bikbik2
|
|
April 28, 2017, 12:06:25 PM |
|
In regard to STEVE STEPHENS: The Facebook Killer Incident! Why not government create a new law for dead people with crimes to serve their time while they're dead isn't that amazing??? that law may help reduce of the number of suicidal crimes because the criminals may understand even when they're dead their body or remains may have to serve the time for their own crime! and no one would want his dead body on display for some of his criminal did while he's dead! What do you think guys??? I think that over such bodies it is necessary to conduct medical experiments for the development of science. Only in this way can we benefit from such garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
cybersofts (OP)
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 284
|
|
April 28, 2017, 12:26:24 PM |
|
LOL! This is funnier than the flat earth thread. However, there is a direction of truth to it. Government doesn't need to create a law. It exists already. In English and American (and Canadian) common law, if a person commits a crime, and if the crime produces harm or damage of property against someone, and if it can be proven, and if the harm or damage was never paid for, the descendants of the harmed or damaged person can lawfully require payment from the descendants of the one who did the harm or damage of property. Another great information here Good development, it's good not to let the criminals commit crime and get away with it, nice
|
|
|
|
cybersofts (OP)
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 284
|
|
April 28, 2017, 12:28:20 PM |
|
In regard to STEVE STEPHENS: The Facebook Killer Incident! Why not government create a new law for dead people with crimes to serve their time while they're dead isn't that amazing??? that law may help reduce of the number of suicidal crimes because the criminals may understand even when they're dead their body or remains may have to serve the time for their own crime! and no one would want his dead body on display for some of his criminal did while he's dead! What do you think guys??? I think that over such bodies it is necessary to conduct medical experiments for the development of science. Only in this way can we benefit from such garbage. Well done, another great suggestion, thank you
|
|
|
|
cybersofts (OP)
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 284
|
|
April 28, 2017, 12:32:46 PM |
|
Why should I care? I will be DEAD... I won't exist anymore... Why should I care for my body if I no longer exist? Oo Have fun with that body of mine if you want There's no problem with you but to your family members they are affected with the shameful crime you made. I think this is a stupid law proposal,let the dead rest forever. Upon his death, his obligation stop also. No, we don't want criminals to get away with their crimes even when they commit suicide that's the point here, hope you understand
|
|
|
|
giantdragon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 28, 2017, 02:57:37 PM |
|
In English and American (and Canadian) common law, if a person commits a crime, and if the crime produces harm or damage of property against someone, and if it can be proven, and if the harm or damage was never paid for, the descendants of the harmed or damaged person can lawfully require payment from the descendants of the one who did the harm or damage of property.
No. Children and other relatives can take the inheritance with all property and obligations, or not to take. If a deceased criminal was a billionaire then you can take away all his assets and pay compensation to the victims. If he was a hobo, victims will get nothing.
|
|
|
|
cybersofts (OP)
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 658
Merit: 284
|
|
April 28, 2017, 03:28:57 PM |
|
In English and American (and Canadian) common law, if a person commits a crime, and if the crime produces harm or damage of property against someone, and if it can be proven, and if the harm or damage was never paid for, the descendants of the harmed or damaged person can lawfully require payment from the descendants of the one who did the harm or damage of property.
No. Children and other relatives can take the inheritance with all property and obligations, or not to take. If a deceased criminal was a billionaire then you can take away all his assets and pay compensation to the victims. If he was a hobo, victims will get nothing. For that, I don't think there is a billionaire that may commit crime and take his life in order to avoid facing the justice. I think most of the criminal that are taking their lives to avoid facing justice are hobos for that matter.
|
|
|
|
gabmen
|
|
May 04, 2017, 02:49:28 PM |
|
In English and American (and Canadian) common law, if a person commits a crime, and if the crime produces harm or damage of property against someone, and if it can be proven, and if the harm or damage was never paid for, the descendants of the harmed or damaged person can lawfully require payment from the descendants of the one who did the harm or damage of property.
No. Children and other relatives can take the inheritance with all property and obligations, or not to take. If a deceased criminal was a billionaire then you can take away all his assets and pay compensation to the victims. If he was a hobo, victims will get nothing. For that, I don't think there is a billionaire that may commit crime and take his life in order to avoid facing the justice. I think most of the criminal that are taking their lives to avoid facing justice are hobos for that matter. possibly or some may have been so stricken by guilt that they feel the only way is to take their lives. but I don't think any of these are thinking about what will happen to their bodies after they die. I don't think anyone who's been executed actually thought beyond their deaths so I don't think any law like that would make much of a difference
|
Report to moderator . ██████████. .████████████████. .██████████████████████. -█████████████████████████████ .██████████████████████████████████. -█████████████████████████████████████████ -███████████████████████████████████████████████ .-█████████████████████████████████████████████████████. .████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████. .██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████. ..███████████████████████████████
|
|
|
dippididodaday
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
|
|
May 04, 2017, 05:00:53 PM |
|
In regard to STEVE STEPHENS: The Facebook Killer Incident! Why not government create a new law for dead people with crimes to serve their time while they're dead isn't that amazing??? that law may help reduce of the number of suicidal crimes because the criminals may understand even when they're dead their body or remains may have to serve the time for their own crime! and no one would want his dead body on display for some of his criminal did while he's dead! What do you think guys??? Not the most efficient psychiatrists or the most extremely tyrannical governments will be able to reduce suicides. It will continue unabated. It is a sure sign of the sickness of the human race at large. It is the way of nature, and this force is unstoppable. As to the body of a person, it is his image, even after death. There is a reason why in times way past only the most egregious of criminals were executed and displayed in public. In the minds of relatives and friends such a decaying corpse becomes the worst of all nightmares. But if a suicide victim were to be displayed, it would serve as a most abhorrent disgrace to family and friends, but a most relevant display to the sickness lingering in the human race.
|
|
|
|
Roger Burton
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2017, 06:17:43 PM |
|
Seriously? Is this a serious question? Of course not, those people have served with their life. There is no bigger punishment than death.
|
|
|
|
tripplewarz
|
|
May 04, 2017, 06:29:05 PM |
|
Seriously? Is this a serious question? Of course not, those people have served with their life. There is no bigger punishment than death. This question is really serious and it's about the life or death of a person that you do not need to speak and be more attentive. And No, it's also necessary to pay attention to the fact that a person was a criminal, everyone can stumble in life but have the right to a second chance even posthumously.
|
|
|
|
|