⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions

[Zlantann]

upload photo to forum

As of last week we saw Manchester United hitting hard to get Donnarumma which hasn't stopped and with the goalkeeper trying to leave PSG, Manchester City have started showing much interest for the goalkeeper as Ederson is in talks with Fenerbahce.
Now between Manchester United and Manchester City that are interested in the Italian shot stopper Donnarumma, which of the Manchesters would best suit him, UTD or The Citizens?

It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on. According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.   

[Futurexxx]

upload photo to forum
It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on. According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.  

I was surprised when he was fit and wasn't even playing against Tottenham Hotspur, when I asked around, I was told that he had an issue with Luis Enrique, and he has been banish from the team, I wasn't that pleased because he is a top quality player that will improve so many top teams around the world because their are few goalkeepers currently that are better than him.
As for his potential move to Manchester city, is a really good signing if Manchester city can pull this off because he has all it takes to be a success in the English premier league.
Then as for psg, it would be logical for them to replace him with someone close to dounaruma's quality or even better because the goalkeeper that was selected for the finals against Tottenham is not good enough to be the first choice goalkeeper, just take a look at the second goal that they conceded, it was a giveaway in my own opinion, so they really need to replace him with someone capable to do what's needed from him, not inferior goalkeeper like the one they have now.

[Iroh]

Chelsea have made several crucial moves in this transfer window, as they are rebuilding the club. One such move is Nkuku to get another player in, which could have an impact on the transfer of players Chelsea are interested in. If Nkunku's transfer is successful, it will help Chelsea accelerate the move for Xavi Simons. So far, Chelsea is keen to keep Xavi Simons and also his teammates at Chelsea.


Source: Chelsea plan has always been Nkunku and Jackson to leave the club, 𝐗𝐚𝐯𝐢 𝐒𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐆𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐨 to join.

With the recent signings Chelsea has made, they're serious about claiming the title of the EPL this season. They had fought hard last season and finished 4th. With the new addition, they're sure to fight much harder for the top spot.
I'm curious on and eager to watch the recent young signing, Estêvão play. I think he would be very instrumental and working alongside Palmer, they're sure to make any goalie work. The new season of the EPL would be more exciting as lots of clubs has also bolstered their squad in preparation for a tough tournament

[Velvet78]

Congratulations to Galatasaray already!

A really good choice of a goalkeeper for them honestly. However they will need to pay more for his fee... As far as I know Manchester City demands a sum around 20 million euros.

Maybe they can find a middle way instead. In this situation, we can consider the Donnarumma deal pretty much done for Guardiola's team then. 

[Obari]

It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on. According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.   

The main clubs keen on making prominent signings in the transfer window is Manchester United and Chelsea, these teams have been in touch with great players and making sure they acquire their targets with ease efforts.Getting fed up by this whole transfer saga because winning is very crucial and important. Everyone wants to see their club lifting trophies and that's ultimate goal. PSG lost vital players over the years because they've been reluctant but no more time for that because Luis Enrique had made sure winning is observed and achieved. Donnarumma on the trends, I would be very dissapointed if les Parisiens allow him exits the club, he's been a crucial member for the team.

[shinratensei_]

It seems that Manchester united are willing to accept Roma's proposal for the loan of the player Sancho with a buy-back obligation set at 20 million.
This is a good market coup for Roma although I doubt the player is ready for the change of league

Is it a loan? The last time i've heard Roma was keen in signing him for 20m. If i were MU, i would that such offer immediately instead of keeping Sancho to get nothing. They should take that 20m, then forget everything happened between them and him. He has never been good in MU, and let him leave is the best decision.

As for the buyobligation, this kinda stupid when you put it to the flop player like him. It can also be negated by paid the penalty like Chelsea did. Just let him leave as a permanent transfer with sell on clause. This makes more sense.
Always learned from what happened in the past.

[Phoenix Anka]

He could get a starting eleven opportunity with Roma. Roma, on the other hand, will struggle to get back on their feet. Jadon Sancho needs to compete with Roma, where he'll experience a high-level competition. I hope the transfer is completed, and Roma can achieve success again with Sancho.

