Muhammed Zakir hacked? Account reactivated just now

[hilariousandco]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320943 Muhammed Zakir

Recently woke up since 2015 and can't seem to provide any verification currently:

Hello everybody! Its been a long time! I had personal issues and weren't able to be active in BT. Although, I was able to login a few months ago, I am unable to login to my pc. After fumbling through my things, I was able to get BT password, however, both my pgp & bitcoin address are lost. I am still trying to recover my pc account. Hopefully, I will recover it, though chances are low!

Btw, did I miss anything important? Especially posts in "Meta", "Bitcoin Discussion" and about popular/prominent users. Please post link to those topics if possible! Thanks in advanced!

Regards,
Muhammed Zakir

I think negative is warranted here until he can provide reasonable proof that this is actually the real Muhammed Zakir.

[Quickseller]

I think there is a decent chance it is hacked. Although his response he gave to your opening of this thread indicates it might not be.

[Muhammed Zakir]

  -snip-
Feedback is there as a precaution as any account that didn't change their password since the 2015 forum hack are likely hacked themselves. I will happily remove it once reasonable proof has been shown.

If you are talking about the attack where theymos(iirc) said to change our passwords*, then, I was there at that time. You can see that by checking my "latest posts". I have changed my password at that time. However, I haven't changed my password after that. If my account did change hands, it should have been changed, right? And also do you really think I would give my personal accounts(Twitter, Github, Facebook, Skype etc...)?

I have exchanged encrypted messages with shorena. Although, I can't say content exactly as it was, but I can say what we have exchanged each other(if shorena is willing, in here, otherwise, in PM or Twitter). I have also exchanged my number with few Indians(eg: chronicsky, Mahin Gupta(Zebpay), Advaith Doosa and few others). Does Mahin Gupta's words have credibility? After all, he is one of the people behind Zebpay and he was previously founder of BuySellBitco.in. BuySellBitco is also his username IIRC.

* I have checked just now and it happened in May. I last posted in October. There hasn't been any attack after that, right?

Edit: It is not BuySellBitco, instead buysellbitcoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67318).

[hilariousandco]

  -snip-
Feedback is there as a precaution as any account that didn't change their password since the 2015 forum hack are likely hacked themselves. I will happily remove it once reasonable proof has been shown.

If you are talking about the attack where theymos(iirc) said to change our passwords*, then, I was there at that time. You can see that by checking my "latest posts". I have changed my password at that time. However, I haven't changed my password after that. If my account did change hands, it should have been changed, right? And also do you really think I would give my personal accounts(Twitter, Github, Facebook, Skype etc...)?

I have exchanged encrypted messages with shorena. Although, I can't say content exactly as it was, but I can say what we have exchanged each other(if shorena is willing, in here, otherwise, in PM or Twitter). I have also exchanged my number with few Indians(eg: chronicsky, Mahin Gupta(Zebpay), Advaith Doosa and few others). Does Mahin Gupta's words have credibility? After all, he is one of the people behind Zebpay and he was previously founder of BuySellBitco.in. BuySellBitco is also his username IIRC.

Some of the accounts hacked haven't had their passwords changed (maybe to try avoid detection) but it's possible this and your accounts were compromised some other way (maybe reusing passwords etc). If shorena or someone else of similar stature can confirm details that may be ok but do you not have access to any old bitcoin wallets? I'm sure you didn't lose access to them and a signed message would be enough here.

[LeGaulois]

https://twitter.com/KZM279/status/874962969301536769

[hahay]

  -snip-
Feedback is there as a precaution as any account that didn't change their password since the 2015 forum hack are likely hacked themselves. I will happily remove it once reasonable proof has been shown.

If you are talking about the attack where theymos(iirc) said to change our passwords*, then, I was there at that time. You can see that by checking my "latest posts". I have changed my password at that time. However, I haven't changed my password after that. If my account did change hands, it should have been changed, right? And also do you really think I would give my personal accounts(Twitter, Github, Facebook, Skype etc...)?

I have exchanged encrypted messages with shorena. Although, I can't say content exactly as it was, but I can say what we have exchanged each other(if shorena is willing, in here, otherwise, in PM or Twitter). I have also exchanged my number with few Indians(eg: chronicsky, Mahin Gupta(Zebpay), Advaith Doosa and few others). Does Mahin Gupta's words have credibility? After all, he is one of the people behind Zebpay and he was previously founder of BuySellBitco.in. BuySellBitco is also his username IIRC.

Some of the accounts hacked haven't had their passwords changed (maybe to try avoid detection) but it's possible this and your accounts were compromised some other way (maybe reusing passwords etc). If shorena or someone else of similar stature can confirm details that may be ok but do you not have access to any old bitcoin wallets? I'm sure you didn't lose access to them and a signed message would be enough here.

This makes sense and I agree with hilariou, supposedly great guy like Zakir will definitely give his old address with signed message which I think it's a very simple proof, but i also do not see Zakir giving it and his just explaining the classic reason.
I personally did not know much about Zakir in the past but after seeing his good reputation from him I was glad to see Zakir come back here again. Hopefully you can provide solid evidence to solve this problem. Good luck!

[shorena]

lets make it short

#1 I was contacted (publicly!) by MZ via twitter. I know this will not be accepted as proof.
#2 The breach hilarious is referencing was announced by theymos 25.05.2015[1]. If this is not the case, please provide a link to a thread discussing the incident in question.
#3 Archive.is has a pretty good history[2] of the seclog.php[3] page
#4 MZ changed the password the same day[4]. Due to my timezone settings and my lack of enthusiasm I didnt bother to check how many hours passed.

I thus consider the accusation refuted and opose the rating until another accusation should be presented (if any).


Edit: No other Password change was archived until the reawakening
-> https://archive.fo/wkYjc#selection-5069.0-5073.10

I also was contacted by MZ via twitter last year (6.2016 according to the rating left by EcuaMobi) during their absence to help repaiy the loan the still owed.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067985.0
[2] https://archive.fo/https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php
[4] https://archive.fo/HQBSM#selection-117829.0-117836.0

[ibminer]

It is a little odd that you seem to be unable to sign a message from a prior known address.
What is the problem with your PC?  Why are chances low of recovery??

