t being paid?
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 120


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 09:30:09 PM
Last edit: February 12, 2026, 10:14:11 PM by BitHodlers

You are just posting what amount to "I have been right for 28 years and you are all idiots for not doing what I say".
Someone who has been always right about the financial markets for 28 years is posting for scraps as part of a signature campaign. It all adds up.  Cheesy Cheesy
If you’re good at something, never do it for free.

The amount of BTC I’ve been given to wear a signature over the years would make you sick. It’s very likely more than your lifetime earnings by a significant amount. You think I’d waste time acknowledging people like you exist if I wasn’t being paid?
As someone who has been always right for 28 years about the financial markets, I would not need to get paid any amount.  Smiley
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 2413


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 10:01:13 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4354
Merit: 13970


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 10:40:08 PM

Well we should not do worse than the 2022/2023 drops to 15.9k from 69k
if you believe in cycles each one the peak was less and the crash was smaller.

now depending on peak to crash is a bit more interesting.
2017 peak  2022 crash
2021 peak 2026 crash

2025 peak 2030 crash
is the cycle comparison I am doing.

so 15.9/19.9=0.799
and 55.1/69=0.799     

Those are not necessarily bad ideas in regards to possible negative scenarios that could play out, even though I think that using the 200-WMA as a reference might stand on more solid grounding.

For sure, 2022 was a bit unique when we analyze in terms of the 200-WMA, and prior to 2022, all of the earlier dips that either touched upon the 200-WMA or broke below it, they did not break below it for very long periods of time, even though there might have had been decently long periods of time (such as most of 2015 - perhaps 9-ish months) that the BTC price was within about 15% of the 200-Week moving average.

To me, it seems that a unique aspect of the 2022 to 2023 period was that the BTC spot price spent a lot of time below the 200-WMA, which probably could be added up to about 16 months from June 2022 to late October 2023, and of course, with the deepest dip in November 2022 when the BTC price dropped down to $15,479, which was about 35% below the 200-WMA.

Of course, we have capital that is likely wanting to really discourage retail coiners from holding their coin (and perhaps even some desperation involved), so there well could be attempts to try to get the BTC price to go even lower than the 2022-2023 levels (relative to the 200-WMA).  Of course, the existence of such desperate desires from status quo financial incumbents and perhaps governments too does not guarantee that they will be successful in being able to achieve such levels of downity... .even though they may well be making such ongong efforts to acheive such high levels of negativity that could end up shaking more and more retail BTC holders from their coins.

And, right now 35% below the current 200-WMA is in the ballpark of just below $39k.

Of course on a personal level, I continue to consider those kinds of possibilities as periods to just keep buying bitcoin and to avoid selling much of the bitcoin, except maybe just in cases in which the selling amounts would be minimal to pay for needs and/or wants that are based on already having enough or more than enough coins (and being in sustainable withdrawal status - even though my own sustainable withdrawal status tools reduces the quantity of BTC that could be eligible for selling in the event that the BTC price goes to such possible low levels below the 200-WMA).

more discounts for us.
hmm 15.9/19.9=0.799

so 55.1/69=0.799

do we need to get to 55.1?
That's what I (and others) call "numerology"...Ben Cowen is an adherent...he always compares pieces of meaningless charts...his favorite is the chart of bitcoin in 2019-2020 because it was so erratic that you can draw basically any conclusion you want from it.

