Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2025, 11:01:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: ⚡MARQUISE $MUSEUM: Opensea 2.0 AGI reinvention  (Read 24830 times)
wavessurfing
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 507
Merit: 64


View Profile
February 19, 2023, 09:26:21 PM
 #141

what happens to polarity.exchange ?
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2023, 06:19:07 AM
Last edit: February 22, 2023, 02:23:29 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #142


New collection:
https://opensea.io/collection/sdchimeras
https://opensea.io/collection/sdfractals

Charity Collection from 21:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund



Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
crypto_trader#43xzEXrP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1588
Merit: 214


View Profile
March 28, 2023, 04:42:01 AM
Last edit: March 28, 2023, 07:00:27 AM by crypto_trader#43xzEXrP
 #143

Nice project, and it seems like a very perspective, for a long term investments.

On a whole waveplatform, this M2 asset is the most liquid asset, which really allowed me to get some ROI, from my fucking investments in this scam-platform!

Thank you for your buyback, MarquiseMuseum.
I'll withdraw the received motherfucker's WAVES, ASAP, because I know it's really not cost even a piece of shit,
and maybe after long-term torment with this rat's pidorussians, I'll just buy the large dick for this fucking pennies, to suck it everyday.

STOP RUSSIAN INVASION OF UKRAINE - SUPPORT UKRAINIAN DEMOS
Contact me in TOX: 653D6C2D13B6DF22C4CB93432586398858A608EE5457624A9A728BE1A9252C5DA12B894C54DB, or just crypto-trader@toxme.io.
Also, WAVES - SCAM! ;(
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
November 24, 2023, 06:00:16 PM
Last edit: November 24, 2023, 06:40:36 PM by MarquiseMuseum
 #144

Q4 status:

-There is a new wx/M2 liquidity pool:
https://wx.network/liquiditypools/pools/Marquise%20Museum_WX/deposit

-400m M2 tokens from the waves vault are for sale in wx/m2 market for 4.2m wx ($25-$50k USDT)
https://wx.network/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WX

-Daily wx emission weight is 4000 on 2.5m gwx pool vote ($50) if you stake 90%+ of the wx/m2 share. 2.5m gwx costs $40k to obtain
https://wx.network/governance/wx_distribution_voting

ROI on $100k cash buyout is 5 years excluding calculated market growth from cmc activation, christies and artbasel partnership which is expected to be worth $100m+. If wx goes from $10m to $100m cap your ROI is only a few months as the monthly emission from pool will be worth $15k.

$100k cash buyout will also produce a paper profit of x5000-x50 000 from market cap base pump at $20k to $500m up to $5bn over 6 to 12 months. The sustained pump liquidity will be obtained from wx/m2 wx emissions ($1500/month). This $1500 will grow to $150 000 per month if wx goes to back to 2022 cap of $1bn compared to todays $10m.

After the pump to $500m we will leverage a cmc activation (top 100 ranking) along with artbasel and christies partnership marketed as the first crypto art vault with 2017 timestamp and high definition art catalogue with design similarity and functionality to cryptopunks and autoglyphs. Generational Monetization potential $500m+ as a pioneering crypto asset in vein of Warhol/Picasso.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/
https://www.christies.com/en/artists/cryptopunks?lotavailability=All&sortby=relevance
https://www.christies.com/en/stories/a-to-z-nft-collecting-guide-b9f875b864c7488eb094595ced7d60cd

Marquise Museum NFT collection $2m SCC certified appraisal (june 2021) when cryptopunks reference was trading at $100m floor (today $1bn):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

*All vintage NFTs are erc-20 the difference is in hyperlinking and contract custom coding. I also have an ERC-20 vault minted in 2017.
*My project is an ABT with similarity to vintage art NFTs. Most ABTs are backed by gold and fiat, mine is backed by art and its the only one of its kind to do so. This is a primary innovation by Marquise Museum along with the first to market vaulting system for art based crypto assets (patent study 1800-14-04).
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokens



Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 9691



View Profile WWW
November 25, 2023, 12:12:06 AM
 #145

You received a bid of $1M for 49% of the collection and you didn't take it?  Shocked

The ERC20 tokens being from 2017 is a good start, and it appears the images are also from around that time, but last I looked at it I didn't see anything that necessarily connected the art with the tokens on the blockchain or elsewhere.

