Is this State important to uncovering Satoshi

[Thatstinks]

Nebraska

Ill just leave that there, I had a hunch, did some research now have a dilemma.

If the forum owner Theymos or whoever wishes to confirm or deny said State is part of the chain via PM that would be nice but I have learned when tracking a person you cannot find, find who is close to him and you will find him.

This isn't "crazy" talk or a conspiracy, a few holes were left open to discover. And before anyone says keep it a secret, I hear you thus my dilemma.

[eternalgloom]

If you don't want to elaborate any further on how you came to this conclusion, then it seems like this is just another conspiracy.
Show us your research and then we can comment on it, but making blank statements like this, doesn't really make anyone believe you're telling the truth here.

I actually have some first hand experience with people being affected by making these 'being Satoshi' accusations.
Right after the suicide of a good friend of mine, Len Sassaman, his widdow was being bombarded with pretty rude questions of him being Satoshi right after his death.
After that, all these threads about finding out who Satoshi is just feel really bad and invasive.

This doesn't really have to do with what you said in your post, I'm just saying that it might not be a good idea to go on a witchhunt to find the real Satoshi.

[Thatstinks]

I understand, let me say more, I have found a person (maybe Satoshi maybe not) but what I do know 110% is THEY know Satoshi at the least, they have to even if they denied being Satoshi. Time lines (such as phone disconnection the same time Satoshi leaves for example there is more), and 2 small bread crumbs were left in their actions. To add to it prior to Bitcoin they dabbled with digital currency leading up to it.

This person CANNOT be easily tracked down, I had a breakthrough today and now have a dilemma.

By just stating Nebraska I am kind of hoping to get confirmation from them and honestly will just leave it there. If I post this here they will see it and avoids me bothering them personally as I want to respect their privacy.

Not sure I can say more at this time.

[andrei56]

At this point, finding satoshi is irrelevant, the genie is out of the lamp and it is impossible to put it back, the only one that cares about not being discovered is satoshi since we do not know if in the future governments could accuse him of aiding criminals.

[Farcoin12]

What would finding Satoshi or one of his friends achieve for our Bitcoin community? Absolutely nothing. The identity of satoshi is irrelevant.

[MingLee]

What would finding Satoshi or one of his friends achieve for our Bitcoin community? Absolutely nothing. The identity of satoshi is irrelevant.

He obviously no longer wants to be a part of the project and prefers his privacy, I guess people just refuse to understand this.

I'm surprised that there aren't more people that understand this. Satoshi disappeared before the community really took off, and if he isn't back yet then there is no reason for people to try and find him, still, considering it is incredibly likely he doesn't want to be found.
I'd love to meet the guy, but a lot of people should respect his desire to not be found.

[Thatstinks]

I see, well, I guess Ill keep it to myself, nothing good by revealing what I know any ways, right?

Son of a gun, I cannot even share this with friends or family, do you guys really think he would be 100% against someone finding him or at the least naming him/friends?

What we all forget in the myth is it was still a person, a person who needs to apply for, register for and use everyday things that require ID, no one is a ghost, no one. His name IS recorded, maybe not where everyone can see it but it is. I would imagine if anyone he would understand this. By name I do not mean Satoshi btw

But based on what I have seen he was NOT Satoshi before deciding to go ghost and as with any human, is not perfect.

[pooya87]

i get all the enthusiasm to find Satoshi Nakamoto and find out who he/she/they is (are) but you know at some point it starts turning into an invasion of privacy!
that's just my opinion but i say Satoshi wanted to stay anonymous and wants to do otherwise it is his choice not ours. going out of our way to find out about someone who clearly wants to protect his privacy doesn't sound so right.

[btc_angela]

Why don't we just leave it as it is. If he really wants to surface, he should have done it years ago. I think he really wants to remain anonymous and look at his invention from the outside. What benefits do you think finding him now? Right. Nothing. Nada. So let the man enjoy his freedom (if he is still alive) now, and let us, WE enjoy his invention.

[Thatstinks]

I see, well, I guess Ill keep it to myself, nothing good by revealing what I know any ways, right?

Son of a gun, I cannot even share this with friends or family, do you guys really think he would be 100% against someone finding him or at the least naming him/friends?

What we all forget in the myth is it was still a person, a person who needs to apply for, register for and use everyday things that require ID, no one is a ghost, no one. His name IS recorded, maybe not where everyone can see it but it is. I would imagine if anyone he would understand this.

If you are tracking a person actually named Satoshi Nakamoto, it isn't him TIME magazine already tried this years ago.

I know, in fact that name Satoshi had NOTHING to do with what I first noticed, researched, confirmed and concluded. In fact Japan played zero factor for me. Remember I saw a pattern and connected dots, lots of dots that most did not even focus on who he is/was.
Then there was the other stuff but alas I am in a dilemma.

Will think hard about this for 24-48 hrs. May even make one more call or wait for a call, he/they see this thread, balls in their court.

To summarize I know about NE, I know this name (Satoshi) was not the only name used that did not "belong to you", important letter is "J" and hint at the NOW/THEN "Democracy" that is all. I KNOW I am very close and if uncomforting they will let me know.

