Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2026, 01:06:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Is the "bear market" over?
Yes - 14 (58.3%)
No - we need to sweep the low again - 3 (12.5%)
No - we need to set a new low first - 4 (16.7%)
No - other (explain below) - 3 (12.5%)
Total Voters: 24

Pages: « 1 ... 35672 35673 35674 35675 35676 35677 35678 35679 35680 35681 35682 35683 35684 35685 35686 35687 35688 35689 35690 35691 35692 35693 35694 35695 35696 35697 35698 35699 35700 35701 35702 35703 35704 35705 35706 35707 35708 35709 35710 35711 35712 35713 35714 35715 35716 35717 35718 35719 35720 35721 [35722] 35723 35724 35725 35726 35727 35728 35729 35730 35731 35732 35733 35734 35735 35736 35737 35738 35739 35740 35741 35742 35743 35744 35745 35746 35747 35748 35749 35750 35751 35752 35753 35754 35755 35756 35757 35758 35759 35760 35761 35762 35763 35764 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26968925 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
WatChe
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1022



View Profile WWW
April 23, 2026, 05:12:17 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1), JayJuanGee (1)

Tiny pump for ants
Satisfaction, just enough
These days, it suffices

#Haiku
80k in next 24 hours.

Wanna bet?  

hahahaha

I know my limits in gambling. Never try to cover your loses in gambling  Wink.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 06:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 07:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 08:01:13 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 09:01:16 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 10:01:14 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
vapourminer
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 5026
Merit: 6119


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 10:25:24 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1), JayJuanGee (1), cAPSLOCK (1), d_eddie (1), psycodad (1)


Coins have been getting hacked almost every single day in all sorts of ways so you are saying Bitcoin is not immutable already? Deriving private keys that are weakly generated is quite similar to this case, so you can't say it is different to dismiss this.

user error is not a flaw in bitcoin
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 11:01:14 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 12:01:19 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 164


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 12:45:59 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Coins have been getting hacked almost every single day in all sorts of ways so you are saying Bitcoin is not immutable already? Deriving private keys that are weakly generated is quite similar to this case, so you can't say it is different to dismiss this.
user error is not a flaw in bitcoin
A user failing to move coins to a new secure address type is an user error, not a flaw in Bitcoin. A user losing his key or throwing them away while having not safe P2PK addresses is also an user error.

Right now, there seem to be BIP proposals to make it "acceptable" to be fucking around with private keys of other members through changes in the software, then it does not matter if you hold your keys as brain wallets or whatever or you gave the private keys to your best friend or to the grandchild of your best frienc, since if the address type might meet a certain criteria of having coins inside that had not been moved or whatever might be the criteria, then your coins might get frozen (rug pulled) or maybe reallocated into tail distribution or some other dumb shit like that.  ..so when you wake up from your coma (or the grandchild of your best friend peels the sticker off of the Casacius coins), there won't be any coins in the place where there used to be coins.

There seem to be faulty assumptions that if someone doesn't move their coins frequently enough (or at all) (and those coins are in supposedly vulnerable addresses) then there are justifications to rewrite the bitcoin software so that those coins can be commandeered (because they have become public property or some dumb shit like that).. .as if that kind of an idea were to make much if any sense under the principles of bitcoin?
I do not like that at all because if we do it for this now, that means we can do it again for other reasons. For me Bitcoin is very different than shitcoins in this way, and actually this method was common in shitcoins that transition from 1 blockchain or another. They say you have a few months or a years to bridge your tokens to the new chain and if you fail to do it you lose it all. Let's not turn Bitcoin into a shitcoin over some coins maybe getting hacked some day in the future...

And this shitcoin aspect does not even include important stuff like Casascius coins or other collectibles that have huge historical values because shitcoins don't even have those. I am against freezing, and reallocating coins of other people into anything. Thank you to all members who will stand their ground on issues like this, who will never sacrifice any Core principles of Bitcoin!

ESG
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 780
Merit: 284


store secretK on Secret place is almost impossible


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 12:50:55 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)


Why the US-military is testing a bitcoin node now?

 The U.S. government is running a Bitcoin node as part of a cybersecurity test, according to Admiral Samuel Paparo, the commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific.

Summary

Admiral Samuel Paparo said the U.S. runs a Bitcoin node for cybersecurity tests, not mining.
The military views Bitcoin as a cryptography and blockchain tool to help secure networks today.
Paparo said the government remains in an experimentation phase as it studies Bitcoin’s defense applications.
He told lawmakers that the work is still in an experimental stage and is focused on network protection, not on producing Bitcoin.

Paparo said the government is not mining Bitcoin. Instead, it is using a node to monitor activity and test how the Bitcoin protocol may support secure systems. He told the House Armed Services Committee, “We have a node on the Bitcoin network right now.”


The statement also made clear that the military is looking at Bitcoin beyond its role as a digital asset. Paparo described it as a system built on cryptography, blockchain design, and reusable proof-of-work that may help strengthen digital defenses.

