rbdrbd (OP)
|
|
May 04, 2013, 04:01:00 AM |
|
There is a protocol switch at block #9869 in the BitBar code. Using p2pool before we have reached that block is not possible.
Good to know we weren't insane or stupid with trying to set up p2pool. Can you provide a github link to that part in the code? Seem like an intentional thing by the authors?
|
|
|
|
j980
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2013, 04:05:57 AM |
|
There is a protocol switch at block #9869 in the BitBar code. Using p2pool before we have reached that block is not possible.
Good to know we weren't insane or stupid with trying to set up p2pool. Can you provide a github link to that part in the code? Seem like an intentional thing by the authors? Search for "p2pool" in main.h. Yes, I think the switch was added by Balthazar to make it compatible with p2p, probably close to block 9869 for PPCoin. But for BitBar this is still quite a bit off (30 days or so).
|
|
|
|
sido
|
|
May 04, 2013, 04:21:40 AM |
|
i was change limits for open files already, but also i was forgot close the screen.. but it's not enought still.. i need to reboot the server
|
|
|
|
xorxor
|
|
May 04, 2013, 04:31:07 AM |
|
There is a protocol switch at block #9869 in the BitBar code. Using p2pool before we have reached that block is not possible.
Good to know we weren't insane or stupid with trying to set up p2pool. Can you provide a github link to that part in the code? Seem like an intentional thing by the authors? Search for "p2pool" in main.h. Yes, I think the switch was added by Balthazar to make it compatible with p2p, probably close to block 9869 for PPCoin. But for BitBar this is still quite a bit off (30 days or so). yup, found that: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=143221.msg1550632#msg1550632looks like taken straight from NVC code.
|
fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
|
|
|
|
TheSwede75
|
|
May 04, 2013, 04:47:41 PM |
|
Holy shitsnacks, 0.1 BTB a day with 1 m/hash wtf. These things ARE rare!
|
|
|
|
LeftToeCut
|
|
May 07, 2013, 11:38:49 PM |
|
Any p2pool forks ready once we hit block #9869 ?
|
|
|
|
|
walf_man
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2013, 11:27:20 AM |
|
i hope you success.
i want to study how to mining new coin in p2pool
|
|
|
|
Invest0r
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2013, 03:27:58 PM |
|
Just a few days more.. I'd really like to see p2pools for bitbar.
|
Speculating..
|
|
|
whitedragon
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 22, 2013, 12:50:46 PM |
|
So is anybody out there ready to make a guide on how to modify p2pool when new coins come out yet? Would be great if more of us out there could get pools going faster and maybe not have the orphan conventions on coin releases.
Then again...there are alot of coins that should just be allowed to orphan and fork themselves into oblivion as quickly as possible....
|
|
|
|
baloo_kiev
|
|
May 27, 2013, 08:17:28 PM |
|
Hello! I have found some lines that have to be modified here https://github.com/j980/p2pool1) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 11: 2) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 15: while bnLowerBound + 0.0001 <= bnUpperBound:
3) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 25: nSubsidy = nSubsidy - 0.0001
4) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 39: SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda target: get_subsidy(6, 1, target),
5) p2pool/data.py line 16: minout = pow(10, 6) / 10000;
Also, concerning block 9689 switch, I can't figure out what the stake entropy bit has to do with proof-of-work mining Now testing the pool at http://78.27.191.182:8333/. Unfortunately, I have less than 1MH/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
August 22, 2013, 04:20:42 PM |
|
Also, concerning block 9689 switch, I can't figure out what the stake entropy bit has to do with proof-of-work mining PoW blocks are used as the entropy source as well as PoS blocks.
|
|
|
|
guugll
|
|
September 06, 2013, 10:51:58 PM |
|
Hello! I have found some lines that have to be modified here https://github.com/j980/p2pool1) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 11: 2) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 15: while bnLowerBound + 0.0001 <= bnUpperBound:
3) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 25: nSubsidy = nSubsidy - 0.0001
4) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 39: SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda target: get_subsidy(6, 1, target),
5) p2pool/data.py line 16: minout = pow(10, 6) / 10000;
Also, concerning block 9689 switch, I can't figure out what the stake entropy bit has to do with proof-of-work mining Now testing the pool at http://78.27.191.182:8333/. Unfortunately, I have less than 1MH/s Hi , i am curious - how did you found this lines: 4) p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py line 39: SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda target: get_subsidy(6, 1, target),
here is the change from 100 to 1 (NVC vs BB) but why? (i try to get any direction - thx) 5) p2pool/data.py line 16: minout = pow(10, 6) / 10000;
trying to mod your pool to Orbitcoin specs.
|
|
|
|
baloo_kiev
|
|
September 22, 2013, 11:51:11 PM |
|
here is the change from 100 to 1 (NVC vs BB) but why? (i try to get any direction - thx)
Because BTB is NVC clone with 100 times less coins, i.e. the block reward is 100 times less. 5) p2pool/data.py line 16: minout = pow(10, 6) / 10000;
The same here: minimal output (and minimal tx fee) is 100 times less in BTB (0.0001 vs. 0.01 in NVC)
|
|
|
|
|