[ANN] [BCD] BitCAD - Encrypted Smart Platform

[omorfi]

Blog spreadsheet still not up to date. i hope you update it. Thank you managers

[herdiansyahdanang]

I removed your signature because I feared to be given neg trust by lauda.But I hope I will get rewarded for the time I wore your signature.

For sure!
Everybody will be paid according to the rules of BitCAD' Bounty Program 

Yes everyone expect that.
Red trust from lauda. Hope there is a fee for bounty program ..
Because it is time-consuming for those who follow bounty from the beginning.

[DomainMagnate]

If signature participant get neg rating,all other bounty participants also got neg rating.Why target sig participants alone?This is unfair to them

[Zepher]

https://etherscan.io/address/0x125D1EB816317A2F46Ae0798bA1376479108698c

This does not give a proof of investors..lol.No one will fall for such a crap.Someone, please ask mods to lock this thread.

We do what you are saying. What else should we do? Maybe sing? or dance? What project in your opinion is scam? Nobody is going to get away with your money . All team members are represented. All people are alive, they have addresses and passports. Great work on the project has already done. Raised funds will be allocated to development and promotion. So, what`s wrong there???

After carefully reading everything, I believe admins must explain how transactions that took place more than 50 days ago have any relationship with this ICO. If no explanation is given, then I believe this project deserves no support.

Agreed.

Those tx's have absolutely nothing to do with this so called ICO.. and, OP, until you provide public proof of funds "raised", my rating will remain.

This looks like a terrible attempt at a scam to me. I would recommend staying far away from this.

[vladmitrofanov]

https://etherscan.io/address/0x125D1EB816317A2F46Ae0798bA1376479108698c

This does not give a proof of investors..lol.No one will fall for such a crap.Someone, please ask mods to lock this thread.

We do what you are saying. What else should we do? Maybe sing? or dance? What project in your opinion is scam? Nobody is going to get away with your money . All team members are represented. All people are alive, they have addresses and passports. Great work on the project has already done. Raised funds will be allocated to development and promotion. So, what`s wrong there???

After carefully reading everything, I believe admins must explain how transactions that took place more than 50 days ago have any relationship with this ICO. If no explanation is given, then I believe this project deserves no support.

Agreed.

Those tx's have absolutely nothing to do with this so called ICO.. and, OP, until you provide public proof of funds "raised", my rating will remain.

This looks like a terrible attempt at a scam to me. I would recommend staying far away from this.

So, if you need one more public proof, give us another address, and we send ether to this address.

We do this at last time, @thebitstreet send us address, we send him 0.1 ether, he return it. Please, tell us what do you need more? We do it.

0x06057678D4A5d678306aA263C71bEd1c4d45aE1C

[applsdev]

It was a good attempt. But not.
Internal contract transactions, as well as internal addresses, are internal service operations in smart contract and are not relevant to external accounts.
This transaction does not prove anything. The proof can be a transaction to a predetermined and named external address at the agreed time with an exact agreed amount.
BitCAD - 100% SCAM

We expect your proof on the published conditions before the end of the current calendar date by UTC (GMT).

[vladmitrofanov]

It was a good attempt. But not.
Internal contract transactions, as well as internal addresses, are internal service operations in smart contract and are not relevant to external accounts.
This transaction does not prove anything. The proof can be a transaction to a predetermined and named external address at the agreed time with an exact agreed amount.
BitCAD - 100% SCAM

We expect your proof on the published conditions before the end of the current calendar date by UTC (GMT).

Well, we will do it.

I propose the following: for the newly generated purse address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 tomorrow (08.06.2017) during the day we will make a transaction in the amount of 0.1 ether from the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c.

These conditions are suitable?

Thank you.

[applsdev]

At 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT you are translating to the address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 amount of
0.00198020 ETH. The presence in the Ethereum blockchain of outgoing transaction from the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 with the amount of 0.00198020 ETH and the time of generation 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT is 100% proof.
Any other outcome is a negative result.

[vladmitrofanov]

At 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT you are translating to the address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 amount of
0.00198020 ETH. The presence in the Ethereum blockchain of outgoing transaction from the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 with the amount of 0.00198020 ETH and the time of generation 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT is 100% proof.
Any other outcome is a negative result.

We do these transaction at 09:22 GMT 08.06.2017 with amount of 0.00198020 ETH.

