🡇︎ BITCOIN IS DEAD. 🡇︎
aGAIN?
ESG, you
ruined my forum art!
Look at the timestamps. If I’d clicked “Post”
exactly two seconds later, that
would’ve been perfect.
-Sorry, was not my intention., I didn't know.
.
Maybe you might want to try again, I'll appreciate it.
next time, let me know by telepathy,
and I'll get out of the way so I don't get hit in the head... hehehe...
>
#
edit.:the art I did in this post, was not very strong,
it was weak, and so I put the name of it three fours,
or, a three of fours, check it out>
>And if you add up the number of characters '1' that appear in this image, you get the result ="5' (five numbers one and three fours),
I don't know if I can be lucky to have a set of fours, but depending on the occasion...
but in this case, this art was pure luck, I didn't even imagine that I had done it...
I only saw it later.
#>and also a sequence of three to eight
-Yes, it is a fact that an opinion existed,
but it is not a fact that this opinion was a fact.
A fact needs to be something concrete that happened and is, of course,
an opinion is a fact, but it is not a fact that the opinion is true or false,
it is just a fact that the opinion occurred...
Because of this, it cannot be said that a man can have children,
because it is a fact that a man is born with a male reproductive system.
But it is also a fact that you can transplant female reproductive organs
into a man and he can have children, that is,
it is a fact that a man who has received female organ transplants
can have children, but it is a fact that a natural man
cannot have children...
and so on...
The counterpoint to this argument: “Man” and “woman” are labels assigned by humans, not anatomy.
I don't think it would be an argument, perhaps, me expressing a kind of line
of reasonning of my own,
which I believe does not apply to all...
I don't even know if it would be applicable,
but I know that I think so.
Sometimes I believe that I think too much.
The counterpoint to this argument: “Man” and “woman”
[WO]Male{Wall Observer Male}
(WO)Female{Wall Observer Female}
,
-Yes, the human being has this habit of labeling and identifying everything since always, a mess, each one puts the label that comes to him the most, things of the inner self of each, but some of those with power that can impose their created label on the others who accept them and start to use, for example, words that we use to communicate, but words are not a problem, it starts to be a problem, when we label people according to our own vision, in which it never resembles the majority, then part label as one thing and another part labels as something else, thus starting a discord because of labels,
And unfortunately excess is not a good thing at all.
-So, counterpoints, it is an art of reasoning, it is reasoning with the understanding of both parties creating a mutual understanding for both different labels, a good thing when agreed by both parties, after a time of discussion, and not good, when at the end of the discussion there are disagreements due to different views of the same thing.
>
So,
Male and Female
are labels designed to distinguish
different anatomies of mammals.
Which also does not confirm that in fact,
every Wall Observer is a reasoning human being,
sometimes not even a mammal.
.
Oh yes, I forgot to mention There are minimal percentages of human beings are born with [some parts of] reproductive apparatuses of both sexes, but this is very rare....
FTFY.
🙏
\/chartBuddy is Buddy!\/ BTC80,400
Poll
