bennett616
Member
 Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
http://www.freebitcointips.co.uk/
|
 |
June 04, 2013, 02:05:28 PM |
|
6 more votes!  Andy B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birdy
|
|
June 04, 2013, 03:04:45 PM |
|
fresh votes are here :3
+6 again
|
|
|
|
|
|
San1ty
|
|
June 04, 2013, 03:19:08 PM |
|
dafuq is dropbox
Mayonnaise! |
Found my posts helpful? Consider buying me a beer :-)!:
BTC - 1San1tyUGhfWRNPYBF4b6Vaurq5SjFYWk NXT - 17063113680221230777
|
|
|
|
Chainsaw
|
|
June 04, 2013, 04:54:44 PM |
|
Bump.
New month, 6 new votes for all.
We should be able to get this to the #1 most popular slot.
|
|
|
|
tehace
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2013, 11:12:29 PM |
|
I almost forgot! 6 more votes
|
DOGE: DChHzYffNDrMsM9L1GtG14cmp1NUXrEe9Z
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pokerfan
|
|
June 05, 2013, 07:14:27 AM |
|
+6
We can make it to the first place!
|
|
|
|
|
The 4ner
aka newbitcoinqtuser
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
R.I.P Silk Road 1.0
|
|
June 05, 2013, 10:33:37 PM |
|
5 of those votes are mine!  |
|
|
|
|
|
bit777
|
|
June 05, 2013, 11:21:00 PM |
|
Voted! (6 times  ) |
|
|
|
|
zazas
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
June 07, 2013, 01:36:16 PM |
|
Is voting still necessary? We are wel over the 100,000 votes already.
|
Tips or Usefull post? Donate please, thank you  BTC: 1DUmbnustDLHEs23EgXrgEjoqx5FiRZGrJ |
|
|
|
Jace
|
|
June 07, 2013, 01:41:50 PM |
|
Is voting still necessary? We are wel over the 100,000 votes already.
As long as it's not on #1, or actually: as long as it's not implemented yet, yes it's still necessary. |
Feel free to send your life savings to 1JhrfA12dBMUhcgh85wYan6HL2uLQdB6z9
|
|
|
BadBitcoin (James Sutton)
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 452
Merit: 252
|
|
June 07, 2013, 02:38:44 PM |
|
just voted 12 times, wooh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptoman
|
|
June 07, 2013, 02:42:18 PM |
|
I can't believe you people actually use or care about Dropbox. They are signing on with the NSA to assist in eavesdropping. If they take bitcoin directly, then they'll happily pass along your bitcoin sending addresses too. SpiderOak is a better choice as the data is encrypted before it leaves your machine.
|
"A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history." --Gandhi
|
|
|
|
mrkent
|
|
June 09, 2013, 05:04:49 AM |
|
I can't believe you people actually use or care about Dropbox. They are signing on with the NSA to assist in eavesdropping. If they take bitcoin directly, then they'll happily pass along your bitcoin sending addresses too. SpiderOak is a better choice as the data is encrypted before it leaves your machine.
Source on Dropbox working with NSA? |
Spend BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC @ amazon
Save 10-25% with Ƀ worldwide - PurseIO | Anonymously▃▃▃▃▃▃ ⌚Fast ⚖Safe ⓑOn Credit
Buy BTC w. Card Worldwide - Purse.IO |
|
|
|
|
bigdude
|
|
June 09, 2013, 05:50:09 AM |
|
+1'd  |
|
|
|
Quicker_777
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2013, 03:55:17 PM |
|
Just voted...  |
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
June 09, 2013, 04:15:58 PM |
|
I can't believe you people actually use or care about Dropbox. They are signing on with the NSA to assist in eavesdropping. If they take bitcoin directly, then they'll happily pass along your bitcoin sending addresses too. SpiderOak is a better choice as the data is encrypted before it leaves your machine.
Source on Dropbox working with NSA? Top secret PRISM documents which were leaked by a whistleblower. |
|
|
|
|
|
boonies4u
|
|
June 09, 2013, 04:26:21 PM |
|
I can't believe you people actually use or care about Dropbox. They are signing on with the NSA to assist in eavesdropping. If they take bitcoin directly, then they'll happily pass along your bitcoin sending addresses too. SpiderOak is a better choice as the data is encrypted before it leaves your machine.
Source on Dropbox working with NSA? Top secret PRISM documents which were leaked by a whistleblower. Google denies their involvement and knowledge of PRISM. If he's telling the truth, that certainly lowers the credibility of the leak and increases the chances that other companies were not contacted regarding this as well. Dear Google users—
You may be aware of press reports alleging that Internet companies have joined a secret U.S. government program called PRISM to give the National Security Agency direct access to our servers. As Google’s CEO and Chief Legal Officer, we wanted you to have the facts.
First, we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government—or any other government—direct access to our servers. Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a “back door” to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2013/06/what.htmledit: Facebook denies as well. https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10100828955847631 |
|
|
|
|
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
|
|
June 09, 2013, 04:28:59 PM |
|
Actually, companies are allowed to lie for national security purposes.
US officials have pretty much admitted PRISM with Obama saying they have achieved the "balance" between national security and privacy. If PRISM was false, they would go "Nup, that's made up." rather than defending it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
boonies4u
|
|
June 09, 2013, 04:33:01 PM
Last edit: June 09, 2013, 04:43:16 PM by boonies4u |
|
Actually, companies are allowed to lie for national security purposes.
US officials have pretty much admitted PRISM with Obama saying they have achieved the "balance" between national security and privacy. If PRISM was false, they would go "Nup, that's made up." rather than defending it.
PRISM might not actually be in full effect yet though. I'm not saying that they weren't planning on approaching companies like Facebook and Google. edit : meant to say full effect |
|
|
|
|
|
