Why most terrorist are Muslim?

[tikalbong]

I just noticed and realized that I have never heard of a certain Christian terrorist, all I hear is that when a terrorist is in the news, he/she is a Muslim. I am not saying that Muslims are terrorist, so don't get me wrong.

[1714060074]

1714060074

[1714060074]

1714060074

[malikusama]

This is wrong perception, terrorist don't have any religion. Why I am saying this because no religion allows you to kill innocent people. There were many terrorist communities in the past claiming themselves Christians but they doesn't represent Christians same as here these groups doesn't represent Islam. Why blaming a particular religion due to the sick mentality of a group of people.

[fistfullofbtc]

the statistics are around 1400 people died in jhadi attacks in the last month, mostly iraq  but is just seems crazy.

[Spendulus]

This is wrong perception, terrorist don't have any religion. Why I am saying this because no religion allows you to kill innocent people. There were many terrorist communities in the past claiming themselves Christians but they doesn't represent Christians same as here these groups doesn't represent Islam. Why blaming a particular religion due to the sick mentality of a group of people.

You mean we're blaming Islam due to the sick mentality of Islamic terrorists?

Gee that makes....

....total sense.

See, you'd be right the first time these fucktards go on. a killing spree shouting Allah Akbar. Maybe the second. Maybe even the tenth.

But dude, we're past 30,000 Islamic terror attacks since 9/11.

Get real.

[favila]

I just noticed and realized that I have never heard of a certain Christian terrorist, all I hear is that when a terrorist is in the news, he/she is a Muslim. I am not saying that Muslims are terrorist, so don't get me wrong.

It's a recent development and a lot has to do with perceived meddling in their internal affairs by the west. In reality though historically there have been more terrorists from other religions and ethnicities, see for example the violence in Northern Ireland and the IRA bombings.

[mindrust]

Muslims' way of thinking and logical reasoning is just not compatible with the humanity. All they understand is money and oil.

USA and Arabs are very alike in this regard. (they only speak the language of money) No wonder they are the best buddies.

While the rich ones become mindless puppets of another greater power, the poor ones are becoming terrorists. Poor and Rich, they all same. They all are being deceived in a way. While some of them are blowing themselves up, the others are swimming in gold till their master decides  to give the position to someone else.

The recent example for that situation is, Qatar
And old ones were; Libya, Iraq, Syria, Egypt... Those countries didn't get destroyed because of nothing. USA tricked the other Arabs to do so. Just like they are tricking Saudis and the others against Iran and Qatar.

USA is not to be blamed though. USA is simply exploiting their stupidity.

If those stupid people don't evolve asap, global terrorism will only increase in the future.

Europe stopped fighting for religion and left this shit ages ago but people in the ME are still fighting for money/religion cuz they dumb.

[coolcoinz]

I just noticed and realized that I have never heard of a certain Christian terrorist, all I hear is that when a terrorist is in the news, he/she is a Muslim. I am not saying that Muslims are terrorist, so don't get me wrong.

You're probably too young, so here's a piece of history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bombings_during_the_Northern_Ireland_Troubles_and_peace_process

Last time I checked, the Irish were Christian and they weren't the only non-muslim terrorists out there. Still they haven't fought for their religion, they just usually happened to be religious.

[xskl0]

Because Islam is not a religion of peace, has never been a religion of peace, and cristians are too acomodate in actual society to commit terrorism.

[lady Royal]

We just cannot blame Muslims. A terrorist can be from any religion. Mostly, Muslims are framed. Muslims are not terrorist, We have good and bad people in every religion. Sometimes, Someone do the wrong thing and Muslims are blamed which is totally wrong.

[Footmanred]

We just cannot blame Muslims. A terrorist can be from any religion. Mostly, Muslims are framed. Muslims are not terrorist, We have good and bad people in every religion. Sometimes, Someone do the wrong thing and Muslims are blamed which is totally wrong.

It seems to me a very difficult question of those, When you do not know the answer to it. How can we generalize all Muslims, and make them all terrorists. I understand that they did not have very complex lives. And these people are very complex in nature, who are very influenced. Well, what to do about it.

[xhomerx10]

We just cannot blame Muslims. A terrorist can be from any religion. Mostly, Muslims are framed. Muslims are not terrorist, We have good and bad people in every religion. Sometimes, Someone do the wrong thing and Muslims are blamed which is totally wrong.

It seems to me a very difficult question of those, When you do not know the answer to it. How can we generalize all Muslims, and make them all terrorists. I understand that they did not have very complex lives. And these people are very complex in nature, who are very influenced. Well, what to do about it.

 According to a Comres poll which was conducted for BBC Radio 4 Today, in Feb 2015,

• Half (49%) believe Muslim clerics preaching that violence against the west can be justified are out of touch with mainstream Muslim opinion, while 45% disagree.

 So it appears that 45% of Muslims polled believe that Muslim clerics can be justified in preaching violence against the west.  Violence against the liberal western world is terrorism and 45% is astounding.

[BADecker]

Am I posting in the right thread, here?