What would help is links to something that proves the "off-chain provenance" of the artwork being associated with the tokens.

██████▄██▄███████████▄█▄
█████▄█████▄████▄▄▄█
███████████████████
████▐███████████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄███████
██▄███████▄▀███▀█▀▀█▄▄▄█
▀██████████▄█████▄▄█████▀██
██████████▄████▀██▄▀▀▀█████▄
█████████████▐█▄▀▄███▀██▄
███████▄▄▄███▌▌█▄▀▀███████▄
▀▀▀███████████▌██▀▀▀▀▀█▄▄▄████▀
███████▀▀██████▄▄██▄▄▄▄███▀▀
████████████▀▀▀██████████
 BETFURY ....█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▀▀▀█▀▀▄░▄███
█▄░░░░░██▌▐████
█████▌▐██▌▐████
███▀▀░▀█▀░░▀███
██░▄▀░█░▄▀░░░██
██░░░░█░░░░░░██
███▄░░▄█▄░░▄███
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████
██░█▀░░░░░░░▀██
██░█░▀░▄░▄░░░██
██░█░░█████░░██
██░█░░▀███▀░░██
██░█░░░░▀░░▄░██
████▄░░░░░░░▄██
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
November 25, 2023, 02:50:18 AM
Last edit: January 08, 2024, 12:27:01 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #146

You received a bid of $1M for 49% of the collection and you didn't take it?  Shocked

The ERC20 tokens being from 2017 is a good start, and it appears the images are also from around that time, but last I looked at it I didn't see anything that necessarily connected the art with the tokens on the blockchain or elsewhere.

What would help is links to something that proves the "off-chain provenance" of the artwork being associated with the tokens.

Royal library of Sweden retains a physical copy since 2018:

https://libris.kb.se/bib/21731534

ISBN is a unique numeric identifier for published media.

9789198369403 is the identifier for Pimp Fashion cryptobook referenced both by ISBN and title in Bitcointalk screenshots:

Page 3:
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO

Here is the unedited and still working 6 year old hyperlink to the book containing all artworks although not all of these originals were included in the NFT migration:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2966730.msg30480040#msg30480040

These are the same images that are today integrated with the vaults on Eth, XCP and Waves:
https://www.marquisemuseum.com/

I also have an email from 2018 containing a full Binance listing application with alot of technical token and art association. It can be forwarded to prospective buyers.

ROI on the waves vault and v.2 NFT assets is easier to calculate now that the wx/m2 pool is operational as it receives wx emissions based on pool weight. ROI on $100k invested is 5 years and if wx goes up it can be a few months.

There is no onchain association except the website link in token description. There are several offchain references starting in 2017 mainly on bitcointalk. In essence this is not a vintage NFT it is ABT and it is the only Art backed ABT.

Most of the ABTs from 2017 are gold or fiat backed and if mine were too I would not make a claim that it was worth anything.
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokens

Vault utility stems from DeFi properties, royalty airdrops from NFT sales, IPO and tokenization/swap mechanics with LTV configurables similar to Punkbasic.

10 Million M2 from the waves vault can be swapped for rarible NFT priced at $100 000 and vice versa. The vault tokens are directly backed by the NFT supply consisting of 30 published and 30 unpublished artworks with 2017 certification. They were actually made in 2015-2016.

All ERC NFTs are minted with the same wallet that made the original token vault and retains 99.99% of that supply to this day. Which is yet another value enhancing continuity & provenance step.
0xC742BcE0c13E31F2BBEC650D3A26058b64038832

I have not yet decided where to mint the waves NFTs.

ps. Here is another picture from 2018 connecting the art with the tokens: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2970288.msg35218483#msg35218483
It's Jörmungandr #3

https://rarible.com/token/0xc9154424b823b10579895ccbe442d41b9abd96ed:90128172362037492596080030408277925649239380377171115284703702150830520008708?tab=overview


Also saw a guessing game (link: https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/968516097271042048) there Marquise asked cryptotwitter to guess where he's at, clue was it's his favorite city. Gave my answer, and guess what? I got it! Woot! So, here's what I got for giving the correct answer: https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/971164575948312577!! How cool is that!?

