UNIFY [UNIFY] - THE NEXT GENERATION OF CROWDFUNDING [POS, LOW SUPPLY]

[Caztiel]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:



Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

Why not create a new coin with similar algo & stats but new code & then exchange Unify to new one with 1:1 ratio....

[onnz423]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:



Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

Why not create a new coin with similar algo & stats but new code & then exchange Unify to new one with 1:1 ratio....

Because the swap will take alot of time, and the Digishield or something similar for difficulty adjustment would still be needed and swapping takes alot of time. Hardfork would be better solution, if you ask me. Because you need to give people alot time to swap their coins, and managing the swap too. And some coins might be left behind, because not everyone is going to make it to swap, even if you give it time of a year or so.

[VirtualCloudMining]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:



Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

Why not create a new coin with similar algo & stats but new code & then exchange Unify to new one with 1:1 ratio....

When the difficulty is low someone often mines on a pool with a too large rented hash power where they get the whole block reward for themselves. When the blocks have come too fast relative the target timespan of 10 minutes leading to the difficulty getting too high most hashpower leave the network.

We need a better difficulty adjustment algorithm.
For example:
"DigiShield
Activated in February of 2014[7] this hard fork allowed for the DigiByte blockchain to protect against multi-pools that mine large numbers of DigiByte at a low difficulty. It achieves this by recalculating block difficulty between each block, allowing for a faster correction when a multi-pool begins or ceases contributing to DigiByte, rather than recalculating once every fortnight as is the case with Bitcoin. Since then DigiShield has been added into a number of other cryptocurrency blockchains such as Dogecoin, Startcoin, Nautiluscoin, and Zcash, with the help of the DigiByte team. [8]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiByte
Nautilus coin is a scrypt coin with digishield difficulty retargeting.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=591114.0
https://github.com/nautiluscoin/nautiluscoin

[SBDomains]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:



Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

100% agree, the old unify has made us waste time and money, the currency does not take off because the dev mined more than 70% of the supply and do not want to sell in novaexchange, there are orders from 1 week ago and do not take them into account , The price every day falls more, he believes that the price will go up with holding the coins, this crazy, the price rises if everyone has a portion of those coins in their possession and trade,I would never buy a new currency Without use in more than 200 satos, would be overrated.

I think than if someone is holding more than 4 million coins is because he wants to make a dump, but he does not know about economics, he does not understand that if people do not have coins at the price that is in their possession, this project will not matter or trade anything

In a healthy economy some win and others lose, this project is destined only for the dev to win, a week ago I put my order in 20, 30, 40, 50, 60,70, 100,150, 200, 250 satos and never were Taken into account, this tells me that even though I arrive first at the project I do not have the possibility to make profit here the only one who gets rich is the dev

Sorry, but what the fuck are you talking about?? I'm holding 70%? 4 million coins? Sorry, but where did you get these numbers from??

[Caztiel]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:



Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

Why not create a new coin with similar algo & stats but new code & then exchange Unify to new one with 1:1 ratio....

Because the swap will take alot of time, and the Digishield or something similar for difficulty adjustment would still be needed and swapping takes alot of time. Hardfork would be better solution, if you ask me. Because you need to give people alot time to swap their coins, and managing the swap too. And some coins might be left behind, because not everyone is going to make it to swap, even if you give it time of a year or so.

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

[onnz423]

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

What do you mean by "old unify" you do realize that the coins on the chain still exist. So if you are going to speculate how the price is going down, let us know why it would do that?
Hardfork is exactly fixing, difficulty adjusting systems cannot be softforked as far as i know. Also i believe that the cause because the price dropped so much, is because of the hard difficulty and long delays and blocks.
And this is what exactly what hardfork would do, it would fix that problem with the difficulty.

But let's assume we would go with a swap like you said, the difficulty would STILL be a problem without Digishield or something similar implemented, so im just wondering if you really know what hardfork is supposed to do on this position.

[Caztiel]

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

What do you mean by "old unify" you do realize that the coins on the chain still exist. So if you are going to speculate how the price is going down, let us know why it would do that?
Hardfork is exactly fixing, difficulty adjusting systems cannot be softforked as far as i know. Also i believe that the cause because the price dropped so much, is because of the hard difficulty and long delays and blocks.
And this is what exactly what hardfork would do, it would fix that problem with the difficulty.