[Lauda]

lets make it short

#1 I was contacted (publicly!) by MZ via twitter. I know this will not be accepted as proof.
#2 The breach hilarious is referencing was announced by theymos 25.05.2015[1]. If this is not the case, please provide a link to a thread discussing the incident in question.
#3 Archive.is has a pretty good history[2] of the seclog.php[3] page
#4 MZ changed the password the same day[4]. Due to my timezone settings and my lack of enthusiasm I didnt bother to check how many hours passed.

You make a decent case.

I thus consider the accusation refuted and opose the rating until another accusation should be presented (if any).

I do not primarily because of this:

It is a little odd that you seem to be unable to sign a message from a prior known address.
What is the problem with your PC?  Why are chances low of recovery??

Not being able to sign from any prior known address or PGP key makes me even more suspicious.

[Chevas Regal]

Not being able to sign from any prior known address or PGP key makes me even more suspicious.

We are in digital ecosystem, a sign will ward off all the possibilities whether he is real or a jacked account.
Why don't we make it simple, If the guy is real MZ then i hope he would have access to his old online wallets, maybe some exchange or Bit-x?? which has 2fa with registered mobile number   , why don't he send a large volume to the address which is significantly larger than his account and prove the truth.

[Muhammed Zakir]

@shorena: Thank you!

@hilariousandco: So, what do you think?


You may not know about this, but before I completely understood how valuable *personal* BTC address is, I sold 2 addresses, which were addresses I created when I got involved in Bitcoin, and someone (buyer of those addresses iirc) has already publicly posted private keys of those 2 addresses. It was a pretty stupid thing and I regretted selling it later! Therefore, I can only sign using either my pgp key or main BTC address - 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh. But you already know I can't sign from either of them.

  -snip-
What is the problem with your PC?  Why are chances low of recovery??

I am unable to login to my profile. I am using windows and have 2 profiles, 1 admin & 1 standard user. I am not exactly sure what is the problem, but I guess it is related to password. I tried many times, but I can't login. It is not possible to recover password using recovery tools because of the length of password. So I am only left with cracking it with a software available online. Like I said earlier, chances for logging in again is very low.

  -snip-
Why don't we make it simple, If the guy is real MZ then i hope he would have access to his old online wallets, maybe some exchange or Bit-x?? which has 2fa with registered mobile number  , why don't he send a large volume to the address which is significantly larger than his account and prove the truth.

If you have read my posts, you can see that I have already said I have access to those accounts, including BIT-X.

[ibminer]

I am unable to login to my profile. I am using windows and have 2 profiles, 1 admin & 1 standard user. I am not exactly sure what is the problem, but I guess it is related to password. I tried many times, but I can't login. It is not possible to recover password using recovery tools because of the length of password. So I am only left with cracking it with a software available online. Like I said earlier, chances for logging in again is very low.

What version of Windows?  There should be ways to get around the password issue. Is it telling you the password has failed or is it giving you another message?  As long as the drive is readable, which it is if you are loading Windows, the data should be retrievable. I assume this machine is where the PGP & wallet exists?  

And you don't know your password but you know how long it is?  

[Lauda]

I am unable to login to my profile. I am using windows and have 2 profiles, 1 admin & 1 standard user. I am not exactly sure what is the problem, but I guess it is related to password. I tried many times, but I can't login. It is not possible to recover password using recovery tools because of the length of password. So I am only left with cracking it with a software available online. Like I said earlier, chances for logging in again is very low.

What version of Windows?  There should be ways to get around the password issue. As long as the drive is readable, which it is if you are loading Windows, the data should be retrievable. I assume this machine is where the PGP & wallet exists?   .. And you don't know your password but you know how long it is? 

You don't even need to do that. There are ways of just deleting the Windows password from outside of the system. I'm 100% positive that I've done it a long time ago with Windows 7.

[ibminer]

You don't even need to do that. There are ways of just deleting the Windows password from outside of the system. I'm 100% positive that I've done it a long time ago with Windows 7.

Do what? This is what I was referring to in my post... there are ways to get around the password issue, depending on the version, I should be able to give instructions... or everyone can just google it.  

Edit: @Lauda, I see the confusion, I was giving 2 methods of recovery. But yes the easiest should be clearing/resetting the password assuming there are not other factors involved (I'm leaving information out of my response on purpose... I don't want to give out excuses or reasons, just want the truth). I'm not 100% sure if it is even the password that he's claiming is the issue because his last post seems to be altering what the issue may be. Hopefully the story doesn't start changing! 

[Lauda]

You don't even need to do that. There are ways of just deleting the Windows password from outside of the system. I'm 100% positive that I've done it a long time ago with Windows 7.

Do what? This is what I was referring to in my post... there are ways to get around the password issue, depending on the version, I should be able to give instructions.

I assumed that you were specifically implying taking out the drive and plugging it into another system. Old habits, sorry.

[sho_road_warrior]

So the new accusation is: "I don't trust them because they lost access to an empty wallet and pgp key"?

I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

[CoinProfiters]

CORRUPTION AT ITS FINEST.

Base your trust on FACTS! A trust rating should NEVER include "possibly" or "likely" in it!

Stop abusing your trust! SOMETHING NEEDS TO CHANGE!

[ibminer]

So the new accusation is: "I don't trust them because they lost access to an empty wallet and pgp key cannot sign a message proving their identity"?

I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

FTFY


It seems like Muhammed Zakir is well aware that a signed message is needed to prove identity:




His own demands to require a signed message are being honored.

CORRUPTION AT ITS FINEST.

Base your trust on FACTS! A trust rating should NEVER include "possibly" or "likely" in it!

Stop abusing your trust! SOMETHING NEEDS TO CHANGE!

Nice to see another account waking up to defend this woken up account. 

[CoinProfiters]

CORRUPTION AT ITS FINEST.

Base your trust on FACTS! A trust rating should NEVER include "possibly" or "likely" in it!

Stop abusing your trust! SOMETHING NEEDS TO CHANGE!

Nice to see another account waking up to defend this woken up account. 

YOU'RE FUCKIN STUPID.

I've been logged into this accout for 3 weeks straight retard!

Always full of assumptions! CORRUPTION ALERT. CORRUPTION ALERT

[Lauda]

So the new accusation is: "I don't trust them because they lost access to an empty wallet and pgp key"?

I'd expect someone like you to know better than that. Statements like these are part of the reason for which we have failed to prevent a number of scams. One of the most recent cases is nachius.

