Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[bitmover]

Any idea who controls Chartbuddy? Would like to chat with them about posting on this hellsite...

Richy_T

bitmover created the FeeBuddy, bot, too.

Thanks for mentioning.

I shared the code with BobLawblaw already! Hope it helps.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[fillippone]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.



Damn! Giacomo is not using my skin theme!



Damn, bitcointalk, why isn’t it showing?

EDIT: thanks ESG for it fixing that!

[CryptoYar]

lower value human == politician

Don't you think that’s an insult to lower value humans?

I think this is better:

lower value human - integrity == politician

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ESG]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.



Damn! Giacomo is not using my skin theme!




Damn, bitcointalk, why isn’t it showing?

because size.

>

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Lucius]

~snip~

[edited out]

Maybe I should have used the phrase "we can assume that 5 million coins are in the possession of these countries/companies", because unless someone publicly admits that they have something and proves it, it all boils down to speculation. However, the fact is that we read more and more about how some countries like the US or Brazil have really big appetites in the future when it comes to Bitcoin, and what would happen if more countries appeared that wanted something similar?

Maybe I'm wrong, but if any of this comes true, millions of coins will be in the possession of states and companies, and accordingly the price should rise significantly, and it doesn't seem unreasonable to talk about even $500k for 1 BTC in the next 5-7 years.

You seem to be assuming more than me.

Even though a large number of us know that one of the only ways (perhaps the only way?) to really have confidence that coins are not being rehypothecated is to hold those coins directly or to have some kind of a proof of reserves that is detailed enough to show that our coins are not moving.  There are few third party custodians that provide proof of reserves in such specific kinds of ways that allows the ability of the client to see coins are not moving.

Sure, it is possible that the BIG players are negotiating better custodian arrangements that allow them to see that non-rehypothecation is taking place, but I am not going to give them the benefit of the doubt on such question.

Once the coins are rehypothecated, then how many fucking times are they rehypothecated, and one of the ONLY ways to really test that they have the coins that they claim to have is by having a run on the bank... which surely I would like to see more runs on the banks to really put the custodian twats to the test, yet I am not sure if I am just engaging in wishful thinking or not?  I (just like many folks) have almost no fucking clue what percentage of the actual bitcoin these various custodian twats have locked up rather than using such coins to sell and resell and resell to such an extent that the actual coins are at risk... and even they could get in trouble if they actually have as high as 10% of the coins they claim to have if there was an ability and actual outcome of doing an actual run on the bank.

Third party custodians and the various financial instruments that have been created are really an attack on bitcoin's 21 million supply.. which may be in the ballpark of several times that amount currently, if we were able to figure out the actual number of claims on coins.

I am not claiming to know any exact solutions, besides more normies (and even the BIGGER players) to take actual custody of their coins in a non-rehypothecatable way... even though I am ongoingly expressing frustration with the seemingly ongoing creation of coins through various bitcoin paper products.

As you say yourself, it's almost impossible to be sure of anything today, we can only assume that something is as we are told, or try to dispute it in some way. However, I have to admit that I don't like the possibility of them manipulating us with their paper BTC, which is much easier and I guess more profitable than trying to make a hard fork and add a few million new BTC.

There has been a lot of writing about paper Bitcoins in recent months in WO, because it is logical that some are wondering why the price hardly reacts positively to the news that someone is buying coins for billions of $ as if someone knows that they have many more coins than 21 million.

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

~snip~

When did that Saturnday happen? I'm asking because I see posts from members who haven't been active on the forum for a long time (@HCP).

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[AlcoHoDL]

[...]

boolean?
((lower_value_human - integrity) == politician) == true;

[...]

I'd take it a step further:

if ((lower_value_human - integrity >= politician) == true)
{
    // Always executes -- Redundant if statement!
}

...because politicians always strive to go lower!

[joker_josue]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

Did this guy have this screenshot saved since 2009? 

What would have been the purpose of taking that screenshot at the time?

[AlcoHoDL]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

Did this guy have this screenshot saved since 2009?  

What would have been the purpose of taking that screenshot at the time?

I read 2019... Top-right.

[joker_josue]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

Did this guy have this screenshot saved since 2009?  

What would have been the purpose of taking that screenshot at the time?

I read 2019... Top-left.

That's 2019! I meant to write *19 and I wrote *09.

[AlcoHoDL]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

Did this guy have this screenshot saved since 2009?  

What would have been the purpose of taking that screenshot at the time?

I read 2019... Top-left.

That's 2019! I meant to write *19 and I wrote *09.

LOL, and I meant top-right, but I typed top-left... It happens...

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[BobClawblaw]

I shared the code with BobLawblaw already! Hope it helps.

Thank you. Surprisingly simple! Working on rolling the rock uphill some more today...

[snowpega]

Scenes from an ordinary Saturnday in Italy.

Did this guy have this screenshot saved since 2009?  

What would have been the purpose of taking that screenshot at the time?

I read 2019... Top-left.

That's 2019! I meant to write *19 and I wrote *09.

LOL, and I meant top-right, but I typed top-left... It happens...

Love responds to love 

Both made a mutual mistake of mistyping...

[xhomerx10]

I didn't get a chance to post this yesterday but I celebrated by making my own pizza.  I used orange peppers instead of green and that's as fancy as I got with it.  Maybe I'll route the savings over ordering from Papa John's back into muh bitcoin stash