markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:11:55 AM |
|
Are the "random" numbers used to make the rewards "random" deterministic, so that all nodes will all agree on the correct "random" reward for each block?
Because if they do not agree what reward the block should have, they will reject it, the net will split and split and split constantly as each node comes up with a different concept of what the correct block reward for a particular block should be...
At a quick glance I don't see the necessary determinism... where is it? If it is there at all?
-MarkM- Yes it is. Using boost Mersenne Twist which is deterministic. So theoretically it is not completely random, it is pseudo random And the block hashes or headers or some such are used to seed it each block so that people cannot pre-compute the entire future-history of which blocks will have the super-high rewards? -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
js2082 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:13:35 AM |
|
man, someone get big things $ ./junkcoind.exe getinfo { "version" : 60300, "protocolversion" : 60001, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 38500.00000000, "blocks" : 974, "connections" : 20, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00024414, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1367614235, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "mininput" : 0.00010000, "errors" : "" } big fishes??? post here guys, let small fishes get some junks, lol! And the block hashes or headers or some such are used to seed it each block so that people cannot pre-compute the entire future-history of which blocks will have the super-high rewards? well you are right, I should have used the block hash, but I was too lazy...
|
|
|
|
brie
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:15:02 AM |
|
How high is the starting difficulty? Are the blocks starting to be found at faster than the target speed already or is the starting difficulty high enough that is is going to take a lot more miners than have even seen the thread yet before the time between blocks becomes as fast as the target time?
-MarkM-
Look how low the difficulty is!  { "version" : 60300, "protocolversion" : 60001, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 1112, "connections" : 25, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00024414, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1367643426, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "mininput" : 0.00010000, "errors" : "" }
|
|
|
|
Caesar V
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:15:20 AM Last edit: May 04, 2013, 05:30:42 AM by Caesar V |
|
Edit: nevermind, noob question
|
|
|
|
brie
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:17:03 AM |
|
I've mined about 22k JKC but they all got orphaned...
Oh well, it's to be expected this early on.
|
|
|
|
monocolor
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:18:39 AM |
|
miserable me, I got only 2 blocks then all the rest are rejected... big fishes have mercy... BTW, anyone start a mining pool for our small fishes?? there are bounty also!
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:18:50 AM |
|
lolz.. looks like we are already down to 200 coins/block. So I guess this counts as day 2
|
|
|
|
bopbeep
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:19:29 AM |
|
lolz.. looks like we have are already down to 200 coins/block.
wow, second day already!
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:20:44 AM |
|
lolz.. looks like we have are already down to 200 coins/block.
wow, second day already! Its been like what, 30 mins from the OP . Accelerated time travel
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:21:58 AM |
|
How insanely low was the initial difficulty set at?
How freaking high does it need to be these days, as no coin lately has managed to set it anywhere near high enough despite each having the previous failed value to multiply a bunch higher yet again to get closer to a reasonable value yet none have been anywhere near sane. How much are they each multiplying the previous fail by in their attempt to get it right?
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
carebear
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:22:40 AM |
|
WTB JK @ 10 LTC / 1k JK
|
|
|
|
Nolo
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:22:45 AM |
|
163 accepted blocks. 0 coins. All orphans.
|
Charlie Kelly: I'm pleading the 5th. The Attorney: I would advise you do that. Charlie Kelly: I'll take that advice under cooperation, alright? Now, let's say you and I go toe-to-toe on bird law and see who comes out the victor? The Attorney: You know, I don't think I'm going to do anything close to that and I can clearly see you know nothing about the law. 19GpqFsNGP8jS941YYZZjmCSrHwvX3QjiC
|
|
|
js2082 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:23:20 AM |
|
what is junkcoined.exe? this is the daemon. you use daemon to get status etc. lolz.. looks like we are already down to 200 coins/block. So I guess this counts as day 2 hope difficulty will be adjusted soon
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:23:54 AM |
|
WTB JK @ 10 LTC / 1k JK
Sold, PM for details
|
|
|
|
bopbeep
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:24:41 AM |
|
WTB JK @ 10 LTC / 1k JK
lololololololol
|
|
|
|
js2082 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:25:08 AM |
|
How insanely low was the initial difficulty set at?
How freaking high does it need to be these days, as no coin lately has managed to set it anywhere near high enough despite each having the previous failed value to multiply a bunch higher yet again to get closer to a reasonable value yet none have been anywhere near sane. How much are they each multiplying the previous fail by in their attempt to get it right?
-MarkM- same as litecoin
|
|
|
|
Caesar V
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:25:15 AM |
|
I can't sync my wallet, wtf I have 0 connections, weird. All my other wallets work.
|
|
|
|
bopbeep
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:27:16 AM |
|
arg 149 orphans/150 blocks no point in mining
|
|
|
|
iamrickrock
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:29:03 AM |
|
same here, closing it down not worth it to me, back to Bitbar
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
|
May 04, 2013, 05:29:15 AM |
|
How insanely low was the initial difficulty set at?
How freaking high does it need to be these days, as no coin lately has managed to set it anywhere near high enough despite each having the previous failed value to multiply a bunch higher yet again to get closer to a reasonable value yet none have been anywhere near sane. How much are they each multiplying the previous fail by in their attempt to get it right?
-MarkM- same as litecoin Litecoin was years ago, and probably already too low even way back then. Recently blocks have been one second or less apart at such low difficulty, so it needs to be higher by at least the number of seconds there are in the actual target time between blocks just to stretch that second out so we can see how much actually less than a second it is between blocks. Most likely it needs to be even more increased than just by the number of seconds in the target time. Basically it is just another pre-mine all over again, nothing learned at all from the previous pre-mined-in-public-sight coins. The lesson evidently being, pre-mining is the way to go, anyone who doesn't pre-mine is just leaving money on the table they and their buddies should have had the sense to grab. -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
|