[Zadicar]

I see, well, I guess Ill keep it to myself, nothing good by revealing what I know any ways, right?

Son of a gun, I cannot even share this with friends or family, do you guys really think he would be 100% against someone finding him or at the least naming him/friends?

What we all forget in the myth is it was still a person, a person who needs to apply for, register for and use everyday things that require ID, no one is a ghost, no one. His name IS recorded, maybe not where everyone can see it but it is. I would imagine if anyone he would understand this.

If you are tracking a person actually named Satoshi Nakamoto, it isn't him TIME magazine already tried this years ago.

Yes they do tracked any information of that Satoshi Nakamoto but all of them failed which we can conclude that this is not his true identity.Hes still living on the shadows and we didnt still see a glimpse of him and this thing would really uncovered unless if he decide to come out but its not possible in my own view because there are lots of questions to be asked and possible he would really be sued up on investing bitcoin.

[digaran]

I want to have either one of his left fingers or left ball for my collection if by any chance you could find him. you really should take the hint when theymos proposed to spend Satoshi's coins, he knew the father of crypto is no longer with us, rip.

[Last of the V8s]

I do hope your thinking skills have improved since you wrote this:

From what I recall from the pyramid the vast majority of all BTC is held by a tiny group. This fact makes bitcoin use a joke, while the idea of BTC is good the vast amounts held by small numbers is a huge flaw.

The only way to get it worth using world wide by billions is a huge unrealistic price increase. That in turn makes those few at the top uber wealthy. If someone can find the pyramid it would be nice showing it.

It's sad but ultimately Satoshi must return and distribute all his coin or he is no better than the world rulers we have now.

So ranking holders is laughable because the vast amounts at the top are all that matter.

Not updated but you get the idea why a small group could mean BTC is nothing but a Ponzi that will end harshly one day.

http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009

You would do well to learn from the great writer and engineer Stanislav Datskovskiy.

I wonder now with this thread of yours if you are a liar, or worse, a socialist.

[haroldtee]

Why the whole obsession of trying to uncover satoshi's identity? What is the difference that would make anyway? OP, people like you should leave this man alone and respect his decisions. Kindly find something else to do unless there is something you are not telling us. Infact, it helps the community a lot as we don't have a clue who he is. Maybe he is reading this post now as a guest, who cares?

[FA wings]

Why are you obsessed with finding Satoshi
Please respect the privacy
This man created bitcoin!

[Kprawn]

Satoshi is global, because we are all Satoshi now.  .... The hunt for Satoshi should stop, because there is nothing to be gained to identify him

or her or them.  Yes, you would solve a mystery, but you will be the villain in the story. Bitcoin fanatics will hunt you down and kick the shit

out of you, if something happens to the real Satoshi. { arrested, murdered, abducted assaulted ....} Bad things might happen to Satoshi, once

his real identity is revealed. 

[Jeger.Kiting]

I do not think it is necessary to do something that makes you complicated to know or reveal who actually satoshi, because only a fool wants to know all about it, I just want to suggest that you focus on what you already have rather than busy figuring out who it is Satoshi.

[soul-impact]

I do not think it is necessary to do something that makes you complicated to know or reveal who actually satoshi, because only a fool wants to know all about it, I just want to suggest that you focus on what you already have rather than busy figuring out who it is Satoshi.

I think the government does not need to learn about Satoshi, because in fact, it's just a name that represents bitcoin, we can not know who or who it is. In addition, we can all use bitcoin and not care about its origin, the government too, they can accept bitcoin and no matter who Satoshi is.

[Marma Kalari]

Unless you provide any proof of what you are talking about,it is just a conspiracy,have seen many people trying many things and are not successful yet and for me it is good to know the real genius behind bitcoin as he could find a solution for the scaling issues we are having right now.

[Thatstinks]

I do hope your thinking skills have improved since you wrote this:

From what I recall from the pyramid the vast majority of all BTC is held by a tiny group. This fact makes bitcoin use a joke, while the idea of BTC is good the vast amounts held by small numbers is a huge flaw.

The only way to get it worth using world wide by billions is a huge unrealistic price increase. That in turn makes those few at the top uber wealthy. If someone can find the pyramid it would be nice showing it.

It's sad but ultimately Satoshi must return and distribute all his coin or he is no better than the world rulers we have now.

So ranking holders is laughable because the vast amounts at the top are all that matter.

Not updated but you get the idea why a small group could mean BTC is nothing but a Ponzi that will end harshly one day.

http://www.loper-os.org/?p=1009

You would do well to learn from the great writer and engineer Stanislav Datskovskiy.

I wonder now with this thread of yours if you are a liar, or worse, a socialist.

Some of my views the last year plus have changed, correct. Some of my reasoning like distribution remain correct and being anti establishment would mean Satoshi distribute or donate his coins, my belief in that is firm only because of the communities foundation of anti establishment (banking). Not because I am a socialist, far from it but because of what Bitcoin supposedly stands for or used to stand for. Will it end harshly, maybe yes maybe no, time will tell but I am not the only one who feels distribution in some form will help, not hurt.

Can I now rule out ponzi, yes and no, always a chance it didn't start out that way of course. We are all human and as humans on whatever intellectual scale we sit we are subject to greed.