|
AmazonStuff (OP)
|
 |
May 01, 2013, 09:53:25 PM |
|
Please share your opinion   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
uMMcQxCWELNzkt
|
 |
May 01, 2013, 09:56:49 PM |
|
You should add $180+ and $40- just for the sake of those who believe in either of the extremes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmazonStuff (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2013, 09:58:28 PM |
|
You should add $180+ and $40- just for the sake of those who believe in either of the extremes.
Here, you have extremes now  |
|
|
|
|
|
evolve
|
|
May 01, 2013, 10:17:16 PM |
|
Depends on what you mean by "short term" (Weeks, days, hours, minutes?). I voted $80 and assumed we were talking about days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AmazonStuff (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2013, 10:20:35 PM |
|
Depends on what you mean by "short term" (Weeks, days, hours, minutes?). I voted $80 and assumed we were talking about days.
OK, let's say 24h |
|
|
|
|
|
AmazonStuff (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2013, 10:23:23 PM |
|
Currently, results look like normal distribution...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ichthyo
|
|
May 02, 2013, 12:30:31 AM |
|
Currently, results look like normal distribution...
...centred roughly at the current price with a bias to slightly lower values in the centre of weight, but with a more developed tail on the up side |
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
|
May 02, 2013, 05:48:17 AM |
|
straight to zero, of course  edit: Currently, results look like normal distribution...
...centred roughly at the current price with a bias to slightly lower values in the centre of weight, but with a more developed tail on the up side this is a really good model. the normal distribution is a probabilistic representation. i wonder how one would go about calculating the skew? |
this sentence has fifteen words, seventy-four letters, four commas, one hyphen, and a period.
18N9md2G1oA89kdBuiyJFrtJShuL5iDWDz
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 02, 2013, 06:00:31 AM |
|
straight to zero, of course edit: Currently, results look like normal distribution...
...centred roughly at the current price with a bias to slightly lower values in the centre of weight, but with a more developed tail on the up side this is a really good model. the normal distribution is a probabilistic representation. i wonder how one would go about calculating the skew? Skew = (mean - median ) / (standard deviation) |
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
|
May 02, 2013, 06:17:10 AM |
|
Don't have idea and nobody does. Act as it happens, that's the only way you can deal with bitcoins market, unless you're the one who can make things happen.
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
|
May 02, 2013, 06:37:38 AM |
|
straight to zero, of course edit: Currently, results look like normal distribution...
...centred roughly at the current price with a bias to slightly lower values in the centre of weight, but with a more developed tail on the up side this is a really good model. the normal distribution is a probabilistic representation. i wonder how one would go about calculating the skew? Skew = (mean - median ) / (standard deviation) executing that on historical price data would be simple. the question is, is it a functioning indicator? is the height above the peak of the distribution indicative of deviation from a trendline? time-scale matters here as well. |
this sentence has fifteen words, seventy-four letters, four commas, one hyphen, and a period.
18N9md2G1oA89kdBuiyJFrtJShuL5iDWDz
|
|
|
|
Poll
