[edited out]
If I die no one gets it.
You fuck!!!!!!
Crossing fingers on breaking through $80k resistance today.
That would be nice.
I would like more than a symbolic breaking through - yet beggers cannot be choosers.
Based on recent momentum, it seems that the odds are in the ballpark of greater than 50% of a break through, yet personally, I don't have enough confidence to proclaim that it is bettable, beyond the funzies of throwing die at a crap table.
Not that we necessarily need to know details, yet sometimes it could be interesting to figure out what back up plans might be in the event that something like a Trezor (or any other hardware) device were to fail, and then there would be needs to have a back up or even more than one back up.
Another thing is communicating these kinds of matters to heirs or potential heirs.. and surely it seems a bit problematic to have all the information with only one person, since it is possible that the person could precede in death or have other limitations that might not materialize until some later date.
I have had some systems of communicating aspects of my security and other systems, and surely, I question the extent to which the information is going to be adequately communicated, even though at the time that I make it and as I communicate the information, it tends to have traits of making sense... but then with the passage of time, I am not even sure, and with the passage of time, even I have some struggles to make sure that the contained information is both clear enough and also somewhat updated with any relevant material changes that might happen at various points along the way.
Surely, we have seen some fire situations, even with the rich folks in California.. and maybe a decent number of them lost some coins.. and even having multiple places might not help if the multiple places all got simultaneously burned down or irretrievably damaged in other ways.
I am probably not the ONLY one with the theory that there are likely way more keys lost than realized.. and gosh, how frequently should we be testing all of our keys, and even testing might contain some risks too. . here.. let me assemble all of this information for "updating" blah blah blah. .then maybe a good portion of the information is in one place during the testing.. and when we communicate the information to someone. .or even some guys who live in apartments and might not have back up locations that might be convenient for guys who might have home and work and maybe a relative or two who might be able to keep back ups on their property (whether wittingly or not).. and yeah, I am not the greatest of fans of safety deposit boxes. .even though it could work for a split key kind of a situation... and how split? if a person get's 1/2 of the key? is that too much? what if they get 1/3 of the key, that is probably o.k.... but if they get 2/3 of the key, then maybe they have enough to brute force it, if they have the right equipment and technical/puzzle-solving knowledge (do they know what they are looking at?).
Poll
