Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:01:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: On-board LAN versus On-Board Wi-fi - Which Consumes More Resources?  (Read 314 times)
coinzoid (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 06, 2017, 10:08:33 PM
 #1

I've a mobo Z87-Deluxe QUAD from Asus. It features 7 pci-express slots and also has following onboard features that is not available on many other mobos:

Thunderbolt
Wifi
Bluetooth

Initially I've configured all slots as x1 and was able to use 5 gpus after disabling ob sound, ob lan, ob bluetooth and thunderbolt.
Later, I tried to add 6th gpu and somehow lights on on my mobo started blinking. I realized that something was not right so decided to disconnect 6th gpu again. Just after powering on system, it displayed following message:

"The memory address is insufficient due to Intel Thunderbolt resource consumption. The onboard Thunderbolt is now disabled for better system resource allocation. Strongly suggest to press F1 to enter BIOS setup and manually disable unused I/O peripheral controllers. Press F1 to Run SETUP"

Notice that Thunderbolt was already disabled before connecting 6th gpu and now BIOS says it is now disabled again. So system must have reset the BIOS upon connecting 6th gpu.

I wanted to see if I could use Wi-Fi instead of LAN (due to a some reason)

To overcome this issue, I've added another 8gb memory stick (totaling ram to 16gb) which didn't change outcome. But I haven't tested disabling onboard wifi and using LAN yet as my goal is not that one.
Any ideas?
1714104078
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104078

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104078
Reply with quote  #2

1714104078
Report to moderator
1714104078
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104078

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104078
Reply with quote  #2

1714104078
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714104078
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104078

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104078
Reply with quote  #2

1714104078
Report to moderator
1714104078
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104078

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104078
Reply with quote  #2

1714104078
Report to moderator
1714104078
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714104078

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714104078
Reply with quote  #2

1714104078
Report to moderator
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 7764


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 07, 2017, 01:09:40 AM
 #2




Wifi sucks to mine.  If this means five cards and use lan so be it.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!