I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

That is proof-of-proxy, i.e. you. Whether you can be trusted with that is debatable for each individual. I'd prefer cryptography over trust. Anyhow, the password problem with Windows can be semi-easily mitigated and thus voids the excuse.

[ibminer]

YOU'RE FUCKIN STUPID.

I've been logged into this accout for 3 weeks straight retard!

Always full of assumptions! CORRUPTION ALERT. CORRUPTION ALERT

"Always full of assumptions" and then you insert an assumption right after that. You're cool.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

So yeah, looks pretty suspicious to me right now.   This forum is a hacker's wet dream and I'd be willing to bet money that this isn't MZ.  Think I'm going to change my password pretty soon, because the security on this site sucks--I've known that for a while now, but watch out when the hackers start doing this crap.  Nothing is safe.

[Patatas]

because the security on this site sucks--I've known that for a while now

You think so ? I doubt it.Never had a complain from people with strong passwords losing access to accounts.Most of the accounts are hacked due to indirect phishing or direct attacking the victims machine.Data-base breach was a different case altogether.My point being,it's due to users fault their accounts are hacked and not the forum.

[tspacepilot]

That is proof-of-proxy, i.e. you. Whether you can be trusted with that is debatable for each individual. I'd prefer cryptography over trust. Anyhow, the password problem with Windows can be semi-easily mitigated and thus voids the excuse.

Yah,  I don't use windows but you should just be able to put a linux distro on a usb, boot from that usb, mount the harddrive, read all the data you want to read.

[Muhammed Zakir]

I am unable to login to my profile. I am using windows and have 2 profiles, 1 admin & 1 standard user. I am not exactly sure what is the problem, but I guess it is related to password. I tried many times, but I can't login. It is not possible to recover password using recovery tools because of the length of password. So I am only left with cracking it with a software available online. Like I said earlier, chances for logging in again is very low.

What version of Windows?  There should be ways to get around the password issue.

Windows 7.

Is it telling you the password has failed or is it giving you another message?

Password failed.

As long as the drive is readable, which it is if you are loading Windows, the data should be retrievable. I assume this machine is where the PGP & wallet exists? 

Yes.

And you don't know your password but you know how long it is? 

I know my password, but I can't login to my profile. I think maybe a letter or number is wrong. I'm not sure about it though!

So the new accusation is: "I don't trust them because they lost access to an empty wallet and pgp key cannot sign a message proving their identity"?

I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

FTFY


It seems like Muhammed Zakir is well aware that a signed message is needed to prove identity:

[ img]https://i.imgur.com/bbPkYwh.png[/img]

His own demands to require a signed message are being honored.
 -snip-

I understand what you're saying, but if I can't access my wallet or PGP, how can I sign?

-snip-
I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

@hilariousandco:- Will this work?


Edit:- If anyone has any instructions on recovering them, please do post here! Thanks in advance! AFAIK, internet connection is broken where I am going. I will be off for about 2-5 days! If there is internet connection, I will try to come online. So if you don't see me around these days, don't make this anymore worse, if you know what I mean!

[Timelord2067]

Just like how TomatoCage came back to life then when challenged to provide proof went offline.

Nice to see the global moderators are about six to nine months behind the rest of us.

[ibminer]

Edit:- If anyone has any instructions on recovering them, please do post here! Thanks in advance! AFAIK, internet connection is broken where I am going. I will be off for about 2-5 days! If there is internet connection, I will try to come online. So if you don't see me around these days, don't make this anymore worse, if you know what I mean!

http://pogostick.net/~pnh/ntpasswd/
Disclaimer: If you encrypted files through Windows, this will not fully work. But based on your current situation, I doubt you were encrypting files.

[digaran]

Why is he so important now? lol he was probably out there killing for ISIS all this time and now is back just give him another chance guys, Muslim=Arab=Terrorist.
Your password is : administrator and if it's not that then just contact NSA and ask them what is the backdoor code for windows.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Just like how TomatoCage came back to life then when challenged to provide proof went offline.

I informed I may not be online for a few days to not see these kind of comments, but sigh... 

Nice to see the global moderators are about six to nine months behind the rest of us.

I don't understand!

Edit:- If anyone has any instructions on recovering them, please do post here! Thanks in advance! AFAIK, internet connection is broken where I am going. I will be off for about 2-5 days! If there is internet connection, I will try to come online. So if you don't see me around these days, don't make this anymore worse, if you know what I mean!

http://pogostick.net/~pnh/ntpasswd/

Thank you, ibminer! I will give it a go when I return home!

Disclaimer: If you encrypted files through Windows, this will not fully work. But based on your current situation, I doubt you were encrypting files.

I didn't encrypt.

[theymos]

At Muhammed Zakir's request, I looked into his IP logs, and he is currently accessing the forum from roughly the same location as he did previously.

[shorena]

At Muhammed Zakir's request, I looked into his IP logs, and he is currently accessing the forum from roughly the same location as he did previously.

Thanks, but you probably know that it wont do.

So the new accusation is: "I don't trust them because they lost access to an empty wallet and pgp key cannot sign a message proving their identity"?

I can't help with that, but as MZ offered a proof of knowledge. Would that be acceptable? I can think of a question only they should be able to answer based on our past exchange of encrypted messages.

FTFY


It seems like Muhammed Zakir is well aware that a signed message is needed to prove identity:
-snip-

Fair enough.


Maybe we can keep the tech support and trolling out of this and just bump it when something happens. It would be greatly appreciated.

[digaran]

At Muhammed Zakir's request, I looked into his IP logs, and he is currently accessing the forum from roughly the same location as he did previously.

Thanks, but you probably know that it wont do.

Maybe we can keep the tech support and trolling out of this and just bump it when something happens. It would be greatly appreciated.

Guilty as charged, I can't believe The "Shorena" indirectly addressed me in his post now I'm walking on pink clouds.
Now the one person with the ability to kick every body from trust list or add any body at will, having access to IP logs and everything is telling you that the user is connecting roughly from same location yet you tell him it's not enough?
Wasn't this like: theymos first trusts a few people and adds them into his list and as they in turn trust a few people themselves and adding them to their list, is there some body above theymos other than the late great Satoshi himself or even if he comes here and vouch for MZ you'll be wanting your signed message?
Am I going to get banned and tagged now after I posted after "Shorena" indirectly told me not to? lol I think you guys are a little bit full of yourselves, if a hacker were that good to duplicate the IP address then don't you think they could come up with a private key?