Focus Remains on Network Protection, Not Mining

Paparo said the government’s work with Bitcoin does not include mining activity. He stated, ”We’re not mining Bitcoin,” and said the node is being used for monitoring and testing purposes. That distinction separates the current project from any direct effort to accumulate BTC through mining.





U.S. MILITARY IS RUNNING A BITCOIN NODE: ADMIRAL PAPARO CONFIRMS

"We have a node on the #Bitcoin network…
We're doing a number of operational tests to secure and protect networks
using the Bitcoin protocol."

First they dismiss it. Then they study it. Then they run it. 🟠


-That politicians enter power to obtain more power with less difficulty,
this is not new anywhere in the world, but here, a small detailed description of
 >how power can be used to have more power!

>>>


Cashing in on the crown:
 How Trump turned the presidency into a personal money machine


Donald Trump is the only billionaire ever to occupy the Oval Office,
and since returning to the precedency in January 2025,
his family’s wealth has grown noticeably.
 This is not the result of traditional business practices.
Instead, Trump has been actively using his presidential status
for personal enrichment, and in some cases,
his efforts amount to outright scams.
...
Senator Elizabeth Warren:
“The regulator is not overseeing Trump’s business,
but working at his direction.
 Nothing like this has ever happened in American history”

“The main question is how Trump circumvents the laws by
transferring assets into trusts managed by his children.
 Experts emphasize that this is not merely an 'ethical violation,'
but a deliberate use of legal loopholes. In addition, non-relative
Trump protégés are now working in the White House and within
the Office of Government Ethics, which makes conducting
real investigations inside the executive branch all but impossible, I
gor Slabykh, an expert on the U.S. legal and tax system and
author of the Telegram channel USLegalNews,
explained in an interview with The Insider....

....





ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 01:01:13 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4844
Merit: 11870


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2026, 01:14:47 PM

Coins have been getting hacked almost every single day in all sorts of ways so you are saying Bitcoin is not immutable already? Deriving private keys that are weakly generated is quite similar to this case, so you can't say it is different to dismiss this.
user error is not a flaw in bitcoin
A user failing to move coins to a new secure address type is an user error, not a flaw in Bitcoin. A user losing his key or throwing them away while having not safe P2PK addresses is also an user error.

Right now, there seem to be BIP proposals to make it "acceptable" to be fucking around with private keys of other members through changes in the software, then it does not matter if you hold your keys as brain wallets or whatever or you gave the private keys to your best friend or to the grandchild of your best frienc, since if the address type might meet a certain criteria of having coins inside that had not been moved or whatever might be the criteria, then your coins might get frozen (rug pulled) or maybe reallocated into tail distribution or some other dumb shit like that.  ..so when you wake up from your coma (or the grandchild of your best friend peels the sticker off of the Casacius coins), there won't be any coins in the place where there used to be coins.

There seem to be faulty assumptions that if someone doesn't move their coins frequently enough (or at all) (and those coins are in supposedly vulnerable addresses) then there are justifications to rewrite the bitcoin software so that those coins can be commandeered (because they have become public property or some dumb shit like that).. .as if that kind of an idea were to make much if any sense under the principles of bitcoin?
I do not like that at all because if we do it for this now, that means we can do it again for other reasons. For me Bitcoin is very different than shitcoins in this way, and actually this method was common in shitcoins that transition from 1 blockchain or another. They say you have a few months or a years to bridge your tokens to the new chain and if you fail to do it you lose it all. Let's not turn Bitcoin into a shitcoin over some coins maybe getting hacked some day in the future...

And this shitcoin aspect does not even include important stuff like Casascius coins or other collectibles that have huge historical values because shitcoins don't even have those. I am against freezing, and reallocating coins of other people into anything. Thank you to all members who will stand their ground on issues like this, who will never sacrifice any Core principles of Bitcoin!



Well one could argue satoshi abandoned bitcoin.

Personally I would love to see the old 2009 blocks start to transfer to a new set of bc1q addresses.

say may 1 2026

block number 2 moves to a bc1q address

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1HLoD9E4SDFFPDiYfNYnkBLQ85Y51J3Zb1

if that happened this may 1st and

 then on may 8th

block 3

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1FvzCLoTPGANNjWoUo6jUGuAG3wg1w4YjR

moved to a new bc1q address

so on and so forth it would be cool to see that as the entire proposed freeze would be done or over and out.

Shame that satoshi did not guess that idea and start to implement it. this may 1st.
Lucius
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3962
Merit: 7383


www.marysmeals.org


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2026, 01:23:37 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (10), Hueristic (1), JayJuanGee (1)

Peter Schiff just made some interesting comments about Saylor’s STRC offering and the SEC…

“Sometimes a Ponzi scheme is not obvious. The only sign may be that it seems too good to be true. But that is not the case with $STRC, which is the most obvious Ponzi that has ever existed. The fact that the SEC allows @Saylor to promote it is more proof that we don't need an SEC.”

https://x.com/peterschiff/status/2047088486415507492?s=46&t=bWFpJfwmRUMUsiGQTzTLyQ


PS should crawl into a cave with a pile of gold and wait there for the end of the world. He is one of those who should not mention ponzi schemes and scams, considering that he himself was involved in similar things, and it is not excluded that he will be under investigation again in the future because he is a classic fraudster.

