Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 11:11:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: bitmain and asicboost/segwit  (Read 1273 times)
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4214
Merit: 4475



View Profile
April 06, 2017, 11:55:06 PM
Last edit: April 07, 2017, 12:07:06 AM by franky1
 #21

quoting vays..(facepalm)
the guy that announced he doesnt program and doesnt even hold much bitcoin
try someone better next time


asics have been around longer than segwit, even longer than Luke JR announcing to use the anyonecanspend opcode exploit to go soft...

if segwit runs into a hurdle in feb 2017 you cant blame hardware made in 2015.. the UN-ACTIVATED segwit software thats just been created obviously didnt take hardware efficiencies into account..

(unless asic manufacturers had a time machine to go back to make an exploit before segwit was coded purely to screw with segwit 2 years later)

the truth is that gmaxwell only found a segwit issue last month.. and realised segwit cant function if efficient asics are running. but...
instead of admitting segwit had an issue and the only remedy is a user node consensus update(HF) to not need 2 merkles.. instead he wants to call asics the exploit..(facepalm)

makes me laugh

come on laugh with me
how can a hardware manufacturer make an intentional exploit attack in 2015 for software only released late 2016.

much simpler answer is gmaxwell only found a segwit flaw last month and is now pointing fingers

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
1715123493
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715123493

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715123493
Reply with quote  #2

1715123493
Report to moderator
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1632


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
April 07, 2017, 06:24:41 AM
 #22

Holy crap I never even thought of it but ya. That's a huge reason for them never to support segwit!! Is this true though? How would you know if asics would be useless with segwit?
Are you even listening? Current miners will hash exactly the same way they always have. If bitmain are doing something secretive with their special sauce then segwit will block it and make them only usable in the same way the rest of the public is using them.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
vapourminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4326
Merit: 3523


what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 04:23:31 PM
 #23

thanks for the explanations, i wasnt sure how asicboost was/is/could be implemented, and if it would suddenly doorstop a bunch of hardware. sounds like bitmain stuff will work either way, just with a 20% boost with proper firmware.

iamnotback
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 265



View Profile
April 15, 2017, 07:58:22 AM
 #24

just done some quick maths



hmm
looks like BTCC and F2pool are the ones making more blocks than their hash %
not the other way round

Nonsense.

The hashrate measured would include the performance boost of the hashrate via AsicBoost.

There is no way to measure whether covert AsicBoost is being used or not. It is indeed 100% covert.

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!