[kiklo]

Theymos himself pops in to let people know that Muhammed Zakir account is using the exact same IP as before and still these users do not remove their False Negative Trust Ratings.
Zepher
Lauda
hilariousandco

@Theymos , you know Lauda has been abusing her position as a DT member for months and you continue to let her place false ratings as she see fit.

How about removing Lauda and blazed from DT because their abuse of it is breathtaking.
They are making a complete and utter joke of your trust system.

 


FYI:
Current Members of a Rogue Default Trust Gang,
tagging others with red trust to limit signature and escrow competition   

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1938190
Who are we?
    Blazed
    minerjones
    Lauda
    Zepher

[boldar]

All DT members make questionable calls on situations like these. From my speculation, Lauda has made the worst calls. Nothing is worse than a red tag an innocent person doesn't deserve. All DT members make mistakes, and for sure many of them have jumped the creek and made a guess here or there. It seems that Lauda does not think the rating's thoroughly, and simply puts red. This is very unfair.

theymos, something must be done.

[Quickseller]

I would say that based on the fact that MZ changed his PW after the forum's member's table was leaked, that MZ not only posted, but also traded/lent BTC a decent number of times after the forum was hacked would make it reasonable to say that his account was secured after the forum hack. In addition to this, MZ repaid a loan several months late, many months after the hack, communicated with shorena regarding repayment, and shorena did not mention anything about MZ's account getting hacked at the time.

I would also argue that the way MZ is behaving is consistent with how I believe the "real" MZ behaves. Although this can reasonably be faked.

Lastly, per theymos, the IP address of MZ is ~the same as what it was previously. If shorena can confirm some kind of proof of knowledge, then I would say that the person behind the MZ account is likely to be the "real" MZ.

With the above being said, I would still be hesitant to trust someone who has been away from the community for as long as MZ was away, at least at first.....

[shorena]

-snip-
Guilty as charged, I can't believe The "Shorena" indirectly addressed me in his post now I'm walking on pink clouds.
Now the one person with the ability to kick every body from trust list or add any body at will, having access to IP logs and everything is telling you that the user is connecting roughly from same location yet you tell him it's not enough?

Because it does not matter what theymos thinks. It matters what hilarious and Zepher think.

Am I going to get banned and tagged now after I posted after "Shorena" indirectly told me not to? lol I think you guys are a little bit full of yourselves, if a hacker were that good to duplicate the IP address then don't you think they could come up with a private key?

No, Ill probably have forgotten about you in a day or two. Sup with the air quotes though?

-snip-

 

I would say that based on the fact that MZ changed his PW after the forum's member's table was leaked, that MZ not only posted, but also traded/lent BTC a decent number of times after the forum was hacked would make it reasonable to say that his account was secured after the forum hack. In addition to this, MZ repaid a loan several months late, many months after the hack, communicated with shorena regarding repayment, and shorena did not mention anything about MZ's account getting hacked at the time.

Payment was received from the known address[1][2].

I would also argue that the way MZ is behaving is consistent with how I believe the "real" MZ behaves. Although this can reasonably be faked.

Lastly, per theymos, the IP address of MZ is ~the same as what it was previously. If shorena can confirm some kind of proof of knowledge, then I would say that the person behind the MZ account is likely to be the "real" MZ.

With the above being said, I would still be hesitant to trust someone who has been away from the community for as long as MZ was away, at least at first.....

[1] https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh/transactions
[2] https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/6a961761f0bc515eee5e6be191e45a344e38bababcdd3e235960187136de462e

[aadje93]

If you can not login to windows, how about to boot via a Linux cd or usb stick you can then easily access the hard drive files and recover your data no?

[Lauda]

At Muhammed Zakir's request, I looked into his IP logs, and he is currently accessing the forum from roughly the same location as he did previously.

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Am I going to get banned and tagged now after I posted after "Shorena" indirectly told me not to?

There's an ignore button which works very nicely.

lol I think you guys are a little bit full of yourselves, if a hacker were that good to duplicate the IP address then don't you think they could come up with a private key?

The database, including IP logs (IIRC) was leaked. Thus getting the IP address that was used with some account should not be too difficult. Spoofing the IP to corresponds with one used before is much harder than just spoofing the location.

With the above being said, I would still be hesitant to trust someone who has been away from the community for as long as MZ was away, at least at first.....

No harm done to wait for a signed Bitcoin/PGP message. Do I need to remind the *knights in shining armor* of their complete failures again?

One of the most recent cases is nachius.

[kiklo]

At Muhammed Zakir's request, I looked into his IP logs, and he is currently accessing the forum from roughly the same location as he did previously.

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Sorry calling your bullshit out on that one.

Explain how you can have two way communications with a false IP Address

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5180557/why-is-it-not-possible-to-fake-an-ip-address

It is fully possible to send data with a fake sender IP. You'll have a hard time getting replies though, since the replies will be sent to the fake IP and never reach you. Additionally, if you send data with a "from" IP that a router doesn't expect to arrive from you, the router will often simply drop it, and sometimes inform the ISP that you're up to something that violates your TOS.

Login to Btctalk requires a reply to your system, if the IP was faked the login approval is sent to the wrong ip address and you can't login.

So Lauda, why are you lying , hmm?


 


FYI:
Seems like you are still red tagging first and asking questions almost never.

FYI2:
LOL,  
leave it to Lauda to blame the users for Btctalk Staff losing the IP address information.
Then punish the users for the BTCtalk staff's fault. 

[philipma1957]

All DT members make questionable calls on situations like these. From my speculation, Lauda has made the worst calls. Nothing is worse than a red tag an innocent person doesn't deserve. All DT members make mistakes, and for sure many of them have jumped the creek and made a guess here or there. It seems that Lauda does not think the rating's thoroughly, and simply puts red. This is very unfair.

theymos, something must be done.

I  have got to ask you  where have you been for 2 years? 

You have a 2 year shutdown  from 2015 to 2017  this attracts attention  from  people that try to do security.

I gave you stellar trust  back in Dec 2014  and now I am reviewing  your account and a dozen others that are gapped with inactivity then started up again.