Father of Famous Aleppo Boy Just Exposed How the US & White Helmets Lied to the World

Covered in dust and bruises with hair disheveled from having survived a blast, the blood beginning to crust over half his face, a seeming placidity — hands anchored on his legs, all-but unmoving — could not mask the stoic trauma in little Omran Daqneesh's eyes.

Gazing hauntingly from the back of an ambulance in Aleppo in August 2016, Omran's image snared the heartstrings of the world — even those previously hardened to the hopelessly tangled morass in Syria — transmogrifying into a single human form the suffering of innocent Syrians at the whims of entire nation-states embroiled in proxy war upon war in the name of political squabbles.

But, while the West took up Omran's cause, Westerners did so under the pretense the child had been bloodied by an airstrike or missile launched by the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad or their allies from Russia — his image rekindling the fire of contention propaganda designed to support the United States' goal of regime change.

But it was a lie — from mass media's parroted claims the boy had escaped an airstrike within an inch of his life, to bandages eventually wrapped around Omran's head — virtually none of the narrative stemming from the starkly persistent image bore the weight of truth.

"We did not find out how the incident happened," Mohamad Kheir Daqneesh, Omran's father, told reporter Kinana Alloush and others in interviews this week. "I pulled my family members out of debris. Omran was with me, while White Helmets took him away and started taking photo of him."

Daqneesh, noting the sound of fighter jets or missiles did not precede the blast which ultimately killed Omran's 10-year-old brother, explained he had to shave the boy's head and ferret him away from overwhelming media attention — and from rebel fighters and sympathizers who sought perhaps to wrest the symbolic child from the relative safety of his family.

Journalists allied with al-Nusra Front — variously, Fatah al-Sham or Levant Liberation, an offshoot of al-Qaeda — demanded the father adhere to the narrative Assad was responsible for Russians bombing the neighborhood, and, thus, their suffering and tragic predicament. They even offered sizable sums to sweeten the pot.

He refused — on principle, as well as on the basis of knowledge likely some contrary was true.

In fact, the attempt to wrangle a narrative favorable to the U.S.-led coalition hasn't ceased — even amid the emergence of the family's actual plight, pro-Western media outlets like the Guardian and Washington Post maintained speculation and withheld details disputing the original maudlin horror evinced in the August 17, 2016, image of Omran in the ambulance's orange chair.

Where Alloush and other journalists, interviewing Daqneesh with Omran by his side — now clean cut and hinting smiles — listened intently to the man fed up with misinformation circulating for almost a year, Western corporate media insisted there could be no way to verify whether coercion forced him to speak out.

Mohamad — gasp — supports the rule of Assad.

But where eagerness to paint the Syrian war in the broad strokes of good versus evil might have fabricated the story to the benefit of shared goals possessed by the West and barbarous militants, reality is never so simple.

Nor is it so verily sterile and concrete, even when tinged with hollow tears from a world audience eager to pin blame and continue dropping bombs as usual.

War's messes cannot be encapsulated so facilely in the resigned, dusty face of a single child — not when thousands of children whose stability, limbs, life, and homeland have been ripped to shreds — but go unnoticed by the same corporate media backing interventionist policy wreaking that havoc in the first place.

Omran, it turns out, suffered only minor injuries — not even severe enough to warrant head bandages, much less a footnote in history as the poster child for why the West must oust Assad — and he left the hospital after receiving first aid to return to whatever remained of their home in Aleppo.

"He only sustained minor injuries, but the militants exaggerated this fact. They said on numerous occasions via their media that he died, until finally admitting that he's alive. They are not to be trusted," the elder Daqneesh asserted.

"While I was rescuing my family the militants filmed my kin getting out of the house, in order to use these images for propaganda … I never had any dealings with their organizations and I never accepted their so-called humanitarian aid."

Months of hiding, dodging further unwanted attention, plagued Daqneesh — until ire at brazen manipulation of his son boiled over into statements with journalists clarifying Assad and the Russians should not bear blame.

Terrorists — some armed, trained, backed, and laughably reclassified by the West and its allies as 'moderate rebels' — still aim to depose Assad and dominate Syria. In some places, they do.

And while it would be equally as farcical to sterilize atrocities committed by Syrian and Russian forces, denying Western and American complicity in the horrors besieging civilians belies a pomposity in politicized warring — with children like Omran unknowingly symbolizing two fundamentally differing justifications for its continuance.

Read more, click the links, and watch the video at http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/06/08/father-of-famous-aleppo-boy-just-exposed-how-the-us-white-helmets-lied-to-the-world/.

[Lancusters]

We just cannot blame Muslims. A terrorist can be from any religion. Mostly, Muslims are framed. Muslims are not terrorist, We have good and bad people in every religion. Sometimes, Someone do the wrong thing and Muslims are blamed which is totally wrong.

It seems to me a very difficult question of those, When you do not know the answer to it. How can we generalize all Muslims, and make them all terrorists. I understand that they did not have very complex lives. And these people are very complex in nature, who are very influenced. Well, what to do about it.