[GalaWan]

How can you prove now that you can not prove anything until today? There is nothing. You do not make checks first, it's right. I hope you can enlighten us on this issue, we are unjust.

[vladmitrofanov]

At 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT you are translating to the address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 amount of
0.00198020 ETH. The presence in the Ethereum blockchain of outgoing transaction from the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 with the amount of 0.00198020 ETH and the time of generation 09:22 08.06.2017 GMT is 100% proof.
Any other outcome is a negative result.

Applsdev, can we increase the amount of the transaction? Better more than 1 ether. In recent times, small amounts have not been sent. We are ready to make the coordinated transaction in the near future, or we wait until the appointed time?

[applsdev]

I agree. The amount is increased to 1.00198020 ETH. Time extend till. 06/09/2017 at 09:22 GMT.

[vladmitrofanov]

I agree. The amount is increased to 1.00198020 ETH. Time extend till. 06/09/2017 at 09:22 GMT.

Can we send it today?

A multi-signature wallet is not synchronized as quickly as we want cause holders are in different time zones.

[btvGainer]

Doing it before your ICO ends would be better.It will help you get more funds if you proved it successfully.I see you guys trying to convince and clear all acussations put against you and that is a good thing.

[necromastery]

Is there possible to confirm the ownership of this address 0x06057678D4A5d678306aA263C71bEd1c4d45aE1C by doing a sign message? Is this menthod accepted through ethereum? Because since bitcoin can confirm the ownership of an address by doing it, why not this one, isnt?

#I just telling what are in my mind, I hope I didn't get any trouble

[applsdev]

Yes. It possible. But the process of verifying the signed message, like its creation, is more complicated and dreary. The (micro) transaction of the exact amount agreed in advance and at the agreed time is a much simpler and more reliable method both in the proof and in the verification .. The result does not require special actions for verification. It is visible immediately and visually directly in the block chain.

[applsdev]

As expected, the agreed transaction amount 1.00198020 ETH from address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 09.06.2017 at 09:22 GMT did not follow. The scammers could not prove that the funds at the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c, which they claimed to be part of their ICO charges, belong to them. That is, they do not have access to an account at this address, which, in fact, indicates that these funds in 25,859,45089568 ETH ($ 6,822,240.34) have absolutely nothing to do with the BitCAD scam project. All of their "fees" are drawn. "MORE THAN 5M RAISED" ICO does not exist. The authors of the project are lie to you..
"Project" BitCAD - 100% SCAM

P.S. Now you can bury it.

[vladmitrofanov]

As expected, the agreed transaction amount 1.00198020 ETH from address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 09.06.2017 at 09:22 GMT did not follow. The scammers could not prove that the funds at the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c, which they claimed to be part of their ICO charges, belong to them. That is, they do not have access to an account at this address, which, in fact, indicates that these funds in 25,859,45089568 ETH ($ 6,822,240.34) have absolutely nothing to do with the BitCAD scam project. All of their "fees" are drawn. "MORE THAN 5M RAISED" ICO does not exist. The authors of the project are lying.
"Project" BitCAD - 100% SCAM

P.S. Now you can bury it.

We have experienced a technical error with Mist's wallet. We will immediately report a change in this situation.

[applsdev]

"The more absurd your excuses, the deeper the abyss of the fall of your reputation..." (c) applsdev.
"Project" BitCAD - 100% SCAM

[btvGainer]

As expected, the agreed transaction amount 1.00198020 ETH from address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c to address 0x07488eb800Db50dD451bf356DB54B6035c1ff8D7 09.06.2017 at 09:22 GMT did not follow. The scammers could not prove that the funds at the address 0x06057678d4a5d678306aa263c71bed1c4d45ae1c, which they claimed to be part of their ICO charges, belong to them. That is, they do not have access to an account at this address, which, in fact, indicates that these funds in 25,859,45089568 ETH ($ 6,822,240.34) have absolutely nothing to do with the BitCAD scam project. All of their "fees" are drawn. "MORE THAN 5M RAISED" ICO does not exist. The authors of the project are lying.
"Project" BitCAD - 100% SCAM

P.S. Now you can bury it.

We have experienced a technical error with Mist's wallet. We will immediately report a change in this situation.

Enough is enough man.If you cant prove yourself now,you can never do it again.How many more chances you want to take to prove you are not scammer but failed to prove it.Accept the facts and do not come back here with another excuse.