Hahahahaha

That is another way of putting it.  "Numerology."    It seems that sometimes guys come up with some quite outrageous ideas regarding scenarios that they consider to be plausible..  similar to some of the guys who come up with scenarios that relate to the movements of astrological bodies in the sky...  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

[edited out]
saying the numbers I picked are not relevant to cycle worshippers is fine enough.
lots of ways to pick numbers and show graphs.
There is a quote from a song
'the past is just a goodbye'
it fits all of the btc action up to and including feb 10 2026.

none of us know jack shit what we will see on March 1 2026

It is sloppy thinking to throw up your hands and proclaim that "all theories are equal to all other theories," especially since some theories are stronger than other theories... and surely many of us have ballpark ideas in regards to what will be the state of affairs (relative to bitcoin) on March 1, 2026, March 1, 2027, March 1, 2029, March 1, 2032, March 1, 2035, March 1, 2040, to the extent to which any of the particular dates matter or the dates in between those or even to attempt to consider directionally where BTC might be (relative to the 200-WMA, for example).

we can kind of say BTC will not pass 90k by Feb 12 2026 and likely be correct.
But March or May or July 2026. One guess is as good as any other

Bullshit.

Some "guesses," to the extent that they are guesses are better than others, even if minority scenarios might end up playing out.

how about low and high for those months.
March 2026  low 57k high   81k
May    2026  low 71k high   91k
July    2026  low 82k high 102k

If "all guesses" are supposedly equal, according to your own point of view, then why the fuck are your anticipated BTC price ranges so narrow for March, May and July?

You seem to be contradicting your own claims of equality in there?  Why don't you have numbers lower than $57k?  or numbers higher than $102k?  You seem to be presuming (even from your own framing of the matter) that some numbers are more likely than others, no?

Various government and Bitcoin rumors are floating out there and there's this picture.

What an amazing coincidence.
May you live in interesting times.
Do you know where the photo was taken? Personally, it's not strange for me to see Saylor moving around in such a circle of people - maybe it has nothing to do with Bitcoin, but the social prestige of being seen at a VIP party.
All I know about this is that it came allegedly from Ivanka's Instagram. It could be AI, it could be fake, but I don't think so. I think this is real. And as to where it happened, I don't know, but based on the amount of garish gilding, I would assume that that's Mar-a-Lago somewhere.

But as to why he would have been there... That is the million dollar question, or maybe I should say the billion dollar question.
That's definitely the Grand Ballroom at Mar-a-Lago.

I appreciate your level of expressed confidence, homer.

You did not even put any disclaimers and/or qualifiers in there.

It's like you were there.

Michael?  Is that you?

*yawn* Another boring day.
Come on bitcoin, do something.....
+/-10k usd by late afternoon say
Yeah... If Jay won the bet... That would be a sight to behold...

Truly would be a miracle, at this point...

Can't Biodom just admit that OG was right so we can go up again....

I really hope we don't have to wait another 2.5 years to get to a new ATH again... fuck these cycles I have enough

Don't do it, Gachapin!!!!!!!!!!!


It is not worth it.

Can't Biodom just admit that OG was right so we can go up again....

I really hope we don't have to wait another 2.5 years to get to a new ATH again... fuck these cycles I have enough
wait! is it now 2.5 years?

that's just a good news. I have already prepared my mind for 2030.

Preparation is both financial and mental, and frequently I have proclaimed that many folks will become much more solid in psychological ways when they have put their finances in a good place... which of course is likely to be a balanced and individually tailored place, so for example if someone is still pretty new to bitcoin, then he likely is going to have to spend several years just building his bitcoin stake, unless he has abilities to frontload his investment. 

At the same time, bitcoin newbies should not take for granted that they will continue to be able to buy bitcoin at current prices and/or lower prices for extended periods of time, so in that regard, it tends to be a good cashflow management practice to ongoingly attempt to prepare yourself both financially and mentally for BTC prices that could go in either direction.. especially if you are attempting to project 4-ish years or more into the future.

[edited out]
I just don't like instant noodles anymoe

That is why "we" (royal perhaps?) retain decently higher aspirations, which include sometimes treating our lil selfies, from time to time, by sometimes sneaking in some higher quality ingredients into our noodles... and you might not even need to tell anyone from where you got such "higher quality ingredients" that cause the noodles to have had become much more tolerable.  I will say that there are even some guys who will substitute out the noodles while proclaiming themselves to still be "eating noodles" - sometimes referred to as "don't ask, don't tell."