 According to a Comres poll which was conducted for BBC Radio 4 Today, in Feb 2015,

• Half (49%) believe Muslim clerics preaching that violence against the west can be justified are out of touch with mainstream Muslim opinion, while 45% disagree.

 So it appears that 45% of Muslims polled believe that Muslim clerics can be justified in preaching violence against the west.  Violence against the liberal western world is terrorism and 45% is astounding.

45% is more than enough terrorism will never end. If you consider that 1-2% of politically active citizens capable of making revolution in a country that 45% of Muslims can organize a real war against the West.

[Spendulus]

...
45% is more than enough terrorism will never end. If you consider that 1-2% of politically active citizens capable of making revolution in a country that 45% of Muslims can organize a real war against the West.

And that's what this motley collection of Muslim jerks and Muslim assholes have done.

[Sithara007]

According to a Comres poll which was conducted for BBC Radio 4 Today, in Feb 2015,

• Half (49%) believe Muslim clerics preaching that violence against the west can be justified are out of touch with mainstream Muslim opinion, while 45% disagree.

 So it appears that 45% of Muslims polled believe that Muslim clerics can be justified in preaching violence against the west.  Violence against the liberal western world is terrorism and 45% is astounding.

The results are not very surprising. Actually, I was expecting much more support for terrorism. Perhaps taqiyya has lowered the percentage. No amount of education can help these people. They are too brainwashed to be able to think logically and rationally. The only option is to limit their entry to the western nations.

[DOGE12321]

Christians have 10 commandments that were made by Moses. No one can kill another. I am guessing this is why there is no terrorist group which is depicted by christian doctrine.

[lady Royal]

...
45% is more than enough terrorism will never end. If you consider that 1-2% of politically active citizens capable of making revolution in a country that 45% of Muslims can organize a real war against the West.

And that's what this motley collection of Muslim jerks and Muslim assholes have done.

And you guys don't know how to respect others religions and People. You have your own thinking and you are not agreeing to any other fact. You don't even know Islam. Islam doesn't promote violation you should read it's history Quran. It'll explain you everything. I'm not here to fight with you I'm just saying that without reading anything don't blame anyone. I respect everyone and all the religions.

[Mometaskers]

According to a Comres poll which was conducted for BBC Radio 4 Today, in Feb 2015,

• Half (49%) believe Muslim clerics preaching that violence against the west can be justified are out of touch with mainstream Muslim opinion, while 45% disagree.

 So it appears that 45% of Muslims polled believe that Muslim clerics can be justified in preaching violence against the west.  Violence against the liberal western world is terrorism and 45% is astounding.

The results are not very surprising. Actually, I was expecting much more support for terrorism. Perhaps taqiyya has lowered the percentage. No amount of education can help these people. They are too brainwashed to be able to think logically and rationally. The only option is to limit their entry to the western nations.

Their clerics actively extol their children to look down on kufars. One of the links shared here in the forum really got my blood boiling of anger, the way these people are allowed to poison the minds of the youth.

I just noticed and realized that I have never heard of a certain Christian terrorist, all I hear is that when a terrorist is in the news, he/she is a Muslim. I am not saying that Muslims are terrorist, so don't get me wrong.

You're probably too young, so here's a piece of history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bombings_during_the_Northern_Ireland_Troubles_and_peace_process

Last time I checked, the Irish were Christian and they weren't the only non-muslim terrorists out there. Still they haven't fought for their religion, they just usually happened to be religious.

Aside from the IRA, I believe the Basque separatists in Spain and France are also Christians. The Irish are mostly not motivated by religion to kill people, though religion is one of the reason they want to secede. When UK went full Protestant, they did many actions against Catholics. The resentment still lingers and the Irish Catholics just don't want to have anything to do with the Protestants.

[Xester]

That is what I also noticed.  Most of the terrorist group or almost all of them were muslim.  But I do not know if they are genuine Muslim. Because the Muslim I know were good people.  Maybe they just aligning themselves to Muslim so they could do some of their bad intentions without having a guilt.  But Christians also did terror things without even knowing that it is an act of terror.

[Spendulus]

...
45% is more than enough terrorism will never end. If you consider that 1-2% of politically active citizens capable of making revolution in a country that 45% of Muslims can organize a real war against the West.

And that's what this motley collection of Muslim jerks and Muslim assholes have done.

And you guys don't know how to respect others religions and People. You have your own thinking and you are not agreeing to any other fact. You don't even know Islam. Islam doesn't promote violation you should read it's history Quran. It'll explain you everything. I'm not here to fight with you I'm just saying that without reading anything don't blame anyone. I respect everyone and all the religions.

And you don't respect other people, you assume they have done no reading, and proceed to lecture others. You assume others don't know Islam <blah blah blah>. And you assume you do know it.

Your ad hominem style attack doesn't even address the prior post, but attempts to shift the goalposts of the argument in a different direction.  Here's the prior post just to remind you.

If you consider that 1-2% of politically active citizens capable of making revolution in a country that 45% of Muslims can organize a real war against the West.
And that's what this motley collection of Muslim jerks and Muslim assholes have done.

Who are you to tell others not to blame anyone without reading anything? When you can't even read and respond to an argument?