I frankly  don't want to bother  but Muhammed Zakir has asked me more then once to review  accounts to see if they were bad. 

So  who are you?  The real  boldar  or  the same person that hacked into  bitcointalk data base?  Or a different hacker.

I do not like doing detective work  and I am not going to redline you  or pull my  trust away.

But 2 year gaps  in activity make me nervous.

[kiklo]

All DT members make questionable calls on situations like these. From my speculation, Lauda has made the worst calls. Nothing is worse than a red tag an innocent person doesn't deserve. All DT members make mistakes, and for sure many of them have jumped the creek and made a guess here or there. It seems that Lauda does not think the rating's thoroughly, and simply puts red. This is very unfair.

theymos, something must be done.

I  have got to ask you  where have you been for 2 years?  

You have a 2 year shutdown  from 2015 to 2017  this attracts attention  from  people that try to do security.

I gave you stellar trust  back in Dec 2014  and now I am reviewing  your account and a dozen others that are gapped with inactivity then started up again.

I frankly  don't want to bother  but Muhammed Zakir has asked me more then once to review  accounts to see if they were bad.  

So  who are you?  The real  boldar  or  the same person that hacked into  bitcointalk data base?  Or a different hacker.

I do not like doing detective work  and I am not going to redline you  or pull my  trust away.

But 2 year gaps  in activity make me nervous.

Oh , I got this one.

Translation, I am a friend of Lauda and if you keep making waves, I will remove you from my trust.

Real classy Dick Move there philipma1957.  
It is people like you that enable Lauda to abuse all of the non default trust members.


 

FYI:
If you are going to threaten someone don't be a pussy about it.

FYI2:
This should show beyond a shadow of a doubt that the majority of DT members are acting as prison guards ,
right before your eyes an attempt at intimidation of another DT member.
Where is Theymos doing nothing to fix his broken trust system as usual.

[philipma1957]

All DT members make questionable calls on situations like these. From my speculation, Lauda has made the worst calls. Nothing is worse than a red tag an innocent person doesn't deserve. All DT members make mistakes, and for sure many of them have jumped the creek and made a guess here or there. It seems that Lauda does not think the rating's thoroughly, and simply puts red. This is very unfair.

theymos, something must be done.

I  have got to ask you  where have you been for 2 years?  

You have a 2 year shutdown  from 2015 to 2017  this attracts attention  from  people that try to do security.

I gave you stellar trust  back in Dec 2014  and now I am reviewing  your account and a dozen others that are gapped with inactivity then started up again.

I frankly  don't want to bother  but Muhammed Zakir has asked me more then once to review  accounts to see if they were bad.  

So  who are you?  The real  boldar  or  the same person that hacked into  bitcointalk data base?  Or a different hacker.

I do not like doing detective work  and I am not going to redline you  or pull my  trust away.

But 2 year gaps  in activity make me nervous.

Oh , I got this one.

Translation, I am a friend of Lauda and if you keep making waves, I will remove you from my trust.

Real classy Dick Move there philipma1957.  
It is people like you that enable Lauda to abuse all of the non default trust members.


 

FYI:
If you are going to threaten someone don't be a pussy about it.

FYI2:
This should show beyond a shadow of a doubt that the majority of DT members are acting as prison guards ,
right before your eyes an attempt at intimidation of another DT member.
Where is Theymos doing nothing to fix his broken trust system as usual.

Actually no I don't bother much in security matters on site.  but I have given trust ratings out since 2012  and a pattern of long inactive accounts coming back to life is happening.  So as I said I made a note here  and thats all I am doing.

Years ago I was asked by theymos to go on the default list.  I did it to be helpful and I have help many people.

I have one thing to say about the trust system  it has issues  and if you can write up a better way to fix it  I would support that.

I think you don't realize the volume the site sees.
 I get 1000 pm's a month.
I get $0 for any work  I do for security .
It is also thankless as you can see. Well some of the time it is thankless.

I am mostly on btc mining alt coin mining and marketplace.  I don't want to get into site security as I am not paid for it.

I also don't think you understand that the site is subject to different laws in every country on earth.
people like theymos and lauda   can be asked by many countries to comply to the law in that country.

Believe it or not I do not know the name address or location of theymos or lauda.
I don't side for them or against them but I do know that the site creates legal obligations on the owners and runners of the site in every country in the world.

The fact is boldar went idle  for 2 year time period.  and is yet to respond to my question  whom is he or who are you.

BTW since he paid me in btc in 2014 December for gear there is an easy fix  if he has proper control of his btc he could go back to that address he paid me with and do a dust send to my address. that  pretty proves whom he is.  and he is yet to answer here.

you can feel free to look at the trust I have given and join to people that look wrong as I have invited multiple people to do this and I have done changes on request if they appeared to be good.  I have turned lauda down on some requests to alter my default list on at least one occasion.

[digaran]

Because it does not matter what theymos thinks. It matters what hilarious and Zepher think.

Actually it matters if theymos removes them from his trust list, while none of this matters if you look at the bigger picture here, any body no matter how good and trustworthy could at any time turn into a scammer.
If it didn't matter what theymos thinks while he is the admin and the entire trust system of this forum is based on his decision and his call then your green trust worth nothing.
IMO trust must be earned by consensus, when some body from DT wants to tag  some body else then at least 5 more DT members should review the case before it takes effect, it doesn't work if you let every DT member individually decide and judges and acts accordingly, why do you think in courts there are a bunch strangers deciding the fate of the defendant?

If admin says that he trusts X & Y then he is giving them the absolute power, and that power is the same power which corrupts people and gives them false sense of authority.

I wish you luck though with your circle of trust, people will continue scamming, killing and destroying, 90% of thieves never wanted to steal but they were impulsive and acted because of temptation of having money, item, property.

Being on the DT list should be deemed sacred because it is nothing less than the sacred duty of a judge in a court of law but DT members are taking it very lightly.

[philipma1957]

Because it does not matter what theymos thinks. It matters what hilarious and Zepher think.

Actually it matters if theymos removes them from his trust list, while none of this matters if you look at the bigger picture here, any body no matter how good and trustworthy could at any time turn into a scammer.
If it didn't matter what theymos thinks while he is the admin and the entire trust system of this forum is based on his decision and his call then your green trust worth nothing.
IMO trust must be earned by consensus, when some body from DT wants to tag  some body else then at least 5 more DT members should review the case before it takes effect, it doesn't work if you let every DT member individually decide and judges and acts accordingly, why do you think in courts there are a bunch strangers deciding the fate of the defendant?

