Following my previous reply, I think it's important to detail that this isn't exclusively about SegWit and since most opinions seem to be like what I described above, this actually doesn't really mean a lot.
Interesting way to downplay its relevance to segwit activation, but okay, you make of it what you will. Time will tell now.
The problem is, that tweet is as relevant for SegWit activation as it is for activation of any other proposal. It mentions "scaling compromise", which covers many things beyond SegWit.
It sure is, can you imagine a Bitcoin community post segwit? No constant attack from BU shills, no yearly scaling debate with spam attacks. Imagine how much the coin could actually grow.
Can you imagine a Bitcoin post Bitcoin Unlimited, for example? Using your point of view, it would be no more constant attacks from SegWit shills... Same thing goes for both ways regardless of which proposal is best.
In my point of view, if/when SegWit activates, Bitcoin Unlimited shills will only scream louder
But we'll see.
then the remaining pools will likely change their stance because it will become obvious they're only being obstructive as opposed to offering an alternative.
Let's seriously hope this happens. I too think it will, pools will only have things to lose if they become obstructive.