I sincerely hope this happens because basically the RFoma needs all the help it can get to get things back on track for this team in which I saw great potential last season. In fact, I have faith in them just as I have faith in AC Milan. It seems to me that these teams are starting to recover their competitive level, that's something that's noticeable and hopefully it can be materialized by demonstrating their game.

Roma is a team with potential, and if Jadon Sancho's transfer goes through, they'll be a team capable of qualifying for the Champions League if they're successful in Italy. Roma's ability to achieve high rankings in Italy without raising high expectations could help them play without stress. Teams without stress are always more likely to succeed. Roma lacks the pressure of Inter and Napoli.

[Oluwa-btc]

Grealish is a new player of everton from Manchester City and it is on Loan.
Donnarumma will leave PSG, he wants to play in Premier League.
News of the day from Romano.

I'm excited for this move. All I want to see is that Aston Villa Jack Grealish back. He was a great playerbut wasn't that machine kind of player Pep Guardiola wanted him to be for Manchester City. It changed the kind of game he played. Well, I'm certain he'll get same freedom to be a free playmaker like he was with Villa at Everton. Donnarumma already in talks with City. Immediately Ederson leaves, he'll join City.

[Webetcoins]

What's clear is that Garnacho couldn't meet the challenges presented by his coach, so it's no surprise that Amorim immediately dropped him from the starting lineup. Furthermore Amorim has his own program of bringing in new players. It's not unlike Ten Hag approach as Manchester United manager. Even quality players who don't fit the coach needs are discarded.
Now Garnacho is determined to go to Chelsea because there's no way back at Manchester United. If he does leave, I'm curious to see how Garnacho will prove himself at Chelsea, where the competition is even fiercer.

Not every player has that loyalty to a team, and why should they? I mean Garnacho required to play in a wildy different place, so why would he accept to play in a team that is requesting him to play out of position and still be a terrible team?

Chelsea is a better team AND would play him at his position. So obviously he would want to go there. Garnacho doesn't owe United anything, and they will just sell him, which means he is going to make a lot of money from it as well. We need to make sure that we are seeing how they are improving.

Garnacho will go for at least 50 million or so, that is what I assume of course, we do not have the latest information. Chelsea is waiting, so that they can sell some few more players, in order to get the money to buy Garnacho.

[Lillominato89]

It seems that Manchester united are willing to accept Roma's proposal for the loan of the player Sancho with a buy-back obligation set at 20 million.
This is a good market coup for Roma although I doubt the player is ready for the change of league

Is it a loan? The last time i've heard Roma was keen in signing him for 20m. If i were MU, i would that such offer immediately instead of keeping Sancho to get nothing. They should take that 20m, then forget everything happened between them and him. He has never been good in MU, and let him leave is the best decision.

As for the buyobligation, this kinda stupid when you put it to the flop player like him. It can also be negated by paid the penalty like Chelsea did. Just let him leave as a permanent transfer with sell on clause. This makes more sense.
Always learned from what happened in the past.

From what I understand it is a loan with a mandatory redemption fee of €20 million
But I still do not understand if this formula has been accepted by Manchester united. Perhaps they prefer to sell him directly in this market session and cash in as much as possible from this transfer.

[Nheer]

It's not just Garnacho several other players have also had issues with Amorim, leading to serious problems for some of them. Some say the players' egotism has led to their problems with the coach, and perhaps there's no harm in that, considering their inconsistent performance. A high asking price will certainly make it difficult for other clubs to sign Garnacho, and the only chance to repair the relationship with the coach is to get playing time this season, even if it's not a priority which Amorim can choose because there are other players who might be his mainstay.

This kind of situation happens a lot nowadays and I don't blame the coach for the decision to leave out some players. It's his responsibility to make the team better and whatever approach and decision he makes is okay for me even though it will not be in favor of some players. Every coach has their playing pattern and they know the kind of players that can execute it perfectly for them so if a player is left out and they are feeling bad then they should go join another team. Garnacho might feel disappointed but every coach must do what must be done to make the team better. We saw how Enzo Maresca did the same thing at Chelsea and now they are better than before. As a player there will always be a coach that will like your style of play even if you're rejected by another.