If admin says that he trusts X & Y then he is giving them the absolute power, and that power is the same power which corrupts people and gives them false sense of authority.

I wish you luck though with your circle of trust, people will continue scamming, killing and destroying, 90% of thieves never wanted to steal but they were impulsive and acted because of temptation of having money, item, property.

Being on the DT list should be deemed sacred because it is nothing less than the sacred duty of a judge in a court of law but DT members are taking it very lightly.

usa law does it that way.
uk law jurors are hired workers and they do know one another.

2 countries both speak english yet different laws.
and the owners running the forum could be made to answer in either country if either country said  a law was broken by the four and went after the forum.

It is not easy to run a perfect forum with the volume of traffic done here.

in the case of boldar I am happy to say I have his old  tx id  and he can pm me and send me 0.00001234 btc which I would refund back to him.

he simply needs to use the same address he used back in dec 2014

https://blockchain.info/tx/08537f20b649c0daa29f7c8cca7195d9c1a75fa1a707688e1edcbe232eaba30c


BTW  my profile address does not change

https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

if boldar  had done the same  it would not be an issue.

While I do not like involvement on the security end of the forum I can tell you this  it is very hard to  do it correctly and people responsible will tend to be harsh to protect the forum and their own self from legal action.

If nothing was said about bolder or Muhammed Zakir  and a big fraud happened  the forum could be shut down or face legal action.

I am older retired person 60 and I can tell you  a little about USA law and I see nothing wrong with the caution used by dt list.  in the case of Muhammed Zakir or boldar.   If some one wants to write up a better method please do I would look at it and push it if it looked good.

Meeting in the middle works for me.  Thanks!

Paid with Transaction ID: 08537f20b649c0daa29f7c8cca7195d9c1a75fa1a707688e1edcbe232eaba30c

Please ship to:

C........
2........
K.......
(7......

Thanks so much!

this is his pm from 2014 dec

[kiklo]

I am older retired person 60 and I can tell you  a little about USA law and I see nothing wrong with the caution used by dt list.  in the case of Muhammed Zakir or boldar.   If some one wants to write up a better method please do I would look at it and push it if it looked good.

The best one written was even better than my prior suggestions.
Theymos ignored it like he ignores everything else.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1913408.msg19011283#msg19011283

It is interesting that with a admitted flawed trust system, and an over aggressive ex staff member,
that all of you want to blame the one pointing out the flaws and instead of agreeing something needs to be done to fix the system

Please, enlighten us on how we can fix the system.
It's extremely easy to say that a system is broken. Providing a fix that makes sense and doesn't just move the issues somewhere else is significantly harder.

Not difficult at all , modify the system so you can PM a Trust group request to another member for say 7 or 14 or 30 days or whatever time is needed,
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.
All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time. 
So no trust monarchy and no bad ratings from people just because they don't like what the other says.

 

[shorena]

Because it does not matter what theymos thinks. It matters what hilarious and Zepher think.

Actually it matters if theymos removes them from his trust list, while none of this matters if you look at the bigger picture here, any body no matter how good and trustworthy could at any time turn into a scammer.
If it didn't matter what theymos thinks while he is the admin and the entire trust system of this forum is based on his decision and his call then your green trust worth nothing.

Might as well ask president trump, because there is the slight chance they might start a war on bitcointalk.org. Admins set people on DT to keep out of these issues.

-snip-
Being on the DT list should be deemed sacred because it is nothing less than the sacred duty of a judge in a court of law but DT members are taking it very lightly.

I agree and maybe the system can be improved, but this is hardly the topic here, is it?

[minifrij]

The best one written was even better than my prior suggestions.
Theymos ignored it like he ignores everything else.

Since I missed my opportunity to reply to this when it was posted in the original thread, let me tell you why this system isn't fit for the forum whatsoever.

Not difficult at all , modify the system so you can PM a Trust group request to another member for say 7 or 14 or 30 days or whatever time is needed,
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.

What scammer would agree to being in a trust group with someone who would tag them? This system gives scammers a free reign to do whatever they like because they know that they wouldn't be able to be tagged with a negative rating so long as they didn't agree to be in a trust group with anyone. This completely removes the entire point of the trust system.

All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time.

Ah yes, so if a new member that didn't understand the system properly agreed to be in a trust group it could be abused by anyone to leave spam negative ratings. I for one would love to see newbies be spammed with hundreds of negative ratings by trolls because they didn't understand what the system did. /s

So no trust monarchy and no bad ratings from people just because they don't like what the other says.

Apart from it solves neither of those problems, it just lets people spam ratings on people that they don't like because they don't understand the system.
Also, let's assume that this forum is fantastic and everyone understands how the system works. What's to stop someone from requesting to be in a trust group in order to give positive trust, only to then have lied and spams the user with negative trust instead?


Overall, an idiotic system written by an idiot and promoted by another idiot. If this is the 'best' system that you know of, you should get one of your family members to put you into an institution.

[philipma1957]

The best one written was even better than my prior suggestions.
Theymos ignored it like he ignores everything else.

Since I missed my opportunity to reply to this when it was posted in the original thread, let me tell you why this system isn't fit for the forum whatsoever.

Not difficult at all , modify the system so you can PM a Trust group request to another member for say 7 or 14 or 30 days or whatever time is needed,
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.

What scammer would agree to being in a trust group with someone who would tag them? This system gives scammers a free reign to do whatever they like because they know that they wouldn't be able to be tagged with a negative rating so long as they didn't agree to be in a trust group with anyone. This completely removes the entire point of the trust system.

All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time.

Ah yes, so if a new member that didn't understand the system properly agreed to be in a trust group it could be abused by anyone to leave spam negative ratings. I for one would love to see newbies be spammed with hundreds of negative ratings by trolls because they didn't understand what the system did. /s

So no trust monarchy and no bad ratings from people just because they don't like what the other says.

Apart from it solves neither of those problems, it just lets people spam ratings on people that they don't like because they don't understand the system.
Also, let's assume that this forum is fantastic and everyone understands how the system works. What's to stop someone from requesting to be in a trust group in order to give positive trust, only to then have lied and spams the user with negative trust instead?


