Are we actually discussing rocket science here? I can address half of the posts that I've seen while skimming through this thread. That said, I haven't been able to tell if they were a joke or not since sarcasm really doesn't translate well through plain text without. Before I spend an hour writing how thrust/motion/momentum/etc works from a current and theoretical standpoint, figured I'd ask if anyone is actually interested, or if this is a joke.
I'm well on my way to getting a PHD in Nuclear Physics. Its not quite Rocket Science, but theres a good deal of overlap with quantum mechanics/dynamics/etc.
FYI Earth isn't flat, rockets do work in space, gravity/light/inertia are really strange subjects that are just best current models and are subject to change.
What scientific proof do you have that "outer space" is real since you want to claim there's rockets up there pushing against nothing as a means of propulsion? Also you realize gravity is an unproven theory right, do you really believe heavy balls in a shed can prove there's heavy balls in the sky?
You'll find light a lot less mysterious once you stop believing there's waves in nothing, what a crackpot theory; special relativity has been empirically disproven.
Hey, at least you'll have somthing to wipe your ass with after a decade and half a million dollars worth of student debt. It's all worth it though when you get the praise of all your Jewish peers who tell you what a good goyim you are.