Everything to do with Bitcoin is a scam for him.

On Sunday, October 18, millionaire investor and popular Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff‘s Euro Pacific Bank came under major investigation by the Global Tax Enforcement dubbed as the J5. Australian newspaper TheAge released the breaking news as investigators from the Australian Tax Office announced the probe along with global lawmakers. The J5 consists of the top tax agencies in the United States, Canada, UK, Australia, and the Netherlands.

The crackdown comes amidst glaring anomalies cited by the Panama Papers in the Euro Pacific Bank accounts. Reportedly, over “hundreds” of accounts of this Puerto-Rico-based banks are under tax investigations for financial crimes. Moreover, the report notes that the bank used over 400 Australian nationals, with over 100 of them considered as “high risk”.
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 164


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 01:35:54 PM

Well one could argue satoshi abandoned bitcoin.
Yes and that is not a Bitcoin flaw, it is an user action or in the situation that we are talking about it would be an user error.

Personally I would love to see the old 2009 blocks start to transfer to a new set of bc1q addresses.

say may 1 2026

block number 2 moves to a bc1q address

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1HLoD9E4SDFFPDiYfNYnkBLQ85Y51J3Zb1

if that happened this may 1st and

 then on may 8th

block 3

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1FvzCLoTPGANNjWoUo6jUGuAG3wg1w4YjR

moved to a new bc1q address

so on and so forth it would be cool to see that as the entire proposed freeze would be done or over and out.

Shame that satoshi did not guess that idea and start to implement it. this may 1st.
That would be a sight to see, but I am sure many would panic and try to cause more panic regarding such moves too.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4844
Merit: 11870


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2026, 01:40:13 PM

Well one could argue satoshi abandoned bitcoin.
Yes and that is not a Bitcoin flaw, it is an user action or in the situation that we are talking about it would be an user error.

Personally I would love to see the old 2009 blocks start to transfer to a new set of bc1q addresses.

say may 1 2026

block number 2 moves to a bc1q address

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1HLoD9E4SDFFPDiYfNYnkBLQ85Y51J3Zb1

if that happened this may 1st and

 then on may 8th

block 3

https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1FvzCLoTPGANNjWoUo6jUGuAG3wg1w4YjR

moved to a new bc1q address

so on and so forth it would be cool to see that as the entire proposed freeze would be done or over and out.

Shame that satoshi did not guess that idea and start to implement it. this may 1st.
That would be a sight to see, but I am sure many would panic and try to cause more panic regarding such moves too.

Just a simple slow 1 block at a time move. it would shut up all the freeze talk.  or would it hasten it?

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 02:01:19 PM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 5426



View Profile
April 23, 2026, 02:15:26 PM
Merited by El duderino_ (10), OgNasty (1), Paashaas (1)


I respect all opinions and thoughts

But I do like the big difference between you and OGnasty
I’m leaning more towards this post … but still every outcome can happen

I’m ok and just riding the waves as how they come.

But let’s go PAASHAAS

Btw a new poll would suit this argument

@infofront, make a poll please OGnasty or PAASHAAS
Would be nice to see who people following the most in a way of thinking for a near-mid term period.

Maybe a 3th option not to agree with any of them.

As long as we having fun together not interested in one upsmanship or a dick swinging competition.

Anything wrong with a nice game?

asUHWEceyc
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 164

dekleptocraticizationismist


View Profile WWW
April 23, 2026, 02:31:13 PM

This guy totally doesn't work for Saylor

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX72aesKGzI

Giveaways: a)coin recovery tale timing makes no sense 3)the context of his persona suggests it's fully contrived

Can't help but like the pseudo protocol spec smack being pedaled, though
BitHodlers
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 164


View Profile
April 23, 2026, 02:35:09 PM

Just a simple slow 1 block at a time move. it would shut up all the freeze talk.  or would it hasten it?
I think even that would split people mostly into two groups. Freeze as fast as possible see there is a quantum computer already, and the messiah satoshi has returned camps. A minority would be among the reasonable stance questioning both.
Pages: « 1 ... 35672 35673 35674 35675 35676 35677 35678 35679 35680 35681 35682 35683 35684 35685 35686 35687 35688 35689 35690 35691 35692 35693 35694 35695 35696 35697 35698 35699 35700 35701 35702 35703 35704 35705 35706 35707 35708 35709 35710 35711 35712 35713 35714 35715 35716 35717 35718 35719 35720 35721 [35722] 35723 35724 35725 35726 35727 35728 35729 35730 35731 35732 35733 35734 35735 35736 35737 35738 35739 35740 35741 35742 35743 35744 35745 35746 35747 35748 35749 35750 35751 35752 35753 35754 35755 35756 35757 35758 35759 35760 35761 35762 35763 35764 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!