Overall, an idiotic system written by an idiot and promoted by another idiot. If this is the 'best' system that you know of, you should get one of your family members to put you into an institution.

Well  I just figured the long play scammer could create a trust group using 8 accounts  with 8 people in on it.

do a lot of .01 or less btc deals with everyone clean for 3 months.  Then do some 1 or 2 coin fakes deals almost each other.

At this point 4-6 months are past and then do a large group buy and skip with the coin.  Yeah it is a six month time frame but  8 guys getting 160 coins from a fake group buy may do it.

[kiklo]

Overall, an idiotic system written by an idiot and promoted by another idiot. If this is the 'best' system that you know of, you should get one of your family members to put you into an institution.

Kid ,
I know you are young , but why are you such a damn fool.

You talk like you know shit , the fact is , you are a wet behind the ear child, less than 21 years old that does not know shit.  You make false claims like when you said IP address could be faked for 2 way communications.

Trying to talk like you are an authority on shit , is stupid.  
YOU ARE NOT!

So unless you actually learn something SHUT THE FUCK UP!
The Grown ups are talking.
Come back when you are over 25 and not so damn stupid.


 

Well  I just figured the long play scammer could create a trust group using 8 accounts  with 8 people in on it.

do a lot of .01 or less btc deals with everyone clean for 3 months.  Then do some 1 or 2 coin fakes deals almost each other.

At this point 4-6 months are past and then do a large group buy and skip with the coin.  Yeah it is a six month time frame but  8 guys getting 160 coins from a fake group buy may do it.

And what keeps the current DT members from creating new accounts and giving trust right now.
Nothing so your point is mute, as least with the new way their is a time imposed ,
with the current corrupt system they can add new fake names and granting fake Positive trust ,
which some are doing NOW!


 

FYI:
Where is all of this analysis on the current corrupt trust system?
You will insult a newer better design over the corrupt current design, what does that say about you?

[minifrij]

You make false claims like when you said IP address could be faked for 2 way communications.

Only to then apologize when I was found to be wrong. I only wish you had the integrity to do the same.

Trying to talk like you are an authority on shit , is stupid.  
YOU ARE NOT!

I don't believe you need any authority to perform critical analysis on a broken system. Who knows.

So unless you actually learn something SHUT THE FUCK UP!
The Grown ups are talking.
Come back when you are over 25 and not so damn stupid.

I do think it's a shame that you dismiss my arguments simply because I do not pass an arbitrary age requirement, though at least it shows you have nothing to actually say about the points I have raised and therefore have to attack my character instead. You're certainly a model member of this forum that everyone can look up to.

FYI:
Where is all of this analysis on the current corrupt trust system?

I actually answered your question in a different thread, to which you actually quoted my answer. Here it is in case you have forgotten:

Please, enlighten us on how we can fix the system.
It's extremely easy to say that a system is broken. Providing a fix that makes sense and doesn't just move the issues somewhere else is significantly harder.

Until you can refute my arguments with something other than a possible mental breakdown, your 'better' system is a load of shit that is broken in every possible way in my eyes (and probably everyone with any sort of understanding of what a trust system should achieve).

[kiklo]

All right kid,

List your reasons in order why you don't think Aztek's idea would work and I will tell you why you are wrong.
School is in.  


 


FYI:
Must be a school night, his Mom must have sent the kid to bed.  

FYI2:

Not difficult at all , modify the system so you can PM a Trust group request to another member for say 7 or 14 or 30 days or whatever time is needed,
if that member accepts the trust group request, their names are entered into a database, so that they can then rate any person in their group for up to that time period, once the time period expires, no further ratings are possible unless a new trust group PM is sent out and accepted.

What scammer would agree to being in a trust group with someone who would tag them? This system gives scammers a free reign to do whatever they like because they know that they wouldn't be able to be tagged with a negative rating so long as they didn't agree to be in a trust group with anyone. This completely removes the entire point of the trust system.

You are an idiot , kid.
If the scammer never agrees to a trust group, they never receive any positive or negative ratings.
*This prevents assholes like Lauda from negatively rating people that would never trust her lying ass anyway.*
None of this political red tagging would be possible.

If the scammer fakes positive ratings from multiple alts they control, only 1 negative rating will destroy all of that work. Where as with the current Piece of shit trust system, any DT member can add any of their fake alts everyday when no issues.
example: How do you know Blazed and Lauda are not the exact same person.
Answer : You Don't!

All ratings from a Trust Group have equal weight, nothing is untrusted as both parties agreed to it ahead of time.

Ah yes, so if a new member that didn't understand the system properly agreed to be in a trust group it could be abused by anyone to leave spam negative ratings. I for one would love to see newbies be spammed with hundreds of negative ratings by trolls because they didn't understand what the system did. /s

Kid, if you are so Damn Stupid , you agree to what should look like a contract, you should get ripped off.
If I hand you a Document and you sign it without reading it, you already confirmed yourself as a moron , and will be ripped off rather quickly. In other words , read shit before you sign it.

What the new design gives is Choice , you have a choice whether you are entered into a contract with that person or not.

The Current Design is a Master / Slave relationship ,
DT members are the masters and you are their slaves as you have no recourse except begging like a slave for forgiveness.

*** So pardon my French , But FUCK THAT! ***

[Muhammed Zakir]

Please keep off topic posts out of this thread. Thank you!

[minifrij]

List your reasons in order why you don't think Aztek's idea would work and I will tell you why you are wrong.

See my previous post:

Overall, an idiotic system written by an idiot and promoted by another idiot. If this is the 'best' system that you know of, you should get one of your family members to put you into an institution.

I request that you reply in a new topic and PM me the link though, to respect MZ's wishes.

Must be a school night, his Mom must have sent the kid to bed.

Not everyone lives in the same timezone.

Please keep off topic posts out of this thread. Thank you!

My apologies, this will be my last reply here.

[theymos]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Same geolocation.

If someone knew Muhammed Zakir's previous location and knew that this issue would come up in advance, they could use a proxy located in the right area. But it's rather unlikely.

[Timelord2067]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Same geolocation.

If someone knew Muhammed Zakir's previous location and knew that this issue would come up in advance, they could use a proxy located in the right area. But it's rather unlikely.

@theymos: TomatoCage's UID appears to have been hacked, when challenged to provide a signed message, they went offline.