#justsaying
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 2413


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 11:01:15 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BTCETFInvestor
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 58

Toodaloo! ..-. ..- -.-. -.- / -.-- --- ..-


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 11:17:13 PM

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee is collaborating with SEC Chair Paul Atkins to craft legislation defining market structure for Bitcoin.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4354
Merit: 13970


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
February 12, 2026, 11:50:15 PM

^ it ain't going to happen as you describe it. This would be idiotically consistent and markets are not.

I don’t know. I thought it was idiotic to not sell this cycle high and yet most people didn’t. Everything has happened exactly as I’ve been predicting it in financial markets for about 28 years now. The only thing that surprises me is that people still doubt when I tell them what is going to happen. Just like when I say you will bend the knee and admit I was right when we dip around $50K this summer. Only then will the market truly recover.

Wow!!!!!

The last time you dug yourself a hole when you proclaimed that you have been a "bitcoin trading professional" for the past 15 years, even though you forgot to buy and hold for the first 6-ish to 7-ish years of those 15 years.

Now you want to proclaim your supposed financial expertise going back 28 years.  Holy fucking shit!!!!!

I will admit that I try to spin myself as being consistent with my various financial management and investment practices going back more than 20 years before I got involved in bitcoin, yet for sure, I know that I also screwed up a whole hell-of-a lot along the way, so I even will admit that there were quite a few defects in my own approach and/or my abilities to consistently apply principles and practices, even when I thought that I was learning as I went.

I also had some pretty fucking big pieces of luck along the way, even though surely I can probably take some credit for some aspects of the luck in terms of some of my preparations paying off in ways that I was just fortunate to be in the right place at the right time, and maybe even difficulties in trying to help anyone else to strike the various balances that ended up paying off quite well for me, while at the same time, there were other guys who were also successful in their own ways, even when their approach was meaningfully different from my own.

you both seem pretty sure about what you are sayin'
have you considered betting?
I already have 7 figures where my mouth is.  I made my bet last October with the market and I'm winning.

From your assertion, I am inferring that you sold more than 50% of your BTC stash.

That really comes off as foolish, from my own perspective, even if your bet ended up paying off, so far, for your lil selfie.

Personally, I believe that it is not a good practice to gamble with bitcoin... even though surely there are guys who take that path in terms of their involvement in bitcoin, and I have my doubts about their abilities to either match or exceed the outcomes that buyers and HODLers have ben able to achieve in the past 8-ish years or more, and it seems likely to me that the upcoming 8-ish years are going to continue to reward buyers and holders more than traders - even if there might be some guys who trade and get lucky in the process (perhaps less than 5% of the traders will get lucky and not necessarily in replicable ways).

By the way, you have pretty much admitted that you fucked up between 2011 and 2017, yet I wonder even if we were to measure your performance since the beginning of 2018 if you had actually beaten a buy and HODL strategy from the beginning of January 2018 until now.  I get the sense that you probably have not, even if you might be feeling your oats right now (while you are in the middle of a trade and seemingly counting your eggs before they have hatched).

[edited out]
OK ... here's the thing.
You are just posting what amount to "I have been right for 28 years and you are all idiots for not doing what I say".

Do you not see how fucking annoying that is?  Would *YOU* listen to someone who was saying that to you?  The technique of selling tops and buying bottoms is an EXTREMELY risky game.  PARTICULARLY with something as volatile as BTC.

hahahahaha .  It is pretty funny (cAPSLOCK) when you put it like that.

It is like OgNasty is making up some imaginary opponent, as if we even had any fucking clue about OgNasty 28 years ago... and so then he is also commiting a similar strawman argument when he suggests his 15 year bitcoin involvement or even if he were to attempt to seriously consider his bitcoin performance in the past 8 years or even extrapolating a longer history based on his supposed yet to be realized success in his most recent trade, to the extent that he even traded in the way that he is proclaiming to have had done in this particular so far correction.

