Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 10:27:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone tested the Intel HD Graphics  (Read 878 times)
hanzac (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 425
Merit: 262


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 06:30:03 AM
 #1

From Ivy Bridge, it starts to support OpenCL. Does anyone give a try? How about the speed of the 6/16 EU?
1715207278
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715207278

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715207278
Reply with quote  #2

1715207278
Report to moderator
1715207278
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715207278

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715207278
Reply with quote  #2

1715207278
Report to moderator
1715207278
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715207278

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715207278
Reply with quote  #2

1715207278
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Vigil
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 08:37:32 AM
 #2

If you are talking about integrated graphics it probably isn't worth it - you might get 20-40 kH/s - if that. But I'm no expert in it.
AlphaWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 120


Presale is live!


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 10:12:46 AM
 #3

I had this thought a while back and gave it a try.  I have an i5-3210M in a laptop.  The GPU is capable of 11.5 MH/s with BFGminer and 2 GPU threads (BTC mining).   The 3210M is dual core with hyperthreading, and the GPU mining will eat up one "core".  You can get another ~8 MH/s out of the remaining cores.  I don't remember the miner I used for CPU... it was like cpu-pooler-miner or something.   With both CPU and GPU mining, it uses 24 Watts.

hanzac (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 425
Merit: 262


View Profile
April 22, 2013, 03:22:11 PM
 #4

I had this thought a while back and gave it a try.  I have an i5-3210M in a laptop.  The GPU is capable of 11.5 MH/s with BFGminer and 2 GPU threads (BTC mining).   The 3210M is dual core with hyperthreading, and the GPU mining will eat up one "core".  You can get another ~8 MH/s out of the remaining cores.  I don't remember the miner I used for CPU... it was like cpu-pooler-miner or something.   With both CPU and GPU mining, it uses 24 Watts.

Thanks, so the intel's integrated GPU is very comparative with AMD's Fusion GPU but AMD's has 100-300 stream processors, which means that Intel has the capability to make a nice discrete GPU but they hasn't made one.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!