Chelsea already wants the services of Garnacho he just have to pray both teams come to agreement so he can join Chelsea this season.

[hyudien]

Congratulations to Galatasaray already!

A really good choice of a goalkeeper for them honestly. However they will need to pay more for his fee... As far as I know Manchester City demands a sum around 20 million euros.

Maybe they can find a middle way instead. In this situation, we can consider the Donnarumma deal pretty much done for Guardiola's team then. 

So in the end Galatasaray submitted a higher offer than before, but I still think their offer is very low for Ederson, I think if they offered 15-18 million euros, Man City would likely not reject it and let Ederson leave. This would also expedite Donnarumma move to City.
Clearly I feel acquiring Ederson would be very beneficial for the Turkish club. Furthermore if the price is under 20 million euros, I think it's a bargain for a goalkeeper of Ederson caliber. Galatasaray could use him for the next three seasons.

[Tonimez]

It seems that Manchester united are willing to accept Roma's proposal for the loan of the player Sancho with a buy-back obligation set at 20 million.
This is a good market coup for Roma although I doubt the player is ready for the change of league

Is it a loan? The last time i've heard Roma was keen in signing him for 20m. If i were MU, i would that such offer immediately instead of keeping Sancho to get nothing. They should take that 20m, then forget everything happened between them and him. He has never been good in MU, and let him leave is the best decision.

As for the buyobligation, this kinda stupid when you put it to the flop player like him. It can also be negated by paid the penalty like Chelsea did. Just let him leave as a permanent transfer with sell on clause. This makes more sense.
Always learned from what happened in the past.

From what I understand it is a loan with a mandatory redemption fee of €20 million
But I still do not understand if this formula has been accepted by Manchester united. Perhaps they prefer to sell him directly in this market session and cash in as much as possible from this transfer.

It surprises me every summer transfer to believe that Jason Sancho is now a regular loanee to different places. Manchester United pursued Sancho for over two seasons before they secured the deal. Now imagine how the long sort after player became a regular loanee every season. I believe that if this deal is secured, then he would be happy again since I'm very sure he would be more appreciated in Roma than Manchester. Sancho is a great player even though he doesn't seem to be a regular blockbuster.

Chelsea chose to pay a 5 million fine in order to avert the obligations to buy him as contained in his loan deal to Stamford bridge which is a red flag and to me, it's a dent to his personality. However, Juventus has also shown interest but As Roma has upper hand.

[shinratensei_]

It seems that Manchester united are willing to accept Roma's proposal for the loan of the player Sancho with a buy-back obligation set at 20 million.
This is a good market coup for Roma although I doubt the player is ready for the change of league

Is it a loan? The last time i've heard Roma was keen in signing him for 20m. If i were MU, i would that such offer immediately instead of keeping Sancho to get nothing. They should take that 20m, then forget everything happened between them and him. He has never been good in MU, and let him leave is the best decision.

As for the buyobligation, this kinda stupid when you put it to the flop player like him. It can also be negated by paid the penalty like Chelsea did. Just let him leave as a permanent transfer with sell on clause. This makes more sense.
Always learned from what happened in the past.

From what I understand it is a loan with a mandatory redemption fee of €20 million
But I still do not understand if this formula has been accepted by Manchester united. Perhaps they prefer to sell him directly in this market session and cash in as much as possible from this transfer.

If MU accepts it, that's obvious they never learn from their mistake. They had also similar agreement with Chelsea for Sancho, yet Chelsea sent him back to them by paid 5m penalty to them. The better they to sell him as a permanent or never.

[Nightwalker(NW)]

Is it a loan? The last time i've heard Roma was keen in signing him for 20m. If i were MU, i would that such offer immediately instead of keeping Sancho to get nothing. They should take that 20m, then forget everything happened between them and him. He has never been good in MU, and let him leave is the best decision.

