Bitcoin Forum
November 20, 2019, 08:50:33 AM *
News: 10th anniversary art contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The Silbert scaling agreement is here  (Read 396 times)
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 2076


Your dearest bum chum


View Profile
May 23, 2017, 06:50:31 PM
 #1

https://medium.com/@DCGco/bitcoin-scaling-agreement-at-consensus-2017-133521fe9a77

Segwit with an 80% threshold and then a 2mb hard fork within six months after that.

Some big names. Some glaring omissions.

What do you think of it? What will Core think of it? Will it descend into ever more squabbling or is this enough? Will everyone tell Core to just fuck off when they start to pick it apart?

1574239833
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1574239833

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1574239833
Reply with quote  #2

1574239833
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin Forum is turning 10 years old! Join the community in sharing and exploring the notable posts made over the years.
-ck
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1214


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 23, 2017, 10:27:36 PM
 #2

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1928093.0

Developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org, 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
25hashcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 23, 2017, 10:40:12 PM
 #3

This is 1000x better and deserves serious exposure and consideration: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014399.html

Bitcoin - Peer to Peer Electronic CASH
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1523



View Profile
May 23, 2017, 10:56:06 PM
Last edit: May 23, 2017, 11:10:09 PM by franky1
 #4

This is 1000x better and deserves serious exposure and consideration: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014399.html

lol screw that cludgy 2 merkle crap if your gonna do a hard consensus make it 1 merkle
lol screw the 'witness discount' cludgy maths. if you gonna do a hard consensus just have everything sit in the same area

plus the proposal is not even address the cry baby elephant in the room of the txsigops. which segwit wont fix!!
as for november 2018!

if core have released
 2017-04-22 - Bitcoin Core version 0.14.1 released
2017-03-08 - Bitcoin Core version 0.14.0 released
2017-01-03 - Bitcoin Core version 0.13.2 released
2016-10-27 - Bitcoin Core version 0.13.1 released
2016-08-23 - Bitcoin Core version 0.13.0 released

5 versions in under 9 months
0.13.1 - 0.14.1 = 4 versions in 7 months... im pretty sure that it wont take a year to get everyone to download one version

id say let it get 80% and then have just six month grace.. not a dang year.

the same fools that want to waste a year for HF were the same ones thinking segwit will be activated in 2 weeks..(christmas '16)

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Minecache
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000


THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROTOCOL


View Profile
May 23, 2017, 11:01:47 PM
 #5

Everyone is sick and tired of this debate and the disgusting trolling that comes with it. Let's just get it done and move the fuck on.

.


▄▄██ █████ █████ █████ █████ ██▄▄
▄████ █████ █████ █████ █████ ████▄
████▀  ▀███ █████ █████ █████ █████
▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄
████    ███ █████ █████ █████ █████
████    ███ █████ █████ █████ █████
▀▀▀▀    ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀
████    ███ █████ █████ █████ █████
████    ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀███ █████ █████
████                 ██ █████ █████
▄▄▄▄     ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄     ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄
████    █▀███████    ██ █████ █████
████    █ ███████    ██ █████ █████
▀▀▀▀    █ ▄▄▄ ███    ▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀
████    █ ███ ███    ██ █████ █████
████    █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█    ██ █████ █████
████     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀      ▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀████
▄▄▄▄                            ▄▄▄
█████ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄ ▄████
 ████ █████ █████ █████ █████ ████
   ▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀   
bluenote.


.



.
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
.
.
.
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████te
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀████████▀▀
.


.


.
█▀▀▀█▀▄
█   █  ▀▄
█   ▀▀▀▀█
█ ▀▀▀▀▀ █
█ ▀▀▀▀▀ █
█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█

  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█▀▀█▀▄   █
█  █  ▀▄ █
█  ▀▀▀▀█ █
█ ▀▀▀▀ █▄█
█▄▄▄▄▄▄█
.
Summary
.
WhitePaper
Yakamoto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1007


View Profile
May 23, 2017, 11:14:52 PM
 #6

https://medium.com/@DCGco/bitcoin-scaling-agreement-at-consensus-2017-133521fe9a77

Segwit with an 80% threshold and then a 2mb hard fork within six months after that.

Some big names. Some glaring omissions.

What do you think of it? What will Core think of it? Will it descend into ever more squabbling or is this enough? Will everyone tell Core to just fuck off when they start to pick it apart?
It definitely looks more promising than what the last agreement was, I definitely think there is some potential for it to blossom into a full-fledged activation of segwit within the blockchain but it is going to take a while to get everyone on board, especially with the omissions that you mentioned. Looking at the names it's not bad, but there are a lot of people that will need to find their place, otherwise it won't work.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1523



View Profile
May 23, 2017, 11:20:15 PM
 #7

It definitely looks more promising than what the last agreement was, I definitely think there is some potential for it to blossom into a full-fledged activation of segwit within the blockchain but it is going to take a while to get everyone on board, especially with the omissions that you mentioned. Looking at the names it's not bad, but there are a lot of people that will need to find their place, otherwise it won't work.

until i see code that actually does fix the real issues. its just whistles in the wind

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!