Here's what's inside that package:
https://i.imgur.com/ewnynfo.jpg

More pictures:
https://i.imgur.com/6gWXdXi.jpg


Jörmungandr #3 has a quite interesting backstory where it was misinterpreted as a Neo Nazi Motif. My intent with this installment was a further exploration of the Jörmungandr subset within Pimp Fashion to capture kinetic dynamics and the illusion of movement in static imagery.

Jörmungandr #1 (which is awaiting republication but can be viewed in the link to the book in this topic on page 10) & #2 share this thematic whereas the kinetic illusion of #3 is the fusing hands, the kinetic of #1 is the pursuit of the symbolic midgård serpent in the shape of a bicycle tyre. In #2 it is the cogwheel.

All three of them also reflect on the mythology of the midgård battle between Thor and the Serpent. In #3 Thor is readying for imminent battle with Mjölnir on standby. In #1 the Midgård serpent is in phallic pursuit of the main Heroine of Pimp Fashion but it can also be interpreted as her guardian. The mythological motif in #2 is a bit different than the others because it reflects back on the artist in a self portrait as Odin/Antichrist.

The themes I incorporated into Pimp Fashion are expressive heavyweights with layers of contemporary and historical symbolism. The artistic merit compared to other crypto "art"/memes from 2017 is leagues above the rest because of my education as an artist. However I must admit that cryptopunks did capture a post modern attitude in its simplicity and vapidness that does express artistic merit and it also resonated with its contemporary audience. But more importantly the technical proficiency on the backend is more valued than artistry with NFT collectors. Especially true for Mitchell Chan.

The unique properties of this asset makes it without the shadow of a doubt in the bluechip category of vintage crypto art: $500m+ market value. However as a bastard this is not within my reach. It must first be sold for pennies on the dollar to a jet setter who will then be able to extract its complete alchemical value.

This project is irrelevant to the public at large it was always designated as a high brow curiosity and repository for the ruling class/institutional. There are only 60x3 original NFTs so scalability at maturity is only a few dozen to a few hundred users.


Update:

Found a direct connection between XCP vault and the art from january 2018:

https://forums.counterparty.io/t/ticker-marquimuseum-now-in-float-on-counterparty-platform-pegged-to-xcp-1-1/4396

Moontime if I can get financed with $30-$50k. Or 2.5m+ gwx pool vote.
https://wx.network/governance/wx_distribution_voting


UPDATE:

100% of #ERC20 vault supply was added to the Uniswap liquidity pool

https://matcha.xyz/tokens/ethereum/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609

~$4200 $USDT = 1 M2 Vault token

1000 tokens can be swapped for NFT

Max supply 66 000 tokens/66 NFTs
Market cap interval $280m to $5bn

Update:

Another link with art+token references but its january 2021 or september 2020 not sure:
https://archive.org/details/vikingm1_20210121/mode/2up

It was before the NFT hype but then again this was never a vintage NFT, it is ABT with art as the backing asset, migrated to NFT in march 21.

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
November 11, 2024, 04:12:36 PM
 #147

Business plan v 1.0

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f96db06957da0ad5ec0089/t/67322c77f9c6490bf8422616/1731341432800/MM+business+plan+v1.0.pdf

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
November 22, 2024, 06:20:07 PM
 #148

Marquise Museum proudly presents a cornerstone of this project with the publication of a teen romance adventure made in 2014, later translated into audio book by Lula Rae. The Audio Version will be republished in the future:

https://amazon.com/dp/B0DNTPJRHF

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
January 25, 2025, 06:11:09 PM
Last edit: January 27, 2025, 03:07:00 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #149

Correct me if I am wrong but is not this XCP vault a bona fide vintage "NFT" considering its direct link to the image catalogue? (The squarespace link to the images is hosted on www.MarquiseMuseum.com which was also immutably burnt into token description during minting).

https://tokenscan.io/asset/MARQUIMUSEUM
https://forums.counterparty.io/t/ticker-marquimuseum-now-in-float-on-counterparty-platform-pegged-to-xcp-1-1/4396

All what's required is a simple hyperlink from the tokens to the images with a 2017 timestamp to classify as bona fide vintage stuff.