As for the buyobligation, this kinda stupid when you put it to the flop player like him. It can also be negated by paid the penalty like Chelsea did. Just let him leave as a permanent transfer with sell on clause. This makes more sense.
Always learned from what happened in the past.

I agree with you too, I will take the money and sell him since the club doesn't want him and also forgo the amount of money spent in signing him. I am just thinking that maybe the money is small for MU that's why they don't want to sell him for that amount. If they send him on loan, they will also be paying part of his salary, it's better they sell him once and for all.

[Adbitco]

It seems that Manchester united are willing to accept Roma's proposal for the loan of the player Sancho with a buy-back obligation set at 20 million.
This is a good market coup for Roma although I doubt the player is ready for the change of league

What a player he was, I never expected that in my wildest dreams that Sancho was going to play for AS Roma after his move to Manchester United from Borussia Dortmund. I believe even he himself wouldn't have believed it. But I thought Chelsea were supposed to sign him this season after the loan spell expired, I just wonder what happened that they don't need him anymore.

[Alpha Marine]

It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on.

It's just business, it's nothing personal, and I think the player can understand that. They are getting a younger keeper and a better one, according to them, so they are not really doing anything wrong. Besides, the keeper is still good and will get offers from top clubs.
I think PSG just didn't want to have a player earning such a high salary to be a second choice, and I understand them. Donnarumma is on a 12 million annual salary and having player like that as a second choice is bad business.

According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.   

It's a no-brainer that he will choose a Champions League team. He is one of the best in his position, so it's only fair that he plays in the highest club competition in the world for an elite team. It looks like Man City is his next destination because Ederson will be going to Galatasaray if the bid is accepted.

[Judith87403]

It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on. According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.   

Come to think of it, what do you want psg or luis enrique to do in this very case because it's not their fault that donnarumma wants to leave. I read that he was offered new contracts over and over again but he said no his not signing. Will they force or beat him to sign the contract, no. He wants to leave and the club needs to sell him since he wants to go and I think that's the best thing to do in this very situation. He has played his part last season in helping the team, maybe he want to experience another league.

[Hvdv]

upload photo to forum

As of last week we saw Manchester United hitting hard to get Donnarumma which hasn't stopped and with the goalkeeper trying to leave PSG, Manchester City have started showing much interest for the goalkeeper as Ederson is in talks with Fenerbahce.
Now between Manchester United and Manchester City that are interested in the Italian shot stopper Donnarumma, which of the Manchesters would best suit him, UTD or The Citizens?

It's sad to see a goalkeeper who worked hard to bring honour to the club being abandoned and replaced. Since the club is supporting Luis Enrique to replace the Italian goalstopper, he has to move on. According to some reports, Donnarumma prefers moving to Manchester City or Chelsea. Maybe he is focusing on clubs that are playing in the Champions League. Manchester United might have resolved to manage Onana since the player is still in Old Trafford.   

I can't understand why they still trust Onana. If it were me, I'd sell him and consider Donnarumma. A goalkeeper like Donnarumma could eliminate the goalkeeper problem for at least six or seven years. I don't understand why Enrique had a problem with him.

[Guccho]

I can't understand why they still trust Onana. If it were me, I'd sell him and consider Donnarumma. A goalkeeper like Donnarumma could eliminate the goalkeeper problem for at least six or seven years. I don't understand why Enrique had a problem with him.

Nut sure what you are getting at. Donnarumma is not old yet and is in his prime and needs to work in a team where he is respected. I suppose that either at Manchester City or Manchester United, that would be a better fit at the moment. They are well established, have the best football and can play in the Champions League on a yearly basis which appears to be what he desires. United could use him as well, although with Onana staying, and them still rebuilding, it would be trickier to feel completely trusted at United. To be fair, the sale of Onana and the transfer of Donnarumma would have fixed many issues at United, yet sometimes the manager has his own ideas and way of doing, and it might be something that bothers the fans, though.