1) This makes everything centralized.
2) Who decides the participants of the panel?
Staff and members through voting
3) Panel participants can be corrupted.
Just like we have escrow members doing escrow services honestly because their reputation is at stake,panel members will also abstain from corruption for their rep's sake.
4) Censorship due to point 1. e.g. I deny your ICO because I don't like the people working on it for whatever reason.
You must have a good reason to deny ICO and not liking people should not be one of them
Ensuring that an idea like this works efficiently is much harder than it seems. We don't even have a proper systems to combat traditional scams, nor spam.
I agree but how long we can sit quite and let scammers take advantage of it
Forum members must be educated enough to know and use the resources they have on the forum to try and prevent themselves from being scammed. These resources aren't always perfect but it is what it is. I'm referring to using escrows, using the scam accusations/reputation sub forums, analyzing trust ratings, and if the circumstances call for it, requesting signed messages of old staked addresses to ensure you are not dealing with an ICO run by someone with a stolen/hacked account which
appears trusted.
If mods removing off-topic altcoin threads causes outcries of censorship, a panel pre-approving announcement posts will not go over well and brings a level of bureaucracy that I would not be comfortable with.
You are welcome to start researching each ICO that announces and if you see something that doesn't look right or have proof that an ICO is a scam,
submit a scam accusation report or
open a reputation thread for the owner and express your opinions in an effort to notify the community.
We do not have fixed numbers of members and new members join the forum everyday.Educating each and every one of them is not possible.
Not all members have wisdom,knowledge and resource to do research on every ICO.It takes time and skills