But let's assume we would go with a swap like you said, the difficulty would STILL be a problem without Digishield or something similar implemented, so im just wondering if you really know what hardfork is supposed to do on this position.

I know.... It would be like ETH & ETC...

[TheGreatChuger]

Since Unify is getting stuck on blocks once again - I am starting to think about hard forking Unify.

That would kill the value of old coins

Hardfork has nothing to do with switching chains, it will continue on the same chain but with new rules.
Therefore the nodes running with old wallet software, and blocks mined by them after the fork are not valid on the new chain.
Here is a picture for the reference, for you to have a better understanding:

https://bitcoin.org/img/dev/en-hard-fork.svg

Edit: by switching chains i mean starting a completely new chain  from the scratch, and therefore old coins disappearing which does not happen with hardfork, since the old blocks will still remain.

100% agree, the old unify has made us waste time and money, the currency does not take off because the dev mined more than 70% of the supply and do not want to sell in novaexchange, there are orders from 1 week ago and do not take them into account , The price every day falls more, he believes that the price will go up with holding the coins, this crazy, the price rises if everyone has a portion of those coins in their possession and trade,I would never buy a new currency Without use in more than 200 satos, would be overrated.

I think than if someone is holding more than 4 million coins is because he wants to make a dump, but he does not know about economics, he does not understand that if people do not have coins at the price that is in their possession, this project will not matter or trade anything

In a healthy economy some win and others lose, this project is destined only for the dev to win, a week ago I put my order in 20, 30, 40, 50, 60,70, 100,150, 200, 250 satos and never were Taken into account, this tells me that even though I arrive first at the project I do not have the possibility to make profit here the only one who gets rich is the dev

Lmao did you just register an account to spread FUD?

[Caztiel]

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

What do you mean by "old unify" you do realize that the coins on the chain still exist. So if you are going to speculate how the price is going down, let us know why it would do that?
Hardfork is exactly fixing, difficulty adjusting systems cannot be softforked as far as i know. Also i believe that the cause because the price dropped so much, is because of the hard difficulty and long delays and blocks.
And this is what exactly what hardfork would do, it would fix that problem with the difficulty.

But let's assume we would go with a swap like you said, the difficulty would STILL be a problem without Digishield or something similar implemented, so im just wondering if you really know what hardfork is supposed to do on this position.

Since its not Soft-Fork Unify will continue to mine on old code... Its Hard-Fork....

[onnz423]

Since its not Soft-Fork Unify will continue to mine on old code... Its Hard-Fork....

That is why everyone needs to upgrade after the fork, and also mining pools will for sure update their source as well.
So i do not really realize what you are meaning with that reply, many coins have done Hardfork in a past and they would have probably died without a one.
For this coin to grow, the problem with difficulty needs to be fixed and hardfork is the only way to do this.

[SBDomains]

Since its not Soft-Fork Unify will continue to mine on old code... Its Hard-Fork....

That is why everyone needs to upgrade after the fork, and also mining pools will for sure update their source as well.
So i do not really realize what you are meaning with that reply, many coins have done Hardfork in a past and they would have probably died without a one.
For this coin to grow, the problem with difficulty needs to be fixed and hardfork is the only way to do this.

Exactly. Why does everyone want a better, more reliable coin, but when you start talking about upgrading it, everybody loses their minds and start panicking?

[Caztiel]

Since its not Soft-Fork Unify will continue to mine on old code... Its Hard-Fork....

That is why everyone needs to upgrade after the fork, and also mining pools will for sure update their source as well.
So i do not really realize what you are meaning with that reply, many coins have done Hardfork in a past and they would have probably died without a one.
For this coin to grow, the problem with difficulty needs to be fixed and hardfork is the only way to do this.

Aah now I got it... So whether it be new or old code... Both will mine same unify... But mining via new code would be easier... Sorry for being a buggy... Whenever someone speaks of hard fork... Ethereum split comes into my mind

[onnz423]

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

You make no sense, no one took you out of a pool. Do you think that dev is hosting all of the pools? ROFL! Also you claim that is dev's address, how do you think that out of all addresses that one is his?
You do know that anyone can mine this currency as they wish, and since it is decentralized the dev cannot disclose one address from receiving or mining the coin.

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

You claim to have proof, yet you have not showed us none. So stop FUD:ing, because you are just making it even worse for yourself.
So please do not come back here, before  you provide any kind of evidence about the "70%". Right now im just assuming that you are a troll.