Remember (referencing ethereum chain), ERC-721/1155 didn't even exist at the time, all vintage NFTs are actually ERC-20's with customization in the smart contract.

It's true my smart contract does not contain any customization it was generically deployed by Minereum devs using their service here on Bitcointalk.

Regardless I am the first by a measure of years to invent and deploy NFT fractionalization through fungible vaulting.


I am willing to sell the XCP vault for $1 million in USDT. I still control all 66 000 tokens, buyer will receive pass phrase.

I wont be here forever, 7 years came and went already and I am aging. This is a true crypto artifact preserved in pristine state who knows the true value in a few years. Cryptopunks is worth several billion I am asking $1m.

I am also selling a 2017 ERC-20 vault, $3m.

For those who argue that its a fungible vault of 66 000 tokens ok well there is a reason for it if you read the patent filing but I could also burn all of the surplus so its only enough tokens for a 1:1 ratio to the images in the hyperlink.

This is a tiny collection of a few dozen images scalability was always going to be limited. It is perfectly suitable for OTC ownership transference it does not need mass market validation. It will remain within institutional and elite collector circuits, perhaps gallery and museum circuit if it is acknowledged by the establishment some time in the future.

It was already appraised to $2m in 2021 when cryptopunks as the reference model were trading x10 lower price floor than today.

https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

Adding that smart contract coding is only relevant on ETH, I deployed this vault myself on XCP and there ain't no coding on pepes and jolly rogers all they have are basic hyperlinks, as do mine. They are 100 and 500 in size my collection is 30 this is obviously a peer asset class and yet for some reason it remains overlooked and in obscura.

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 9691



View Profile WWW
January 27, 2025, 12:46:21 AM
 #150

Correct me if I am wrong but is not this XCP vault a bona fide vintage "NFT" considering its direct link to the image catalogue? (The squarespace link to the images is hosted on www.MarquiseMuseum.com which was also immutably burnt into token description during minting).

https://tokenscan.io/asset/MARQUIMUSEUM
https://forums.counterparty.io/t/ticker-marquimuseum-now-in-float-on-counterparty-platform-pegged-to-xcp-1-1/4396

All what's required is a simple hyperlink from the tokens to the images with a 2017 timestamp to classify as bona fide vintage stuff.

"Vault" refers to an Emblem Vault address, meaning Counterparty tokens that have been locked in a "vault" and a corresponding NFT is issued on the Ethereum blockchain. So that's not what that is.

You issued 66,000 divisible tokens in November 2017 -- there's a huge stretch of imagination involved to call these "NFTs" (Non-Fungible Tokens). They're extremely fungible. "Bona-fide NFT" would suggest a 1-of-1, although its true Rare Pepes and SoG are considered NFTs even if the supply is huge or they are divisible.

██████▄██▄███████████▄█▄
█████▄█████▄████▄▄▄█
███████████████████
████▐███████████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄███████
██▄███████▄▀███▀█▀▀█▄▄▄█
▀██████████▄█████▄▄█████▀██
██████████▄████▀██▄▀▀▀█████▄
█████████████▐█▄▀▄███▀██▄
███████▄▄▄███▌▌█▄▀▀███████▄
▀▀▀███████████▌██▀▀▀▀▀█▄▄▄████▀
███████▀▀██████▄▄██▄▄▄▄███▀▀
████████████▀▀▀██████████
 BETFURY ....█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▀▀▀█▀▀▄░▄███
█▄░░░░░██▌▐████
█████▌▐██▌▐████
███▀▀░▀█▀░░▀███
██░▄▀░█░▄▀░░░██
██░░░░█░░░░░░██
███▄░░▄█▄░░▄███
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████
██░█▀░░░░░░░▀██
██░█░▀░▄░▄░░░██
██░█░░█████░░██
██░█░░▀███▀░░██
██░█░░░░▀░░▄░██
████▄░░░░░░░▄██
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2025, 03:48:51 AM
Last edit: January 27, 2025, 04:03:45 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #151

Sorry I have been unfocused lately this is not a vintage NFT of course.

