BUgcoin strikes back

[Carlton Banks]

Don't put words in my mouth, you brainless pratt.

Calm down jonald, we know your dream is dead and all, but there's no need to lash out at people telling you facts you wished were not true

I support on chain scaling.  There can be a variety of implementations supporting
bigger blocks.

You do not support on-chain scaling, you support on-chain capacity increases.

And because you think and behave as if blocksize increases are the only method of improving transaction capacity that exist, your views on the matter are null and void. You're blinkered, you are compulsive-obsessive about the blocksize, and nothing else.
 

Enjoy defending Blockstream controlled core that doesn't give a shit about you.

And I suppose BU's attitude of "attack the BTC chain till it's face is in the dirt" demonstrates how much they value free and open competition, or how much they care?

[1715140795]

1715140795

[1715140795]

1715140795

[1715140795]

1715140795

[1715140795]

1715140795

[Wind_FURY]

Don't put words in my mouth, you brainless pratt.

Calm down jonald, we know your dream is dead and all, but there's no need to lash out at people telling you facts you wished were not true

I support on chain scaling.  There can be a variety of implementations supporting
bigger blocks.

You do not support on-chain scaling, you support on-chain capacity increases.

And because you think and behave as if blocksize increases are the only method of improving transaction capacity that exist, your views on the matter are null and void. You're blinkered, you are compulsive-obsessive about the blocksize, and nothing else.
 

Enjoy defending Blockstream controlled core that doesn't give a shit about you.

And I suppose BU's attitude of "attack the BTC chain till it's face is in the dirt" demonstrates how much they value free and open competition, or how much they care?

I do not think franky1 and jonald_fyookball supports Bitcoin Unlimited only because of onchain capacity increases, they support it because they think it is a good idea to let the miners decide how large or how small the block sizes are. They want to take away the decision making from the Core developers because they believe the developers are corrupt.

[Carlton Banks]

I do not think franky1 and jonald_fyookball supports Bitcoin Unlimited only because of onchain capacity increases, they support it because they think it is a good idea to let the miners decide how large or how small the block sizes are. They want to take away the decision making from the Core developers because they believe the developers are corrupt.

Well, that's a whole load of wrong "thinking" they're doing (and I don't believe it. That's what jonald & trolls say, but they can only be thinking something completely different)


The devs cannot decide the blocksize without taking the users with them, it's that simple. External devs have tried to convince users to accept 2MB blocksize increases twice (XT & Classic), and no-one followed them. That demonstrates that the users are ultimately in charge, whatever the devs propose.

[Wind_FURY]

I do not think franky1 and jonald_fyookball supports Bitcoin Unlimited only because of onchain capacity increases, they support it because they think it is a good idea to let the miners decide how large or how small the block sizes are. They want to take away the decision making from the Core developers because they believe the developers are corrupt.

Well, that's a whole load of wrong "thinking" they're doing (and I don't believe it. That's what jonald & trolls say, but they can only be thinking something completely different)

Maybe but from their perspective it is not. History will be the judge of who is right and wrong. If Bitcoin Unlimited "wins" then we who support Segwit are wrong.

The devs cannot decide the blocksize without taking the users with them, it's that simple. External devs have tried to convince users to accept 2MB blocksize increases twice (XT & Classic), and no-one followed them. That demonstrates that the users are ultimately in charge, whatever the devs propose.

For the Bitcoin Unlimited supporters that is not enough. They want the miners to independently decide how big or small the blocks are without having the developers involved. That for them is the correct long term solution.