[Chevas Regal]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Spoofing the IP address and Geo location is a trivial task, even a high school geek can do it.
Call someone over Skype, get his/her IP and spoof it, fairly simple.

[shorena]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Spoofing the IP address and Geo location is a trivial task, even a high school geek can do it.
Call someone over Skype, get his/her IP and spoof it, fairly simple.

It hurts. Wana bet? If theymos agrees, I give you a valid, working, online IP, you have to make a post here from it. If you can you get the coins BTC if you cant I do. 0.1 BTC?

[Chevas Regal]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Spoofing the IP address and Geo location is a trivial task, even a high school geek can do it.
Call someone over Skype, get his/her IP and spoof it, fairly simple.

It hurts. Wana bet? If theymos agrees, I give you a valid, working, online IP, you have to make a post here from it. If you can you get the coins BTC if you cant I do. 0.1 BTC?

why are you so excited suddenly? Are you a fool, dont know anything about google captcha? you cannot bypass it , if you try then it will ask for clicks on various images and thus will extract your original ip.

what i say is that i can spoof his or your IP , if i have , i can get it verify by whatismyipaddress,com, but not bypass google captcha which this forum use.

There are similar ways in wich you can send spoof emails , but if you know the person valid ip then email spoof is well played.

[kiklo]

Same IP(s) or same location? Spoofing the location would be fairly trivial.

Same geolocation.

If someone knew Muhammed Zakir's previous location and knew that this issue would come up in advance, they could use a proxy located in the right area. But it's rather unlikely.

Aside from the False Retarded Negative Ratings from Overzealous DT members,
hilariousandco
lauda

None of you seem to have any proof of wrong doing.

DT member seem to follow the same requirements as the Salem witch trials.
Tied them up and throw them in the water ,
if they float , they are a witch and you burn them at the stake.
if they drown , well they were a good Christian, may God rest their soul. 

Maybe DT members should back the fuck off , until their is evidence of a scam.
Or is this guy going to run an escrow service, so Lauda & Blazed need him red tag so he can't compete.

@Theymos, guess your DT members just ignore the daylights out of you, huh?
They should have removed the negs on MZ days ago.

 

[SaShiRaJaVu]

To all the smart asses who think that MZ could spoof his IP and shit like that  ,it is possible but you must understand that theymos just confirmed that he is using the same geo location and i had a conversation with MZ in our mother tongue and he replied me in our language, i did not come here and write this before is because he did not reply me extensively and i am writing here now because theymos confirmed his geo location. I personally do not know MZ but the language we speak is exclusive for our state.

[shorena]

-snip-
why are you so excited suddenly? Are you a fool, dont know anything about google captcha? you cannot bypass it , if you try then it will ask for clicks on various images and thus will extract your original ip.

what i say is that i can spoof his or your IP , if i have , i can get it verify by whatismyipaddress,com, but not bypass google captcha which this forum use.

There are similar ways in wich you can send spoof emails , but if you know the person valid ip then email spoof is well played.

I didnt solve a captcha here in years... anyway. Now its not possible anymore? It was childs play just a few hours ago. Thanks for making my point though.

[Joel_Jantsen]

why are you so excited suddenly? Are you a fool, dont know anything about google captcha? you cannot bypass it , if you try then it will ask for clicks on various images and thus will extract your original ip.

Why suddenly you went from Chevas Regal to Engg.Chakks ? Head over to the service section and I just noticed someone selling an automated captcha solver.

what i say is that i can spoof his or your IP , if i have , i can get it verify by whatismyipaddress,com, but not bypass google captcha which this forum use.

Yes Engg.Chakks was a hacker too,makes perfect sense now.

There are similar ways in wich you can send spoof emails , but if you know the person valid ip then email spoof is well played.

Not really.Email servers don't work like that and it depends on the email client you're using.Stop calling him a fool when you lack basic networking knowledge yourself.

[Muhammed Zakir]

Thank you everyone for giving your statement or suggestions! I have recovered a backup of private key corresponding to 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh! I'm still working on recovering PGP key. I will post a signed message from my addresses (current & 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh) soon!

[Quickseller]

Thank you everyone for giving your statement or suggestions! I have recovered a backup of private key corresponding to 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh! I'm still working on recovering PGP key. I will post a signed message from my addresses (current & 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh) soon!

If you have recovered a backup of your 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh key, why are you unable to sign a message immidiately?

[Muhammed Zakir]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This account is still under Muhammed Zakir's control!
Signed on 07/07/2017, Friday
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Address: 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh
HAY0QkqYgLZk+wcN7YDPKKKRplt3bxDlUna+ha2o+UyeFraJ9iydIaQSeIGpyPgjnbrpkwCpoHKH3BUb2sEhkFM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Can Lauda & hilariousandco please remove your trust feedback?

Thank you everyone for giving your statement or suggestions! I have recovered a backup of private key corresponding to 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh! I'm still working on recovering PGP key. I will post a signed message from my addresses (current & 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh) soon!

If you have recovered a backup of your 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh key, why are you unable to sign a message immidiately?

1. My current internet data plan has usage limits. When I reach my usage limit, it gets awfully slow!
2. It was dinner time and I have already delayed it as I was focused on recovering. If I still delayed eating, I would probably have to sleep on an empty stomach.

[ibminer]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This account is still under Muhammed Zakir's control!
Signed on 07/07/2017, Friday
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Address: 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh
HAY0QkqYgLZk+wcN7YDPKKKRplt3bxDlUna+ha2o+UyeFraJ9iydIaQSeIGpyPgjnbrpkwCpoHKH3BUb2sEhkFM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Verified, welcome back?

[Muhammed Zakir]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This account is still under Muhammed Zakir's control!
Signed on 07/07/2017, Friday
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Address: 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh
HAY0QkqYgLZk+wcN7YDPKKKRplt3bxDlUna+ha2o+UyeFraJ9iydIaQSeIGpyPgjnbrpkwCpoHKH3BUb2sEhkFM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Verified, welcome back?

Thanks! I have sent a PM to hilariousandco and shorena. I am not sure about hilariousandco, but shorena will remove it soon!

[DrMsEr]

Its good that Zakir you are back :0 Welcome back to green...

[shorena]

Removed the counter rating. I know it took some time, but since I had already left MZ a rating in past I didnt think it was a pressing matter. Welcome back.