What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ?

[dossantosleite]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

[swogerino]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

The dice and casino games always because they are projected with the house edge that will always make you lose in the long run. In a basketball game you can read news about the teams and watch the standings and with an odd 1.05 99% of the times it will be a win.

[Celsiuss]

Depends on how good you're at predicting sports. If you don't know anything and just betting blindly based on the odds, you're probably going to lose. On casino games, you are doomed to lose unless you are very lucky. The house always wins on casino, and they also do for the most part on sports betting.

[chris200x9]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

The dice and casino games always because they are projected with the house edge that will always make you lose in the long run. In a basketball game you can read news about the teams and watch the standings and with an odd 1.05 99% of the times it will be a win.

Yes it is Dice and sports betting the odds are the dead opposite. Don't compare both are same. Because in sports betting the ratio is 1.05 means as a mate said 99% we will win our bet. And that is why the ratio is very less, and usually people will not choose this type of ratios because suppose if we lose our bet it's a big loss for us. But in Dice game is an unpredictable game you may win or may not be that's it.

[mirakal]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I guess it is risky on sports betting, that is my understanding because every time set a line like the ATS, the odds are like 1.90 or -110, so that means they are putting juice of 10%, in dice the house edge is like 1% which is very low compared the juice you will have to pay when you bet wins.
However based on chances, you have a bigger chance of winning since you can analyze the data while in dice it is purely based on luck.

[roadbits]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I guess it is risky on sports betting, that is my understanding because every time set a line like the ATS, the odds are like 1.90 or -110, so that means they are putting juice of 10%, in dice the house edge is like 1% which is very low compared the juice you will have to pay when you bet wins.
However based on chances, you have a bigger chance of winning since you can analyze the data while in dice it is purely based on luck.

I think No sports betting is not riskier than casino games. Whatever happen in sports betting it depends on our knowledge. If we take time and do accurate analysis, we will win our bet. And whenever the odds is below 1.1 or 1.2 this is safe odds in sports betting. In casino games, as you told it is completely based on our luck. No analysis and strategies will not help you to win your bet. So for me, casino games are risky games.

[btc_angela]

Casino bets of course, because of its house edge. While in sports bet, you can used analysis and its a 1:1 bet. So the chances of picking the correct winners is high. And if you follow your team, you can be sure that you know their strengths and weakness so you know how to place your bets properly if their are facing a stronger team. So riskier is the casino bet is more riskier obviously.

[PokerDiceMan]

if only one bet dice with chance win 95% is low risk can easy win
basketball with odds 1.05 can chance lost, but is long time playing, with big odds sport betting compare dice/casino, still low risk sport betting
if you good analys, and understand about basket ball or football can easy to take profit use sport betting

[bitjoin]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

It depends on the actual skill of the basketball team vs the other team they are playing, sometimes you get better odds vs what "it should be" sometimes worse. 

In casino games like dice you can predict with mathmatical certainty the odds given are your chances of actually winning.

[Slark]

It depends on the actual skill of the basketball team vs the other team they are playing, sometimes you get better odds vs what "it should be" sometimes worse. 

In casino games like dice you can predict with mathmatical certainty the odds given are your chances of actually winning.

If the skill was the only factor needed to win the game we wouon't have sportbetting in the first place.
Every game could be evaluated and winner predicted every time, based on previous games, experience and players skills.
I've seen many times games when all professional tipsters/sport experts failed to predict a winner.

[piloder]

In sports betting even if you bet on 1.05 odds you can loss because game can change any moment and all those % chances actually doesn't guarantee anything.

In casino bets if you place bet your chance of winning will be same and you can even verify fairness of your roll which is quite impossible in any sports betting.

[EdenHazard]

It depends on the actual skill of the basketball team vs the other team they are playing, sometimes you get better odds vs what "it should be" sometimes worse. 

In casino games like dice you can predict with mathmatical certainty the odds given are your chances of actually winning.

If the skill was the only factor needed to win the game we wouon't have sportbetting in the first place.
Every game could be evaluated and winner predicted every time, based on previous games, experience and players skills.
I've seen many times games when all professional tipsters/sport experts failed to predict a winner.

place a bet on sports not always have less risk because of its analyzable.

sometimes an unexpected result break your confidence that is why even a professional tipster can still failed to win and have a correct prediction , they are human and it is normal. and play at casino not always have a bigger risk too , as sometimes you hit the streak lost because of its constant house edge.

[bering]

both have equal risk although you change percentages setting chance in dice game to the highest chance and putting your money to the low odds would not makes you automatically won your bets and you should be know that on sport matches there are many upredictable results and sometimes strong teams will lost against weak team in dice game also not so different

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

even though casinos talk of a low house edge sports gambling as a much flexible way to win by setting our own house edge
and if you have a good sport knowledge it is easier to play and win as you apply it there unlike casinos which require skill and luck.

[emberbekas]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

The chance is the same, both is risky. But in sports, you can't find such odds everytime. While at dice game, you can play with that percent anytime you want. If for example you play that percent win of chance only once, the both have the same risk.

[aardvark15]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

I don't get the "95% chance to win" for dice games. The chance of winning in dice is probably more like 48% for a dice game that gives a heads or tails with a 2% house edge.

[Oilacris]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

Having 1.05 odds would be rare on sports betting on my own view since i do seldom see this odds as of now and it doesnt mean if you have this bet 95% chance of winning cant really be guaranteed and also the same on dice games which i would say its more riskier than on sports betting game. They are both risky but dice would be more thats why if you chose on of those things then play for your own risk.

[coynedterm]

hello,

What is your opinion bout this.

If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win.  VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?

In my opinion , gambling in the casino is much risky then in the sports .
In the sports Gambling you can make sure that why you losses your bet but in case of casino Gambling you can't get real reason to loss your bet , Because they are filled with the number of house edge factor  , opposite of this in sports Gambling you will came know that why you lost your bet according to win or loss of the countries team for which you placed your bet .
So here it is only the casino which is more risky , but here another thing that is running in my mind that why lost my all the money in the Gambling​ in casino as well as in the sports gambling .

[clickerz]

For me, casino bets is more risky. I mean risk to lose more money. In sports betting, its like worth if you lose since you win with the experience, the thrill during the play or games and so forth. Also, sports betting is long time play like basketball meaning risk is minimize unlike in casino bets in minutes your money is gone if you are not lucky enough.

[iv4n]

Casino bets without any doubt, simply because on sport betting you bet and wait match to end, in casino games you bet every couple seconds. Bets can be high on sports and in casino, that is something that we choose by ourselves, I wanted to say that sports betting now and 20 years ago is much different, now sports betting offer many different features, and betting on some of this things can be very risky, maybe same risk like in casino games, but if you bet on goals, winners, and some simple stuff then risk is much lower.