Edit: Also this coin does not have PoS yet activated, so you cannot mint any coins. 

[SBDomains]

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

What do you mean by "old unify" you do realize that the coins on the chain still exist. So if you are going to speculate how the price is going down, let us know why it would do that?
Hardfork is exactly fixing, difficulty adjusting systems cannot be softforked as far as i know. Also i believe that the cause because the price dropped so much, is because of the hard difficulty and long delays and blocks.
And this is what exactly what hardfork would do, it would fix that problem with the difficulty.

But let's assume we would go with a swap like you said, the difficulty would STILL be a problem without Digishield or something similar implemented, so im just wondering if you really know what hardfork is supposed to do on this position.

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

Sorry, but you are clearly stupid & also doing some BS conspiracy theories. If that was me mining it, I would have sold it once it was 2K sat, but I didn't. Better go back to watching some dank TV shows where you've learned to make up bullshit like that. My nerves are not unlimited. I took you off the pool? How the fuck could I do that? I don't own any of the pools. I never rented anything more than 1 GHZ. Anyway, I don't know why I have to explain anything to you at all since you're just making some bullshit up.

[TheGreatChuger]

In any scenario value of old unify will go down and investors will lose money... Is that what we were planning for the early investors ?? Mistakes do happen... But fix it in a right way even if it takes time... It should be win-win for everyone.... If you announce hard-fork now... People might dump old unify leaving its value to probably 1-2 satoshi .... Won't be fair to early investors.... Still think SWAP is better option

What do you mean by "old unify" you do realize that the coins on the chain still exist. So if you are going to speculate how the price is going down, let us know why it would do that?
Hardfork is exactly fixing, difficulty adjusting systems cannot be softforked as far as i know. Also i believe that the cause because the price dropped so much, is because of the hard difficulty and long delays and blocks.
And this is what exactly what hardfork would do, it would fix that problem with the difficulty.

But let's assume we would go with a swap like you said, the difficulty would STILL be a problem without Digishield or something similar implemented, so im just wondering if you really know what hardfork is supposed to do on this position.

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

A lot of assumptions and no proof, ye.... no fuck off.

[SBDomains]

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

You make no sense, no one took you out of a pool. Do you think that dev is hosting all of the pools? ROFL! Also you claim that is dev's address, how do you think that out of all addresses that one is his?
You do know that anyone can mine this currency as they wish, and since it is decentralized the dev cannot disclose one address from receiving or mining the coin.

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

You claim to have proof, yet you have not showed us none. So stop FUD:ing, because you are just making it even worse for yourself.
So please do not come back here, before  you provide any kind of evidence about the "70%". Right now im just assuming that you are a troll.

Edit: Also this coin does not have PoS yet activated, so you cannot mint any coins. 

I was removed dozens of times from the pools, I had to be switching from one pool to another because I undermined 20 minutes and they took me out, the monitors did not appear, do you want my pool 1 user to tell you And how many times did they take me out on Saturday?

From pool2, from pool3, from pool4 this is my wallet,

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

I do not have access to the log of those servers mining pool, but I do not have two days in this brother, I know how to do that, when you manage a pool.

I am not a troll, I'm just telling the truth about what happened on Saturday, as my presumption of the dozens of dev's wallet I'm going to prove it,

Ok. Goodluck, please comeback with proof and I will give you a gold medal & buy you a house.

[SBDomains]

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

You make no sense, no one took you out of a pool. Do you think that dev is hosting all of the pools? ROFL! Also you claim that is dev's address, how do you think that out of all addresses that one is his?
You do know that anyone can mine this currency as they wish, and since it is decentralized the dev cannot disclose one address from receiving or mining the coin.

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

You claim to have proof, yet you have not showed us none. So stop FUD:ing, because you are just making it even worse for yourself.
So please do not come back here, before  you provide any kind of evidence about the "70%". Right now im just assuming that you are a troll.

Edit: Also this coin does not have PoS yet activated, so you cannot mint any coins.  

I was removed dozens of times from the pools, I had to be switching from one pool to another because I undermined 20 minutes and they took me out, the monitors did not appear, do you want my pool 1 user to tell you And how many times did they take me out on Saturday?

From pool2, from pool3, from pool4 this is my wallet,

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

I do not have access to the log of those servers mining pool, but I do not have two days in this brother, I know how to do that, when you manage a pool.