It is an Asset Backed Token (ABT) which was at the time pegged to custom art assets. It is unique in its category since the other ABT's from 2017 were all backed by Gold or fiat.

https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/tokenized-products

The art assets were migrated to Opensea and Rarible in 2021/22 and are NFTs since.

The only comparable asset is vintage NFT's and for this reason I argue that it may hold a fraction of the value of a vintage NFT.

The problem is that the spread between different 2017 NFTs is big, anywhere from $100k to billions.

I am willing to sell for $1m or thereabout.

It's art, it's crypto, it's 2017 and it is also the progenitor to fractionalization of art assets on blockchain. Vaulting is in mass use today in many projects but from a collectible aspect it does not appear to be particularly valued (collectors aren't looking for vault chronology in other words). So I would not claim that this part of the projects fungible innovation is valuable, but it appears to be the originator of a concept which was later reinvented and widely implemented. Culturally (in the commercial art circuit) that is usually one hallmark and indicator of value (originator/use case).

The confusion and uncertainty is caused by the wrongful attribution as an NFT.

It has alot more substance than 2021 or newer NFT's but then again most of those are not worth anything.

I believe the SCC appraisal is correct at $2 to $4 million and I also think it will outperform every other classical asset over the next 30 years by a factor of 3-5 similar to Orange Marilyn by Andy Warhol (bought for $1000 in 1960 sold for $15m in 1995).

To further complicate things it is also illiquid because it is a very small asset base of 30-50 images. It is suitable for OTC sale to institutional or well connected buyer, it is not intended for mass market appeal as scalability is limited to a few hundred users. The fact that the tokens and art doesn't contain market history is irrelevant, archaeological rediscoveries such as viking coin treasures don't have trading data but everyone knows it's valuable because they just compare it to similar market assets.

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 9691



View Profile WWW
January 27, 2025, 03:56:42 AM
 #152

It has alot more substance than 2021 or newer NFT's but then again most of those are not worth anything.

I agree with this part. If you can clearly demonstrate the intent you had back then was to "fractionalize artworks" then yes, you may be on to something. Truth be told, I think $1M is high for a market cap for such a token supply, and its late 2017, which isn't really "early" by crypto standards. Even the first truly tokenized artwork doesn't garner a whole lot of interest from token collectors (albeit it is on an obscure blockchain). Still, good luck.

██████▄██▄███████████▄█▄
█████▄█████▄████▄▄▄█
███████████████████
████▐███████████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄███████
██▄███████▄▀███▀█▀▀█▄▄▄█
▀██████████▄█████▄▄█████▀██
██████████▄████▀██▄▀▀▀█████▄
█████████████▐█▄▀▄███▀██▄
███████▄▄▄███▌▌█▄▀▀███████▄
▀▀▀███████████▌██▀▀▀▀▀█▄▄▄████▀
███████▀▀██████▄▄██▄▄▄▄███▀▀
████████████▀▀▀██████████
 BETFURY ....█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▀▀▀█▀▀▄░▄███
█▄░░░░░██▌▐████
█████▌▐██▌▐████
███▀▀░▀█▀░░▀███
██░▄▀░█░▄▀░░░██
██░░░░█░░░░░░██
███▄░░▄█▄░░▄███
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
█████████████
███████████████
███████████████
██▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████
██░█▀░░░░░░░▀██
██░█░▀░▄░▄░░░██
██░█░░█████░░██
██░█░░▀███▀░░██
██░█░░░░▀░░▄░██
████▄░░░░░░░▄██
███████████████
███████████████
░░█████████████
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2025, 04:07:48 AM
Last edit: January 29, 2025, 04:03:03 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #153

It has alot more substance than 2021 or newer NFT's but then again most of those are not worth anything.

I agree with this part. If you can clearly demonstrate the intent you had back then was to "fractionalize artworks" then yes, you may be on to something. Truth be told, I think $1M is high for a market cap for such a token supply, and its late 2017, which isn't really "early" by crypto standards. Even the first truly tokenized artwork doesn't garner a whole lot of interest from token collectors (albeit it is on an obscure blockchain). Still, good luck.