[edited out]
at least in my case I got the silver rally correct.

You are looking at "short term."

The longer term should be the more accurate assessment.

And, so your ongoingly striving to judge yourself based on "trades" the more likely you are going to end up undermining your own situation based on the difficulties that you have in terms of getting out of such a trading mindset, especially when it comes to how you set up your bitcoin and how you plan to continue to manage it into your more elderly years.

Of course, in the end, you are going to follow paths that are within your comfort, and surely you have to pay the costs and/or benefits that go along with how you make your investment (into bitcoin  - the topic of this thread) and/or how you manage your cashflows - in regards to other investments that you have and/or income/expenses that you have too.

[edited out]
The reason I continue to troll certain people here is that I was right and they were wrong, I told them I was going to be right and they were going to be wrong, and still they continue to criticize me as I'm right and they are wrong.  They were literally calling me names at the time for trying to save them from losing 50% of their savings and now they're bitter about it.  

Are these "certain people" in the room with you now?

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


How can I not have some fun?

You do seem to have issues - even though there is nothing wrong with trying to have fun.

I am going to try not to put myself in the camp of "anti-fun" that's for sure.

Am I annoying?  

Yes.

Maybe for the folks that didn't listen to me and chose to criticize me instead.  Those quotes aren't going away.  The folks that did listen and saved themselves from watching half their savings disappear might have a different opinion.  

Hopefully no one is listening to such a retard like you, even though once in a while you make some good points.

Better (and maybe even best?) practices involve coming to our own balances in regards to where we might find ourselves in our bitcoin investment journey, including considering the extent to which selling and/or trading is a good practice when it comes to accumulating bitcoin.

Of course, guys who have larger bitcoin stashes, they likely are in a better position to play with parts of their bitcoin stash, as compared with guys who are earlier in their bitcoin accumulation phase.

Accordingly, it is likely a better practice for each of us to make sure whatever it is that we are doing is accounting for where we are at in our bitcoin journey, perhaps even including the consideration of our 9 individual factors.

Anyone is free to hit the ignore button if they don't feel I'm providing any value.  I won't lose any sleep over it.

There might be some value in some of your posts, from time to time.  Not often, but once in a while you might make some points that are helpful rather than just self-aggrandizing.

at least in my case I got the silver rally correct.
I was glad to see you selling the silver rally.  I sold 5 ounces over the weekend for USD and another ounce this morning with a sale currently pending for 11 more in BTC.  Dumping it as fast as I can.

This is confusing.  I just google-checked, and it says that 1 BTC equals close to 900 ounces of silver, so if you are talking about 11 BTC, then that would be right around 9,900 ounces of silver.

Or maybe you meant to say that you had 11 ounces of silver, which would be around $9,900?  Call me confused, if you must.
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5376
Merit: 6046


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2026, 11:54:45 PM

Or maybe you meant to say that you had 11 ounces of silver, which would be around $9,900?  Call me confused, if you must.

I don’t have to call you confused. It is obvious.
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4480
Merit: 10776



View Profile
February 12, 2026, 11:57:45 PM
Merited by philipma1957 (1), JayJuanGee (1)

The way I read it, he is selling another 11 ounces of silver for bitcoin as opposed to ramen noodles or some other form of money.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2814
Merit: 2413


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
Today at 12:01:28 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Pages: « 1 ... 35452 35453 35454 35455 35456 35457 35458 35459 35460 35461 35462 35463 35464 35465 35466 35467 35468 35469 35470 35471 35472 35473 35474 35475 35476 35477 35478 35479 35480 35481 35482 35483 35484 35485 35486 35487 35488 35489 35490 35491 35492 35493 35494 35495 35496 35497 35498 35499 35500 35501 [35502] 35503 35504 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!