I am not a troll, I'm just telling the truth about what happened on Saturday, as my presumption of the dozens of dev's wallet I'm going to prove it,

By the way, Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr (which is not even mine) has 400654 balance. Yes, read it again. 400654. 4 0 0 6 5 4 - where do you see 7 digits here to make it 4 millions?

[SBDomains]

At this point I am disagree the price has gone down not because the difficulty is because the number of currencies available in the trader, only 400 000 when they have already mined more than 6 000 000 we are not stupid please, somebody has them holding, I Mine 6800 coins on Saturday and then take them to the trader and sold them.

But note something curious in the 3 pool, had someone mining more than 5GHZ and it was up to 7GHZ was this people

Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr

I was this, this is my address of my wallet

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

You remember my dev, I was mining the Saturday at 1GHZ with a rented miner and you took me out of the pool every time, while you continued all day at 4, 5 and 7 GHZ

You make no sense, no one took you out of a pool. Do you think that dev is hosting all of the pools? ROFL! Also you claim that is dev's address, how do you think that out of all addresses that one is his?
You do know that anyone can mine this currency as they wish, and since it is decentralized the dev cannot disclose one address from receiving or mining the coin.

What miner mines millions of coins and does not sell them in the trader? None, just someone with money and who wants to do a dump.

I am not stupid dev, I know that you have dozens of addresses So nobody suspects anything, I can prove it to you, from the ip address where you minted them to what your wallets

You claim to have proof, yet you have not showed us none. So stop FUD:ing, because you are just making it even worse for yourself.
So please do not come back here, before  you provide any kind of evidence about the "70%". Right now im just assuming that you are a troll.

Edit: Also this coin does not have PoS yet activated, so you cannot mint any coins.  

I was removed dozens of times from the pools, I had to be switching from one pool to another because I undermined 20 minutes and they took me out, the monitors did not appear, do you want my pool 1 user to tell you And how many times did they take me out on Saturday?

From pool2, from pool3, from pool4 this is my wallet,

Udc8rJdy4z6m3rMFCB7VnHaswLPP2jE5uT

I do not have access to the log of those servers mining pool, but I do not have two days in this brother, I know how to do that, when you manage a pool.

I am not a troll, I'm just telling the truth about what happened on Saturday, as my presumption of the dozens of dev's wallet I'm going to prove it,

By the way, Uj2NKxVrfCy6qGdv7aAjwgVA5GfQyeBxLr (which is not even mine) has 400654 balance. Yes, read it again. 400654. 4 0 0 6 5 4 - where do you see 7 digits here to make it 4 millions?

I said dozens of wallets that is single 1, you have spread the coins in dozens of different wallets, mining with 1 of them at a time because if there were 4 million in 1 single wallet, everyone would suspect, you think I was born yesterday

Thanks to you now some people starting to believe your bullshit consipracy theories.

Here's to the everyone who are believing in this conspiracy theorist:



His assumptions are stupid asf & he can say this about any coin dev or any coin and some people will still fall for it.

[onnz423]

Hello everyone! If anyone wants their own vanity address, i will provide here a guide how to do so.
Since im not a programmer, i will not even try to add a flag to the code seperately so you will pretty much need to use the whole line i provided.
I only did this guide for windows, because im sure many GNU/Linux users will know how to use the vanitygen and compile.

First download the executable from HERE
Then extract the folder somewhere on your computer.

After that, edit the bat file and will look like this:

Code:

vanitygen.exe -X 68 UNF
pause

Do not change the anything apart from the "NF" part of the file, other ones are important parts.
If you example want to generate addy starting like "Uida" change the file to following:

Code:

vanitygen.exe -X 68 Uida
pause

Then just save the file, and run the bat file.

you should get something like this as output

Code:

Difficulty: 78508
Pattern: Uida                                                                  
Address: UidaosTM7qLAZ6J1tH7M3ez7AnkF3PWPfH
Privkey: 7bUHXuuTWvCqoZfLqjkShSvhFLKoB47hfKzKcMtks3UyiGJTCuh

Then just copy the private key that you created, and go to your unify-qt -> help -> debug window -> console
then write the following line with your private key

Code:

importprivkey yourprivkeyhere

I hope many of you will find this information valuable

Edit: you cannot use the following characters in the pattern: 0 (zero), O (capital o), I (capital i) and l (lower case L) as well as the non-alphanumeric characters + (plus) and / (slash)

[syrusek]

So when do you plan to make a hardfork? the sooner the better.