The yardstick keeps moving first I should show the connection between the art and tokens, which I did which in itself is kind of unbelievable to out of nowhere actually back it up. Now it's this but I don't blame anyone because I myself am confused at times.

The fractional intent is self explanatory and it is also fully presented in the patent study from 2018. Redeem tokens, get the book. If they have 50% of the required amount which was also specified at the time, then they have 50% of the book i.e fractional ownership.

The entire preface of the solution is the pegging of fungible tokens to hard asset in this case the book.

If you say "fractionalize artworks" I say that's easy to show.

Fractionalize JPGs? No not even close. Basing anything on the value of jpgs in 2017 would be lunacy.

In any case the fractional part of the project is not valued by anyone as proven by your remark. It was the progenitor to art vaulting on ethereum people can make what they will of it because it's not commercially relevant.

Let's not get into an argument here, because I was the one to initially misattribute it as Vintage NFT. You corrected me I stand corrected.

2017 is foundational on ethereum my dude. But fair enough I was originally referring to the xcp version.

There are 3 versions on XCP ETH and Waves $1m, $3m and a few hundred k respectively. The waves version is cashflow generating (defi integration) p/e 10 on $100k cap but the risk level is ridiculous 3 letter agencies are emailing me about the russian founder.

On an unrelated note the waves vault can be pumped and sustained from $100k to $500m+ or top 100 global rank. I am looking to partner with an investor to secure this unprecedented paper profit. We will then invest a share of the capital into wx/waves liquidity pools and gwx to generate sustained cashflow to keep the $500m cap. After that I will market make daily volume to enter cmc and then possibly partner with top 20 cex and later on futures listing combined with legacy art circuit exhibitions to realize the $500m paper profit. I need $150k for this venture buyer gets 50% of token supply and NFT base.

https://www.coinlore.com/coin/marquise-museum
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale

Be advised that waves is russian and possibly under investigation for embezzlement and defrauding investors. However I believe that a successful bootstrapping of the waves sandbox will convert into eth/xcp monetization of the primary versions of Marquise Museum. Risk level should be lower on those platforms but price of entry is also $1m+ compared to $100k on waves.

We will post an offer of intent and set up a business entity with legal M & A advisory (cheaper than it sounds as its a small project). To make everything legally binding. The best way to promote this is just pump the cap by x5000 with CMC active tracking.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2025, 10:54:10 PM
 #154

OS 2 version is in publication:

https://opensea.io/item/ethereum/0x41072b3e6b3ce4afc46a1b576a8c1983a6804500/1

Compared to v1 from 2021 the image resolution is now 100% to scale and lots of vital project info pertinent to its 2017 vintage status was included in the product description.

Price was lowered from $100 000 to $15 000 as a first time offer and because of changing NFT markets and with a greater reliance on the new OS2 locked 10% projected aftermarket royality cashflow as an alternative to capture future value.

30 unique NFTs are in publication with another 15 up to 30 in unpublished reserves for a max supply of 60 in the ERC version. All of the originals can be viewed on xcp forum post from 2018.

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
MarquiseMuseum (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 759
Merit: 29

www.MarquiseMuseum.com


View Profile WWW
May 27, 2025, 01:59:10 PM
Last edit: June 22, 2025, 12:37:28 AM by MarquiseMuseum
 #155

This project is relaunched as a complete Opensea 2.0 integrated product line consisting of NFT art assets. The legacy presentation for the vault system on the first page is now only for provenance records and the fungible swaps will be decommissioned because Opensea does not require it anymore since their platform contains everything for NFT trading.

There are 20 art collections to choose from and they are presented on the first page of this announcement. There are still some simplified mechanics for users to receive aftermarket royalties but the complex vault system with DeFi integration is decommissioned. The primary market for buying and selling is on Opensea and it is not meaningful to try and bridge it with external token trading unless Opensea develops an integrated NFTx functionality for it in the future.

This project has exited development stage and entered commercialization as an operational and fully automated system for trading on Opensea 2.0.

Patent studied 2017 Certified ABT/NFT catalogue
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
ABTx swap certificate for https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum/sale 7.5m tokens per NFT
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!